Skip to main content
Log in

A jump diffusion model for VIX volatility options and futures

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Volatility indices are becoming increasingly popular as a measure of market uncertainty and as a new asset class for developing derivative instruments. Although jumps are widely considered as a salient feature of volatility, their implications for pricing volatility options and futures are not yet fully understood. This paper provides evidence indicating that the time series behaviour of the VIX index is well approximated by a mean reverting logarithmic diffusion with jumps. This process is capable of capturing stylized facts of VIX dynamics such as fast mean-reversion at higher levels, level effects of volatility and large upward movements during times of market stress. Based on the empirical results, we provide closed-form valuation models for European options written on the spot and forward VIX, respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

Notes

  1. Other types of derivatives used for trading/hedging volatility include variance and volatility swaps, which are traded over-the-counter (see Demeterfi et al. 1999; Chriss and Morokoff 1999, and Carr and Lee 2005, for details on the pricing and hedging aspects of variance/volatility swaps).

  2. Data were downloaded from the website of the CBOE. For details on the construction methodology of the VIX see Carr and Wu (2006).

  3. Jumps are defined here as upward or downward discontinuous shifts in the underlying process which occur infrequently. As positive (negative) spikes we characterize upward (downward) discontinuous variations of the underlying which are immediately followed by a downward (upward) discontinuous reversal.

  4. See, among others, Heston (1993), Grünbichler and Longstaff (1996), and Jones (2003) for the case of square root (SR) process, and Detemple and Osakwe (2000) for the case of mean reverting logarithmic (LR) process.

  5. The likelihood ratio test statistic for comparing the nested models is \( LR = - 2 \times \left( {LL_{R} - LL_{U} } \right) \sim \chi^{2} (df) \), where df is the number of parameter restrictions and \( LL_{R} ,\,\,LL_{U} \) are the log-likelihoods of the restricted and unrestricted model, respectively. The 5% level critical values are: \( \chi^{2} (df)\, = \left[ {3.84\,(df = 1),\,5.99(df = 2),\,7.82\,(df = 3)} \right]\). In order to be able to compare the directly the performance of the LRJ and LR processes with that of the SR, SRJ and SRPJ we apply the following change of variable: \( LL_{R} = \sum\nolimits_{t = 1}^{T} {\log (V_{t + \tau } )} + \mathop {\max }\limits_{\Uptheta } \sum\nolimits_{t = 1}^{T} {\log [f\left( {V_{t + \tau } |V_{t} ,\Uptheta } \right)]} \) where \( x_{t + \tau } \equiv \log \left( {{\frac{{V_{t + \tau } }}{{V_{t} }}}} \right) \) and \( g\left( {x_{t + \tau } |V_{t} ,\Uptheta } \right),\,\,\,\,f\left( {V_{t + \tau } |V_{t} ,\Uptheta } \right) \) are the conditional probability density functions of the log-returns and levels of volatility, respectively, and \( \Im_{R} = \mathop {\max }\limits_{\Uptheta } \sum\nolimits_{t = 1}^{T} {\log [g\left( {x_{t + \tau } |V_{t} ,\Uptheta } \right)]} \).

  6. This result implies that the key difference is whether the arithmetic Brownian motion or the Geometric Brownian motion is a better description of the volatility process. To this end, we have also estimated the Ornstein–Uhlenbeck process and it was found to be misspecified. These results are not reported in the paper but are available from the authors upon request. Dotsis et al. (2007) find a similar result. According to the authors, implied volatility follows a Geometric Brownian Process with jumps.

  7. Since the results remain the same, and due to space limitations, we have not include the tables with the Vuong statistic for each subsample. However the tables are available from the authors upon request.

  8. The CBOE site provides details on the calculation of forward VIX.

  9. Das and Sundaram (1999) and Pan (2002) provide similar results in the case of index options, where jumps improve the pricing mainly of short-term options. The pricing of intermediate and long maturity options is mainly improved by the assumption that the volatility of returns is stochastic.

  10. The derivation of Δ is straightforward and requires taking the partial derivative of C(V t ,T  t,K), with respect to V t (see also Proposition 2 in Detemple and Osakwe 2000). The diffusion model’s Δ can be derived by setting λ=0.

  11. This can be verified by replacing the estimated parameters to the conditional variance of the LRJ process, which is given by: \( {\frac{{1 - e^{{ - 2k\left( {T - t} \right)}} }}{k}}\left( {{\frac{\lambda }{{\eta^{2} }}} + {\frac{{\sigma^{2} }}{2}}} \right) \). However, we should note that this is not a general result and holds only for the estimated set of parameters.

  12. The actual importance of jumps in VIX option pricing can only be verified by studying the distributional shape of forward VIX implied by the VIX options. This is a good strand for future research, when enough VIX options data will be available.

