Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Comparison between observed and DeNitrification-DeComposition model-based nitrous oxide fluxes and maize yields under selected soil fertility management technologies in Kenya

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
Plant and Soil Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aims

Process-based biogeochemical models can be used to simulate soil nitrous oxide (N2O) fluxes and maize yields and draw insights on yields improvement and climate change mitigation options. We compared both observed and DeNitrification-DeComposition (DNDC) simulated soil N2O fluxes and maize yields.

Methods

We used DNDC model to simulate soil N2O fluxes and maize yields under four soil fertility treatments (inorganic fertiliser, animal manure, animal manure + inorganic fertiliser and control,) replicated thrice for 1 year in Central Highlands of Kenya. We sampled soil N2O fluxes using static chambers installed in each plot. We analysed soil N2O using gas chromatography and calculated cumulative fluxes using trapezoidal rule linear interpolation between sampling dates.

Results

DNDC showed poor results in simulating daily N2O fluxes (157.16% ≤ normalised root mean square error (nRMSE) ≤ 324.01% and 0.90 ≤ modelling efficiency (NSE) ≤ 0.96), good to excellent performance in simulating cumulative annual soil N2O fluxes (6.16 ≤ nRMSE ≤12.86 and 0.63 ≤ NSE ≤ 0.86) and good to excellent performance in simulating maize yields (1.15% ≤ nRMSE ≤13.86% and 0.51 ≤ NSE ≤ 0.88) across all soil fertility treatments.

Conclusion

The DNDC model had good to excellent performance in simulating cumulative soil N2O fluxes and crop yields across treatments. Though the model captured yield-scaled N2O fluxes and N2O emission factors across treatments, they were underestimated under manure treatment. There is a need to continue calibrating the DNDC model for improved capture of daily N2O fluxes and uptakes on Kenyan soils.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge the three farmers whose farms were used for the field experiment. We thank the International Livestock Research Institute, Mazingira Centre, for providing static chambers and carrying out GHG analysis.

Availability of data and material

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article.

Code availability

Not applicable.

Funding

We acknowledge funding support from the National Research Fund (NRF) Kenya through the University of Embu Multi-disciplinary project; “Towards quantifying greenhouse gas emissions and deriving emission factors from organic and inorganic fertilised farming systems of Kenya.”

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

CMM, JMM, and FKN conceived this research and designed experiments; CMM performed experiments and analysis; CMM, OKN, CAS, JMO, EAO, MNK participated in the design and interpretation of the data. CMM, JMM, MNK, FKN wrote the paper and participated in the revisions of it. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Collins M. Musafiri.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest/competing interests

The authors declare that they have no potential conflict of interest in relation to the study in this paper.

Ethics approval

Not applicable.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

All authors are aware of the submission and consent to it.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Elizabeth M Baggs.

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Musafiri, C.M., Macharia, J.M., Kiboi, M.N. et al. Comparison between observed and DeNitrification-DeComposition model-based nitrous oxide fluxes and maize yields under selected soil fertility management technologies in Kenya. Plant Soil 463, 395–413 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-021-04924-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-021-04924-x

Keywords

Navigation