Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Friendship and Gender in Russia and the United States

  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study provides descriptive data that contrast patterns of friendship for men and women in Russia and the United States, based on a parallel survey conducted at comparable universities in the two countries. Both cultural and gender differences were observed. Russians reported fewer friends with whom they shared less personal information than did Americans, and women in both societies reported that their friendships are more conversation-focused and intimate than men’s. In addition, interactive effects of culture and gender were apparent in patterns of cross-gender friendships. Numerous explanations for these patterns—including differences in the social and political histories of the two countries and in the relative importance of gender role distinctions—are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, G., & Plaut, V. (2003). The cultural grounding of personal relationships: Friendship in North American and West African worlds. Personal Relationships, 10, 333–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allan, G. (1989). Friendship: Developing a sociological perspective. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altman, I., & Taylor, D. A. (1973). Social penetration: The development of interpersonal relationships. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Antonucci, T. C., & Akiyama, H. (1995). Convoys of social relations: Family and friendships within a life-span context. In R. Blieszner & V. H. Bedford (Eds.), Handbook of aging and the family (pp. 355–371). Westport, CT: Greenwood.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aron, A., Aron, E., & Smollan, D. (1992). Inclusion of other in the self scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 596–612.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bank, B. J. (1995). Friendships in Australia and the United States: From feminization to more heroic image. Gender and Society, 9, 79–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bank, B. J., & Hansford, S. L. (2000). Gender and friendship: Why are men’s best same-sex friendships less intimate and supportive? Personal Relationships, 7, 63–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baum, A., & Valins, S. (1979). Architectural mediation of residential density and control: Crowding and the regulation of social contact. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 12, pp. 131–175). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, S., & Coleman, S. (Eds.). (1999). The anthropology of friendship. Oxford: Berg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bleske, A., & Buss, D. (2000). Can men and women be just friends? Personal Relationships, 7, 131–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burleson, B. R. (2003). The experience and effects of emotional support: What the study of cultural and gender differences can tell us about close relationships, emotion, and interpersonal communication. Personal Relationships, 10, 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, M. S. (1981). Noncomparability of benefits given and received: A cue to the existence of friendship. Social Psychology Quarterly, 44, 375–381.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, M. S., & Mills, J. (1993). The difference between communal and exchange relationships: What it is and is not. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 684–691.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, M. (1977). What is a friend? New Society, 20, 116–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dindia, K., & Allen, M. (1992). Sex differences in self-disclosure: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 106–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duck, S., & Wright, P. H. (1993). Reexamining gender differences in same-gender friendships: A close look at two kinds of data. Sex Roles, 28, 709–727.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fehr, B. (1996). Friendship processes. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fehr, B. (2004). Intimacy expectations in same-sex friendships: A prototype interaction-pattern model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 265–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fehr, B., & Perlman, D. (1985). The family as social network and support system. In L. L’Abate (Ed.), Handbook of family psychology and therapy (Vol. I, pp. 323–356). Homewood, IL: Dorsey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, R. (1995a). Personal relationships across cultures. The Psychologist, 8, 73–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, R. (1995b). The privatization of the personal? I: Intimate disclosure in modern-day Russia. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 12, 121–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, R. (1998). Personal relationships and social change: The “realpolitik” of cross-cultural research in transient cultures. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 15, 227–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, R., Nizharadze, G., Luu, L. A. N., Kosa, E., & Emelyanova, T. (1999). Glasnost and the art of conversation: A multilevel analysis of intimate disclosure across three former soviet cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 30, 72–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inman, C. (1996). Friendships among men: Closeness in the doing. In J. T. Wood (Ed.), Gendered relationships (pp. 95–110). Mountain View, CA: Mayfield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, F., & Aries, E. (1983). Conversational patterns among same-sex pairs of late-adolescent close friends. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 142, 225–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Komarovsky, M. (1964). Blue collar marriage. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson, R. W., & Bradney, N. (1988). Precious moments with family members and friends. In R. M. Milardo (Ed.), Families and social networks (pp. 107–126). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levant, R., Cuthbert, A., Richmond, K., Sellers, A., Matveev, A., et al. (2003). Masculinity ideology among Russian and U.S. young men and women and its relationships to unhealthy lifestyles habits among young Russian men. Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 4, 26–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matsumoto, D., Takeuchi, S., Andayani, S., Kouznetsova, N., & Krupp, D. (1998). The contribution of individualism vs. collectivism to cross-national differences in display rules. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 1, 147–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moghaddam, F. M., Taylor, D. M., & Wright, S. C. (1993). Social psychology in cross-cultural perspective. New York: W.H. Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Meara, J. D. (1989). Cross-sex friendship: Four basic challenges of an ignored relationship. Sex Roles, 21, 525–543.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reis, H. T. (1988). Gender effects in social participation: Intimacy, loneliness, and the conduct of social interaction. In R. Gilmour & S. Duck (Eds.), The emerging field of personal relationships (pp. 91–105). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reis, H. T., Senchak, M., & Solomon, B. (1985). Sex differences in the intimacy of social interaction: Further examination of potential explanations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 1204–1217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richmond, Y. (1996). From nyet to da: Understanding the Russians. Yarmouth, ME: Intercultural Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, L. (1986). On men and friendship. Psychoanalytic Review, 73, 165–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sapadin, L. A. (1988). Friendship and gender: Perspectives of professional men and women. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 5, 387–403.

    Google Scholar 

  • Searle-White, J. (1996). Personal boundaries among Russians and Americans: A Vygotskian approach. Cross-Cultural Research, 30, 184–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultze, S. (2000). Culture and customs of Russia. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheets, V. L., & Lugar, R. (2004). Sources of conflict between friends in Russia and the United States. Manuscript submitted for publication.

  • Sherrod, D. (1989). The influence of gender on same-sex friendships. Review of Personality and Social Psychology, 10, 164–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sprecher, S., & Hatfield, E. (1996). Premarital sexual standards among U.S. college students: Comparison with Russian and Japanese students. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 25, 261–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swain, S. (1989). Covert intimacy: Closeness in men’s friendships. In B. J. Risman & P. Schwartz (Eds.), Gender in intimate relationships (pp. 71–86). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Triandis, H. C., Bontempo, R., Villareal, M. J., Asai, M., & Lucca, N. (1988). Individualism and collectivism: Cross-cultural perspectives on self in group relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 323–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogel, E. (1965). From friendship to comradeship: The change in personal relations in communist China. China Quarterly, 21, 46–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • West, L., Anderson, J., & Duck, S. (1996). Crossing the barriers to friendships between men and women. In J. T. Wood (Ed.), Gendered relationships (pp. 111–127). Mountain View, CA: Mayfield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, J. T. (1994). Gendered lives: Communication, gender, & culture. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, J. T. (2000). Gender and personal relationships. In C. Hendrick & S. S. Hendrick (Eds.), Close relationships: A sourcebook (pp. 301–313). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, J. T., & Inman, C. C. (1993). In a different mode: Masculine styles of communicating closeness. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 21, 279–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, P. H. (1985). The Acquaintance Description Form. In S. Duck & D. Perlman (Eds.), Understanding personal relationships: An interdisciplinary approach (pp. 39–62). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, P. H. (1989). Gender differences in adults’ same- and cross-gender friendships. In R. G. Adams & R. Blieszner (Eds.), Older adult friendships (pp. 197–221). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, Indiana State University, Terre Haute, Indiana, 47809

    Virgil L. Sheets

  2. Department of Social Work, Indiana State University, Terre Haute, Indiana

    Robyn Lugar

Authors
  1. Virgil L. Sheets
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Robyn Lugar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Virgil L. Sheets.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sheets, V.L., Lugar, R. Friendship and Gender in Russia and the United States. Sex Roles 52, 131–140 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-005-1200-0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-005-1200-0

KEY WORDS:

Search

Navigation