Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

The Neurobiology of Fairness and Social Justice: An Introduction

  • Published:
Social Justice Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The study of social justice has always been an interdisciplinary undertaking, but in recent years neurobiologists have joined scholars and scientists from other areas to tackle complex questions concerning fairness, empathy, equality, hierarchy, and ideological conflict and polarization. By synthesizing insights from multiple, mutually informative levels of analysis, it is possible to shed new light on basic biological processes that reflect, inspire, and inhibit the pursuit of a more just society. With this special issue we highlight groundbreaking research on the neurobiology of fairness and social justice, bringing together six articles that address core themes of social justice, including individual variability in definitions of fairness, the genetic basis of economic egalitarianism, neural bases of empathy in environmental and intergroup domains, and the neural and genetic correlates of ideological polarization. Taken in conjunction, these diverse contributions bring multiple theoretical perspectives and research methods to bear on the shared goal of understanding and promoting social justice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alford, J. R., Funk, C. L., & Hibbing, J. R. (2005). Are political orientations genetically transmitted? American Political Science Review, 99, 153–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amodio, D. M., Jost, J. T., Master, S. L., & Yee, C. M. (2007). Neurocognitive correlates of liberalism and conservatism. Nature Neuroscience, 10, 1246–1247.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Avenanti, A., Sirigu, A., & Aglioti, S. M. (2010). Racial bias reduces empathic sensorimotor resonance with other-race pain. Current Biology, 20, 1018–1022.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Batrićević, N., & Littvay, L. (2017). A genetic basis of economic egalitarianism. Social Justice Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-017-0297-y.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, M. D., Toscano, J. E., Mason, W. A., Lavenex, P., & Amaral, D. G. (2006). The expression of social dominance following neonatal lesions of the amygdala or hippocampus in rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta). Behavioral Neuroscience, 120, 749–760.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Botvinick, M. M. (2007). Conflict monitoring and decision making: Reconciling two perspectives on anterior cingulate function. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 7, 356–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brosnan, S. F. (2006). Nonhuman species’ reactions to inequity and their implications for fairness. Social Justice Research, 19, 153–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brosnan, S. F., Hopper, L. M., Richey, S., Freeman, H. D., Talbot, C. F., Gosling, S. D., et al. (2015). Personality influences responses to inequity and contrast in chimpanzees. Animal Behaviour, 101, 75–87.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Cacioppo, J. T., & Berntsen, G. G. (1992). Social psychological contributions to the decade of the brain: Doctrine of multilevel analysis. American Psychologist, 47, 1019–1028.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cikara, M., Bruneau, E. G., & Saxe, R. R. (2012). Us and them: Intergroup failures of empathy. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20, 149–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Critchley, H. D., Wiens, S., Rotshtein, P., Ohman, A., & Rolan, R. J. (2004). Neural systems supporting interoceptive awareness. Nature Neuroscience, 7, 189–195.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dahling, J. J., Whitaker, B. G., & Levy, P. E. (2009). The development and validation of a new Machiavellianism scale. Journal of Management, 35, 219–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Decety, J., & Yoder, K. (2017). The emerging social neuroscience of justice motivation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 21, 6–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, G. C., III, Barrett, A., & Peake, J. (1997). The legislative impact of divided government. American Journal of Political Science, 41, 545–563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farmer, H., & Maister, L. (2017). Putting ourselves in another’s skin: Using the plasticity of self-perception to enhance empathy and decrease prejudice. Social Justice Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-017-0294-1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowler, J. H. (2006). Altruism and turnout. The Journal of Politics, 68, 674–683.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fowler, J. H., Baker, L. A., & Dawes, C. T. (2008). Genetic variation in political participation. American Political Science Review, 102, 233–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fowler, J. H., & Dawes, C. T. (2008). Two genes predict voter turnout. The Journal of Politics, 70, 579–594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fowler, J. H., & Kam, C. D. (2006). Patience as a political virtue: Delayed gratification and turnout. Political Behavior, 28, 113–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franklin, R. G., Jr., Nelson, A. J., Baker, M., Beeney, J. E., Vescio, T. K., Lenz-Watson, A., et al. (2013). Neural responses to perceiving suffering in humans and animals. Social Neuroscience, 8, 217–227.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Geiger, N., Bowman, C. R., Clouthier, T. L., Nelson, A. J., & Adams, R. B. (2017). Observing environmental destruction stimulates neural activation in networks associated with empathic responses. Social Justice Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-017-0298-x.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haas, I. J., Baker, M. N., & Gonzalez, F. J. (2017). Who can deviate from the party line? Political ideology moderates evaluation of incongruent policy positions in insula and anterior cingulate cortex. Social Justice Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-017-0295-0.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, L. T., & Fiske, S. T. (2006). Dehumanizing the lowest of the low: Neuroimaging responses to extreme out-groups. Psychological Science, 17, 847–853.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hatemi, P. K., & McDermott, R. (Eds.). (2011). Man is by nature a political animal: Evolution, biology, and politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatemi, P. K., & McDermott, R. (2012). The genetics of politics: Discovery, challenges, and progress. Trends in Genetics, 28, 525–533.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hein, G., Engelmann, J. B., Vollberg, M. C., & Tobler, P. N. (2016). How learning shapes the empathic brain. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 113, 80–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hetherington, M. J., & Rudolph, T. J. (2015). Why Washington won’t work: Polarization, political trust, and the governing crisis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hibbing, J. R., Smith, K. B., & Alford, J. R. (2014). Predisposed: Liberals, conservatives, and the biology of political differences. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huddy, L., Sears, D. O., & Levy, J. (2013). Introduction: Theoretical foundations of political psychology. In L. Huddy, D. O. Sears, & J. Levy (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of political psychology (2nd ed., pp. 1–19). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Iyengar, S., Sood, G., & Lelkes, Y. (2012). Affect, not ideology: A social identity perspective on polarization. Public Opinion Quarterly, 76, 405–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iyengar, S., & Westwood, S. J. (2015). Fear and loathing across party lines: New evidence on group polarization. American Journal of Political Science, 59, 690–707.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jankowski, R. (2007). Altruism and the decision to vote: Explaining and testing high voter turnout. Rationality and Society, 19, 4–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jarvis, W. B. G., & Petty, R. E. (1996). The need to evaluate. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 172–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jost, J. T., Federico, C. M., & Napier, J. L. (2009). Political ideology: Its structure, functions, and elective affinities. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 307–337.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jost, J. T., Nam, H. H., Amodio, D. M., & Van Bavel, J. J. (2014). Political neuroscience: The beginning of a beautiful friendship. Advances in Political Psychology, 35, 3–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jost, J. T., & Sidanius, J. (2004). Political psychology: Key readings. New York: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kandler, C., Bleidorn, W., & Riemann, R. (2012). Left or right? Sources of political orientation: The roles of genetic factors, cultural transmission, assortative mating, and personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 633–645.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ksiazkiewicz, A., & Krueger, R. F. (2017). The role of genes and environments in linking the need to evaluate with political ideology and political extremity. Social Justice Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-017-0292-3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumaran, D., Melo, H. L., & Duzel, E. (2012). The emergence and representation of knowledge about social and nonsocial hierarchies. Neuron, 76, 653–666.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Lamm, C., Batson, C. D., & Decety, J. (2007). The neural substrate of human empathy: Effects of perspective-taking and cognitive appraisal. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19, 42–58.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, D. P., & Castel, A. D. (2008). Seeing is believing: The effect of brain images on judgments of scientific reasoning. Cognition, 107, 343–352.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McCarty, N., Poole, K. T., & Rosenthal, H. (2006). Polarized America: The dance of ideology and unequal riches. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGuire, W. J. (1993). The poly-psy relationship: Three phases of a long affair. In S. Iyengar & W. J. McGuire (Eds.), Explorations in political psychology (pp. 9–35). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nam, H. H., Jost, J. T., Kaggen, L., Campbell-Meiklejohn, D., & Van Bavel, J. J. (in press). Amygdala structure and the tendency to perceive the social system as legitimate and desirable. Nature Human Behaviour.

  • Niemi, L., Wasserman, E., & Young, L. (2017). The behavioral and neural signatures of distinct conceptions of fairness. Social Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470919.2017.1333452.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Niemi, L., & Young, L. (2017). Who sees what as fair? Mapping individual differences in valuation of reciprocity, charity, and impartiality. Social Justice Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-017-0291-4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ploner, M., Lee, M. C., Wiech, K., Bingel, U., & Tracey, I. (2010). Prestimulus functional connectivity determines pain perception in humans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 107, 355–360.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Poldrack, R. A. (2006). Can cognitive processes be inferred from neuroimaging data? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 59–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Poldrack, R. A. (2011). Inferring mental states from neuroimaging data: From reverse inference to large-scale decoding. Neuron, 72, 692–697.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Preston, S. D., & De Waal, F. B. (2002). Empathy: Its ultimate and proximate bases. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 25, 1–20.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rosvold, H. E., Mirsky, A. F., & Pribram, K. H. (1954). Influence of amygdalectomy on social behavior in monkeys. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 47, 173–178.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Samochowiec, J., Lesch, K. P., Rottmann, M., Smolka, M., Syagailo, Y. V., Okladnova, O., et al. (1999). Association of a regulatory polymorphism in the promoter region of the monoamine oxidase A gene with antisocial alcoholism. Psychiatry Research, 86, 67–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, L. G., Sander, T., Kuhn, S., Smolka, M., Rommelspacher, H., Samochowiec, J., et al. (2000). Different allele distribution of a regulatory MAOA gene promoter polymorphism in antisocial and anxious-depressive alcoholics. Journal of Neural Transmission, 107, 681–689.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shanahan, M. J., & Hofer, S. M. (2005). Social context in gene–environment interactions: Retrospect and prospect. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 60, 65–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singer, T., Critchley, H. D., & Preuschoff, K. (2009). A common role of insula in feelings, empathy and uncertainty. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13, 334–340.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stephan, W. G., & Finlay, K. (1999). The role of empathy in improving intergroup relations. Journal of Social Issues, 55, 729–743.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sturgis, P., Read, S., Hatemi, P. K., Zhu, G., Trull, T., Wright, M. J., et al. (2010). A genetic basis for social trust? Political Behavior, 32, 205–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taber, C. S., & Young, E. (2013). Political information processing. In L. Huddy, D. O. Sears, & J. Levy (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of political psychology (pp. 525–558). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Theodoridis, A. G., & Nelson, A. J. (2012). Of BOLD claims and excessive fears: A call for caution and patience regarding political neuroscience. Political Psychology, 33, 27–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uddin, L. Q. (2015). Salience processing and insular cortical function and dysfunction. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 16, 55–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vanukov, M. M., Moss, H. B., Yu, L. M., & Deka, R. (1995). A dinucleotide repeat polymorphism at the gene for monoamine oxidase A and measures of aggressiveness. Psychiatry Research, 59, 35–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wicker, B., Keysers, C., Plailly, J., Royet, J., Gallese, V., & Rizzolatti, G. (2003). Both of us disgusted in my insula: The common neural basis of seeing and feeling disgust. Neuron, 40, 655–664.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, E. O. (1998). Consilience: The unity of knowledge. New York: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zink, C. F., Tong, Y., Chen, Q., Bassett, D. S., Stein, J. L., & Meyer-Lindenberg, A. (2008). Know your place: Neural processing of social hierarchy in humans. Neuron, 58, 273–283.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Political Science, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, 11794, USA

    H. Hannah Nam & Stanley Feldman

  2. Department of Psychology, New York University, New York, NY, USA

    John T. Jost

Authors
  1. H. Hannah Nam
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. John T. Jost
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Stanley Feldman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to H. Hannah Nam.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nam, H.H., Jost, J.T. & Feldman, S. The Neurobiology of Fairness and Social Justice: An Introduction. Soc Just Res 30, 289–299 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-017-0296-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-017-0296-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation