Skip to main content
Log in

Coding, sorting and sifting of qualitative data analysis: debates and discussion

  • Published:
Quality & Quantity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A variety of prominent objectivist and positivist philosophical standpoints frequently attempt to ignore the extraordinary set of strengths and potentiality that qualitative data analysis (QDA) has in the social science research arena. Specifically, the notion that QDA involves non-scientific style of data collection and data analysis which comprises with coding, sorting and sifting of qualitative data, is frequently referred by many quantitative researchers to challenge or weaken the robustness and reliability of qualitative research. This paper aims to address this debate by scrutinising the nature and quality of the methods of qualitative research. By highlighting the philosophical stance of QDA, this paper tackles the criticisms of qualitative research, and also critically evaluates different approaches and perspectives of QDA. The paper finally goes on to justify that, QDA with its significantly broader attributes and extensive research capacity, in fact, involves more than the coding, sorting and sifting of qualitative data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Altheide, D.L., Johnson, J.M.: Criteria for assessing interpretive validity in qualitative research. In: Denzin, N.K., Lincoln, Y.S. (eds.) Handbook of Qualitative Research. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, D.: The Political Anatomy of the Body: Medical Knowledge in Britain in the Twentieth Century. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, P., Coffey, A., Delamont, S.: Key Themes in Qualitative Research: Continuities and Change. Altamira Press, Walnut Creek, CA (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  • Baxter, P., Jack, S.: Qualitative case study methodology: study design and implementation for novice researchers. Qual. Report. 13(4), 544–559 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bazeley, P.: Integrating analyses in mixed methods research. J. Mixed Methods Res. 3(3), 203–207 (2009)

  • Becker, H.S., Geer, B.: Participant observation and interviewing: a comparison. Hum. Organ. 16(3), 28–32 (1957)

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, P.H.: Common pitfalls in published grounded theory research. Qual. Health Res. 3(2), 254–260 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blaikie, N.: Approaches to Social Enquiry. Polity Press, Cambridge (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  • Boeije, H.R.: Analysis in Qualitative Research. Sage Publications, London (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdon, S.: The integration of qualitative data analysis software in research strategies: resistance and possibilities. Forum Qual. Soc. Res. 3(2), article 11 (2002)

  • Bowling, A.: Research Methods in Health. Open University Press, Buckingham (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, D.: Going digital and staying qualitative: some alternative strategies for digitizing the qualitative research process. Forum Qual. Soc. Res. 3(2), article 12 (2002)

  • Bryman, A.: Quantity and Quality in Social Research. Routledge, New York (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryman, A.: Integrating quantitative and qualitative research: how is it done? Qual. Res. 6(1), 97–113 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryman, A.: Barriers to integrating quantitative and qualitative research. J. Mixed Methods Res. 1(1), 8–22 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, D.R.: An uneasy alliance: combining qualitative and quantitative research methods. Health Educ. Behav. 19(1), 117–135 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, W.B.: Informal Sociology: A Casual Introduction to Sociological Thinking. Random House, New York (1963)

    Google Scholar 

  • Cicourel, A.: The Social Organization of Juvenile Justice. Wiley, New York (1968)

    Google Scholar 

  • Dean, J.P., Whyte, W.F.: How do you know if the informant is telling the truth? Hum. Organ. 17(2), 34–38 (1958)

    Google Scholar 

  • Denzin, N.K., Lincoln, Y.S. (eds.): The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research, 3rd edn. Sage Publications, London (2005)

  • Denzin, N.K., Lincoln, Y.S.: The Landscape of Qualitative Research: Theories and Issues. Sage Publications, London (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutscher, I.: What We Say/What We Do: Sentiments and Acts. Scott Foresman, Illinois (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, P., Mahoney, J.O., Vincent, S. (eds.): Explaining Management and Organisation Using Critical Realism: A Practical Guide. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2014)

  • Gadamer, H.: Philosophical hermeneutics. University of California Press, California (1976)

  • Gibbs, G.R.: Qualitative Data Analysis: Exploration with NVivo. Open University Press, Buckingham (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B.G.: Theoretical Sensitivity: Advances in the Methodology of Grounded Theory. Sociology Press, California (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, J., Patterson, J.A.: Response to Tracy’s under the big tent: establishing universal criteria for evaluation qualitative research. Qual. Inq. 19(9), 689–695 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gubrium, J.: Out of Control: Family Therapy and Domestic Disorder. Sage Publications, London (1992)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gubrium, J., Buckholdt, D.: Describing Care: Image and Practice in Rehabilitation. Gunn and Hain, Cambridge (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammersley, M.: Ethnography: potential, practice and problem. In: Qualitative Research Seminar Series, National Centre for Research Methods, University of Southampton, sponsored by ESRC—Economic and Social Research Council, UK (2005)

  • Holge-Hazelton, B.: The internet: a new field for qualitative inquiry. Forum Qual. Soc. Res. 3(2), article 15 (2002)

  • Jick, T.D.: Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: triangulation in action. Adm. Sci. Q. 24(4), 602–611 (1979)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelle, U.: Computer-Aided Qualitative Data Analysis: Theory. Methods and Practice. Sage Publications, London (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelle, U.: Sociological explanations between micro and macro and the integration of qualitative and quantitative methods. Hist. Soc. Res. 30(1), 95–117 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirk, J., Miller, M.L.: Reliability and Validity in Qualitative Research. Sage Publications, London (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, R.M., Fielding, M.: Qualitative data analysis: Representations of a technology: A comment on Coffey, Holbrook and Atkinson. Sociol. Res. Online 1(4). http://www.socresonline.org.uk/1/4/lf.html (1996). Accessed 20 Nov 2013

  • Layder, D.: Understanding Social Theory. Sage Publications, London (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  • Loseke, D.R., Cahil, S.E.: Publishing Qualitative Manuscripts: Lessons Learned. Sage Publications, London (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  • Mack, N., Woodsong, C., MacQueen, K.M., Guest, G., Namey, E.: Qualitative Research Methods: A Data Collector’s Field Guide. Family Health International, North Carolina (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, C., Rossman, G.B.: Designing Qualitative Research, 4th edn. Sage Publications, London (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, E.: The Woman in the Body: A Cultural Analysis of Reproduction. Open University Press, Buckingham (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, J.: Qualitative Researching, 2nd edn. Sage Publications, London (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell, J.A.: Qualitative Research Design: An Interactive Approach. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  • McCall, G., Simmons, J.L.: Issues in Participant Observation. Addison Wesley, Reading (1969)

  • Moseley, L.G., Mead, D.M., Murphy, F.: Applying lexical and semantic analysis to the exploration of free-text data. Nurse Res. 4(3), 46–68 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patton, M.Q.: Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods, 3rd edn. Sage Publications, London (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  • Patton, M.Q., Cochran, M.: A Guide to Using: Qualitative Research Methodology. Medicins Sans Frontieres, UK (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, T., Richards, L.: Using Computers in Qualitative Method: Computational Paradigms and Research Processes. Sage Publications, London (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ring, N., Jepson, R., Ritchie, K.: Methods of synthesising qualitative research studies for health technology assessment. Int. J. Technol. Assess. Healthc. 27(4), 384–390 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, K.A., Wilson, R.W.: ICT and the research process: issues around the compatibility of technology with qualitative data analysis. Forum Qual. Soc. Res. 3(2), article 23 (2002)

  • Sacks, H.: On the analyzability of stories by children. In: Turner, R. (ed.) Ethnomethodology. Penguin, Harmondsworth (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  • Sale, J.E.M., Lohfeld, L.H., Brazil, K.: Revisiting the quantitative–qualitative debate: implications for mixed-methods research. Qual. Quant. 36(1), 43–53 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandelowski, M.: Combining qualitative and quantitative sampling, data collection, and analysis techniques in mixed-method studies. Res. Nurs. Health. 23(3), 246–255 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savin-Baden, M., Major, C.: Qualitative Research: The Essential Guide to Theory and Practice. Routledge, London (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  • Schutt, R.K.: Investigating the Social World: The Process and Practice of Research, 7th edn. Sage Publications, Boston (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwandt, T.A.: Three epistemological stances for qualitative inquiry. In: Denzin, N.K., Lincoln, Y.S. (eds.) Handbook of Qualitative Research, 3rd edn. Sage Publications, London (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • Seale, C., Silverman, D.: Ensuring rigour in qualitative research. Eur. J. Public Health. 7(4), 379–384 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seale, C.: Quality in qualitative research. Qual. Inq. 5(4), 465–478 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sears, K.: What is qualitative synthesis. Evid. Based Nurs. 15(4), 101–102 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, D.: Doing Qualitative Research: A Practical Handbook, 2nd edn. Sage Publications, London (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, D.: Qualitative Research, 3rd edn. Sage Publications, London (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  • Srinivas, R.: Marketing strategy and pricing. Iterative Path website. http://iterativepath.wordpress.com/2013/04/03/not-everything-that-counts-can-be-counted-but-did-you-try (2013). Accessed 16 November 2013

  • Steckler, A., McLeroy, K.R., Goodman, R.M., Bird, S.T., McCormick, L.: Toward integration qualitative and quantitative methods: an introduction. Health Educ. Quart. 19(1), 1–8 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Streubert, H.J., Carpenter, D.R. (eds.): Qualitative Research in Nursing: Advancing the Humanist Imperative. Lippincott, Philadelphia (1995)

  • Tashakkori, A., Teddlie, C.: Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Sage Publications, California (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, J., Harden, A.: Methods for the thematic systematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Med. Res. Methodol. 8(45), 1–10 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  • Tracy, S.J.: Qualitative quality: eight “big tent” criteria for excellent qualitative research. Qual. Inq. 16(10), 837–851 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webb, C.: Analysing qualitative data: computerised and other approaches. J. Adv. Nurs. 29(2), 323–330 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webb, J.: Organizations. Self-identities and the new economy. Sociology 38(4), 719–738 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welsh, E.: Dealing with data: using nvivo in the qualitative data analysis process. Forum Qual. Soc. Res. 3(2), article 26 (2002)

  • Yin, R.K.: Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 3rd edn. Sage Publications, California (2009)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Muhammad Faisol Chowdhury.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chowdhury, M.F. Coding, sorting and sifting of qualitative data analysis: debates and discussion. Qual Quant 49, 1135–1143 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-014-0039-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-014-0039-2

Keywords

Navigation