Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Extracting More Knowledge from Time Diaries?

  • Published:
Social Indicators Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Time-use diary data convey information about the activities an individual was engaged in, when and for how long, and the order of these activities throughout the day. The data are usually analyzed by summarizing the time used per activity category. The aggregates are then used to determine the mean time use of a mean individual on an average day. However, this approach discards information about the duration of activities, the order in which they are undertaken, and the time of day each activity is carried out. This paper outlines an alternative approach grounded in the time-geographic theoretical framework, which takes the duration, order, and timing of activities into consideration and thus yields new knowledge. The two approaches to analyzing diary data are compared using a simple empirical example of gender differences in time use for paid work. The focus is on the effects of methodological differences rather than on the empirical outcomes. The argument is made that using an approach that takes the sequence of activities into account deepens our understanding of how people organize their daily activities in the context of a whole day at an aggregate level.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Also known as event history analysis in sociology or duration modelling in economics.

  2. Exceptions being the day an individual is born and the day the individual dies.

References

  • Abbott, A. (1990). A primer on sequence methods. Organization Science, 1, 375–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abbott, A. (1995). Sequence analysis: New methods for old ideas. Annual Review of Sociology, 21, 93–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abbott, A., & Tsay, A. (2000). Sequence analysis and optimal matching in sociology: Review and prospects. Sociological Methods & Research, 29, 3–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agresti, A. (2007). An introduction to categorical data analysis (2nd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ås, D. (1978). Studies of time use: Problems and prospects. Acta Sociologica, 21, 125–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baxter, J. (2011). Flexible work hours and other job factors in parental time with children. Social Indicators Research, 101, 239–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, M. E., & Arnold, J. E. (2009). Gendered time use at home: an Ethographic examination of leisure time in middle-class families. Leisure Studies, 28, 121–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bejerholm, U., & Eklund, M. (2006). Engagement in occupations among men and women with schizophrenia. Occupational Therapy International, 13, 100–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bendixen, H. J., & Ellegård K. (2013). Occupational therapists’ job satisfaction in a changing hospital organisation: A time-geography-based study. Work. doi:10.3233/WOR-121572.

  • Bianchi, S., & Robinson, J. (1997). What did you do today? Children’s use of time, family composition, and the acquisition of social capital. Journal of Marriage and Family, 59, 332–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolger, N., Davis, A., & Rafaeli, E. (2003). Diary methods: Capturing life as it is lived. The Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 579–616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonke, J. (2005). Paid work and unpaid work: Diary information versus questionnaire information. Social Indicators Research, 70, 349–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boone, J., Sadreih, A., & van Ours, J. (2009). Experiments on unemployment benefit sanctions and job search behaviour. European Economic Review, 53, 937–951.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J., Broom, D., Nicholson, J., & Bittman, M. (2010). Do working mothers raise couch potato kids? Maternal employment and children’s lifestyle behaviours and weight in early childhood. Social Science and Medicine, 70, 1816–1824.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J., & Dunn, P. K. (2011). Comparisons of tobit, linear and Poisson-gamma regression models: An application of time use data. Sociological Methods & Research, 40, 511–535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Claessens, B. J. C., van Eered, W., Rutte, C. G., & Roe, R. A. (2010). Things to do today…: A daily diary study on task completion at work. Applied Psychology, 59, 273–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, D. J., White, S., & Cohen, S. B. (2011). A time use diary study of adult everyday writing behavior. Written Communication, 28, 3–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dribe, M., & Stanfors, M. (2009). Does parenthood strengthen a traditional household division of labour? Evidence from Sweden. Journal of Marriage and Family, 71, 33–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, P. K. (2013). tweedie: Tweedie exponential family models. R package version, 2(1), 7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellegård, K. (1994). Att fånga det förgängliga: Utveckling av en metod för studier av vardagslivets skeenden [Capturing the perishable: Development of a method for studies of the course of events of everyday life]. Occasional Papers/Department of Human and Economic Geography, School of Economics and Commercial Law 1994:1. Gothenburg, Sweden: Gothenburg University.

  • Ellegård, K. (2006). The power of categorisation in the study of everyday life. Journal of Occupational Science, 13, 37–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eurostat. (2009). Harmonised European time use surveys 2008 guidelines. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, K., Bennett, M., Tucker, J., Altintas, E., Jahandar, A., Jun, J., & Other members of the Time Use Team (2009). Time Use studies. http://www-2009.timeuse.org/information/studies. Accessed 12 December 2012.

  • Gabadinho, A., Ritschard, G., Müller, N. S., & Studer, M. (2011). Analyzing and visualizing state sequences in R with TraMineR. Journal of Statistical Software, 40(4), 1–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gershuny, J. (2011). Time-use surveys and the measurement of national well-being. Newport, UK: Office for National Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gershuny, J. (2012). Too many zeros: A method for estimating long-term time-use from short diaries. Annals of Economics and Statistics, 105(106), 247–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hägerstrand, T. (1970a). Tidsanvändning och omgivningsstruktur [Time use and context]. In SOU 1970:14 Urbaniseringen i Sverige, en geografisk samhällsanalys [The urbanization in Sweden, a geographic social analysis]. Sweden: Offentliga Förlaget.

