Abstract
People’s explanations for why some individuals are poor are of great importance to a comprehensive study of poverty. This cross-cultural study aims to profile differences and similarities in perceptions of the causes of poverty within and between 28 European Union countries. Multilevel models were estimated to allow two levels of analysis to be studied simultaneously, namely the individual and the country, and a multilevel latent class model was selected with six classes of countries and seven classes of individuals. Despite the generalization of the social explanations of poverty at the individual level, some groups also blame the poor for their situation. Individuals in greater economic difficulty attributed more social causes to poverty than those who were better off financially and socially. At the country level, the most developed countries believe poverty has individualistic and fatalistic causes, whereas the least developed countries explain poverty based on the injustices of society. We found that this methodology permits a deeper and richer analysis than traditional clustering methods as it accounts for different nested levels of analysis simultaneously.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The second wave of the European Social Survey took place in 1990 and included some non-European countries such as Canada and the United States of America.
The authors thank one of the anonymous referees for this suggestion.
References
Abouchedid, K., & Nasser, R. (2001). Poverty attitudes ant their determinants in Lebanon’s plural society. Journal of Economic Psychology, 22, 271–282.
Appelbaum, L. D. (2001). The influence of perceived deservingness on policy decisions regarding aid to the poor. Political Psychology, 22(3), 419–442.
Bijmolt, T. H. A., Paas, L. J., & Vermunt, J. K. (2004). Country and consumer segmentation: Multi-level latent class analysis of financial product ownership. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 21(4), 323–340.
Blomberg, H., Kroll, C., Kallio, J., & Erola, J. (2013). Social workers’ perceptions of the causes of poverty in the Nordic countries. Journal of European Social Policy, 23(1), 68–82.
Bullock, H. (1999). Attributions for poverty: A comparison of middle-class and welfare recipient attitudes. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29(10), 2059–2082.
Costa, L. P., & Dias, J. G. (2014). Perceptions of poverty attributions in Europe: A multilevel mixture model approach. Quality & Quantity, 48(3), 1409–1419.
Cozzarelli, C., Wilkinson, A., & Tagler, M. (2001). Attitudes toward the poor and attributions for poverty. Journal of Social Issues, 57(2), 207–227.
Davids, Y. D., & Gouws, A. (2013). Monitoring perceptions of the causes of poverty in South Africa. Social Indicators Research, 110(3), 1201–1220.
Dewilde, C. (2004). The multidimensional measurement of poverty in Belgium and Britain: A categorical approach. Social Indicators Research, 68, 331–369.
Dias, J., & Vermunt, J. (2007). Latent class modeling of website users’ search patterns: Implications for online market segmentation. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 14(6), 359–368.
European Commission. (1977). The Perception of Poverty in Europe (Eurobarometer 5). Brussels (Available on http://ec.europa.eu).
European Commission. (1990). The Perception of Poverty in Europe in 1989 (Eurobarometer 32). Brussels (Available on http://ec.europa.eu).
European Commission. (2007). Poverty and Exclusion (Special Eurobarometer 279/Wave 67.1). Brussels (Available on http://ec.europa.eu).
European Commission. (2010). Poverty and Social Exclusion (Special Eurobarometer 321/Wave 72.1). Brussels (Available on http://ec.europa.eu).
Eurostat. (2010). Database with at-risk-of-poverty rate after social transfers (Available on http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu).
Feagin, J. (1972). Poverty: We still believe that God helps who help themselves. Psychology Today, 6, 101–129.
Gallie, D., & Paugam, S. (2002). Social precarity and social integration: Report based on Eurobarometer 56.1. Brussels: European Commission Directorate-General Employment.
Halman, L., & van Oorschot, W. (1999). Popular perceptions of poverty in Dutch Society. WORC Paper 99.11.01, Tilburg University.
Hayati, D., & Karami, E. (2005). Typology of causes of poverty: The perception of Iran farmers. Journal of Economic Psychology, 26, 884–901.
Henry, P. J., Reyna, C., & Weiner, B. (2004). Hate welfare but help the poor? How the attributional content of stereotypes explains the paradox of reactions to the destitute in America. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34(1), 34–58.
