Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Gender, Narratives and Intersectionality: can Personal Experience Approaches to Research Contribute to “Undoing Gender”?

  • Published:
International Review of Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper examines narrative methodologies as one approach to exploring issues of gender, education and social justice and, particularly, insights into “undoing gender”. It furthermore examines the possibilities of exploring gender and its multiple intersections in a range of global and policy contexts through the use of personal experience approaches. The “storying” of lived experience is examined as a means of challenging dominant discourses which can construct and other individuals and groups in relation to many aspects of gender and education. Drawing on intersectionality, as a complex and developing feminist theory, the paper considers ways in which narrative can illuminate often hidden complexities while seeking to avoid generalisations and essentialisms. The difficulties of using narrative in relation to these aims are explored in the light of the warnings of feminist writers such as Michele Fine and bell hooks. The paper briefly considers narrative as both methodology and phenomenon, and finally, drawing on critical discourse analysis, discusses the potential of intersectionality and narrative in relation to undoing gender.

Résumé

GENRE, RÉCITS ET INTERSECTIONNALITÉ : L’EXPÉRIENCE PERSONNELLE APPLIQUÉE À LA RECHERCHE PEUT-ELLE CONTRIBUER À « DÉFAIRE LE GENRE » ? – Cet article examine les méthodologies narratives en tant qu’approche pour explorer les questions de genre, d’éducation et de justice sociale, et en particulier pour aborder la question de «défaire le genre». L’auteure analyse en outre les possibilités d’étudier la question du genre et ses nombreuses intersections avec plusieurs contextes mondiaux et stratégiques à travers les approches de l’expérience personnelle. La narration de l’expérience vécue est examinée comme moyen de contester les discours dominants, qui peuvent construire et rendre autres les individus et les groupes par rapport à de nombreux aspects du genre et de l’éducation. À partir de l’intersectionnalité, théorie féministe émergente et complexe, l’auteure étudie comment le récit peut éclairer des complexités souvent masquées tout en s’efforçant d’éviter les généralisations et essentialismes. Les difficultés d’utiliser le récit par rapport à ces objectifs sont analysées à la lumière des mises en garde d’écrivaines féministes telles que Michele Fine et bell hooks. L’auteure aborde brièvement le récit en tant que méthodologie et phénomène et examine finalement, à partir d’une analyse critique du discours, le potentiel de l’intersectionnalité et du récit en vue de déconstruire les inégalités sexuelles.

Zusammenfassung

GENDER, ERZÄHLUNGEN UND INTERSEKTIONALITÄT: KÖNNEN ERFAHRUNGSBEZOGENE FORSCHUNGSANSÄTZE HELFEN, GESCHLECHTSSPEZIFISCHE BENACHTEILIGUNG ZU BESEITIGEN? – Dies ist eine Untersuchung narrativer Methodik als Ansatz zur Erforschung von Geschlechtsrollen (Gender), Bildung und sozialer Gerechtigkeit und insbesondere zur Gewinnung von Einsichten, wie geschlechtsspezifische Benachteiligungen beseitigt werden können. Darüber hinaus wird eruiert, wie unter Einsatz erfahrungsbezogener Forschungsansätze Geschlechtsrollen und deren vielfältige überschneidungen in diversen globalen und politischen Kontexten untersucht werden können. Es wird untersucht, inwieweit die Fiktionalisierung gelebter Erfahrung in Geschichten ein Mittel sein kann, um vorherrschende Diskurse, durch die viele Aspekte von Gender und Bildung unter Umständen erst geschaffen werden, und in Bezug darauf andere Personen und Gruppen kritisch zu hinterfragen. Im Rückgriff auf Intersektionalität als komplexer und sich entwickelnder feministischer Theorie werden in dieser Arbeit Mittel und Wege erörtert, wie die Erzählung Vielschichtigkeiten ans Licht bringen kann, die sonst oft im Dunkel liegen, wobei versucht wird, Verallgemeinerungen und essenzialistische Erklärungen zu vermeiden. Im Licht der Warnungen feministischer Autorinnen wie Michele Fine und bell hooks wird die Problematik narrativer Ansätze hinsichtlich dieser Ziele ausgelotet. Erzählen wird sowohl als Methodik als auch als Phänomen in knapper Form dargestellt. Unter Rückgriff auf die kritische Diskursanalyse wird am Schluss das Potenzial von Intersektionalität und Erzählung im Hinblick auf die Beseitigung geschlechtsspezifischer Benachteiligung diskutiert.

