Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Studying children in armed conflict: data production, social indicators and analysis

  • Published:
Social Indicators Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The authors seek to give an overview of ways in which social indicators relevant to research on children affected by armed conflict can be developed, and how such research can be carried out. Technical and methodological challenges involved in this pursuit are discussed. It is argued that data production must consider issues of definition and delineation of the phenomenon of war-affected children more actively than it does currently. An analytical approach is proposed, in which children’s characteristics in different situations, or in different stages of conflict, may be used as intakes to understanding how the social processes pertaining to life histories of children in armed conflict are created and reproduced.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. WatchList, The Coalition to Stop the Use of Child Soldiers, the Children in Armed Conflict Unit and (formerly) the Swedish Save the Children (Rädda Barnen), to name some of these organisations.

  2. All social research must necessarily confront ethical issues, but few as much as studies of children in armed conflict. The UN Convention on the Rights of the Child stipulates that children’s right to participate in activities that affect them is a fundamental principle. Even though research may be seen as an investigative quest, and not as straightforward program activity, it is still an activity that affects children, or, through informing interventions, is intended to do so in the future. In this sense, research is no different from other activities when it comes to child participation. Research easily raises ethical concerns in regard to other actors too, such as adult respondents, researchers and fieldworkers. These issues are discussed in Gironde et al. (2002, chapter 2). Moreover, ethical considerations partly underlie the methodological approaches that are proposed here, and we do not make them explicit again here. For another sources that has informed our thinking on ethical considerations, see Brett and Specht (2004). On the specific issue of child participation, see Ben-Arieh (2005).

References

  • Ben-Arieh, A. (2005). Where are the children? Children’s role in measuring and monitoring their well-being. Social Indicators research, 74(3), 573–596.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benzécri, J. P. (1982). Histoire et préhistoire de l’analyse des données. Paris: Junod.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berge, G. (2000). ‘A call to engage in urgent issues: Anthropology and war’, Paper presented at the University of Oslo, May 5th 2000.

  • Boyden, J., & Gibbs, S. (1997). Children of war: Responses to psycho-social distress in Cambodia. Geneva: United Nations Research Institute for Social Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brett, R., & Specht, I. (2004). Young soldiers: Why they choose to fight. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brett, R., & McCallin, M. (1998). Children: The invisible soldiers. Stockholm: Rädda Barnen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunovskis, A., & Tyldum, G. (2004). Crossing borders: An empirical study of transnational prostitution and trafficking in human beings. Oslo: Fafo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cagoco-Guiam, R. (2002). Child soldiers in central and western mindanao: A rapid assessment, series investigating the worst forms of Child Labour no 21. Geneva: ILO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, C. (2002). Girls in war: Public health and social and economic reintegration. In: Address at the international conference on children and war, Brussels, 1. October 2002.

  • Douglas, M. (1957). ‘Animals in Lele religious thought’, Africa, 27(1), 46–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erickson, B. H. (1979). ‘Some problems of inference from chain data’, Sociological Methodology, 10, 276–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fafo. (2006). Fafo and living conditions surveys, http://www.fafo.no/ais/topics/living.htm.

  • Garfield, R. (2000). ‘A multivariate method for estimating mortality rates among under five year olds from health and social indicators in Iraq’, Paper presented at the Conference on Statistics, Development and Human Rights, Montreux 4–8.9.2000.

  • Gironde, C., Sletten, P., Sommerfelt, T., & Pedersen, J. (2002). L’Utilisation des enfants dans les conflits armés en Afrique Central. Manuel pour l’évaluation rapid. Geneve: BIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gluckman, M. (1961). ‘The use of ethnographic data in social anthropological analysis in Britain’, Sociological Review, 9, 5–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, L. A. (1961). ‘Snowball Sampling’, Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 32, 148–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grootaert, G., & Marchant, T. (1991). The social dimensions of adjustment priority survey: An instrument for the rapid identification and monitoring of policy target groups. Social dimensions of adjustment in sub-saharan Africa. Working Paper No.12 Survey and Statistics. Washington: The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heckathorn, D. D. (1997). ‘Respondent-driven sampling: A new approach to the study of hidden populations’, Social Problems, 44(2), 174–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heckman, J. J., Ichimura, H., Smith, J., & Todd, P. (1996). ‘Sources of selection bias in evaluating social programs: An interpretation of conventional measures and evidence on the effectiveness of matching as a program evaluation method’, In Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 93(23), 13416–13420.

  • Honwana, A. (2005). Innocent and guilty: Child soldiers as interstitial & tactical agents, In A. Honwana, & F. De Boeck (Eds.), Makers & breakers: Children & youth in postcolonial Africa, (pp. 31–52) Oxford: James Currey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson, S. E. (1997). Nuer dilemmas: Coping with money, war, and the State. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ILO .(2003). Wounded childhood: The use of children in armed conflicts in Central Africa. Geneva: ILO-IPEC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jareg, E. (1993). From soldiers to citizens: Re-integration of children involved in war, Note prepared for Redd Barna (Save the Children), Norway.

  • Jensen, R., & Pearson, M. (2002). Rapid Assessment/Capture-Recapture (RA-CR): A field guide. Cambridge: Harvard University.

  • Levy, P. S., & Lemeshow, S. (1999). Sampling of populations, 3rd edn. New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Machel, G. (2000). The Machel Review 1996–2000 (UNIFEM, Norway, UNICEF, Canada, s.l.).

  • Macro International. (n.d.) http://www.measuredhs.com/.

  • Pedersen J., & Arneberg M. (Eds.) (1999). Social and economic conditions of East Timor. New York: Columbia University.

  • Rosen, D. M. (2005). Armies of the young: Child soldiers in war and terrorism. Piscataway: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Semaan, S., Lauby, J., & Liebman, J. (2002). ‘Street and network sampling in evaluation studies of HIV risk-reduction interventions’, AIDS Review, 4(4), 213–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanton, C., Hill, K., AbouZahr C., & Wardlaw T. (1996). Modelling maternal mortality in the developing world, WHO/UNICEF: Unpublished.

  • Thompson, S. K. (1992). Sampling. New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toweh, K. D. (1998). The disarmament, demobilization & reintegration of child soldiers in Liberia 1994–1997. s. l.: UNICEF-Liberia & U.S. National Committee for UNICEF.

  • UNICEF. (n.d.) http://http://www.childinfo.org/.

  • United Nations. (1996). Impact of armed conflict on children, Report of the expert of the Secretary-General, Ms. Graça Machel, submitted pursuant to General Assembly resolution 48/157, United Nations A/51/306 26 August 1996.

  • Women’s Commission for Refugee Women & Children. (2000). Untapped Potential: Adolescents affected by armed conflict (Women’s Commission for Refugee Women & Children, Washington).

  • The World Bank Group. (n.d.) Core welfare indicators questionnaire, http://www4.worldbank.org/afr/stats/cwiq.cfm.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jon Pedersen.

Additional information

The authors are grateful to Alcinda Honwana and Ron Kassimir for comments to earlier drafts.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pedersen, J., Sommerfelt, T. Studying children in armed conflict: data production, social indicators and analysis. Soc Indic Res 84, 251–269 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-007-9117-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-007-9117-3

Keywords

Navigation