Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Empowering local communities: decentralization, empowerment and community driven development

  • Published:
Quality & Quantity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Governance and development practitioners discourse continues to embrace community participation and community empowerment as an elementary means of building local capacity towards improving quality of life, poverty reduction, development and change at local level. This article illustrates a review of decentralization initiative of local government system after announcement of devolution plan in Pakistan and appraises its participatory methods to ascertain how far they have improved the process of community development at local level. This article also measure the impact of community empowerment on the sustainability of community driven projects implemented under decentralization initiatives through community based organizations called Citizen Community Board’s (CCB’s). The results acknowledge the human development and improvement in community empowerment and sustainability of projects at local but yet sense of community and shared benefits to be translated for rural communities. The fundamental goal of decentralization seems to be elusive as only power was transferred at local level, whereby there is less support for community capacity building, community access to resources, still there is elite holding over the electoral process. It is argued that community development initiatives in Pakistan require continues support from local government to boost local rural economies. Likewise, community-local government participatory development strategies can attain strong local ownership and empowerment among rural communities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. CCB: A Citizen Community Board (CCB) is a voluntary organization based on the community in which people live. According to LGO, local people form a CCB with a chairman, a secretary, and general members. A registered CCB makes a proposal for development projects and contribute up to 20 % of total project cost. The local government funds 80 % of the total project cost

References

  • Agrawal, A., Gupta, K.: Decentralization and participation: the governance of common pool resources in Nepal’s Terai. World Dev. 33, 1101–1114 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alderman, H.: Do local officials know something we don’t? Decentralization of targeted transfers in Albania. J. Public Econ. 83, 375–404 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alsop, R., Heinsohn, N.: Measuring Empowerment in Practice: Structuring Analysis and Framing Indicators. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 3510. Washington (2005)

  • Andersson, K.P., Gibson, C.C., Lehoucq, F.: The politics of decentralized natural resource governance. Political Sci. Politics 37, 421–426 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, C.W., de Vries, M.S.: High expectations, varying outcomes: decentralization and participation in Brazil, Japan, Russia and Sweden. Int. Rev. Adm. Sci. 73, 424–451 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anjum, Z.: New local government system: a step towards community empowerment. Pak. Dev. Rev. 40, 845–867 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  • Awortwi, N.: An unbreakable path? A comparative study of decentralization and local government development trajectories in Ghana and Uganda. Int. Rev. Adm. Sci. 77, 347–377 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bardhan, P.: Decentralization of governance and development decentralization of governance and development. J. Econ. Perspect. 16, 185–205 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennet, L.: Using empowerment and social inclusion for pro-poor growth: a theory of social change. Background paper for the Social Development Sector Strategy. World Bank, Washington (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  • Blair, H.: Participation and accountability at the periphery: democratic local governance in six countries. World Dev. 28, 21–39 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowles, S., Gintis, H.: Social capital and community governance*. Econ. J. 112, F419–F436 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, A., Hughes, J., Hewstone, M., et al.: Social capital as a mechanism for building a sustainable society in Northern Ireland. Community Dev. J. 45, 22–38 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheema, A., Mohmand, S.: Decentralisation and inequality in Pakistan: bridging the gap that divides? In: Saqib, M.A. (ed.) Devolution and Governance: Reforms in Pakistan. Oxford University Press, Karachi (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  • Corbett, J., Keller, P.: Empowerment and participatory geographic information and multimedia systems: observations from two communities in Indonesia. Info. Technol. Int. Dev. 2, 25–44 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dale, A., Newman, L.: Social capital: a necessary and sufficient condition for sustainable community development? Community Dev. J. 45, 5–21 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dongier, P., Domelen, J.V., Ostrom, E., et al.: Community driven development. PRSP Sourcebook. World Bank, Washington (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  • DTCE. DTCE Monthly Progress Report- As on 30th September 2010. Devolution trust of Community Empowerment, Islamabad (2010)

  • Duncana, S., Goodwina, M.: Local economic policies: local regeneration or political mobilization. Local Gov. Stud. 11, 75–96 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox, W., Meyer, I.H.: Public Administration Dictionary. Juta, Cape Town (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, H.: Four different approaches to community participation. Community Dev. J. 40, 286–300 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • George, M.G., Costel, D.T.: Capital Programming and Budgeting: Comparative Local Government Perspectives. Encyclopedia of Public Administration and Public Policy, 2nd edn, pp. 270–278. Taylor & Francis, London (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutberlet, J.: Solidarity economy and recycling co-ops: micro-credit to alleviate poverty. Dev. Pract. 19, 737–751 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hankla, C., Downs, W.: Decentralisation, governance and the structure of local political institutions: lessons for reform? Local Gov. Stud. 36, 759–783 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayami, Y., Godo, Y.: Development Economics: From the Poverty to the Wealth of Nations. Oxford University Press, Agosto (2005)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hjorth, P.: Knowledge development and management for urban poverty alleviation. Habitat Int. 27, 381–392 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kakumba, U.: Local government citizen participation and rural development: reflections on Uganda’s decentralization system. Int. Rev. Adm. Sci. 77, 171–186 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khwaja, A.I.: Is increasing community participation always a good thing? J. Eur. Econ. Assoc. 2, 427–436 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kurosaki, T.: Determinants of collective action under devolution initiatives: the case of citizen community boards in Pakistan. Pak. Dev. Rev. 44, 253–270 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurosaki, T.: Community and economic development in Pakistan: the case of Citizen Community Boards in Hafizabad and a Japanese perspectives. Pak. Dev. Rev. 45, 575–585 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  • Laverack, G.: An identification and interpretation of the organizational aspects of community empowerment. Community Dev. J. 36, 134–145 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laverack, G.: Using a ‘domains’ approach to build community empowerment. Community Dev. J. 41, 4–12 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mansuri, G., Rao, V.: Evaluating Community-Based and Community-Driven Development: A Critical Review of the Evidence. Development Research Group, World Bank, Washington (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  • Michels, A., De Graaf, L.: Examining citizen participation: local participatory policy making and democracy. Local Gov. Stud. 36, 477–491 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narayan, D., Petesch, P.: Voices of the Poor: From Many Lands. Oxford University Press, New York (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  • Nrb, NRB.: The Local Government Plan 2000. http://www.nrb.gov.pk/publications/LG_Final_Plan_2000.pdf. (2000)

  • Nrb, NRB.: The Local Government System 2001. http://www.nrb.gov.pk/local_government/default.asp. (2001)

  • Patrick, W.O., Scott, F.: Decentralization in Developing Countries. Encyclopedia of Public Administration and Public Policy, 2nd edn, pp. 498–503. Taylor & Francis, London (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  • Paul, O.: Pakistan: devolution and community empowerment. South Asian J. 65–84 (2010)

  • Power, G., Khatun, S., Debeljak, K.: Citizen access to information: capturing the evidence across Zambia, Ghana and Kenya. Handbook of Global Media Research. Wiley Blackwell, London (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  • Roche, B.: New Directions in Community-Based Research. Wellesley Institute, Toronto (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  • Rondinelli, D.: Decentralization and Development. In: Haque, A.S., Zafarullah, H. (eds.) International Development Governance. Taylor and Francis, London (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  • Rondinelli, D.A.: Government decentralization in comparative perspective: theory and practice in developing countries. Int. Rev. Adm. Sci. 47, 133–145 (1980)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saegaert, S.: Building civic capacity in urban neighborhoods: an empirically grounded anatomy. J. Urb. Aff. 28, 275–294 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salmon, A.: Walking the talk: how participatory interview methods can democratize research. Qual. Health Res. 17, 982–993 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schulz, A., Israel, B.A., Zimmerman, MAea: Empowerment as a multi-level construct: perceived control at the individual, organizational and community levels. Health Educ. Res. 10, 309–327 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sidorenko, A.: Empowerment & participation in policy action on ageing. UN Program on Ageing paper presented at the international design for all conference, Rovaniemi, Finland, 2006

  • Speer, P.W., Jackson, C.B., Peterson, N.A.: The relationship between social cohesion and empowerment: support and new implications for theory. Health Educ. Behav. 28, 716–732 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terry, F.B., Marcela, T., Redburn, F.S.: Economic Development, Citizen Participation and. Encyclopedia of Public Administration and Public Policy, 2nd edn, pp. 569–576. Taylor & Francis, London (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallerstein N.: What is the evidence on effectiveness of empowerment to improve health? http://www.euro.who.int/Document/E88086.pdf. (2006)

  • Zimmerman, M.A.: Empowerment theory: psychological, organizational, and community levels of analysis. In: Rappaport, J., Seidman, E. (eds.) Handbook of Community Psychology. Plenum Press, New York (2000)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Management Sciences, COMSATS Institute of Information Technology, Kamra Road, Attock, 43600, Pakistan

    Muhammad Shakil Ahmad

  2. Faculty of Management and Human Resource Development, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 , Skudai, Johor, Malaysia

    Noraini Bt. Abu Talib

Authors
  1. Muhammad Shakil Ahmad
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Noraini Bt. Abu Talib
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Muhammad Shakil Ahmad.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ahmad, M.S., Abu Talib, N.B. Empowering local communities: decentralization, empowerment and community driven development. Qual Quant 49, 827–838 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-014-0025-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-014-0025-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation