Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Institutional Expenditures and Student Engagement: a Role for Financial Resources in Enhancing Student Learning and Development?

  • Published:
Research in Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The concept of student engagement is receiving increased attention from researchers, higher education leaders, and the general public in recent years. This increased attention represents a shift from the more traditional “resource and reputation” model of academic quality to a model that emphasizes institutional best practices and student experiences that enhance student learning and development. At the same time, institutions face rising operating costs and the public faces rising costs of attendance. However, relatively little effort has been made to explore the potential relationship between these two important research and policy areas. This study examined the relationship between institutional expenditures and student engagement based on data from 142 colleges and universities. The results of an OLS multiple regression model, including a factor for student engagement as the dependent variable, suggest that administrative expenditures are negatively related to student engagement. These results support further exploration of potential complex causal links between expenditures and engagement and may provide support for initiatives to reverse historical trends and adjust institutional spending.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. A. W. Astin (1993) What Matters In College: Four Critical Years Revisited Jossey-Bass San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  2. C. R. Belfield H. R. Thomas (2000) ArticleTitleThe relationship between resources and performance in further education colleges Oxford Review of Education 26 239–253

    Google Scholar 

  3. A. W. Chickering Z. F. Gamson (1987) ArticleTitleSeven principles for good practice in undergraduate education AAHE Bulletin 37 IssueID7 3–7

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ehrenberg (2000) Tuition Rising: Why College Costs So Much Harvard University Press CambridgeMA

    Google Scholar 

  5. J. Fox (1991) Regression Diagnostics. Sage University Papers Sage Publications Newbury Park

    Google Scholar 

  6. D. N. Gujarati (1995) Basic Econometrics EditionNumber3 McGraw-Hill New York

    Google Scholar 

  7. E. A. Hanushek (1997) ArticleTitleAssessing the effects of school resources on student performance: An update Educational Evaluation and Policv Analysis 19 141–164

    Google Scholar 

  8. InstitutionalAuthorNameHigher Learning Commission (2004) Handbook of Accreditation EditionNumber3 IL Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hodas, S. (1993). Is water input to a fish?: Problems with the production-function model in higher education. Education Policy Analysis Archives 1(12).

  10. G. D. Kuh (2001) College students today: Why we can’t leave serendipity to chance P. Altbach P. Gumport B. Johnstone (Eds) Defense of the American University Johns Hopkins University Press Baltimore 277–303

    Google Scholar 

  11. G. D. Kuh (2002) The College Student Report(4th ed). National Survey of Student EngagementCenter for Postsecondary Research and Planning Indiana University Bloomington

    Google Scholar 

  12. G. D. Kuh S. Hu (2001) ArticleTitleThe effects of student-faculty interaction in the 1990s The Review of Higher Education 24 309–332

    Google Scholar 

  13. G. L. Marco A.A. Abdel-fattah P.A. Baron (1992) Methods used to Establish Score Comparability on the Enhanced ACT Assessment and the SAT (College Board Report No. 92–3) The College Board New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  14. W. F. Massy (Eds) (1996) Resource Allocation in Higher Education University of Michigan Press Ann Arbor

    Google Scholar 

  15. R. J. Meisinger (1994) College and University Budgeting: An Introduction for Faculty and Academic Administrators EditionNumber2 NACUBO Washington D.C

    Google Scholar 

  16. D. H. Monk (1992) ArticleTitleEducation productivity research: An update and assessment of its role in education finance reform Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 14 307–332

    Google Scholar 

  17. Monk, D. H. (1993). A reply to Mr. Hodas. Education Policy Analysis Archives 1(15).

  18. National Center for Education Statistics (2003). Digest of Education Statistics. (NCES Publication No. 2003060). AuthorWashington, D.C.

  19. National Survey of Student Engagement (2001). NSSE Technical and Norms Report. Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research and Planning.

  20. E. T. Pascarella P. T. Terenzini (1991) How College Affects Students: Findings and Insights From Twenty Years Of Research Jossey-Bass San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  21. G. R. Pike (2004) ArticleTitleMeasuring Quality: A comparison of U.S. News Rankings and NSSE Benchmarks Research in Higher Education 45 IssueID2 193–208

    Google Scholar 

  22. L. Pritchett D. Fulmer (1997) ArticleTitleWhat education production functions really show: A positive theory of education expenditures Economics of Education Review 18 IssueID2 223–239

    Google Scholar 

  23. J. F. Ryan (2004) ArticleTitleThe relationship between institutional expenditures and degree attainment at baccalaureate colleges Research in Higher Education 45 IssueID2 97–114

    Google Scholar 

  24. J. C. Smart C. A. Ethington R. O. Riggs M. D. Thompson (2002) ArticleTitleInfluences of institutional expenditure patterns on the development of students’ leadership competencies Research in Higher Education 43 115–132

    Google Scholar 

  25. W. Spady (1971) ArticleTitleDrop-outs from higher education: Toward an empirical model Interchange 1 38–82

    Google Scholar 

  26. V. Tinto (1975) ArticleTitleDropout from higher education: A theoretical synthesis of recent research Review of Educational Research 45 89–125

    Google Scholar 

  27. V. Tinto (1993) Leaving College: Rethinking the Causes and Cures of Student Attrition University of Chicago Press Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  28. R. K. Toutkoushian J. C. Smart (2001) ArticleTitleDo institutional characteristics affect gains from college? The Review of Higher Education 25 IssueID1 39–61

    Google Scholar 

  29. U.S. House of Representatives (2004). Committee on Education and the Workforce. College Cost Central Available: http://edworkforce.house. gov/issues/108th/education/highereducation/collegecostcentral/htm.

  30. M. L. Upcraft J. N. Gardner (1989) The Freshman Year Experience: Helping Students Survive and Succeed in College Jossey-Bass San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  31. H. Wenglinsky (1997) When Money Matters:How Educational Expenditures Improve Student Performance and How They Don’t NJ: Educational Testing Service Princeton

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Office of Academic Affairs, The Ohio State University, 203 Bricker Hall, 190 North Oval Mall, Ohio, Columbus, 43210

    John F. Ryan

Authors
  1. John F. Ryan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John F. Ryan.

Additional information

I would like to thank Ms. Cathy Statham for assistance in obtaining data for this study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ryan, J.F. Institutional Expenditures and Student Engagement: a Role for Financial Resources in Enhancing Student Learning and Development?. Res High Educ 46, 235–249 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-004-1601-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-004-1601-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation