Skip to main content
Log in

Mapping the scientific research in organic farming: a bibliometric review

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The main aim of this study was to analyze the scientific productivity, collaboration and impact of research on organic agriculture through bibliometric analyses of articles included in the Science Citation Index Expanded database for the period 1954–2013. A number of 1009 research articles were published in 359 journals belonging to several subject areas, being Agriculture Multidisciplinary, Agronomy and Environmental Sciences the most productive. A social network analysis of collaboration between small countries and co-words was performed in order to analyze the most powerful scientific cooperation. The results highlight the important of the collaboration between small countries from north and eastern of Europe, as well as four non-European countries along with the US: Canada, Australia, Brazil and China, which is consistent with the importance that the consumption of products derived from organic farming has in these countries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

References

  • Aleixandre, J. L., Aleixandre-Tudó, J. L., Bolaños, M., & Aleixandre-Benavent, R. (2013). Mapping scientific research on wine and health. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 61(49), 11871–11880.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Badgley, C., Moghtader, J., Quintero, E., Zakem, E., Chappell, M. J., Aviles-Vazques, K., et al. (2007). Organic agriculture and the global food supply. Renewable Agriculture and Food System, 22, 86–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baranski, M., Srednicka-Tober, D., Volakakis, N., Seal, C., Sanderson, R., Stewart, G. B., et al. (2014). Higher antioxidant and lower cadmium concentrations and lower incidence of pesticide residues in organically grown crops: A systematic literature review and meta-analyses. British Journal of Nutrition, 112, 794–811.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batagelj, V., & Mrvar, A. (2002). Pajek—Analysis and visualization of large networks. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2265, 477–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burton, M., Rigby, D., & Young, T. (1999). Analysis of the determinants of adoption of organic horticultural techniques in the UK. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 50(1), 47–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CEC: Commissions of the European Communities. (2002). Analysis of the possibility of a European action plan for organic food and farming. Commission staff working paper. Brussels.

  • Conner, D. J. (2008). Organic agriculture cannot feed the world. Field Crops Research, 106, 187–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darnhofer, I., Schneeberger, W., & Freyer, B. (2005). Converting or not converting to organic farming in Austria: Farmer types and their rationale. Agricultural Human Values, 22(1), 39–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Ponti, T., Rijk, B., & van Ittersum, M. K. (2012). The crop gap between organic and conventional agriculture. Agricultural Systems, 108, 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duram, L. A. (2000). Agents: Perceptions of structure: How Illinois organic farmers view political, economic, social, and ecological factors. Agricultural Human Values, 17(1), 35–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durham, L. A. (2005). Good growing: Why organic farming works. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Union. (2014). European Commission Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural Development. An analysis of the EU organic sector. http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/markets-and-prices/more-reports/pdf/organic_2010_en.pdf. Consulted 25 October 2014.

  • Fairweather, J. R. (1999). Understanding how farmers choose between organic and conventional production: Results from New Zealand and policy implications. Agricultural Human Values, 16(1), 51–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fairweather, J. R., & Campbell, H. R. (2003). Environmental beliefs and farm practices of New Zealand farmers: Contrasting pathways to sustainability. Agricultural Human Values, 20(3), 287–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FIBL and IFOAM. (2014). The World of Organic Agriculture 2014. Statistics and emerging trends. Available at: http://www.organic-world.net/2613.html. Consulted 25 October 2014.

  • German, J. B., & Walzem, R. L. (2000). The health benefits of wine. Annual Review of Nutrition, 20, 561–593.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giacosa, A., Adam-Blondon, A. F., Baer-Sinnott, S., Barale, R., Bavaresco, L., Di Gaspero, G., et al. (2012). Alcohol and wine in relation to cancer and other diseases. European Journal of Cancer Prevention, 21, 103–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gold, M. (2014). What is organic production? National Agricultural Library. USDA. Retrieved 1 March 2014.

  • Guilford, J. M., & Pezzuto, J. M. (2011). Wine and health: A review. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 62, 471–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horrigan, L., Lawrence, R. S., & Walker, P. (2002). How sustainable agriculture can address the environmental and human health harms of industrial agriculture. Environmental Health Perspectives, 110, 445–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IFOAM. (2010). The principles of organic agriculture. Bonn, Germany: IFOAM. LD (Ministry of Agriculture) 1999, St.meld. nr. 19 (1999–2000). Om norsk landbruk ogmatproduksjon (White paper No. 19 (1999–2000) on Norwegian agriculture and food production), Oslo: Det Kongelige Landbruksdepartement.

  • Lockeretz, W. (1997). Diversity of personal and enterprise characteristics among organic growers in the Northeastern United States. Biological Agriculture and Horticulture, 14(1), 37–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lutz, W., Sanderson, W., & Scherbov, S. (1997). Doubling of world population unlikely. Nature, 387, 803–804.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthias, K., Flaten, O., & Lien, G. (2008). Factors influencing the conversion to organic farming in Norway. International Journal Agricultural Resources, Governance and Ecology, 7(1/2), 75–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Midmore, P., Padel, S., McCalman, H., Isherwood, J., Fowler, S., & Lampkin, N. (2001). Attitudes towards conversion to organic production systems: A study of farmers in England. Aberystwyth: Institute of Rural Studies, The University of Wales.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oesch vd, S., & Schaer B. (2008). Specialised organic retail report in europe. Practical compendium of the organic market in 27 European countries. Organic Retailers Association (ORA). Available at: www.ecozept.com. Consulted 4 Nov 2014.

  • Paull, J. (2010). From France to the World: The International Federation of Organic Agriculture Movements (IFOAM). Journal of Social Research and Policy, 1(2), 93–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paull, J. (2011). Nanomaterials in food and agriculture: The big issue of small matter for organic food and farming. In Proceedings of the third scientific conference of ISOFAR (International Society of Organic Agriculture Research) (Vol. 2, 96–99), 28 September–1 October, Namyangju, Korea.

  • Pietola, K. S., & Lansink, A. O. (2001). Farming response to policies promoting organic farming technologies in Finland. European Review of Agriculture Economics, 28(1), 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reganold, J. P. (2012). The fruits of organic farming. Nature, 485, 176–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rigby, D., & Cáceres, D. (2001). Organic farming and the sustainability of agricultural systems. Agricultural Systems, 68, 21–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruf, J. C. (2003). Overview of epidemiological studies on wine, health and mortality. Drugs Under Experimental Clinical Research, 29, 173–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneeberger, W., Darnhofer, I., & Eder, M. (2002). Barriers to the adoption of organic farming by cash-crop producers in Austria. American Journal of Alternative Agriculture, 17(1), 24–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seufert, V., Ramankutty, N., & Foley, J. A. (2012). Comparing the yields of organic and conventional agriculture. Nature, 485, 229–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thilmany, D. (2006). The US organic industry: Important trends and emerging issues for the USDA (pp. 1–10). Agribusiness Marketing Report (AMR), Cooperative Extension, Colorado State University.

  • Trewavas, A. (2001). Urban myths about organic farming. Nature, 410, 409–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trewavas, A. (2004). A critical assessment of organic farming-and-food assertions with particular respect to the UK and the potential environmental benefits of no-till agriculture. Crop Protection, 23, 757–781.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yuseffi, M. (2004). Development and state of organic agriculture worldwide. In H. Willer, & M. Yussefi (Eds.), The world of organic agriculture—statistics and emerging trends (pp. 13–20). Bonn, Germany: International Federation of Organic Agriculture Movements.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to José Luis Aleixandre.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Aleixandre, J.L., Aleixandre-Tudó, J.L., Bolaños-Pizarro, M. et al. Mapping the scientific research in organic farming: a bibliometric review. Scientometrics 105, 295–309 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1677-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1677-4

Keywords

Navigation