Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Men in the Office, Women in the Kitchen? Contextual Dependency of Gender Stereotype Activation in Spanish Women

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In a set of two studies, we tested whether gender-stereotypical associations are automatically activated by Spanish women in a categorization task, and how this process is conditioned by the context in which the target is presented (kitchen vs. office). We hypothesized that gender stereotypes would be activated implicitly when the target (men vs. women) appeared in an office context (associated with male dominant roles), but not when they appeared in a kitchen context (traditionally associated with female roles). The studies were conducted with two samples (N = 44; N = 47) of female undergraduate students from the University of Granada (Spain). In both studies, a priming effect was found, indicating that a traditional, role-congruent stereotype pattern (men-competence, women-warmth) emerged when primes appeared in an office context, but not in a kitchen context. Further, negative competence traits were evaluated faster when a male prime was presented in the context of a kitchen (role-incongruent). The purpose of Study 2 was to clarify the implicit nature of this contextual contingency effect by manipulating the controllability of the priming effect (i.e., Stimulus Onset Asynchrony duration-SOA, and restricted response time). The results of Study 1 were replicated in only the short SOA condition, which implies faster and presumably less controlled processing of the stimuli. Theoretical implications for stereotyping and gender role research are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abele, A. E. (2003). The dynamics of masculine-agentic and feminine-communal traits: Findings from a prospective study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 768–776. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.85.4.768.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Álvarez, B., & Miles, D. (2006). Husbands’ housework time: Does wives paid employment make a difference? Investigaciones Economicas, 30, 5–31. Retrieved from ftp://ftp.fundacionsepi.es/InvEcon/paperArchive/Ene2006/v30i1a1.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barreto, M., Ryan, M., & Schmitt, M. (2009). The glass ceiling in the 21st century: Understanding barriers to gender equality. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bem, S. L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Clinical and Consulting Psychology, 42, 155–162. doi:10.1037/h0036215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blair, I. (2002). The malleability of automatic stereotypes and prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6, 242–261. doi:10.1207/S15327957PSPR0603_8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blair, I. V., Ma, J. E., & Lenton, A. P. (2001). Imagining stereotypes away: The moderation of automatic stereotypes through mental imagery. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 828–841. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.81.5.828.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bosak, J., & Diekman, A. (2010). Malleability of intergroup stereotypes and attitudes [Editorial]. Social Psychology, 41, 111–112. doi:10.1027/1864-9335/a000016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bosak, J., Sczesny, S., & Eagly, A. H. (2008). Communion and agency judgments of women and men as a function of role information and response format. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 1148–1155. doi:10.1002/ejsp.538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bukowski, M., Moya, M., de Lemus, S., & Szmajke, A. (2009). Selective stereotype activation: The joint impact of interpersonal goals and task context. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 317–324. doi:10.1002/ejsp.585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cuddy, A. J. C., Fiske, S. T., Kwan, V. S. Y., Glick, P., Demoulin, S., Leyens, J. Ph., … Ziegler, R. (2009). Stereotype content model across cultures: Towards universal similarities and some differences. British Journal of Social Psychology, 48, 1–33. doi:10.1348/014466608X314935.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta, N., & Asgari, S. (2004). Seeing is believing: Exposure to counterstereotypic women leaders and its effect on the malleability of automatic gender stereotyping. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 642–658. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2004.02.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Lemus, S., & Bukowski, M. (2013). When interdependence shapes social perception: Cooperation and competition moderate the implicit activation of gender stereotypical associations. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 16.

  • de Lemus, S., Moya, M., Bukowski, M., & Lupiáñez, J. (2008). Activación automática de las dimensiones de competencia y sociabilidad en el caso de los estereotipos de género (Automatic activation of competence and warmth dimensions in the case of gender stereotyping). Psicológica, 29, 115–132. Retrieved from http://www.uv.es/psicologica/articulos2.08/1LEMUS.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Lemus, S., Spears, R., Bukowski, M., Moya, M., & Lupiáñez, J. (2013b). Reversing implicit gender stereotypes as a function of exposure to traditionalrole relations. Social Psychology, 44, 109–117. doi:10.1027/1864-9335/a000140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A. H., & Diekman, A. B. (2005). What is the problem? Prejudice as an attitude-in-context. In J. F. Dovidio, P. Glick, & L. Rudman (Eds.), On the nature of prejudice. Fifty years after Allport (pp. 19–35). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A. H., & Karau, S. J. (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review, 109, 573–598. doi:10.1037//0033-295X.109.3.573.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A. H., & Mladinic, A. (1989). Gender stereotypes and attitudes toward women and men. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 15, 543–558. doi:10.1177/0146167289154008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A. H., & Steffen, V. J. (1984). Gender stereotypes stem from the distribution of women and men into social roles. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 735–754. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.46.4.735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A. H., Wood, W., & Diekman, A. B. (2000). Social role theory of sex differences and similarities: A current appraisal. In T. Eckes & H. M. Trautner (Eds.), The developmental social psychology of gender (pp. 123–174). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckes, T. (2002). Paternalistic and envious gender stereotypes: Testing predictions from the stereotype content model. Sex Roles, 47, 99–114. doi:10.1023/A:1021020920715.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eurostat. (2006). 8 March 2006: International women’s day. A statistical view of the life of women and men in the EU25. Retrieved from http://europa.eu/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?reference=STAT/06/29&format=HTML&aged=0&language=EN&guiLanguage=e.

  • Fiske, S., Cuddy, A., Glick, P., & Xu, J. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 878–902. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.82.6.878.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, & Glick, P. (2007). Universal dimensions of social cognition: warmth and competence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 277–283. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2006.11.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia-Retamero, R., & López-Zafra, E. (2006). Prejudice against women in male-congenial environments: Perceptions of gender role congruity in leadership. Sex Roles, 55, 51–61. doi:10.1007/s11199-006-9068-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia-Retamero, R., & López-Zafra, E. (2009). Causal attributions about feminine and leadership roles: A cross-cultural comparison. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 40, 492–509. doi:10.1177/0022022108330991.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1999). Sexism and other isms. Independence, status, and the ambivalent content of stereotypes. In W. B. Swann Jr., J. H. Langlois, & L. A. Gilbert (Eds.), Sexism and stereotypes in modern society. The gender science of Janet Taylor Spence (pp. 193–222). Washington: American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, S. E., & Flom, R. (2007). 18- & 24-month-olds’ discrimination of gender-consistentand inconsistent activities. Infant Behavior and Development, 30, 168–173. doi:10.1016/j.infbeh.2006.08.003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ibañez-Pascual, M. (2008). La segregación ocupacional por sexo a examen. Características personales, de los puestos y de las empresas asociadas a las ocupaciones masculinas y femeninas. [Sex segregation of occupations under examination. Individual, job and business characteristics associated with male and female occupations]. Revistas Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas, 123, 87–122. Retrieved from http://www.reis.cis.es/REIS/PDF/REIS_123_041215167193739.pdf.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klauer, K. C., & Musch, J. (2003). Affective priming: Findings and theories. In J. Musch & K. C. Klauer (Eds.), The psychology of evaluation: Affective processes in cognition and emotion (pp. 371–391). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kulich, C., Trojanowski, G., Ryan, M. K., Haslam, S. A., & Renneboog, L. D. R. (2011). Who gets the carrot and who gets the stick? Evidence of gender disparities in executive remuneration. Strategic Management Journal, 32, 301–321. doi:10.1002/smj.878.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lenton, A. P., Bruder, M., & Sedikides, C. (2009). A meta-analysis on the malleability of automatic gender stereotypes. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 33, 183–196. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2009.01488.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • López-Zafra, E., Garcia-Retamero, R., & Eagly, A. H. (2009). Congruencia de rol de género y aspiraciones de las mujeres a posiciones de liderazgo [Gender congruity and women’s aspirations in leadership roles]. Revista de Psicología Social, 24, 99–108. doi:10.1174/021347409786923005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moors, A., & De Houwer, J. (2006). Automaticity: A theoretical and conceptual analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 297–326. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.132.2.297.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Neely, J. H. (1977). Semantic priming and retrieval from lexical memory: Roles of inhibitionless spreading activation and limited-capacity attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 106, 226–254. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.106.3.226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Operario, D., Goodwin, S. A., & Fiske, S. T. (1998). Power is everywhere: Social control and personal control both operate as stereotype activation, interpretation, and response. In R. S. Wyer (Ed.), Advances in social cognition (Vol. 11, pp. 163–176). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Puertas, S. (2003). Activación automática de los estereotipos asociados al poder y su medición implícita y explícita [Automatic activation of stereotypes associated to power measured implicit and explicitly]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Universidad de Granada.

  • Ridgeway, C. L. (2001). The emergence of status beliefs: From structural inequality to legitimizing ideology. In J. T. Jost & B. Major (Eds.), The psychology of legitimacy: Emerging perspectives on ideology, justice, and intergroup relations (pp. 257–277). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudman, L. A. (1998). Self-promotion as a risk factor for women: The costs and benefits of counterstereotypical impression management. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 629–645. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.74.3.629.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rudman, L. A., & Kilianski, S. E. (2000). Implicit and explicit attitudes toward female authority. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1315–1328. doi:10.1177/0146167200263001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sánchez, L., & Hall, C. S. (1999). Traditional values and democratic impulses: The gender division of labor in contemporary Spain. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 30, 659–685.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sánchez-Herrero Arbide, S., Sánchez-López, M. P., & Dresch, V. (2009). Hombres y trabajo doméstico: Variables demográficas, salud y satisfacción [Men and house—work: Demographic variables, health and satisfaction]. Anales de Psicología, 25, 299–307. Retrieved from http://revistas.um.es/analesps/article/view/87681/84451.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, W., Eschman, A., & Zuccolotto, A. (2002). E-prime user’s guide. Pittsburgh: Psychology Software Tools Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silván-Ferrero, M. P., & Bustillos López, A. (2007). Benevolent sexism toward men and women: Justification of the traditional system and conventional gender roles in Spain. Sex Roles, 57, 607–614. doi:10.1007/s11199-007-9271-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spence, J. T., & Helmreich, R. L. (1978). Masculinity and femininity: Their psychological dimensions, correlates, and antecedents. Austin: University of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wade, M. L., & Brewer, M. B. (2006). The structure of female subgroups: An exploration of ambivalent stereotypes. Sex Roles, 45, 753–765. doi:10.1007/s11199-006-9043-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J. E., & Best, D. L. (1990). Measuring sex stereotypes: A multi-nation study. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, W., & Eagly, A. H. (2002). A cross-cultural analysis of the behavior of women and men: Implications for the origins of sex differences. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 699–727. doi:10.1037//0033-2909.128.5.699.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by Grants No. PSI2010-15139 from the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación) and No. SEJ2010-6225 from the Andalusian Regional Government (Junta de Andalucía). The authors would like to thank Russell Spears and Wolfgang Stroebe, as well as the editors and blind reviewers, for their helpful comments to previous versions of this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Soledad de Lemus.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

de Lemus, S., Moya, M., Lupiáñez, J. et al. Men in the Office, Women in the Kitchen? Contextual Dependency of Gender Stereotype Activation in Spanish Women. Sex Roles 70, 468–478 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-013-0328-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-013-0328-6

Keywords

Navigation