Skip to main content
Log in

Business failure and institutions in entrepreneurship: a systematic review and research agenda

  • Published:
Small Business Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Because entrepreneurship entails uncertainty, business failure is a common outcome for entrepreneurs. When entrepreneurs encounter business failure, they carry a financial, social, and emotional burden associated with the failure. However, the magnitude of this burden differs by institutions, influencing entrepreneurial decisions and behaviors. Although institutions governing the rules of business failure are a topic for a rapidly growing field of research, research on this topic is highly fragmented. Therefore, the purpose of this systematic review is to unpack the relationships between institutions—governing the rules of business failure—and entrepreneurial decisions/behaviors. The paper provides a fine-grained and comprehensive review of the relevant literature and develops an agenda to guide future research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Short-term changes are based on some joint historical experience that leads to shared shift in norms in formative years or adolescence of a given generation. (See Zhang & Acs, 2018).

  2. Entrepreneurial exit can occur at any stage of the business life cycle. The exit can have two paths either successful entrepreneurial exit or failure (See Wennberg et al., 2010).

  3. Regarding empirical issues, most previous studies have used GEM (Global Entrepreneurship Monitor) data to capture the fear of failure while assuming it links to psychological traits, which may not be the case. Shaper survey instruments would be helpful to improve our understanding of the source and the role of the fear of failure.

  4. We acknowledge that our framing of institutions was simplified for practicality.

References * A reference with an asterisk mark indicates that the study is included in the review.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to Dr. J. Hessels and two anonymous reviewers for their kind support during the four revision periods in 2.5 years.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

The contributions of authors based on the authorship determination scorecard (APA.org) are as follows: Dr. C.K. Lee (55%), Dr. J. Wiklund (15%), Dr. A. Amezcua (15%), Dr. T.J. Bae (15%), and Dr. A. Palubinskas (< 0.01%; contributed only to the minor change in the appendix during the revision stage).

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chong Kyoon Lee.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lee, C.K., Wiklund, J., Amezcua, A. et al. Business failure and institutions in entrepreneurship: a systematic review and research agenda. Small Bus Econ 58, 1997–2023 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-021-00495-4

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-021-00495-4

Keywords

JEL Classifications

Navigation