Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

More than Typewriters, More than Adding Machines: Integrating Information Technology into Political Research

  • Published:
Quality and Quantity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It has long been recognized that information technology (IT) can facilitate (or even permit) forms of empirical analysis unimagined just a generation ago. However, political scientists have generally experimented with only a narrow range of the possibilities the new technologies offer – easier writing, editing and communications processes, and more sophisticated statistical analyses. While these have undoubtedly increased productivity and rigor within the discipline, other IT applications have largely gone unnoticed. The growing pool of Computer-Aided Qualitative Data Analysis Software (CAQDAS) technologies presents researchers with new ways to conceptualize, perceive, and communicate their research, with the potential of revolutionizing social science research. This paper offers an overview of those IT and CAQDAS solutions with the most potential to facilitate political inquiry, and offers a series of practical steps by which technological novices might begin to apply the new technologies in their research. In closing, we discuss the benefits and perils of using such technology, and suggest the ways by which IT might strengthen current research techniques. The appendix catalogues several dozen applications for data acquisition, organization, processing, analysis and presentation, with contact and pricing information.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • M. Alexa C. Zuell (1999) A review of Software for text Analysis ZUMA Mannheim

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Alexa C. Zuell (2000) ArticleTitle“Text Analysis Software: Commonalities, Difference and Limitations: The Results of a Review” Quality and Quantity 34 IssueID3 299–321 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1004740203542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • C. Ansell (2000) Community Embeddedness and Collaborative Governance. Social Movement Analysis: The Network Perspective Ross Priory, Loch Lemond Scotland

    Google Scholar 

  • Bampton R., Cowton C.J. (2002). The E-Interview. Forum: Qualitative Social Research. 3:2 May.

  • BBC (2003). Dyke to open up BBC archive, British Broadcasting Corporation.

  • Benoit K., Laver M. (2003). “Estimating Irish Party Positions Using Computer Wordscoring: The 2002 Elections”. Irish Political Studies 17(2).

  • R. Bolden J. Moscarola (2000) ArticleTitle“Bridging the Quantitative-Qualitative Divide: The Lexical Approach to Textual Data Analysis” Social Science Computer Review 18 IssueID4 450–460

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Bond J. Bond et al. (2003) ArticleTitle“Integrated Data for Events Analysis (IDEA): An Event Typology for Automated Events Data Development” Journal of Peace Research 40 IssueID6 733–745 Occurrence Handle10.1177/00223433030406009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D. Bond J.C. Jenkins (1997) ArticleTitle“Mapping Mass Political Conflict and Civil Society: Issues and Prospects for the Automated Development of Event Data” Journal of Conflict Resolution 41 IssueID4 533–579

    Google Scholar 

  • Bong S.A. (2002). Debunking Myths in Qualitative Data Analysis. Forum: Qualitative Social Research. 3:2 May.

  • Bourdon S. (2002). The Integration of Qualitative Data Analysis Software in Research Strategies: Resistances and Possibilities Forum: Qualitative Social Research. 3:2 May.

  • J. Brace-Govan (2002) ArticleTitle“Qualitative Data for a Quantitative Audience: An Evaluative Framework for Analysis” Qualitative Research Journal 2 IssueID1 47

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown D. (2002). Going Digital and Staying Qualitative: Some Alternative Strategies for Digitizing the Qualitative Research Process Forum: Qualitative Social Research. 3:2 May.

  • P.C. Burnley W. Evans et al. (2002) ArticleTitle“A Comparison of Approaches and Instruments for Evaluating a Geological Sciences Research Experiences Program” Journal of Geoscience Education 50 IssueID1 15–24

    Google Scholar 

  • O.V. Burton (Eds) (2002) Computing in the social sciences and humanities University of Illinois Press Urbana, IL

    Google Scholar 

  • CACI International (2001). CACI Awarded “Mega 2” Contract With Department of Justice. Arlington, VA, CACI International, Inc: 2.

  • Carmichael P. (2002). Extensible Markup Language and Qualitative Data Analysis. Forum: Qualitative Social Research. 3:2 May.

  • Carvajal D. (2002). “The Artisan’s Tools. Critical Issues When Teaching and Learning CAQDAS”. Forum: Qualitative Social Research 3(2).

  • Clarke P. (2000). The Internet as a medium for qualitative research. 2nd Annual Conference on World-Wide Web Applications, Centre for Research in Web-based Applications, Rand Afrikaans University, South Africa, Department of Information Studies.

  • A. Coffey P. Atkinson (1996) Making sense of qualitative data: complementary research strategies Sage Publications Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  • Coffey A., Holbrook B. et al. (1996). Qualitative Data Analysis: Technologies and Representations, Sociological Research Online. 1.

  • Corney M., de Vel O. et al. (2002). Gender-Preferential Text Mining of E-mail Discourse. 18th Annual Computer Security Applications Conference, Applied Computer Security Associates, Las Vegas, NV.

  • Corti L. (2000). Progress and Problems of Preserving and Providing Access to Qualitative Data for Social Research: The International Picture of an Emerging Culture. Forum: Qualitative Social Research. 1:3 December.

  • Corti L., Day A. et al. (2000). Confidentiality and Informed Consent: Issues for Consideration in the Preservation of and Provision of Access to Qualitative Data Archives. Forum: Qualitative Social Research. 1:3 December.

  • Crawford H.K., Leybourne M.L. et al. (2000). How we Ensured Rigour in a Multi-site, Multi-discipline, Multi-researcher Study. Forum: Qualitative Social Research. 1:1 January.

  • J.W. Creswell (1994) Research Design: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches Sage Publishers London

    Google Scholar 

  • J.S. DuBowe (1982) ArticleTitle“Automated Litigation Support: A Litigator’s Primer” ABA Journal 68 IssueID9 1118–1123

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Eagles R.S. Katz et al. (2000) ArticleTitle“Controversies in political redistricting: GIS, geography, and society: editorial” Political Geography 19 IssueID2 135–139 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0962-6298(99)00044-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emery P. (2003). Capturing Terrorists and Criminals: Speeding Up the Intelligence Gathering Process. McLean, VA, ZyLAB Technologies: 16.

  • Emery P. (2003). Document and Records Management: Understanding The Differences and Embracing Integration. McLean, VA, ZyLAB Technologies: 4.

  • D.C. Engelbart (1962) Augmenting Human Intellect: A Conceptual Framework Stanford Research Institute Menlo Park, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Everton S.F. (2004). A Guide for the Visually Perplexed: Visually Representing Social Networks. Stanford, CA.

  • Fielding N. (1993). “Analysing qualitative data by computer”. Social Research Update(1): 7.

  • Fielding N. (2002). Automating the Ineffable: Qualitative software and the meaning of qualitative research. Qualitative Research in Action. T. May. Sage. London, pp.161–178.

  • N. Fielding R. Lee (2002) ArticleTitle“New Patterns in the Adoption and Use of Qualitative Software” Field Methods 14 IssueID2 197–216 Occurrence Handle10.1177/1525822X02014002005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • N. Fielding M. Lee R. (1991) Using Computers in Qualitative Research Sage London

    Google Scholar 

  • N. Fielding R.M. Lee (1998) Computer Analysis and Qualitative Research Sage London

    Google Scholar 

  • B.I. Finel K.M. Lord (Eds) (2002) Power and Conflict in the Age of Transparency Palgrave Macmillan New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher D. (2003). Social Networks for End Users. Irvine, CA: 20.

  • Ford, K., Oberski et al., I. (2000). “Computer-Aided Qualitative Analysis of Interview Data: Some Recommendations for Collaborative Working”. The Qualitative Report. 4:3–4.

  • R.D. Fricker SuffixJr. M. Schonlau (2002) ArticleTitle“Advantages and Disadvantages of Internet Research Surveys: Evidence from the Literature” Field Methods 14 IssueID4 347 Occurrence Handle10.1177/152582202237725

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • G. Gibbs (2002) Qualitative data analysis: explorations with NVivo Open University Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs G.R., Friese S. et al. (2002). The Use of New Technology in Qualitative Research. Introduction to Issue 3(2) of FQS Forum: Qualitative Social Research. 3:2 May.

  • W. Heesterman (1993) ArticleTitle“Text Retrieval Software: AskSam, Idealist, Isys, Zyindex” Law Technology Journal 3 IssueID1 7

    Google Scholar 

  • K. Hill J. Hughes (1997) ArticleTitle“Computer-Mediated Political Communication: The USENET and Political Communities” Political Communication 14 3–27 Occurrence Handle10.1080/105846097199515

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hochheiser H. (2003). Interactive Graphical Querying of Time Series and Linear Sequence Data Sets. Department of Computer Science University of Maryland, College Park, MD, p. 313.

  • L. Introna H. Nissenbaum (2000) ArticleTitle“Shaping the Web: Why the Politics of Search Engines Matter” The Information Society 16 IssueID3 169–186 Occurrence Handle10.1080/01972240050133634

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • S. Jones (1999) Doing Internet research: critical issues and methods for examining the Net Sage Publications Thousand Oaks, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • D.J. Juhnke (2003) ArticleTitle“Electronic Discovery in 2010” Information Management Journal 37 IssueID6 34–40

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Keeva (1990) ArticleTitle“Why Litigation Support?: The Sky Is the Limit” ABA Journal 76 IssueID5 76

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerlin B. (2000). Qualitative research in the United States Forum: Qualitative Social Research. 1:1 January.

  • Kimmelman M. (2003). Webs Connecting the Power Brokers, the Money and, Ultimately, the World. New York Times, New York, p. 2.

  • G. King W. Lowe (2003) ArticleTitle“An Automated Information Extraction Tool for International Conflict Data with Performance as Good as Human Coders: A Rare Events Evaluation Design” International Organization 57 617–642

    Google Scholar 

  • G. King R.O. Keohane S. Verba (1994) Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research Princeton University Press Princeton, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • S.C. Kinnevy G. Enosh (2002) ArticleTitle“Problems and promises in the study of virtual communities” Journal of Technology in Human Services 19 IssueID2–3 119–134 Occurrence Handle10.1300/J017v19n02_09

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M. Koppel S. Argamon et al. (2002) ArticleTitle“Automatically Categorizing Written Texts by Author Gender” Literary and Linguistic Computing 17 IssueID4 401–412 Occurrence Handle10.1093/llc/17.4.401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. Krause (2003) “What a Concept!” ABA Journal 89 IssueID9 60

    Google Scholar 

  • T.M. La Porte C.C. Demchak et al. (2001) ArticleTitle“Webbing Governance: Global Trends across National- Level Public Agencies” Communications of the ACM 44 IssueID1 63–67 Occurrence Handle10.1145/357489.357509

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laver M., Benoit K. (2002). “Locating TDs in Policy Spaces: Wordscoring Dáil Speeches”. Irish Political Studies 17(1).

  • M. Laver K. Benoit et al. (2003) ArticleTitle“Extracting Policy Positions from Political Texts Using Words as Data” American Political Science Review 97 IssueID2 311–331 Occurrence Handle10.1017/S0003055403000698

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M. Laver J. Garry (2000) ArticleTitle“Estimating policy positions from political texts” American Journal of Political Science 44 IssueID3 619–634

    Google Scholar 

  • R.M. Lee L. Esterhuizen (2000) ArticleTitle“Computer Software and Qualitative Analysis: Trends, Issues and Resources” International Journal of Social Research Methodology 3 IssueID3 231–243 Occurrence Handle10.1080/13645570050083715

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • L. Leydesdorff P. Wouters (1996) ArticleTitle“Quantitative Measuring or Qualitative Understanding: Is it possible to bridge the divide in STS?” EASST Review 15 IssueID3 5

    Google Scholar 

  • D. List (2001) Know Your Audience: A Practical Guide to Media Research Original Books NZ

    Google Scholar 

  • LOC (2002). Preserving Our Digital Heritage: Plan for the National Digital Information Infrastructure and Preservation Program. US Library of Congress, Washington, DC, p. 74.

  • C. Mann F. Stewart (2000) Internet communication and qualitative research: a handbook for researching online Sage Publications Thousand Oaks, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • H. Marshall (2002) ArticleTitle“What Do We Do When We Code Data?” Qualitative Research Journal 2 IssueID1 56–70

    Google Scholar 

  • W.S. McLaughlin (2003) ArticleTitle“The use of the Internet for Political Action by Non-state Dissident actors in the Middle East” First Monday 8 IssueID11 44

    Google Scholar 

  • S.B. Merriam (Eds) (2002) Qualitative Research in Practice: Examples for Discussion and Analysis Jossey-Bass San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Min (2003) Mark Lombardi: Global Networks The Drawing Center New York, 2

    Google Scholar 

  • Morse J.M., Barrett M. et al. (2002). “Verification Strategies for Establishing Reliability and Validity in Qualitative Research”. International Journal of Qualitative Methods 1(2).

  • J. Nagler (1995) ArticleTitle“Coding Style and Good Computing Practices” PS: Political Science and Politics 6 IssueID28 488–493

    Google Scholar 

  • InstitutionalAuthorNameNRC (2003) Preparing for the Revolution: Information Technology and the Future of the Research University National Acadamies Press Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • C. O’Muircheartaigh P. Campanelli (1998) ArticleTitle“The Relative Impact of Interviewer Effects and Sample Design Effects on Survey Precision” Statistics in Society 161 IssueID1 63–77 Occurrence Handle10.1111/1467-985X.00090

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker D.R. (1996). Emerging Uses of Computer Technology in Qualitative Research. Annual Conference of the Association of Louisiana Evaluators, Association of Louisiana Evaluators, New Orleans, LA.

  • PoliticsOnline (2004). 2004 Special Report on the Year of Internet and Politics, PoliticsOnline, Inc.

  • L. Raber (1997) ArticleTitle“Toxics Data: How Much is too Much?” Chemical and Engineering News 75 IssueID22 26

    Google Scholar 

  • C.W. Roberts (1997) Text Analysis for the Social Sciences: Methods for Drawing Statistical Inferences from Texts and Transcripts Lawrence Erlbaum Mahwah, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • C.W. Roberts (2000) ArticleTitle“A Conceptual Framework for Quantitative Text Analysis” Quality and Quantity 34 IssueID3 259–274 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1004780007748

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M. Schonlau J. Fricker D. Ronald et al. (2001) Conducting Research Surveys via E-mail and the Web RAND Santa Monica, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Scott (2000) Social network analysis: A handbook Sage London

    Google Scholar 

  • B.A. Smith S. Hesse-Biber (1996) ArticleTitle“Users’ Experiences with Qualitative Data Analysis Software: Neither Frankenstein’s Monster Nor Muse” Social Science Computer Review 14 IssueID4 423–432

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon D.J. (2001). “Conducting Web-Based Surveys”. ERIC Digest.

  • B.A. Starkey E.L. Blake (2001) ArticleTitle“Simulation in International Relations Education” Simulation and Gaming 32 IssueID4 537–551

    Google Scholar 

  • T. Stephen (1999) ArticleTitle“Computer-Assisted Concept Analysis of HCR’s First 25 Years” Human Communication Research 25 IssueID4 498–513

    Google Scholar 

  • Stockdale A. (2002). Tools for Digital Audio Recording in Qualitative Research, Social Research Update. Autumn 2002.

  • D.Z. Sui P.J. Hugill (2002) ArticleTitle“A GIS-Based Spatial Analysis on Neighborhood Effects and Voter turn-out:-A Case Study in College Station, Texas” Political Geography 21 IssueID2 159–173 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0962-6298(01)00054-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M. Thelwall (2001) ArticleTitle“The Responsiveness of Search Engine Indexes” Cybermetrics 5 IssueID1 8

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas G.D. (2000). The Machine-Assisted Creation of Historical Event Data Sets: A Practical Guide. International Studies Association Annual Meeting, Los Angeles, CA.

  • Thompson R. (2002). Reporting the Results of Computer-assisted Analysis of Qualitative Research Data. Forum: Qualitative Social Research. 2003.

  • S. Wasserman K. Faust (1994) Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications Cambridge University Press New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Y. Zhang (1999) ArticleTitle“Scholarly use of Internet-Based Electronic Resources: A Survey Report” Library Trends 47 IssueID4 746–770

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Government and Politics, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, 20742, U.S.A

    Ken Cousins & Wayne Mcintosh

Authors
  1. Ken Cousins
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Wayne Mcintosh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ken Cousins.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cousins, K., Mcintosh, W. More than Typewriters, More than Adding Machines: Integrating Information Technology into Political Research. Qual Quant 39, 581–614 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-005-3149-z

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-005-3149-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation