Skip to main content
Log in

Learning to read in Arabic: the long and winding road

  • Published:
Reading and Writing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We examined the relative contribution of visual abilities, accessibility of letter names, and phonological awareness, to text reading speed and accuracy of Arabic in first, third, and fifth grades. The results revealed that for all levels of skill, phonological awareness contributes significantly to reading accuracy, to the same degree. For reading speed, letter naming speed is crucial in first and fifth grade, whereas phonological awareness is crucial in third grade. These patterns differ from those found of readers of other scripts and are interpreted in the context of diglossia, and the visual aspects of the Arabic orthography.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abdelhadi, S., Ibrahim, R., & Eviatar, Z. (2011). Perceptual load in the reading of Arabic. Writing Systems Research, 3(2), 117–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asaad, H., & Eviatar, Z. (2013). The effects of orthographic complexity and diglossia on letter identification (naming or retrieval) in Arabic: Developmental changes. Writing Systems Research (in press).

  • Azzam, R. (1984). Orthography and reading of the Arabic language. In J. Aaron & R. M. Joshi (Eds.), Reading and writing disorders in different orthographic systems (pp. 1–29). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baluch, B., & Besner, D. (1991). Visual word recognition: Evidence for strategic control of lexical and nonlexical routines in oral reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17(4), 644–652.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentin, S., & Leshem, H. (1993). On the interaction between phonological awareness and reading acquisition: It’s a two-way street. Annals of Dyslexia, 43, 125–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berman, R. A. (1978). Modern Hebrew structure. Tel Aviv, Israel: University Publishing.

  • Daniels, P. T. (1990). Fundamentals of grammatology. Journal of the American Oriental Society, 110(4), 727–731.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehri, L. C., Nunes, S. R., Willows, D. M., Schuster, B. V., Yaghoub-Zadeh, Z., & Shanahan, T. (2001). Phonemic awareness instruction helps children learn to read: Evidence from the National Reading Panel’s meta-analysis. Reading Research Quarterly, 36, 250–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eviatar, Z., & Ibrahim, R. (2000). Bilingual is as bilingual does: Metalinguistic abilities of Arabic-speaking children. Applied Psycholinguistics, 21(4), 451–471.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eviatar, Z., & Ibrahim, R. (2004). Morphological and orthographic effects on hemispheric processing of nonwords: A Cross-linguistic comparison. Reading and Writing, 17, 691–705.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eviatar, Z., & Ibrahim, R. (2012). Multilingualism among Israeli Arabs and the neuropsychology of reading in different languages. In M. Leikin, Y. Tobin, & M. Schwartz (Eds.), Current issues in bilingualism: Cognitive and socio-linguistic perspectives (pp. 57–74). Heidelberg: Springer-Dordrech.

  • Eviatar, Z., Ibrahim, R., & Ganayim, D. (2004). Orthography and the hemispheres: Visual and linguistic aspects of letter processing. Neuropsychology, 18(1), 174–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frost, R. (1994). Prelexical and postlexical strategies in reading: Evidence from a deep and a shallow orthography. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20(1), 116–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frost, R. (2012). Towards a universal model of reading. Behavioral and Brain Science, 35(5), 263–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, M. F. (1996). Test of visual-perception skills (n-m) revised (TVPS-R). Novato, CA: Academic Therapy Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geva, E., Wade-Woolley, L., & Shany, M. (1993). The concurrent development of spelling and decoding in two different orthographies. Journal of Literacy Research, 25, 383–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ibrahim, R. (2009). The cognitive basis of diglossia in Arabic: Evidence from a repetition priming study within and between languages. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 12, 95–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ibrahim, R., & Eviatar, Z. (2012). The contribution of the two hemispheres to lexical decision in different languages. Behavioral and Brain Functions, 8(3). doi:10.1186/1744-9081-8-3.

  • Ibrahim, R., Eviatar, Z., & Aharon- Peretz, J. A. (2007). Metalinguistic awareness and reading performance: A cross language comparison. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 36, 297–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kang, H., & Simpson, G. B. (2001). Local strategic control of information in visual word recognition. Memory and Cognition, 29(4), 648–655.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, L., & Frost, R. (1992). The reading process is different for different orthographies: The orthographic depth hypothesis. Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning. In R. Frost & L. Katz (Eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning, advances in psychology, vol. 94 (pp. 67–84). Oxford, England: North-Holland.

  • PISA. (2009). http://stats.oecd.org/PISA2009Profiles.

  • Saiegh-Haddad, E. (2003). Linguistic distance and initial reading acquisition: The case of Arabic diglossia. Applied Psycholinguistics, 24, 115–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saiegh-Haddad, E. (2004). The impact of phonemic and lexical distance on the phonological analysis of words and pseudo-words in diglossic context. Applied Psychlinguistics, 25, 495–512.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saiegh-Haddad, E. (2005). Correlates of reading fluency in Arabic: Diglossic and orthographic factors. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 18, 559–582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saiegh-Haddad, E. (2007a). Linguistic constraints on children’s ability to isolate phonemes in diglossic Arabic. Applied Psycholinguistics, 28, 607–625.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saiegh-Haddad, E. (2007b). The effect of exposure to Modern Standard Arabic on the acquisition of basic language and literacy skills in Arabic. Manuscript submitted for publication.

  • Saiegh-Haddad, E. (2008). On the challenges posed by diglossia to the acquisition of basic reading processes in Arabic. Language and Literacy, 1, 101–126 (Hebrew).

    Google Scholar 

  • Shany, M., Lachman, D., Shalem, Z., Bahat, A., & Zeiger, T. (2006). “Aleph-Taph” a test for the diagnosis of reading and writing disabilities, based on National Israeli norms. Tel Aviv: Yesod Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Share, D. L. (1995). Phonological recoding and self-teaching: Sine que non of reading acquisition. Cognition, 55, 151–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shatil, E., & Share, D. L. (2003). Cognitive antecedents of early reading ability: A test of modularity hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 86, 1–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sprugevica, I., Paunina, I., & Hoien, T. (2006). Early phonological skill as a predictor of reading acquisition in Latvian. In R. M. Joshi & P. G. Aaron (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 291–301). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tabossi, P., & Laghi, L. (1992). Semantic priming in the pronunciation of words in two writing systems: Italian and English. Memory and Cognition, 20(3), 303–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Ministry of Education and Culture. (1992). The report on the results of the national survey of reading comprehension for third grades. Jerusalem: The national department for learning programs at the Ministry of education.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zohar Eviatar.

Appendices

Appendix A: Transliterations and translations of the phonological tests lists

Segmenting words into phonemes

Spoken Arabic

Gloss

Dam

Blood

Rama:

Throw

Nese

Forget

‘enab

Grapes

Bare:d

Mail

Jandab

Grasshopper

Farfu:r

Young

Mandale:na

Clementine

Blending phonemes into words

Spoken Arabic

Gloss

Dura

Corn

Seta

Rain

Same:r

(name)

‘asfu:r

Bird

Barme:l

Barrel

Mafate:ḥ

Keys

Za’tar

Thyme

‘ankabu:t

Spider

Deletion syllable task

Instructions: I will say a word, then I will take away part of it, and you will tell me what is left

Gloss

Say

Delete

Spread

našar

Na

(name)

Mas’u:d

Mas

Wounded

Majru:ḥ

Maj

Train

qeṭa:r

qi

Replete

Šaba:n

Aan

Squirrel

Senja:b

Jab

Tree

šajara

Ja

Judge

ḥakam

Ka

Window

šubak

Ba

Ship

Safe:ne

Fee

Squeezers

Ma’a:ser

Aa

Walled

Masu:ra

Soo

Fatty

Dasam

Sa

Magic

seḥer

He

Deletion phoneme task

Instructions: I will say a word, then I will take away part of it, and you will tell me what is left

Gloss

Say

Delete

Sleeve

Kum

K

Camel

Jamal

J

Dog

Kaleb

K

Body

Jesem

J

Throw

Kab

K

(Name)

Same:r

S

(Name)

Sa:jed

J

Ceremony

ḥafel

H

Exhalation

Zafe:r

F

Elephant

Fe:l

L

Hot

ḥam

M

Day

Nha:r

H

Holiday

‘e:d

A

Empty

Fa:de

F

Cucumber

Xya:ra

X

Bells

Jra:s

J

Appendix B: Reading tests

Text for first grade

figure h

Text for third grade

figure i

Text for fifth grade

figure j

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Asaad, H., Eviatar, Z. Learning to read in Arabic: the long and winding road. Read Writ 27, 649–664 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-013-9469-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-013-9469-9

Keywords

Navigation