  • Hägerstrand, T. (1970b). What about people in regional science? Papers in Regional Science, 24(1), 6–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hägerstrand, T. (1973). The domain of human geography. In Richard J. Chorley (Ed.), Directions in geography (pp. 67–87). London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hägerstrand, T. (1974). On socio-technical ecology and the study of innovations. Rapporter och notiser nr 10. Lund, Sweden: Lund University, Kulturgeografiska institution.

  • Hägerstrand, T. (1989). Reflections on “What about people in regional science?”. Papers in Regional Science, 66(1), 1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Juster, F. T., Ono, H., & Stafford, F. P. (2003). An assessment of alternative measures of time use. Sociological Methodology, 33, 19–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kan, M. Y. (2008). Measuring housework participation: The gap between “stylised” questionnaire estimates and diary-based estimates. Social Indicators Research, 86, 381–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kan, M. Y., & Pudney, S. (2008). Measurement error in stylized and diary data on time use. Sociological Methodology, 38, 101–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krueger, A. B., & Mueller, A. (2010). Job search and unemployment insurance: New evidence from time use data. Journal of Public Economics, 94, 298–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lesnard, L. (2010). Setting cost in optimal matching to uncover contemporaneous socio-temporal patterns. Sociological Methods & Research, 38, 389–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindmark, A. (2010). Reliabilitet hos metoder för mätning av avstånd mellan sekvenser. Master’s thesis, Umeå Universitet, Umeå, Sweden.

  • Millward, H., & Spinney, J. (2011). “Active living” related to the rural–urban continuum: A time-use perspective. The Journal of Rural Health, 27, 141–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Motiram, S., & Osberg, L. (2009). Gender inequalities in tasks and instruction opportunities within Indian families. Feminist Economics, 16(3), 141–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Otterbach, S., & Sousa-Poza, A. (2010). How accurate are German work-time data? A comparison of time-diary reports and stylized estimates. Social Indicators Research, 97, 325–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R Core Team (2012). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0.

  • Ricci, J., Jerome, N., Megally, N., Galal, O., Harrison, G., & Kirksey, A. (1995). Assessing the validity of informant recall: Results of a time use pilot study in peri-urban Egypt. Human Organization, 54, 304–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, J., Martin, S., Glorieux, I., & Minnen, J. (June 2011). The overestimated workweek revisited. Monthly Labor Review, 134(6), 43–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, D. (2011). Market earnings and household work: New tests of gender performance theory. Journal of Marriage and Family, 73, 845–860.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smyth, G. (2013). statmod Statistical modeling. R package version, 1(4), 17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spinney, J. E. L., Millward, H., & Scott, D. M. (2011). Measuring active living in Canada: A time-use perspective. Social Science Research, 40, 685–694.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Statistics Sweden. (2013). Nu för tiden En undersökning om svenska folkets tidsanvändning år 2010/11. Stockholm: Statistics Sweden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, P. J. (1972). The analysis of time-budget data. In A. Szalai (Ed.), The use of time: Daily activities of urban and suburban populations in twelve countries. Den Haag, Netherlands: Mouton & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Studer, M., Ritschard, G., Gabadinho, A., & Müller, N. S. (2011). Discrepancy analysis of state sequences. Sociological Methods & Research, 40, 471–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, O., & Gershuny, J. (2001). Cross-national changes in time-use: Some sociological (hi)stories re-examined. British Journal of Sociology, 52, 331–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szalai, A. (1972). The use of time: Daily activities of urban and suburban populations in twelve countries. Den Haag, Netherlands: Mouton & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • US Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2012). American Time Use Survey user’s guide: Understanding ATUS 2003 to 2011. http://www.bls.gov/news.release/atus.nr0.htm. Accessed 15 March 2013.

  • Vrotsou, K. (2010). Everyday mining: Exploring sequences in event-based data. PhD thesis, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.

  • Widén, J., & Wäckelgård, E. (2010). A high-resolution stochastic model of domestic activity patterns and electricity demand. Applied Energy, 87, 1880–1992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, L. (2011). Some comments on “Sequence analysis and optimal matching methods in sociology: review and prospects”. Sociological Methods & Research, 29, 41–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yanos, P., West, M., & Smith, S. (2010). Coping, productive time use, and negative mood among adults with severe mental illness: A daily diary study. Schizophrenia Research, 124, 54–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author would like to thank Kajsa Ellegård and the TEVS seminar group at the Department of Thematic Studies—Technology and social change at Linköping University as well as the anonymous referees for valuable comments and suggestions, which have greatly improved the article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Thematic Studies, Technology and Social Change, Linköping University, 581 83, Linköping, Sweden

    Mattias Hellgren

Authors
  1. Mattias Hellgren
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mattias Hellgren.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hellgren, M. Extracting More Knowledge from Time Diaries?. Soc Indic Res 119, 1517–1534 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-013-0558-6

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-013-0558-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation