Abstract
Scholarly articles are discussed and shared on social media, which generates altmetrics. On the opposite side, what is the impact of social media on the dissemination of scholarly articles and how to measure it? What are the visiting patterns? Investigating these issues, the purpose of this study is to seek a solution to fill the research gap, specifically, to explore the dynamic visiting patterns directed by social media, and examine the effects of social buzz on the article visits. Using the unique real referral data of 110 scholarly articles, which are daily updated in a 90-day period, this paper proposes a novel method to make analysis. We find that visits from social media are fast to accumulate but decay rapidly. Twitter and Facebook are the two most important social referrals that directing people to scholarly articles, the two are about the same and account for over 95 % of the total social referral directed visits. There is synchronism between tweets and tweets resulted visits. Social media and open access are playing important roles in disseminating scholarly articles and promoting public understanding science, which are confirmed quantitatively for the first time with real data in this study.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allen, H. G., Stanton, T. R., Di Pietro, F., & Moseley, G. L. (2013). Social media release increases dissemination of original articles in the clinical pain sciences. PLoS ONE, 8(7), e68914.
Bornmann, L. (2014a). Alternative metrics in scientometrics: A meta-analysis of research into three altmetrics. Scientometrics, 103(3), 1123–1144.
Bornmann, L. (2014b). Do altmetrics point to the broader impact of research? An overview of benefits and disadvantages of altmetrics. Journal of Informetrics, 8(4), 895–903.
Bornmann, L., & Haunschild, R. (2015). Which people use which scientific papers? An evaluation of data from F1000 and Mendeley. Journal of Informetrics, 9(3), 477–487.
Cheung, M. K. (2013). Altmetrics: Too soon for use in assessment. Nature, 494(7436), 176.
Costas, R., Zahedi, Z., & Wouters, P. (2014). Do “altmetrics” correlate with citations? Extensive comparison of altmetric indicators with citations from a multidisciplinary perspective. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(10), 2003–2019.
Dinsmore, A., Allen, L., & Dolby, K. (2014). Alternative perspectives on impact: The potential of ALMs and altmetrics to inform funders about research impact. PLoS Biology, 12(11), e1002003.
Eysenbach, G. (2011). Can tweets predict citations? Metrics of social impact based on Twitter and correlation with traditional metrics of scientific impact. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 13(4), e123.
Glänzel, W., & Gorraiz, J. (2015). Usage metrics versus altmetrics: Confusing terminology? Scientometrics, 102(3), 2161–2164.
Haustein, S., Peters, I., Bar-Ilan, J., Priem, J., Shema, H., & Terliesner, J. (2013). Coverage and adoption of altmetrics sources in the bibliometric community. Scientometrics, 101(2), 1145–1163.
Mohammadi, E., Thelwall, M., Haustein, S., & Larivière, V. (2015). Who reads research articles? An altmetrics analysis of Mendeley user categories. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 66(9), 1832–1846.
Priem, J., & Hemminger, B. H. (2010). Scientometrics 2.0: New metrics of scholarly impact on the social Web. First Monday, 15(7), 16.
Priem, J., Taraborelli, D., Groth, P., & Neylon, C. (2010). Altmetrics: A manifesto. 1 May, 2016. Retrieved from http://altmetrics.org/manifesto/.
Sotudeh, H., Mazarei, Z., & Mirzabeigi, M. (2015). CiteULike bookmarks are correlated to citations at journal and author levels in library and information science. Scientometrics, 105(3), 2237–2248.
Thelwall, M., Haustein, S., Larivière, V., & Sugimoto, C. R. (2013). Do altmetrics work? Twitter and ten other social web services. PLoS ONE, 8(5), e64841.
Thelwall, M., Kousha, K., Dinsmore, A., & Dolby, K. (2016). Alternative metric indicators for funding scheme evaluations. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 68(1), 2–18.
Torres-Salinas, D., Cabezas-Clavijo, A., & Jimenez-Contreras, E. (2013). Altmetrics: New indicators for scientific communication in web 20. Comunicar, 41(41), 53–60.
Wang, X., Liu, C., Mao, W., & Fang, Z. (2015). The open access advantage considering citation, article usage and social media attention. Scientometrics, 103(2), 555–564.
Wang, X., Mao, W., Xu, S., & Zhang, C. (2014). Usage history of scientific literature: Nature metrics and metrics of Nature publications. Scientometrics, 98(3), 1923–1933.
Wang, X., Xu, S., & Fang, Z. (2016). Tracing digital footprints to academic articles: An investigation of PeerJ publication referral data. arXiv:1205.5611.
Acknowledgments
The work was supported by the project of “National Natural Science Foundation of China” (61301227), the project of “the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities”(DUT15YQ111), “Liaoning Province Higher Education Innovation Team Fund” (WT2015002), and “Humanity and Social Science Foundation of Ministry of Education of China” (11YJA630128).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, X., Fang, Z. & Guo, X. Tracking the digital footprints to scholarly articles from social media. Scientometrics 109, 1365–1376 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2086-z
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2086-z