Abstract
Classic studies on local demographic consequences of natural disasters in the United States are now more than 30 years old, raising questions about how and to what extent relevant patterns have changed over intervening years, as the number and cost of recorded environmental hazards have increased. This study examines these questions at the county level for the nation as a whole, using recent census and hazards data in conjunction with statistical methods that account for spatial dependencies among neighboring counties. Results indicate a positive correlation between cumulative disaster impact during the 1990s and changes in local population and housing units; they also reveal patterns of increased socioeconomic polarization among local residents. These findings differ from earlier studies and put recent case studies in broader context, suggesting that current disaster recoveries contribute to the growth of larger and more unequal populations in environmentally hazardous places.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anselin, L., & Berra, A. (1998). Spatial dependence in linear regression models with an introduction to spatial econometrics. In A. Ullah & D. Giles (Eds.), Handbook of applied economic statistics (pp. 255–258). New York: CRC Press.
Barnett, B. J. (1999). US government natural disaster assistance: Historical analysis and a proposal for the future. Disasters, 23(2), 139–155.
Barry, J. M. (1998). Rising tide: The great Mississippi flood of 1927 and how it changed America. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Bates, F. L., Fogleman, C. W., Parenton, V. J., Pittman, R. H., & Tracy, G. S. (1963). The social and psychological consequences of a natural disaster: A longitudinal study of Hurricane Audrey. Washington, D.C.: National Academy of Sciences, National Research Council.
Belasen, A. R., & Polachek, S. W. (2009). How disasters affect local labor markets: The effects of Hurricanes in Florida. Journal of Human Resources, 44(1), 251–276.
Blaikie, P., Cannon, T., Davis, I., & Wisner, B. (1994). At risk: Natural hazards, people’s vulnerability, and disasters. New York, NY: Routledge.
Bolin, R., & Stanford, L. (1998). The Northridge earthquake: Vulnerability and disaster. London: Routledge.
Brunsma, D. L., Overfelt, D., & Picou, J. S. (2010). The sociology of Katrina: Perspectives on a modern catastrophe (2nd ed.). New York: Rowman & Littlefield.
Clarke, L. (2005). Worst cases: Terror and catastrophe in the population imagination. Chicago: University of Chicago.
Cochrane, H. C. (1975). Natural hazards and their distributive effects. Boulder, CO: Institute of Behavior Science Monograph #NSF-RA-E-75-003.
Cutter, S., Mitchell, J. T., & Scott, M. S. (2000). Revealing the vulnerability of people and places: A case study of Georgetown County, South Carolina. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 90(4), 713–737.
Dacy, D. C., & Kunreuther, H. (1969). The economics of natural disasters: Implications for federal policy. New York: Free Press.
Dash, N., Morrow, B. H., Mainster, J., & Cunningham, L. (2007). Lasting effects of Hurricane Andrew on a working-class community. Natural Hazards Review, 8(1), 13–21.
Dauber, M. L. (2005). The sympathetic state. Law and History Review, 23(2), 387–442.
Douty, C. M. (1977). The economics of localized disasters. New York: Arno Press.
Drabek, T. E. (1986). Human system responses to disaster: An inventory of sociological findings. NY: Springer.
Dynes, R. R. (2000). The Lisbon earthquake of 1755: Contested meanings in the first modern disaster. TsuInfo Alert, 2, 10–18.
Elliott, J., & Frickel, S. (2011). Environmental dimensions of urban change: Uncovering relict industrial waste sites and subsequent land use conversions in Portland and New Orleans. Journal of Urban Affairs, 33(1), 61–82.
FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency). (2011). Declared disasters by year. Available from http://www.fema.gov/news/disaster_totals_annual.fema. Accessed July 2011.
Foster, J. (1999). Marx’s theory of metabolic rift: Classical foundations for environmental sociology. American Journal of Sociology, 105(2), 366–405.
Fothergill, A., & Peek, L. A. (2004). Poverty and disaster in the United States: A review of recent sociological findings. Natural Hazards, 32, 89–110.
Friesema, H. P., Caporaso, J. A., Goldstein, G., Lineberry, R., & McMcleary, R. (1977). Community impacts of natural disasters. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
Fussell, E., & Elliott, J. R. (2009). Social organization of demographic responses to disaster: Studying population-environment interactions in the case of Hurricane Katrina. Organization & Environment, 22(4), 379–394.
Fussell, E., Sastry, N., & VanLandingham, M. (2010). Race, socioeconomic status, and return migration to New Orleans after Hurricane Katrina. Population and Environment, 31(1–3), 20–42.
Garrett, T. A., & Sobel, R. S. (2003). The political economy of FEMA disaster payments. St. Louis, MO: Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis.
Groen, J. A., & Polivka, A. E. (2010). Going home after Hurricane Katrina: Determinants of return migration and changes in affected areas. Demography, 47(4), 821–844.
Gutmann, M., & Field, V. (2010). Katrina in historical context: Environment and migration in the U.S. Population and Environment, 31(1–3), 3–19.
Haas, J. E., Kates, R. W., & Bowden, M. J. (1977). Reconstruction following a disaster. Boston: MIT Press.
Halaby, C. N. (2004). Panel models in sociological research: Theory into practice. Annual Review of Sociology, 30, 507–544.
Hamilton, L. C. (2009). Statistics with Stata. Florence, KY: Cengage.
Hazards and Vulnerability Research Institute (2010). The spatial hazard events and losses database for the United States, Version 8.0. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina. Available from http://www.sheldus.org.
Hewitt, K. (1997). Regions of risk: A geographic introduction to disasters. London: Longman.
HUD (U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development). (2008). Fiscal year 2008 budget summary. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.
Hunter, L. M. (1998). The association between environmental risk and internal migration flows. Population and Environment, 19(3), 247–277.
Hunter, L. M. (2005). Migration and environmental hazards. Population and Environment, 26(4), 273–302.
Liu, A., Anglin, R. V., Mizelle, R. M., Jr, & Plyer, A. (Eds.). (2011). Resilience and opportunity: Lessons from the U.S. Gulf Coast after Katrina and Rita. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
Melosi, M. (2010). Humans, cities, and nature: How do cities fit in the material world? Journal of Urban History, 36(1), 3–21.
Moss, D. (1999). Courting disaster? The transformation of federal disaster policy since 1803. In K. A. Froot (Ed.), The financing of catastrophe risk (pp. 307–362). Chicago: University of Chicago.
Mullener, E. (2005). A sister city flourishes. New Orleans: Times-Picayune.
Myers, C., Slack, T., & Singelmann, J. (2008). Social vulnerability and migration in the wake of disaster: The case of Hurricanes Katrina and Rita. Population and Environment, 29(6), 271–291.
NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration). (2011). U.S. Sets record with a dozen billion-dollar weather disasters in one year. Available at: http://www.noaanews.noaa.gov/stories2011/20111207_novusstats.html. Accessed 15 December 2011.
Oliver-Smith, A. (1998). Global changes and the definition of disaster. In E. L. Quarantelli (Ed.), What is a disaster? Perspectives on the question (pp. 179–196). New York: Routledge.
Pais, J., & Elliott, J. R. (2008). Places as recovery machines: Vulnerability and neighborhood change after major hurricanes. Social Forces, 86(4), 1415.
Peacock, W. G., Morrow, B. H., & Gladwin, H. (1997). Hurricane Andrew: Ethnicity, gender and the sociology of disasters. New York: Routledge.
Perrow, C. (2007). The next catastrophe: Reducing our vulnerabilities to natural, industrial, and terrorist disasters. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University.
Plyer, A., Bonaguro, J., & Hodges, K. (2010). Using administrative data to estimate population displacement and resettlement following a catastrophic U.S. disaster. Population and Environment, 31(1–3), 150–175.
Quarantelli, E. L. (1998). What is a disaster? Perspectives on the question. New York: Routledge.
Solnit, R. (2009). A paradise built in hell: The extraordinary communities that arise in disaster. New York: Viking.
Stallings, R. A. (2002). Weberian political sociology and sociological disaster studies. Sociological Forum, 17(2), 281–305.
Steinberg, T. (2006). Acts of god: The unnatural history of natural disaster in America. New York: Oxford University Press.
Stringfield, J. (2010). Higher ground: An exploratory analysis of characteristics affecting returning populations after Hurricane Katrina. Population and Environment, 31(1–3), 43–63.
Tierney, K. (2006). Facing hazards and disasters understanding human dimensions. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press.
U.S. Census Bureau. (nd). Decennials - census of population and housing. Washington, DC: Author. Available from http://www.census.gov/prod/www/abs/decennial/.. Accessed May 2011.
Verardi, V., & Croux, C. (2008). Robust regression in Stata. Available via SSRN. http://ssrn.com/abstract=1369144. Accessed 3 May 2011.
Voss, P. R., Long, D. D., Hammer, R. B., & Friedman, S. (2006). County child poverty rates in the US: A spatial regression approach. Population Research Policy Review, 25, 369–391.
Wright, J. D., & Rossi, P. H. (1981). Social science & natural hazards. Cambridge, MA: Abt Books.
Wright, J. D., Rossi, P. H., Wright, S. R., & Weber-Burdin, E. (1979). After the clean-up: Long-range effects of natural disasters. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
York, R., Rosa, E., & Dietz, T. (2003). Footprints on the earth: The environmental consequences of modernity. American Sociological Review, 68(2), 279–300.
Zack, N. (2010). Ethics for disaster. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schultz, J., Elliott, J.R. Natural disasters and local demographic change in the United States. Popul Environ 34, 293–312 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11111-012-0171-7
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11111-012-0171-7