Resumen

GÉNERO, NARRATIVA E INTERSECCIONALIDAD ¿PUEDEN CONTRIBUIR A “DESHACER EL GÉNERO” LOS ENFOQUES INVESTIGATIVOS BASADOS EN LA EXPERIENCIA PERSONAL? – En este trabajo, la autora examina metodologías narrativas como modo de explorar problemas de género, educación y justicia social y, en particular, insights de lo que llamamos “deshacer el género”. Además, examina las posibilidades de explorar el género y sus múltiples intersecciones en una serie de contextos globales y de políticas basando sus enfoques en la experiencia personal. Examina esta “narración” de experiencia vivida como desafío de los discursos dominantes, capaces de construir otros individuos y grupos en función de muchos aspectos de género y educación. Inspirada en la interseccionalidad como teoría feminista compleja y en desarrollo, la autora estudia caminos donde la narrativa puede aclarar complejidades frecuentemente ocultas, a la vez que trata de evitar generalizaciones y esencialismos. Las dificultades de usar la narrativa en relación con estos objetivos se han explorado a la luz de las advertencias de escritoras feministas como Michele Fine y bell hooks. En resumen, en este trabajo la autora considera la narrativa como metodología y también como fenómeno, y basándose en un análisis de discurso crítico, finalmente trata el potencial de la interseccionalidad y la narrativa en relación con “deshacer el género”.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abu-Lughod, Lila. 1990. Is There a Feminist Ethnography? Women and Performance: A Journal of Feminist Theory 5(1): 7-27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alur, Mithu 2007. Forgotten Millions: A case of cultural and systemic bias. Support for Learning 22(4): 174-180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnot Madeleine, Miriam David, and Gaby Weiner. 1999. Closing the Gender Gap. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, Dorothy. 1997. An Auto/Biographical Approach to Learning Disability Research. Brookfield, Vermont: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bassett, Rachel. 2005. Parenting and Professing: Balancing family work with an academic career. Tennessee: Vanderbilt University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateson, Mary. 1989. Composing a Life. New York: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateson, Mary. 2000. Full Circles, Overlapping lives: Culture and generation in transition. New York: Ballantine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackmore, Jill. 1999. Troubling Women: Feminism, Leadership and Educational Change. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumenfeld-Jones, Donald. 1995. Fidelity as a Criterion for Practicing and Evaluating Narrative Inquiry. In: Hatch, J. Amos, and Wisniewski, Richard (eds.), Life History and Narrative. London: The Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Booth, Tim, and Wendy Booth. 1996. Sounds of Silence: Narrative research with inarticulate subjects. Disability and Society 11(1): 55-69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradbury, Lynne. 2007. Dialogic Identities: The Experiences of Women who are Headteachers and Mothers in English Primary Schools. Journal of Administration and History 39(1): 81-95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruner, Jerome. 2002. Making Stories: Law, literature life. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruner, Jerome. 2002. Making Stories: Law, literature life. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butt, Richard, Danielle Raymond, G. McCue, and L. Yamagishi. 1992. Collaborative Autobiography and the Teacher’s Voice. In: Goodson, Ivor (ed.), Studying Teachers’ Lives. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clandinin, Jean (ed.). 2007. Handbook of Narrative Inquiry: Mapping a Methodology. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clandinin, Jean, and Michael Connelly. 1994. Personal Experience Methods. In: Norman Denzin, and Yvonna Lincoln (eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clandinin, Jean, and Connelly, Michael. 2000. Narrative Inquiry: Experience and story in qualitative research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clandinin, Jean, and Sean Murphy. 2007. Looking Ahead: Conversations with Elliot Mishler, Don Polkinghorne and Amia Lieblich. In: Clandinin, Jean (ed.), Handbook of Narrative Inquiry: Mapping a Methodology. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clandinin, Jean, and Jerry Rosiek. 2007. Mapping a Landscape of Narrative Inquiry: Borderland Spaces and Tensions. In: Clandinin, Jean (ed.), Handbook of Narrative Inquiry: Mapping a Methodology. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clough, Peter. 2002. Narratives and Fictions in Educational Research. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, Barbara. 2004. Mother-Teachers: Insights into Inclusion. London: David Fulton Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, Barbara A. 2007b. Mothers, Gender and Inclusion in the Context of Home-School Relations. Support for Learning 22(4): 165-173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, Marianne. 2002. Women as Headteachers: Striking the Balance. Stoke-on-Trent: Trentham Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, Patricia. 2000. Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connelly, Michael and Jean Clandinin. 1990. Stories of Experience and Narrative Inquiry. Educational Researcher 19(5): 2-14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crenshaw, Kimberlé. 1989. Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory and Antiracist Politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum 14: 538-554.

    Google Scholar 

  • David, Miriam. 2003. Personal and Political: Feminisms, Sociology and Family Lives. Stoke-on-Trent: Trentham Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • David, Miriam, and Diana Woodward (eds.). 1998. Negotiating the Glass Ceiling. London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, Kathy. 2008. Intersectionality as Buzzword: A sociology of science perspective on what makes a feminist theory successful. Feminist Theory 9: 67-85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denzin, Norman. 1989. Interpretive Biography. Newbury Park, California: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denzin, Norman. 2003. Reality and Writing Performance. Qualitative Research 3(2): 243-268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, Francine. 2007. Undoing Gender. Gender and Society 21(1): 106-127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, Carolyn, and Arthur Bochner. 2000. Autoethnography, Personal Narrative, Reflexivity: Researcher as subject. In: Denzin, Norman, and Lincoln, Yvonna (eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research (2nd edition). London: Sage Publications, pp.733-768.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erben, Michael (ed.). 1998. Biography and Education: A Reader. London: The Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairclough, Norman. 2003. Analysing Discourse: Textual analysis for social research. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fine, Michelle. 1994. Working the Hyphens: Reinventing Self and Other in Qualitative Research. In: Denzin, Norman and Lincoln, Yvonna (eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • French, Sally and John Swain. 2006. Telling Stories for a Politics of Hope. Disability and Society 21(5): 383-396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodson, Ivor. 1992. Studying Teachers’ Lives. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodson, Ivor, and Pat Sikes. 2001. Life Histories in Educational Settings: learning from lives. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, Maxine. 1978. Landscapes of Learning. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, Morwenna. 1995. Feminism and the Self: The Web of Identity. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunter, Helen, and Pat Thompson. 2007. Learning about Student Voice. Support for Learning 22(4): 181-188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, Valerie. 1996. Dancing on the Ceiling: A Study of Women Managers in Education. London: Paul Chapman Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatch, J. Amos, and Richard Wisniewski (eds.). 1995. Life History and Narrative, London: The Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • hooks, bell. 2000. Feminist theory: From Margin to Centre. Cambridge, Massachussets: South End Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • hooks, bell. 1991. Narratives of Struggle. In: Mariani, Phil (ed.), Critical Fictions: The Politics of Imaginative Writing. Seattle, Washington: Bay Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • hooks, bell. 1990. Yearning: Race, gender and cultural politics. Boston: South End.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimmel, Michael. 2000. The Gendered Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lavia, Jennifer. 2007. Girls and Special Education in the Caribbean. Support for Learning 22(4): 189-197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leonard. Diana. 2001. A Woman’s Guide to Doctoral Studies. Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyons, Nona. 2007. Narrative Inquiry: What possible future influence on policy or practice? In: Clandinin, Jean (ed.), Handbook of Narrative Inquiry: Mapping a Methodology. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madison, D. Soyini. 1998. Performances, Personal Narratives, and the Politics of Possibility. In: Dailey, Sheron (ed.), The Future of Performance Studies: Visions and Revisions. Annadale, Virginia: National Communication Association, pp. 276-286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maguire, Meg. 1996. In the Prime of their Lives? Older Women in Higher Education. In: Morley, Louis, and Walsh, Val (eds.), Breaking Boundaries: Women in Higher Education. London: Taylor and Francis, pp.24-36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, Gwyneth (ed.). 1983. Voices from the Shadows: Women with Disabilities Speak Out. Ontario, Canada: Women’s Educational Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCall, Leslie. 2005. The Complexity of Intersectionality. Signs 30(3): 1771-1800.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, W. J. Thomas. 1981. On Narrative. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morley, Louise, and Val Walsh (eds.). 1995. Feminist Academics: Creative Agents for Change. London: Taylor and Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morley, Louise and Val Walsh (eds.). 1996. Breaking Boundaries: Women in Higher Education. London: Taylor and Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, Jenny. 1993a. Feminism and Disability. Feminist Review, 43: 57-70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, Jenny. 1993b. Gender and Disability. In: Swain, John; Finkelstein, Vic; French, Sally; Oliver, Michael (eds.), Disabling Barriers – Enabling Environments. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, Jenny. 1996. Encounters with Strangers: Feminism and Disability. London: The Women’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, Amy. 2006. An African-American Woman with Disabilities: The intersection of gender, race and disability. Disability and Society 21(7): 721-734.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, Denis. 1994. Telling it Straight: Issues in assessing narrative research. Educational Psychologist 29(1): 13-21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pillay, Venitha. 2007. Academic Mothers. Stoke-on-Trent: Trentham Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinnegar, Stephinee, and Gary Daynes. 2007. Locating Narrative Inquiry Historically: Thematics in the turn to narrative. In: Clandinin, Jean (ed.), Handbook of Narrative Inquiry: Mapping a Methodology. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plummer, Ken. 1993. Documents of Life: An introduction to the problems and literature of the humanistic method. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reay, Diane. 1998. Class Work: Mothers’ involvement in their children’s primary schooling. London: UCL.Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reay, Diane. 2005. Degrees of Choice: Class, race, gender and higher education. Stoke-on-Trent: Trentham Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rollock, Nicola. 2007. Why Black Girls Don’t Matter: Exploring how race and gender shape academic success in an inner city school. Support for Learning 22(4): 197-203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross, Catherine. 1996. Struggling for Inclusion: Black Women in Professional and Management Education. In: Morley, Louise, and Walsh, Val (eds.), Breaking Boundaries: Women in Higher Education. London: Taylor and Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruth, Jan-Eric, and Peter Öberg. 1992. Expressions of Aggression in the Life Stories of Aged Women. In: Bjorkqvist, Kaj, and Niemela, Pirkko (eds.), Of Mice and Women: Aspects of female aggression, San Diego: Academic Press, pp. 133-146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sagaria, Mary Ann. 2007. Women, Universities and Change: Gender equality in the European Union and the U.S. London: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheldon, Alison. 2004. Women and Disability. In: John Swain, Sally French, Colin Barnes and Carol Thomas (eds.), Disabling Barriers – Enabling Environments. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Somers, Margaret. 1994. The Narrative Construction of Identity: A relational and network approach. Theory and Society 23: 605-649.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, Carol. 1999. Female Forms: Experiencing and understanding disability. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Manen, Max. 1990. Researching Lived Experience: Human science for an action sensitive pedagogy, Albany, New York: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walkerdine, Valerie, Helen Lucey, and June Melody. 2002. Subjectivity and Qualitative Method. In: May, Tim (ed.). Qualitative Research in Action. London: Sage, pp.179-196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiler, Kathleen, and Middleton, Sue (eds.). 1999. Telling Women’s Lives: Narrative Inquiries in the History of Women’s Education, Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witherell, Carol, and Nel Noddings (eds.). 1991. Stories Lives Tell: Narrative and Dialogue in Education. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Barbara Ann Cole.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cole, B.A. Gender, Narratives and Intersectionality: can Personal Experience Approaches to Research Contribute to “Undoing Gender”?. Int Rev Educ 55, 561 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-009-9140-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-009-9140-5

Keywords

Navigation