Skip to main content
Log in

Trends in research foci in life science fields over the last 30 years monitored by emerging topics

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We report here a simple method to identify the ‘emerging topics’ in life sciences. First, the keywords selected from MeSH terms on PubMed by filtering the terms based on their increment rate of the appearance, and, then, were sorted into groups dealing with the same topics by ‘co-word’ analysis. These topics were defined as ‘emerging topics’. The survey of the emerging keywords with high increment rates of appearance between 1972 to 2006 showed that emerging topics changed dramatically year by year, and that the major shift of the topics occurred in the late 90s; the topics that cover technical and conceptual aspects in molecular biology to the more systematic ‘-omics’-related and nanoscience-related aspects. We further investigated trends in emerging topics within various sub-fields in the life sciences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Batageji, V., & Mrvar, A. (2002). Pajek—analysis and visualization of large networks. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2265, 477–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braam, R. R., Moed, H. F., & van Raan, A. F. J. (1991). Mapping of science by combined co-citation and word analysis. I. Structural aspects. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 42(4), 233–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Callon, M., Courtial, J. P., Turner, W. A., & Bauin, S. (1983). From translations to problematic networks—an introduction to co-word analysis. Social Science Information Sur Les Sciences Sociales, 22, 191–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callon, M., Law, J., & Rip, A. (1986). Mapping the dynamics of science and technology-sociology of science in the real world. London: The MacMillian Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, C. (2006). CiteSpace II: Detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(3), 359–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ding, Y., Chowdhury, G. G., & Foo, S. (2001). Bibliometric cartography of information retrieval research by using co-word analysis. Information Processing and Management, 37, 817–842.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Fujigaki, Y. (1998). Filling the gap between discussions on science and scientists’ everyday activities: Applying the autopoiesis system theory to scientific knowledge. Social Science Information, 37(1), 5–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, W. H. (2008). How to identify emerging research fields using scientometrics: An example in the field of Information Security. Scientometrics, 76, 503–525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leydesdorff, L. (1995). The challenge of scientometrics. Leiden, The Netherlands: DSWO Press, Leiden University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noyons, E., Moed, H., & van Raan, A. F. J. (1999). Integrating research performance analysis and science mapping. Scientometrics, 46(3), 591–604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ohniwa, R. L., Denawa, M., Kudo, M., Nakamura, K., & Takeyasu, K. (2004). Perspective factor a novel indicator for the assessment of journal quality. Research Evaluation, 13, 175–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ohniwa, R. L., Hibino, A., & Takeyasu, K. (2007). Perspective factor; past, present and future of life sciences. Proceedings of international society for scientometrics and informatics 2007, II, pp. 908–909.

  • Price, D. J. D. (1963). Little science, big science. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulman, J. (2000). Using medical subject headings (MeSH) to examine patterns in American medicine-preliminary consideration of vocabulary change as a metric. http://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/patterns.html.

  • Small, H. (2006). Tracking and predicting growth areas in science. Scientometrics, 68(3), 595–610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tseng, Y. H., Lin, Y. I., Lee, Y. Y., Hung, W. C., & Lee, C. H. (2009). A comparison of methods for detecting hot topics. Scientometrics, 81(1), 73–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Upham, S. P., & Small, H. (2010). Emerging research fronts in science and technology: patterns of new knowledge development. Scientometrics, 83, 15–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ryosuke L. Ohniwa.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ohniwa, R.L., Hibino, A. & Takeyasu, K. Trends in research foci in life science fields over the last 30 years monitored by emerging topics. Scientometrics 85, 111–127 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-010-0252-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-010-0252-2

Keywords

Navigation