Hox, J. (2002). Multilevel analysis: Techniques and applications. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Hunt, M. (1996). The individual, society, or both? A comparison of black, latino, and white beliefs about the causes of poverty. Social Forces, 75(1), 293–322.
Kim, K., Lee, Y., & Lee, Y. (2010). A multilevel analysis of factors related to poverty in Welfare States. Social Indicators Research, 99, 391–404.
Kreft, I., & de Leeuw, J. (1998). Introducing multilevel modeling. London: Sage.
Kreidl, M. (2000). Perceptions of poverty and wealth in western and post-communist countries. Social Justice Research, 13(2), 151–176.
Lepianka, D., Gelissen, J., & van Oorschot, W. (2010). Popular explanations of poverty in Europe: Effects of contextual and individual characteristics across 28 European countries. Acta Sociologica, 53(1), 53–72.
Morçöl, G. (1997). Lay explanations for poverty in Turkey and their determinants. Journal of Social Psychology, 137(6), 728–738.
Nándori, E. (2011). Subjective poverty and its relation to objective poverty concepts in Hungary. Social Indicators Research, 102, 537–556.
Nasser, R., Abouchedid, K., & Khashan, H. (2002). Perceptions of the causes of poverty comparing three national groups: Lebanon, Portugal, and South Africa. Current Research in Social Psychology, 8(7), 101–118.
Niemelä, M. (2008). Perceptions of the causes of poverty in Finland. Acta Sociologica, 51(1), 23–40.
Papacostas, A. (2007). Eurobarometer 67.1: Cultural values, poverty and social exclusion, developmental aid and residential mobility. Brussels (Available on http://www.icpsr.umich.edu).
Patterson, B. H., Dayton, C. M., & Graubard, B. (2002). Latent class analysis of complex sample survey data: Application to dietary data (with discussion). Journal of the American Statistical Association, 97(459), 721–741.
Pirani, E. (2013). Evaluating contemporary social exclusion in Europe: A hierarchical latent class approach. Quality & Quantity, 47(2), 923–941.
Reutter, L. I., Veenstra, G., Stewart, M. J., Raphael, D., Love, R., Makwarimba, E., et al. (2006). Public attributions for poverty in Canada. Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology, 43(1), 1–22.
Shek, D. T. L., & Ma, C. S. (2009). Dimensionality of the Chinese perceived causes of poverty scale: Findings based on confirmatory factor analyses. Social Indicators Research, 90(2), 155–164.
Tagler, M. J., & Cozzarelli, C. (2013). Feelings toward the poor and beliefs about the causes of poverty: The role of affective-cognitive consistency in help-giving. The Journal of Psychology, 147(6), 517–539.
UNDP. (2009). Human Development Report 2009. Overcoming barriers: Human mobility and development, 5 October. http://www.refworld.org/docid/4ac9d10d2.html.
van Oorschot, W., & Halman, L. (2000). Blame or fate, individual or social: An international comparison of popular explanations of poverty. European Societies, 2(1), 1–28.
Vermunt, J. K. (2003). Multilevel latent class models. Sociological Methodology, 33, 213–239.
Wedel, M., ter Hofstede, F., & Steenkamp, J. (1998). Mixture model analysis of complex samples. Journal of Classification, 15(2), 225–244.
Weiner, B., Osborne, D., & Rudolph, U. (2011). An attributional analysis of reactions to poverty: The political ideology of the giver and the perceived morality of the receiver. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 15(2), 199–213.
Zucker, G., & Weiner, B. (1993). Conservatism and perceptions of poverty: An attributional analysis. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 23, 925–943.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank the editor and two anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments, which helped us to improve the manuscript. This research was supported by the Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia (Portugal), Grant PTDC/CS-DEM/108033/2008.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
da Costa, L.P., Dias, J.G. What do Europeans Believe to be the Causes of Poverty? A Multilevel Analysis of Heterogeneity Within and Between Countries. Soc Indic Res 122, 1–20 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-014-0672-0
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-014-0672-0