Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Effects of linguistic and affective variables on middle school students’ writing performance in the context of English as a foreign language: an approach using structural equation modeling

  • Published:
Reading and Writing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study examines the relative contributions of linguistic and affective variables to writing performance among students learning English as a foreign language (EFL) in South Korea. In total, 270 middle school students completed four language tests assessing their reading comprehension, grammar knowledge, and descriptive and argumentative writing skills, as well as a questionnaire on their previous writing instruction, motivation (intrinsic value, utility value, and cognitive/linguistic value), writing apprehension, and self-efficacy. Confirmatory factor analysis and structural equation modeling were performed to examine the predictive value of each predictor of EFL writing. The results revealed that reading comprehension is the most influential contributor to writing proficiency, followed by grammar knowledge and previous writing instruction. Although cognitive/linguistic value and apprehension were found to be significant predictors, the remaining three affective variables—intrinsic value, utility value, and self-efficacy—were not. The findings suggest that improving language-specific knowledge is an essential prerequisite for developing the EFL writing performance of middle school students having limited linguistic knowledge.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ai, B. (2015). A study of the EFL writing of Chinese learners: A critical narrative. Changing English,22, 294–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Hammadi, F., & Sidek, H. M. (2015). An analytical framework for analysing secondary EFL writing curriculum: Approaches for writing and preparation for higher education. International Education Studies,8, 59–70. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v8n1p59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, R., Torgerson, C., Beverton, S., Freeman, A., Locke, T., Low, G., et al. (2006). The effect of grammar teaching on writing development. British Educational Research Journal,32, 39–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920500401997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asmari, A. A. (2013). Investigation of writing strategies, writing apprehension, and writing achievement among Saudi EFL-major students. International Education Studies,6, 130–143. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v6n11p130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bae, J. (2011). Teaching process writing for intermediate/advanced learners in South Korea. (Unpublished Master’s Thesis). River Falls, WI: University of Wisconsin.

  • Bandura, A. (1986). The explanatory and predictive scope of self-efficacy theory. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 4, 359–373. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.1986.4.3.359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: W. H. Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barkaoui, K. (2007). Teaching writing to second language learners: Insights from theory and research. TESL Reporter,40, 35–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bazerman, C. (2009). Genre and cognitive development: Beyond writing to learn. In C. Bazerman, A. Bonini, & D. Figueiredo (Eds.), Genre in a changing world (pp. 279–294). West Lafayette, IN: Parlor Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin,107, 238–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhowmik, S. K. (2009). L2 writing pedagogy in EFL contexts: An exploration of salient practices in teaching and learning. Journal of Asia TEFL,6, 351–373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carson, J. E., Carrell, P. L., Silberstein, S., Kroll, B., & Kuehn, P. A. (1990). Reading-writing relationships in first and second language. TESOL Quarterly,24, 245–266. https://doi.org/10.2307/3586901.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casanave, C. P. (2009). Training for writing or training for reality? Challenges facing EFL writing teachers and students in language teacher education programs. In R. M. Manchon (Ed.), Writing in foreign language contexts: Learning, teaching, and research (pp. 256–277). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, Y. S. (2002). Factors associated with foreign language writing anxiety. Foreign Language Annals,35, 647–656. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2002.tb01903.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, Y. S. (2004). A measure of second language writing anxiety: Scale development and preliminary validation. Journal of Second Language Writing,13, 313–335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2004.07.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox, K. E., & Guthrie, J. T. (2001). Motivational and cognitive contributions to students’ amount of reading. Contemporary Educational Psychology,26, 116–131. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1044.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daly, J. A., & Miller, M. D. (1975a). The empirical development of an instrument to measure writing apprehension. Research in the Teaching of English,9, 242–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daly, J. A., & Miller, M. D. (1975b). Further studies on writing apprehension: SAT scores, success expectations, willingness to take advanced courses and sex differences. Research in the Teaching of English,9, 250–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durik, A. M., Vida, M., & Eccles, J. S. (2006). Task values and ability beliefs as predictors of high school literacy choices: A developmental analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology,98, 382–393. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.98.2.382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eccles, J. S. (2005). Subjective task value and the Eccles et al. model of achievement-related choices. In A. J. Elliot & J. S. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 105–121). New York, NY: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Educational Testing Service. (2014). TOEFL iBT®test: Independent writing rubrics. Princeton, NJ: Author. Retrieved from www.ets.org/s/toefl/pdf/toefl_writing_rubrics.pdf.

  • Erkan, D. Y., & Saban, Aİ. (2011). Writing performance relative to writing apprehension, self-efficacy in writing, and attitudes towards writing: A correlational study in Turkish tertiary-level EFL. Asian EFL Journal,13, 164–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faigley, L., Daly, J. A., & Witte, S. P. (1981). The role of writing apprehension in writing performance and competence. The Journal of Educational Research,75, 16–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.1981.10885348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgerald, J., & Shanahan, T. (2000). Reading and writing relations and their development. Educational Psychologist,35, 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3501_5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • George, D., & Mallery, M. (2011). SPSS for windows step by step: A simple guide and reference 18.0 update (11th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, S. (2018). A writer(s)-within-community model of writing. In C. Bazerman, V. Berninger, D. Brandt, S. Graham, J. Langer, S. Murphy, P. Matsuda, D. Rowe, & M. Schleppegrell (Eds.), The lifespan development of writing (pp. 271–325). Urbana, IL: National Council of English.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, S., Berninger, V., & Fan, W. (2007). The structural relationship between writing attitude and writing achievement in first and third grade students. Contemporary Educational Psychology,32, 516–536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2007.01.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, S., & Hebert, M. (2011). Writing to read: A meta-analysis of the impact of writing and writing instruction on reading. Harvard Educational Review,81, 710–744. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.81.4.t2k0m13756113566.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, S., & Perin, D. (2007a). Writing next-effective strategies to improve writing of adolescents in middle and high schools. New York, NY: Carnegie Corporation of New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, S., & Perin, D. (2007b). A meta-analysis of writing instruction for adolescent students. Journal of Educational Psychology,99, 445–476. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.99.3.445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harklau, L. (2002). The role of writing in classroom second language acquisition. Journal of Second Language Writing,11, 329–350. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(02)00091-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harklau, L. (2011). Commentary: Adolescent L2 writing research as an emerging field. Journal of Second Language Writing,3, 227–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2011.05.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoyle, R. H., & Panter, A. T. (1995). Writing about structural equation models. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equational modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 158–176). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, Y. H. (2011). Does EFL students’ grammatical ability account for writing ability? A case study. Chia-Nan Annual Bulletin,37, 500–515.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hulleman, C. S., Durik, A. M., Schweigert, S. B., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2008). Task values, achievement goals, and interest: An integrative analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology,100, 398–416. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.100.2.398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hulleman, C. S., Godes, O., Hendricks, B. L., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2010). Enhancing interest and performance with a utility value intervention. Journal of Educational Psychology,102, 880–895. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kırmızı, Ö., & Kırmızı, G. D. (2015). An investigation of L2 learners’ writing self-efficacy, writing anxiety and its causes at higher education in Turkey. International Journal of Higher Education,4, 57–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klapper, J., & Rees, J. (2003). Reviewing the case for explicit grammar instruction in the university foreign language learning context. Language Teaching Research,7, 285–314. https://doi.org/10.1191/1362168803lr128oa.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S. Y. (2005). Facilitating and inhibiting factors in English as a foreign language writing performance: A model testing with structural equation modeling. Language Learning,55, 335–374. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0023-8333.2005.00306.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S. Y., & Krashen, S. (1997). Writing apprehension in Chinese as a first language. Review of Applied Linguistics,115–116, 27–35. https://doi.org/10.1075/itl.115-116.02lee.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J., & Schallert, D. L. (2014). Literate actions, reading attitudes, and reading achievement: Interconnections across languages for adolescent learners of English in Korea. The Modern Language Journal, 98, 553–573. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12088.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J., & Schallert, D. L. (2016). Exploring the reading-writing connection: A year-long classroom-based experimental study of middle school students developing literacy in a new language. Reading Research Quarterly, 51, 143–164. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leki, I. (1999). Techniques for reducing second language writing anxiety. In D. J. Young (Ed.), Affect in foreign language and second language learning (pp. 64–88). New York, NY: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leki, I. (2001). Material, educational, and ideological challenges of teaching EFL writing at the turn of the century. International Journal of English Studies,1, 197–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, M. C., Cheng, Y. S., & Lin, S. H. (2014). Development of a research article writing motivation inventory. TESOL Quarterly,48, 389–400. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, M.-C., Cheng, Y.-S., Lin, S.-H., & Hsieh, P.-J. (2015). The role of research-article writing motivation and self-regulatory strategies in explaining research-article abstract writing ability. Perceptual and Motor Skills,120, 397–415. https://doi.org/10.2466/50.PMS.120v17x9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manchón, R. M., & Haan, P. D. (2008). Writing in foreign language contexts: An introduction. Journal of Second Language Writing,17, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2007.08.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCleary, B. (1995). Grammar making a comeback in composition teaching. Composition Chronicle: Newsletter for Writing Teachers,8, 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merkle, E. C., You, D., & Preacher, K. J. (2016). Testing nonnested structural equation models. Psychological Methods,21, 151–163. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000038.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mills, N., Pajares, F., & Herron, C. (2007). Self-efficacy of college intermediate French students: Relation to achievement and motivation. Language Learning,57, 417–442. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2007.00421.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohamed, M., & Zouaoui, M. (2014). EFL writing hindrances and challenges: The case of second year students of English at Djillali Liabes. Journal of Educational and Social Research,4, 149–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mol, S. E., & Bus, A. G. (2011). To read or not to read: A meta-analysis of print exposure from infancy to early adulthood. Psychological Bulletin,137, 267–296. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021890.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortega, L. (2009). Studying writing across EFL contexts: Looking back and moving forward. In R. M. Manchon (Ed.), Writing in foreign language contexts: Learning, teaching, and research (pp. 232–255). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pajares, F. (2003). Self-efficacy beliefs, motivation, and achievement in writing: A review of the literature. Reading & Writing Quarterly,19, 139–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573560308222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pajares, F., & Johnson, M. J. (1994). Confidence and competence in writing: The role of self-efficacy, outcome expectancy, and apprehension. Research in the teaching of English,28, 313–331.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pajares, F., & Valiante, G. (1999). Grade level and gender differences in the writing self-beliefs of middle school students. Contemporary Educational Psychology,24, 390–405. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1998.0995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pajares, F., Valiante, G., & Cheong, Y. F. (2007). Writing self-efficacy and its relation to gender, writing motivation and writing competence: A developmental perspective. In P. Boscolo & S. Hidi (Eds.), Writing and motivation (Vol. 19, pp. 141–159). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichelt, M. (2005). English-language writing instruction in Poland. Journal of Second Language Writing,14, 215–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2005.10.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reichelt, M., Lefkowitz, N., Rinnert, C., & Schultz, J. M. (2012). Key issues in foreign language writing. Foreign Language Annals,45, 22–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2012.01166.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rinnert, C., & Kobayashi, H. (2009). Situated writing practices in foreign language settings: The role of previous experience and instruction. In R. M. Manchon (Ed.), Writing in foreign language contexts: Learning, teaching, and research (pp. 23–48). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, L. A., & Graham, S. (2008). A meta-analysis of single subject design writing intervention research. Journal of Educational Psychology,100, 879–906. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.100.4.879.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarkhoush, H. (2013). Relationship among Iranian EFL learners’ self-efficacy in writing, attitude towards writing, writing apprehension and writing performance. Journal of Language Teaching and Research,4, 1126–1132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sasaki, M. (2000). Toward an empirical model of EFL writing processes: An exploratory study. Journal of Second Language Writing,9, 259–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(00)00028-X.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sasaki, M., & Hirose, K. (1996). Explanatory variables for EFL students’ expository writing. Language Learning,46, 137–168. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1996.tb00643.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schiefele, U. (1991). Interest, learning, and motivation. Educational Psychologist,26, 299–323. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2603&4_5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoonen, R., Gelderen, A. V., Glopper, K. D., Hulstijn, J., Simis, A., Snellings, P., et al. (2003). First language and second language writing: The role of linguistic knowledge, speed of processing, and metacognitive knowledge. Language Learning,53, 165–202. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9922.00213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schreiber, J. B., Nora, A., Stage, F. K., Barlow, E. A., & King, J. (2006). Reporting structural equation modeling and confirmatory factor analysis results: A review. The Journal of Educational Research,99, 323–338. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOER.99.6.323-338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schunk, D. (1984). Self-efficacy perspective on achievement behavior. Educational Psychologist,19, 48–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461528409529281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shen, Y. (2012). Reconsidering English grammar teaching for improving non-English majors’ English writing ability. English Language Teaching,5, 74–78. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v5n11p74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, T. K. R., & Rajalingam, S. K. (2012). The relationship of writing apprehension level and self-efficacy beliefs on writing proficiency level among pre-university students. English Language Teaching,5, 42–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stotsky, S. (1982). The role of writing in developmental reading. Journal of Reading,25, 330–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swain, M. (2000). The output hypothesis and beyond: Mediating acquisition through collaborative dialogue. In J. P. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (Vol. 97, pp. 97–114). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tierney, R. J., & Pearson, P. D. (1983). Toward a composing model of reading. Language Arts,60, 568–580.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tran, L. T. (2007). Learners’ motivation and identity in the Vietnamese EFL writing classroom. English Teaching: Practice and Critique,6, 151–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trapman, M., Van Gelderen, A., Van Steensel, R., Van Schooten, E., & Hulstijn, J. (2014). Linguistic knowledge, fluency and meta-cognitive knowledge as components of reading comprehension in adolescent low achievers: differences between monolinguals and bilinguals. Journal of Research in Reading,37, 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2012.01539.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Troia, G. A., Shankland, R. K., & Wolbers, K. A. (2012). Motivation research in writing: Theoretical and empirical considerations. Reading & Writing Quarterly,28, 5–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2012.632729.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, G. H., & Wang, S. D. (2014). Explicit grammar instruction for EFL writing and editing: An exploratory study at a Korean university. Linguistics and Literature Studies,2, 65–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weaver, C. (1996). Teaching grammar in context. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker, T. A. (2012). Using the modification index and standardized expected parameter change for model modification. The Journal of Experimental Education,80, 26–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2010.531299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2000). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology,25, 68–81. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J. (2004). Teaching writing in second and foreign language classrooms. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J. (2012). The potential role(s) of writing in second language development. Journal of Second Language Writing,21, 321–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2012.09.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wyse, D. (2001). Grammar for writing? A critical review of empirical evidence. British Journal of Educational Studies,49, 411–427. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8527.t01-1-00185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xing, M., Wang, J., & Spencer, K. (2008). Raising students’ awareness of cross-cultural contrastive rhetoric in English writing via an e-learning course. Language Learning & Technology,12, 71–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Y., & Guo, H. (2012). A study of English writing and domain-specific motivation and self-efficacy of Chinese EFL learners. Journal of Pan-Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics,16, 101–121.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Ministry of Education of the Republic of Korea and the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2016S1A5A2A02925539).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of English Education, College of Education, Gyeongsang National University, 501 Jinju-daero, Jinju, 52828, South Korea

    Juhee Lee

Authors
  1. Juhee Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Juhee Lee.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

See Table 5.

Table 5 Please select a number indicating how much you agree with the statement. 1 = Strongly disagree; 2 = Somewhat disagree; 3 = Neutral; 4 = Somewhat agree; 5 = Strongly agree
Full size table

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lee, J. Effects of linguistic and affective variables on middle school students’ writing performance in the context of English as a foreign language: an approach using structural equation modeling. Read Writ 33, 1235–1262 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-019-10007-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-019-10007-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation