Abstract
Terrorism is becoming a weapon of ever increasing importance to reach certain ends, given the potential of mass destruction available to leading international powers and the rise of one superpower dominating the international system. In most cases terrorism is driven by an ideology comprising a world view with supreme values. Since these values are absolutely true to believers, they have to be preferred to everything, so that terrorists are required to sacrifice not only the lives of others but also their own. It is therefore difficult to prevent this kind of terrorism. But the threatening damages can be mitigated by economic, technological and political decentralization. In the long run, it is even more important to win the spiritual fight. This can be done by starting from the fact that believers in ideologies whose supreme values are conflicting, can only live together peacefully, if they accept that each individual has the right to choose his or her own belief. A corresponding education has to prevent fundamentalist instruction and to inculcate the basic rules of a free society.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aristegui, G. de. (2004). El islamismo contra el islam. Les claves para entender el terrorismo yihadista. Ediciones B.S.A., Barcelona, Madrid, Mexico, Montevideo.
Bernholz, P. (1985). The International Game of Power. Berlin and New York: Mouton Publishers.
Bernholz, P. (1995). Supreme values, tolerance and the constitution of liberty. In: G. Radnitzky, & H. Bouillon (Eds.), Values and the Social Order (Vol., 1, pp. 235–250). Values and society. Aldershot, Brookfield, USA and Hong Kong: Avebury.
Bernholz, P. (1997). Ideology, sects, state and totalitarianism: a general theory. Forum für osteuropäische Ideen- und Zeitgeschichte (Vol. 1 (1), pp. 51–84). Also In: H. Maier, & M. Schaefer (Eds.), Totalitarismus und politische Religionen. Konzepte des Diktaturvergleichs, (Vol. II, pp. 271–298). Ferdinand Schöningh, Paderborn, München, Wien, Zürich.
Bernholz, P. (2001). Ideocracy and totalitarianism. A formal analysis incorporating ideology. Public Choice, 108, 33–75.
Bernholz, P. (2004). Supreme values as the basis for terror. European Journal of Political Economy, 20, 317–333.
Fishburn, P.C. (1974). Lexicographic orders, utilities and decision rules: a survey. Management Science, 20, 1442–1471.
Frey, B.S., & Luechinger, S. (2004). Decentralization as a disincentive for terror. European Journal of Political Economy, 20, 509–515.
Hoffman, B. (1998). Inside terrorism. New York: Columbia University Press.
Hubback, A. (1997). Apocalypse when? The Global Threat of Religious Cults. Conflict Studies, 300, June.
Ibn, K. (1967). Translated from the Arabic. In: F. Rosenthal (Ed.), The Muqaddimah. An Introduction to History (Vol. 3, 2nd ed.). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Krueger A.B., & Maleckova, J. (2003). Education, poverty, and terrorism: is there a causal connection? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 17, 119–144.
Morgan, E.S. (1958). The Puritan Dilemma. The story of John Winthrop. New York: Harper Collins.
Peters, R. (1996): Jihad in classical and modern Islam. Princeton: Markus Wiener Publishers.
Qutb, S. (2001). In the shade of the Quran. Vol. IV: Surah 5. Translated and edited by Salahi, Adil and Shamis, Arthur. Markfield (Leicester): The Islamic Foundation.
Rapoport, D.C. (1984). Fear and trembling: terrorism in three religious traditions. American Political Science Review, 78, 658–677.
Sobel, L.A. (Ed.) (1975). Political terrorism. Oxford: Clio Press.
Stayer, J.M. (1976). Anabaptists and the sword. Lawrence (Kansas): Colorado Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bernholz, P. International political system, supreme values and terrorism. Public Choice 128, 221–231 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-006-9050-z
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-006-9050-z