Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Learning at the bottom of the pyramid: Constraints, comparability and policy in developing countries

  • Trends/ Cases
  • Published:
PROSPECTS Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

United Nations development goals have consistently placed a high priority on the quality of education—and of learning. This has led to substantive increases in international development assistance to education, and also to broader attention, worldwide, to the importance of children’s learning. Yet, such goals are mainly normative: they tend to be averages across nations, with relatively limited attention to variations within countries. This review provides an analysis of the scientific tensions in understanding learning among poor and marginalized populations: those at the bottom of the pyramid. While international agencies, such as UNESCO and OECD, often invoke these populations as the “target” of their investments and assessments, serious debates continue around the empirical science involved in both research and policy. The present analysis concludes that the UN post-2015 development goals must take into account the critical need to focus on learning among the poor in order to adequately address social and economic inequalities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arnett, J. J. (2008). The neglected 95%: Why American psychology needs to become less American. American Psychologist, 63(7), 602–614.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Babson, A. (2010). The place of English in expanding repertoires of linguistic code, identification and aspiration among recent high school graduates in Limpopo Province, South Africa. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.

  • Banerjee, A. V., & Duflo, E. (2011). Poor economics: A radical rethinking of the way to fight poverty. New York: Public Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett, L., & Garcia, O. (2011). Additive schooling in subtractive times: Bilingual education and Dominican immigrant youth in the Heights. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benavot, A., & Tanner, E. (2007). The growth of national learning assessments in the world, 1995–2006. Background paper prepared for EFA Global Monitoring Report 2008. Paris: UNESCO.

  • Benedict, M., & Hoag, J. (2004). Seating location in large lectures: Are seating preferences or location related to course performance? The Journal of Economic Education, 35(3), 215–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharjea, S., Wadhwa, W., & R. Banerji, R. (2011). Inside primary schools: A study of teaching and learning in rural India. New Delhi: ASER. http://img.asercentre.org/docs/Publications/Inside_Primary_School/Report/tl_study_print_ready_version_oct_7_2011.pdf.

  • Blackledge, A., & Creese, A. (2010). Multilingualism: A critical perspective. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloem, S. (2013). PISA in low and middle income countries. OECD education working papers, no. 93. Paris: OECD.

  • Braun, H., & Kanjee, A. (2006). Using assessment to improve education in developing nations. In J. E. Cohen, D. E. Bloom, & M. B. Malin (Eds.), Educating all children: A global agenda (pp. 303–353). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brookings Institution (2013). Toward universal learning: Recommendations from the Learning Metrics Task Force. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Center for Universal Education. http://www.brookings.edu/~/media/Research/Files/Reports/2013/09/learning%20metrics%20task%20force%20universal%20learning/LTMF%20RecommendationsReportfinalweb.pdf.

  • Bruns, B., Filmer, D., & Patrinos, H. A. (2011). Making schools work: New evidence on accountability reforms. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Buchmann, C., & Hannum, E. (2001). Education and stratification in developing countries: A review of theories and research. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 77–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castillo, N. M., & Wagner, D. A. (2014). Gold standard? The use of randomized controlled trials for international educational policy. Comparative Education Review, 58(1), 166–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole, M., Gay, J., Glick, J., & Sharp, D. (1971). The cultural context of learning and thinking. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cortina, R. (Ed.) (2014). The education of indigenous citizens in Latin America. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • DBE [Department of Basic Education], South Africa (2013). Report on the Annual National Assessment of 2013: Grades 1 to 6 & 9. Pretoria: DBE. http://www.education.gov.za/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=Aiw7HW8ccic%3D&tabid=36.

  • Dudley-Marling, C., & Gurn, A. (Eds.) (2010). The myth of the normal curve. New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engel, L. C., & Feuer, M. J. (2014). Five myths about international large-scale assessments. Quality Assurance in Education, 22, 18–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • GEFI [Global Education First Initiative] (2014). Global Education First Initiative: An initiative of the United Nations Secretary-General. http://www.globaleducationfirst.org/files/GEFI_Brochure_ENG.pdf.

  • Gilmore, A. (2005). The impact of PIRLS (2001) and TIMSS (2003) in low- and middle-income countries: An evaluation of the value of World Bank support for international surveys of reading literacy (PIRLS) and mathematics and science (TIMSS). New Zealand: IEA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gove, A., & Wetterberg, A. (2011). The early grade reading assessment: Applications and interventions to improve basic literacy. Research Triangle Park, NC: RTI.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Greaney, V., & Kellaghan, T. (1996). Monitoring the learning outcomes of education systems. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gurn, A. (2010). Conclusion: Re/visioning the ideological imagination in (special) education. In C. Dudley-Marling & A. Gurn (Eds.), The myth of the normal curve (pp. 241–256). New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harper, S. R. (2012). Black male student success in higher education: A report from the National Black Male College Achievement Study. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania, Center for the Study of Race and Equity in Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinrich, J., Heine, S., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). The weirdest people in the world? Behavioral Brain Science, 33(2–3), 85–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • ILI [International Literacy Institute] (2002). Towards guidelines for the improvement of literacy assessment in developing countries: Conceptual dimensions based on the LAP project. Philadelphia: ILI/UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kagan, J., Moss, H. A., & Sigel, I. E. (1963). Psychological significance of styles of conceptualization. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 28(4), 73–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korinek, K., & Punpuing, S. (2012). The effect of household and community on school attrition: An analysis of Thai youth. Comparative Education Review, 56(3), 474–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kremer, M., & Holla, A. (2009). Improving education in the developing world: What have we learned from randomized evaluations? Annual Review of Economics, 1, 513–542.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, J. (2003). U.S. and Chinese cultural beliefs about learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 258–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu, Y., & Treiman, D. J. (2011). Migration, remittances and educational stratification among Blacks in Apartheid and Post-Apartheid South Africa. Social Forces, 89(4), 1119–1143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, H.-D., & Benavot, A. (Eds.) (2013). PISA, power and policy: The emergence of global educational governance. Oxford: Symposium Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moll, L. C., Amanti, C., Neff, D., & Gonzalez, N. (1992). Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms. Theory Into Practice, 31(2), 132–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2014). PISA for development. Paris: OECD. http://www.oecd.org/pisa/aboutpisa/pisafordevelopment.htm.

  • Pigozzi, M. J., Carrol, B., Hayden, J., & Ndaruhutse, S. (2014). Fragile and conflict-affected situations. In D. A. Wagner (Ed.), Learning and education in developing countries: Research and policy for the post-2015 UN development goals (pp. 58–73). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piper, B., & Korda, M. (2010). Early grade reading assessment (EGRA) plus: Liberia. Program evaluation report: Prepared for USAID/Liberia. Research Triangle Park, NC: RTI International.

  • Prahalad, C. K. (2006). The fortune at the bottom of the pyramid: Eradicating poverty through profits. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Wharton School Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saito, M. (2011). Gender equality in education: Looking beyond parity. Paris: UNESCO IIEP. http://www.sacmeq.org/sites/default/files/sacmeq/publications/7_1_1_5_mioko_saito_eng_version_2012_02_15.pdf.

  • Sjoberg, S. (2007). PISA and ‘real life challenges’: Mission impossible? In S. T. Hopmann, G. Brinek, & M. Retzl (Eds.), PISA according to PISA: Does PISA keep what it promises? (pp. 203–224). Vienna: LIT Verlag. http://folk.uio.no/sveinsj/Sjoberg-PISA-book-2007.pdf.

  • Stevenson, H. W., & Stigler, J. W. (1982). The learning gap: Why our schools are failing and what we can learn from Japanese and Chinese education. New York: Summit.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO (2003). Education for All Global Monitoring Report: Gender and Education for All—The leap to equality. Paris: UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO (2010). Education for All Global Monitoring Report: Reaching the marginalized. Paris: UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (2000). United Nations Millennium Declaration. Resolution adopted by the General Assembly. United Nations A/RES/55/2. http://www.un.org/millennium/declaration/ares552e.htm.

  • Wagner, D. A. (1983). Rediscovering ‘rote’: Some cognitive and pedagogical preliminaries. In S. Irvine & J. W. Berry (Eds.), Human assessment and cultural factors (pp. 179–190). New York: Plenum.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, D. A. (1993). Literacy, culture and development: Becoming literate in Morocco. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, D. A. (2010). Quality of education, comparability, and assessment choice in developing countries. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 40(6), 741–760.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, D. A. (2011a). What happened to literacy? Historical and conceptual perspectives on literacy in UNESCO. International Journal of Educational Development, 31, 319–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, D. A. (2011b). Smaller, quicker, cheaper: Improving learning assessments in developing countries. Paris & Washington, DC: UNESCO IIEP and EFA Fast Track Initiative of Global Partnership for Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, D. A. (Ed.) (2014). Learning and education in developing countries: Research and policy for the post-2015 UN Development Goals. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, D. A., Murphy, K. M., & de Korne, H. (2012). Learning first: A research agenda for improving learning in low-income countries. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witkin, H. A., Moore, C. A., Goodenough, D. R., & Cox, P. W. (1977). Field-dependent and field-independent cognitive styles and their educational implications. Review of Educational Research, 47, 1–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Graduate School of Education, University of Pennsylvania, 3700 Walnut Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19104-6216, USA

    Daniel A. Wagner & Nathan M. Castillo

Authors
  1. Daniel A. Wagner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Nathan M. Castillo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel A. Wagner.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wagner, D.A., Castillo, N.M. Learning at the bottom of the pyramid: Constraints, comparability and policy in developing countries. Prospects 44, 627–638 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-014-9328-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-014-9328-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation