Skip to main content
Log in

A citation analysis of Catalan literary studies (1974–2003): Towards a bibliometrics of humanities studies in minority languages

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A citation analysis was carried out on the most important research journals in the field of Catalan literature between 1974 and 2003. The indicators and qualitative parameters obtained show the value of performing citation analysis in cultural and linguistic areas that are poorly covered by the A&HCI. Catalan literature shows a similar pattern to that of humanities in general, but it could still be in a stage of consolidation because too little work has as yet been published.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aksnes, D. W. (2003), A macro study of self-citation, Scientometrics, 56: 235–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al, U., Sahiner, M., Tonta, Y. (2006), Arts and Humanities Literature: bibliometric bharacteristics of bontributions by Turkish authors, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57: 1011–1022.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ardanuy, J. (2008), Anàlisi bibliomètrica de la producció científica en literatura catalana, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona. Available online at: www.tesisenxarxa.net/TDX-0226108-124023/index.html, accessed on 20 May 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., Freeman, L. C. (2002), Ucinet for Windows: Software for Social Network Analysis, Analytic Technologies, Harvard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Budd, J. (1986), Characteristics of written scholarship in American literature: A citation study, Library and Information Science Research, 8: 189–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cullars, J. (1985), Characteristics of the monographic literature of British and American literary studies, College and Research Libraries, 46: 511–522.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cullars, J. (1988), Characteristics of the monographic scholarship of foreign literary studies by native speakers of English, College and Research Libraries, 49: 157–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cullars J. (1989), Citation characteristics of French and German literary monographs, Library Quarterly, 59: 305–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cullars, J. (1990), Citation characteristics of Italian and Spanish literary monographs, Library Quarterly, 60: 337–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cullars, J. (1992), Citation characteristics of monographs in the fine arts, Library Quarterly, 62: 325–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cullars, J. (1996), Citation characteristics of French and German fine arts monographs, Library Quarterly, 66: 138–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cullars, J. (1998), Citation characteristics of English language monographs in philosophy, Library and Information Science Research, 20: 41–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duran, E. (coord.) (2004), Reports de la recerca a Catalunya. 1996–2002 filologia catalana: literatura, Institut d’Estudis Catalans, Barcelona. Available online at: www2.iecat.net/gc/digitalAssets /3701_1097665504296_litcat9602.pdf, accessed on 20 May 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, D., Oldman, H. (2005), The English literature researcher in the age of the internet, Journal of Information Science, 31: 29–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernández-Izquierdo, F., Román, A., Rubio-Liniers, M. C., Moreno, F. J., Martín-Moreno, C., García-Zorita, J. C.; Lascurain M. L., García, P. E., Povedano, E., Sanz, E. (2007), Bibliometric study of early Modern History in Spain based on bibliographic references in national scientific journals and conference proceedings. In: D. Torres-Salinas, H. F. Moed (Eds), 11 International Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics. CSIC, Madrid, vol. 1, pp. 266–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfield, E. (1980), Is information retrieval in the arts and humanities inherently different from that in science? The effect that ISI’s citation index for the arts and humanities is expected to have on future scholarship, Library Quarterly, 50: 40–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Georgas, H.; Cullars, J. (2005), A citation study of the characteristics of the linguistics literature, College and Research Libraries, 66: 496–515.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glänzel, W., Thijs, B. (2004), The influence of author self-citationson bibliometric macro indicators, Scientometrics, 59: 281–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glänzel, W., Thijs, B., Schlemmer, B. (2004), A bibliometric approach to the role of author selfcitationsin scientific communication, Scientometrics, 59: 63–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gleaves, E. S. (1961), Characteristics of the Research Materials Used by Scholars Who Write in Journals in the Field of American Literature., ACRL Microcard, 130, University of Rochester Press, Rochester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinzkill, R. (1980), Characteristics of references in selected scholarly English literary journals, Library Quarterly, 50: 352–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herubel, J. P., Buchanan, A. L. (1994), Characteristics of references in selected scholarly English journals, Collection Management, 18: 89–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, C., Chapman, M., Woods, P. C. (1972), The characteristics of the literature used by historians, Journal of Librarianship, 4: 137–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamada, T., Kawai, S. (1989), An algorithm for drawing general undirected graphs, Information Processing Letters, 31: 7–15.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Kreuzman, H. (2001), A co-citation analysis of representative authors in philosophy: Examining the relationship between epistemologists and philosophers of science, Scientometrics, 51: 525–539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindholm-romantschuk, Y., Warner, J. (1996), The role of monographs in scholarly communication: An empirical study of philosophy, sociology and economics, Journal of Documentation, 52(4): 389–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lotka, A. J. (1926), The frequency distribution of scientific productivity, Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences, 16: 317–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowe, M. S. (2003), Reference analysis of the ‘American Historical Review’, Collection Building, 22: 13–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCain, K. W. (1987), Citation patterns in the history of technology, Library and Information Science Research, 9: 41–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Molas, J. (coord.) (2001), Reports de la Recerca a Catalunya. Literatura catalana, Institut d’Estudis Catalans, Barcelona. Available online at: www2.iecat.net/gc/digitalAssets /3686_1097661647515_literatura.pdf, accessed on 20 May 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Molteni, V., Zulueta, M. A. (2002), Análisis de la visibilidad internacional de la producción científica argentina en las Bases de datos Social Science Citation Index y Arts and Humanities Citation Index de 1990–2000, Revista Española de Documentacion Cientifica, 25: 455–465.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nederhof, A. J. (2006), Bibliometric monitoring of research performance in the Social Sciences and the Humanities: A review, Scientometrics, 66: 81–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nederhof, A. J., Erlings, C. M. (1993), A Bibliometric Study of Productivity and Impact of Modern Language and Literature Research in the Netherlands, 1982–1991, Center for Science and Technology Studies (CWTS), Leiden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nederhof, A. J., Noyons, E. C. M. (1992), International comparison of departments’ research performance in the humanities, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 43: 249–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nederhof, A. J., Zwaan, R. A, Bruin, P. J. de, Dekker, P. J. (1989), Assessing the usefulness of bibliometric indicators for the humanities and the social and behavioural sciences: A comparative study, Scientometrics, 15: 423–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newby, G. B., Greenberg, J., Jones, P. (2003), Open source software development and Lotka’s law: Bibliometric patterns in programming. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54: 169–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Price, D. J. D. (1970), Citation measures of hard science, soft science, technology and nonscience. In: C. E. Nelson, D. K. Pollock (Eds), Communication among Scientists and Engineers. Heat, Lexington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, W. (2002), The Use of the Internet by Academics in the Discipline of English Literature: A Quantitative and Qualitative Approach, University of Wales, Aberystwyth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Small, H., Sweeney, E. (1985), Clustering the science citation index using co-citations I: A comparison of methods, Scientometrics, 7: 391–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Small, H., Sweeney, E., Greenlee, E. (1985). Clustering the science citation index using co-citations II: Mapping science. Scientometrics, 8: 321–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stern, M. (1983), Characteristics of the literature of literary scholarship, College and Research Libraries, 44: 199–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stinson, E. R., Lancaster, F. W. (1987), Synchronous versus diachronous methods in the measurement of obsolescence by citation studies, Journal of Information Science, 13: 65–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stone, Sue (1982), Progress in documentation. Humanities scholars: Information needs and uses, Journal of Documentation, 38: 292–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, J. W. (2002), The Death of the Scholarly Monograph in the Humanities? Citation Patterns in Literay Scholarship, Libri 52: 121–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Urbano, C. (2000), El análisis de citas en publicaciones de usuarios de bibliotecas universitarias: estudio de tesis doctorales en infomática de la Universidad Politécnica de Cataluña, 1996–1998, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona. Available online at: www.tesisenxarxa.net/TDX-0614102-113014/index.html, accessed on 20 May 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urbano, C., Borrego A., Brucart, J. M., Cosculluela, A.; Somoza, M. (2005), Análisis bibliométrico de la bibliografía citada en estudios de filología espanyola, Revista Española de Documentacion Cientifica, 28: 439–461.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urbano, C., Borrego, A., Rodríguez-Gairín, J. M., Ardanuy, J., Brucart, J. M., Cosculluela, A., Guardiola, E., Pons, A., Somoza, M. (2004), La evaluación de revistas en procesos de evaluación de la investigación española en humanidades y ciencias sociales: desarrollo de un modelo y experimentación en el área de filología hispánica. Informe EA2004-00025 del Programa de Estudios y Análisis del MEC, Ministerio de Educación i Ciencia, Madrid. Available online at: www.mec.es/univ/html/informes/estudios_analisis/resultados_2004/ea0025/ea0025.pdf, accessed on 20 May 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson-Boone, R. (1994), Information needs and habits of humanities scholars, Reference Quarterly, 34: 203–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zainab, A. N., Goi, S. S. (1997), Characteristics of citations used by humanities researchers, Malaysia Journal of Library & Information Science, 2: 19–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zwaan, R. A; Nederhof, A. J. (1990), Some aspects of scholarly communication in linguistics: An empirical study, Language, 66: 523–527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jordi Ardanuy.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ardanuy, J., Urbano, C. & Quintana, L. A citation analysis of Catalan literary studies (1974–2003): Towards a bibliometrics of humanities studies in minority languages. Scientometrics 81, 347–366 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-008-2143-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-008-2143-3

Keywords

Navigation