  13. See Duffie et al. page 1,351, Eqs. 2.4, 2.5, 2.6.

  14. This characteristic function has also been used for estimating purposes by Bakshi and Cao (2006).

  15. In the case of the LRJ process the conditional density is given by: \( f[\ln V(T)\left| {\ln V(t)} \right.] = {\frac{1}{\pi }}\int_{0}^{\infty } {\text{Re} [e^{ - is\ln V(T)} \phi (\ln V(t),T - t;s)]ds} \).

References

  • Bakshi G, Cao C (2006) Risk-neutral kurtosis, jumps, and option pricing: evidence from most actively traded firms on the CBOE. Working Paper, University of Maryland

  • Bakshi G, Madan D (2000) Spanning and derivative-security valuation. J Financ Econ 55:205–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakshi G, Ju N, Ou-Yang H (2006) Estimation of continuous-time models with an application to equity volatility dynamics. J Financ Econ 82:227–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Black F (1976) The pricing of commodity contracts. J Financ Econ 3:167–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blair BJ, Poon S, Taylor SJ (2001) Forecasting S&P 100 volatility: the incremental information content of implied volatilities and high-frequency index returns. J Econom 105:5–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brenner M, Galai D (1989) New financial instruments for hedging changes in volatility. Financ Anal J 4:61–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brenner M, Galai D (1993) Hedging volatility in foreign currencies. J Deriv 1:53–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brenner M, Ou E, Zhang J (2006) Hedging volatility risk. J Bank Financ 30:811–821

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carr P, Lee R (2005) Robust replication of volatility derivatives working paper, Courant Institute, NYU and University of Chicago

  • Carr P, Wu L (2006) A tale of two indices. J Deriv 13:13–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan KC, Karolyi GA, Longstaff FA, Sanders AB (1992) An empirical comparison of alternative models of the short-term interest rate. J Financ 47:1209–1227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chriss N, Morokoff W (1999) Market risk of variance swaps. RISK 12:55–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Christoffersen P, Jacobs K, Mimouni K (2006) Models for S&P500 dynamics: evidence from realized volatility, daily returns, and option prices. Working Paper, McGill University

  • Corrado CJ, Miller T (2005) The forecast quality of CBOE implied volatility indexes. J Futur Mark 25:339–373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox JC, Ingersoll JE, Ross SA (1981) The relationship between forward prices and futures prices. J Financ Econ 9:321–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox JC, Ingersoll JE, Ross SA (1985) A theory of the term structure of interest rates. Econometrica 53:385–408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daouk H, Guo JQ (2004) Switching asymmetric GARCH and options on a volatility index. J Futur Mark 24:251–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Das RS, Sundaram R (1999) Of smiles and smirks: a term structure perspective. J Financ Quant Anal 34:211–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demeterfi K, Derman E, Kamal M, Zou J (1999) More than you ever wanted to know about volatility swaps. J Deriv 6:9–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Detemple J, Osakwe C (2000) The valuation of volatility options. Eur Financ Rev 4:21–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dotsis G, Psychoyios D, Skiadopoulos G (2007) An empirical comparison of continuous-time models of implied volatility indices. J Bank Financ 31:3584–3603

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duffie D, Pan J, Singleton K (2000) Transform analysis and asset pricing for affine jump-diffusions. Econometrica 68:1343–1376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engle RF, Ng VK (1993) Measuring and testing the impact of news and volatility. J Financ 48:1749–1778

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleming J, Ostdiek B, Whaley RE (1995) Predicting stock market volatility: a new measure. J Futur Mark 15:265–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giot P (2005) Relationships between implied volatility indices and stock index returns. J Portf Manage 31:92–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grünbichler A, Longstaff F (1996) Valuing futures and options on volatility. J Bank Financ 20:985–1001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heston S (1993) A closed-form solution for options with stochastic volatility with applications to bond and currency options. Rev Financ Stud 6:327–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heston S, Nandi S (2000a) Derivatives on volatility: some simple solutions based on observables. Working Paper, Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta

  • Heston S, Nandi S (2000b) A closed-form GARCH option pricing model. Rev Financ Stud 13:585–626

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones C (2003) The dynamics of stochastic volatility: evidence from underlying and options markets. J Econom 116:181–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kou SG (2002) A jump-diffusion model for option pricing. Manage Sci 48:1086–1101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin Y (2007) Pricing VIX futures: evidence from integrated physical and risk-neutral probability measures. J Futur Mark 27:1175–1217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson DB (1990) ARCH models as diffusion approximations. J Econom 45:7–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pan J (2002) The jump-risk premia implicit in options: evidence from an integrated time-series study. J Financ Econ 63:3–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips PCB, Yu J (2005) Jackknifing bond option prices. Rev Financ Stud 18:707–742

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott LO (1987) Option pricing when the variance changes randomly: theory, estimation, and an application. J Financ Quant Anal 22:419–438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sepp A (2008) VIX option pricing in a jump-diffusion model. RISK 21:84–89

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon DP (2003) The Nasdaq volatility index during and after the Bubble. J Deriv 11:9–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singleton KJ (2001) Estimation of affine asset pricing models using the empirical characteristic function. J Econom 102:111–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stein E, Stein J (1991) Stock price distributions with stochastic volatility: an analytic approach. Rev Financ Stud 4:727–752

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vuong Q (1989) Likelihood ratio tests for model selection and nonnested hypotheses. Econometrica 57:307–333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner N, Szimayer A (2004) Local and Spillover shocks in implied market volatility: evidence for the US and Germany. Res Int Bus Financ 18:237–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whaley RE (1993) Derivatives on market volatility: hedging tools long overdue. J Deriv 1:71–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whaley RE (2000) The investor fear gauge. J Portf Manage 26:12–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu Y, Zhang JE (2007) Variance term structure and VIX futures pricing. Int J Theor Appl Financ 10:111–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to George Dotsis.

Appendices

Appendix 1: Derivation of the characteristic functions for the jump-diffusion processes

Duffie et al. (2000) prove that, under technical regularity conditions, the characteristic function for affine diffusion/jump diffusion processes, such as the SRJ and SRPJ, has the following exponential affine formFootnote 13:

$$ \phi (V_{t} ,T - t;s) = \exp \left( {A(T - t;s) + B(T - t;s)V_{t} } \right) $$
(26)

Thus, for the case of the SRJ, \( A(T - t;s) \) and \( B(T - t;s) \) are given byFootnote 14:

$$ A(T - t;s) = a\left( {T - t;s} \right) + z\left( {T - t;s} \right) $$
(27)
$$ a(T - t;s) = - {\frac{2k\theta }{{\sigma^{2} }}} \times ln\left( {{{\left( {k - {\frac{1}{2}}\,i\sigma^{2} s\left( {1 - e^{{ - k\left( {T - t} \right)}} } \right)} \right)} \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{\left( {k - {\frac{1}{2}}i\sigma^{2} s\left( {1 - e^{{ - k\left( {T - t} \right)}} } \right)} \right)} k}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} k}} \right) $$
(28)
$$ z(T - t;s) = {\frac{2\lambda \rho }{{2k - \eta \sigma^{2} }}} \times ln\left( {{{\left( {k - {\frac{1}{2}}\,i\sigma^{2} s + is\left( {{\frac{{\sigma^{2} }}{2}} - {\frac{k}{\eta }}} \right)e^{{ - k\left( {T - t} \right)}} } \right)} \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{\left( {k - {\frac{1}{2}}i\sigma^{2} s + is\left( {{\frac{{\sigma^{2} }}{2}} - {\frac{k}{\eta }}} \right)e^{{ - k\left( {T - t} \right)}} } \right)} {\left( {k - {\frac{isk}{\eta }}} \right)}}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} {\left( {k - {\frac{isk}{\eta }}} \right)}}} \right) $$
(29)

and,

$$ B(T - t;s) = {\frac{{ksie^{{ - k\left( {T - t} \right)}} }}{{k - {\frac{1}{2}}i\sigma^{2} s\left( {1 - e^{{ - k\left( {T - t} \right)}} } \right)}}} $$
(30)

The characteristic function of the LRJ expressed in logarithms is given by:

$$ \phi (lnV_{t} ,T - t;s) = \exp \left( {A(T - t;s) + B(T - t;s)\left( {lnV_{t} } \right)} \right) $$
(31)

where

$$ A(T - t;s) = is \theta (1 - e^{{ - k\left( {T - t} \right)}} ) - s^{2} \sigma^{2} \left( {{\frac{{1 - e^{{ - 2k\left( {T - t} \right)}} }}{4\kappa }}} \right) + {\frac{\lambda }{k}} \times ln\left( {{\frac{{\eta - ise^{{ - k\left( {T - t} \right)}} }}{\eta - is}}} \right) $$
(32)
$$ B(T - t;s) = ise^{{ - k\left( {T - t} \right)}} $$
(33)

Finally, in the case of the SRPJ the coefficients \( A(T - t;s) \) and \( B(T - t;s) \) cannot be solved in closed form and are estimated numerically. So, the conditional characteristic function \( \phi (V_{t} ,T - t;s) = E(e^{{isV_{T} }} \left| {V_{t} } \right.) \) of the SRPJ must satisfy the following Kolmogorov backward differential equation:

$$ {\frac{\partial \phi }{{\partial V_{t} }}} + k(\theta - V_{t} ) + {\frac{1}{2}}{\frac{{\partial^{2} \phi }}{{\partial V_{t}^{2} }}}V_{t} \sigma^{2} - {\frac{\partial \phi }{\partial \tau }} + \lambda V_{t} {\rm E}\left[ {F(V_{t} + y) - F(V_{t} )} \right] = 0 $$
(34)

subject to the boundary condition

$$ F(V_{t} ,T - t = 0;s) = e^{{isV_{t} }} $$
(35)

where \( i = \sqrt { - 1} \). Differentiating the characteristic function given by Eq. (26) yields:

$$ \begin{gathered} \phi_{V} = BF \hfill \\ \phi_{VV} = B^{2} F \hfill \\ \phi_{T - t} = F\left( {A_{T - t} + VB_{T - t} } \right) \hfill \\ \end{gathered} $$
(36)

where the subscripts denote the corresponding partial derivatives. Substituting Eq. (36) into Eq. (34) and rearranging yields:

$$ V_{t} \left( { - kB - B_{T - t} + {\frac{1}{2}}\,\sigma^{2} B^{2} + \lambda {\rm E}\left[ {e^{yB} - 1} \right]} \right) + \left( {k\theta B - A_{T - t} } \right) = 0 $$
(37)

Also, \( {\rm E}\left[ {e^{yB} - 1} \right] = \int_{0}^{ + \infty } {\eta e^{ - \eta y} e^{yB} } dy - 1\,\, = {\frac{\eta }{{\eta - {\rm B}}}} - 1 \), and since \( V_{t} \ne 0 \), the expressions in the parentheses in Eq. (37) must equal zero. Therefore, we obtain the following ordinary differential equations (ODEs)

$$ - kB - B_{T - t} + {\frac{1}{2}}\,\sigma^{2} B^{2} + \lambda \left( {{\frac{\eta }{{\eta - {\rm B}}}} - 1} \right) = 0 $$
(38)
$$ k\theta B - A_{T - t} = 0 $$
(39)

Although the ODEs cannot be solved in a closed form, numerical solutions are possible subject to the boundary conditions \( A(T - t = 0;s) = 0 \), and \( B(T - t = 0;s) = is \).

Appendix 2: Maximum-likelihood estimation

Maximum Likelihood estimation requires the conditional (transition) density function \( f[V(t + \tau )\left| {V(t)} \right.,\Uptheta ] \) (τ > 0) of the process V t , where τ denotes the sampling frequency of observations and Θ is the set of parameters to be estimated. For a sample \( \left\{ {V(t)} \right\}_{t = 1}^{T} \), the log-likelihood function that is maximized is given by: \( LL = \mathop {\max }\limits_{\Uptheta } \sum\nolimits_{t = 1}^{T - \tau } {\log \left( {f\left( {V(t + \tau )} \right)\left| {V(t),\Uptheta } \right.} \right)} \).

In the case of the SR and LR processes, the conditional density is known in closed form (see Dotsis et al. 2007 and Detemple and Osakwe 2000, respectively). The conditional density of the jump diffusion processes is derived from the characteristic function as described below (see also Singleton 2001). Assume that we stand at time t, and τ denotes the sampling frequency of observations. Then, the Fourier inversion of the characteristic function \( \phi (V(t),T - t;s) \) provides the required conditional density function \( f[V(T)\left| {V(t)} \right.] \):

$$ f[V(T)\left| {V(t)} \right.] = {\frac{1}{\pi }}\int_{0}^{\infty } {\text{Re} [e^{ - isV(T)} \phi (V(t),T - t;s)]ds} $$
(40)

where \( \text{Re} \) denotes the real part of complex numbers. For a sample \( \left\{ {V(t)} \right\}_{t = 1}^{T} \), the conditional log-likelihood function to be maximized is given by:

$$ LL = \mathop {\max }\limits_{{\left\{ \Uptheta \right\}}} \sum\limits_{t = 1}^{T} {\log \left( {{\frac{1}{\pi }}\int_{0}^{\infty } {\text{Re} [e^{ - isV(t + \tau )} \phi (V(t),T - t;s)]ds} } \right)} $$
(41)

where Θ = {κ, θ, σ, λ, η} is the set of parameters to be estimated.Footnote 15 The standard errors of the ML estimators are retrieved from the inverse Hessian evaluated at the obtained estimates.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Psychoyios, D., Dotsis, G. & Markellos, R.N. A jump diffusion model for VIX volatility options and futures. Rev Quant Finan Acc 35, 245–269 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11156-009-0153-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11156-009-0153-8

Keywords

JEL Classification

Profiles

  1. George Dotsis