Abstract
Aims
Terrestrial plants require relative stable stoichiometry of elements for their growth. The effects of plant species and soil phosphorus (P) concentration on P:nutrient stoichiometry in plant remains still unknown.
Methods
Soil and plant samples were collected from 88 sites in a P-rich area of a subtropical portion of China to examine the linkage of soil P concentration with the concentrations and stoichiometry of 12 nutrient elements (C, N, P, S, K, Ca, Mg, Fe, Al, Zn, Mn and Na) for different plant species.
Results
Soil rich in P increased the concentrations of S, P, K, Ca, Fe, Mg, Mn, Al, and Na in the plants, but induced a strong antagonism to Zn. Meanwhile, the concentrations of C and N in the leaf was restrained when the plants grew in soil under high P concentration. Clustering analysis showed that plant species were categorized according to soil P concentration into P > 2 mg g−1 and P < 2 mg g−1 groups. However, insignificant dissimilarity among plant species was noticed.
Conclusions
The stoichiometry of P:nutrient in the plant organs was strongly affected by soil P concentrations and this could reflect soil nutrient status over plant species. Therefore, the difference in soil P concentration is a major driver triggering the variation in elemental stoichiometry.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ägren GI (2008) Stoichiometry and nutrition of plant growth in natural communities. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 39:153–170
Ägren G, Weih M (2012) Plant stoichiometry at different scales: element concentration patterns reflect environment more than genotype. New Phytol 194:944–952
Augusto L, Achat DL, Jonard M, Vidal D, Ringeval B (2017) Soil parent material – a major driver of plant nutrient limitations in terrestrial ecosystems. Glob Chang Biol 23:3808–3824
Bell C, Carrillo Y, Boot CM, Rocca JD, Pendall E, Wallenstein MD (2013) Rhizosphere stoichiometry: are C: N: P ratios of plants, soils, enzymes conserved at the plant species-level? New Phytol 201:505–517
Bracken MES, Hillebrand H, Borer ET, Seabloom EW, Cebrian J, Cleland EE, Elser JJ, Gruner DS, Harpole WS, Ngai JT, Smith JE (2015) Signatures of nutrient limitation and co-limitation: responses of autotroph internal nutrient concentrations to nitrogen and phosphorus additions. Oikos 124:113–121
Broadley MR, White PJ, Hammond JP, Zelko I, Lux A (2007) Zinc in plants. New Phytol 173:677–702
Campo J, Gallardo JF, Hernández G (2014) Leaf and litter nitrogen and phosphorus in three forests with low P supply. Eur J For Res 133:121–129
Carnicer J, Sardans J, Stefanescu C, Ubach A, Bartrons M, Asensio D, Peñuelas J (2015) Global biodiversity, stoichiometry and ecosystem function responses to human-induced C-N-P imbalances. J Plant Physiol 172:82–91
Chen Z, Chen Z, Yan X, Bai L (2016) Stoichiometry mechanisms of Dicranopteris dichotoma growth and resistance to nutrient limitation in the Zhuxi watershed in the red soil hilly region of China. Plant Soil 398:367–379
Disantea KB, Fuentesb D, Cortinaa J (2011) Response to drought of Zn-stressed Quercus suber L. seedling. Environ Exp Bot 70:96–103
Elisabeth NB, Brent LH (2013) C: N: P stoichiometry in Australian soils with respect to vegetation and environmental factors. Plant Soil 373:553–568
Fan H, Wu J, Liu W, Yuan Y, Hu L, Cai Q (2015) Linkage of plant and soil C: N: P stoichiometry and their relationships to forest growth in subtropical plantations. Plant Soil 392:127–138
Galbraith ED, Martiny AC (2015) A simple nutrient-dependence mechanism for predicting the stoichiometry of marine ecosystems. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 112:8199–8204
Gordon WS, Jackson RB (2000) Nutrient concentrations in fine roots. Ecology 81:275–280
Güsewell S (2004) N: P ratios in terrestrial plants: variation and functional significance. New Phytol 164:243–266
Hafeez B, Mhanif YM, Saleem M (2013) Role of zinc in plant nutrition – a review. Am J Exp Agric 3:374–391
Han W, Fang J, Guo D, Zhang Y (2005) Leaf nitrogen and phosphorus stoichiometry across 753 terrestrial plant species in China. New Phytol 168:377–385
Han WX, Fang JY, Reich PB, Woodward FI, Wang ZH (2011) Biogeography and variability of eleven mineral elements in plant leaves across gradients of client, soil and plant functional type in China. Ecol Lett 14:788–796
Jackson RB, Mooney HA, Schulze ED (1997) A global budget for fine root biomass, surface area, and nutrient concentrations. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99:7362–7366
Ladanai S, Ågren GI, Olsson BA (2010) Relationships between tree and soil properties in Picea abies and Pinus sylvestris forests in Sweden. Ecosystems 13:302–316
Li M, Hu Z, Zhu X, Zhou G (2015) Risk of phosphorus leaching from phosphorus-enriched soils in the Dianchi catchment, southwestern China. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22:8460–8470
Li Y, Niu S, Yu G (2016) Aggravated phosphorus limitation on biomass production under increasing nitrogen loading: a meta-analysis. Glob Chang Biol 22:934–943
Loneragan JF, Grove TS, Robson AD, Snowball K (1979) Phosphorus toxicity as a factor in zinc-phosphorus interactions in plants. Soil Sci Soc Am J 43:966–972
Mao R, Chen HM, Zhang XH, Shi FX, Song CC (2016) Effects of P addition on plant C:N:P stoichiometry in an N-limited temperate wetland of Northeast China. Sci Total Environ 559:1–6
Mengel K, Kirkby EA (2001) Principles of plant nutrition. Kluwer Academic Publisher, Dordrecht
Newman GS, Hart SC (2006) Nutrient covariance between forest foliage and fine roots. For Ecol Manag 236:136–141
Paul EA (2007) Soil microbiology, ecology, and biochemistry, 3rd edn. Elsevier Academic Press, Oxford
Peńuelas J, Poulter B, Sardans J, Ciais P, van Velde M, Bopp L, Boucher O, Godderis Y, Hinsinger P, Llusia J, Nardin E, Vicca S, Obersteiner M, Janssens IA (2013) Human-induced nitrogen-phosphorus imbalances alter natural and managed ecosystems across the globe. Nat Commun 4:2934
Richardson SJ, Allen RB, Doherty JE (2008) Shifts in leaf N: P ratio during resorption reflect soil P in temperate rainforest. Funct Ecol 22:738–745
Sardans J, Rivas-Ubach A, Peñelas J (2012) The C: N: P stoichiometry of organisms and ecosystems in a changing world: a review and perspectives. Pespect Plant Ecol 14:33–47
Sistla SA, Appling AP, Lewandowska AM, Taylor BN, Wolf AA (2015) Stoichiometric flexibility in response to fertilization along gradients of environmental and organismal nutrient richness. Oikos 124:949–959
Sterner RW, Elser JJ (2008) Ecological stoichiometry: overview. In: Jørgensen SE, Fath BD (eds) Encyclopedia of ecology. Elsevier, Oxford, pp 1101–1116
Sun LK, Zhang B, Wang B, Zhang G, Zhang W, Zhang B, Chang S, Chen T, Liu G (2017) Leaf elemental stoichiometry of Tamarix Lour. Species in relation to geographic, climatic, soil, and genetic components in China. Ecol Eng 106:448–457
Tian H, Chen G, Zhang C, Melillo JM, Hall CAS (2010) Pattern and variation of C: N: P ratios in China’s soils: a synthesis of observational data. Biogeochemistry 98:139–151
Tian D, Reich PB, Chen HYH, Xiang Y, Luo Y, Shen Y, Meng C, Han W, Niu S (2018) Global changes alter plant multi-element stoichiometric coupling. New Phytol 221:807–817. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.15428
Vitousek P, Porder S, Houlton BZ, Chadwick OA (2010) Terrestrial phosphorus limitation: mechanisms, implications and nitrogen-phosphorus interactions. Ecol Appl 20:5–15
Yan K, Duan C, Fu D, Li J, Wong MHG, Qian L, Tian Y (2015) Leaf nitrogen and phosphorus stoichiometry of plant communities in geochemically phosphorus-enriched soils in a subtropical mountainous region, SW China. Environ Earth Sci 74:3867–3876
Yang Y, Liu BR, An SS (2018) Ecological stoichiometry in leaves, roots, litters and soil among different plant communities in a desertified region of northern China. Catena 166:328–338
Yuan ZY, Chen HYH, Reich PB (2011) Global–scale latitudinal patterns of plant fine–root nitrogen and phosphorus. Nat Commun 2:344
Zhang SB, Zhang JL, Slik JWF, Cao KF (2011) Leaf element concentrations of terrestrial plants across China are influenced by taxonomy and the environment. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 21:809–818
Zhang H, Wu H, Yu Q, Wang Z, Wei C, Long M, Kattge J, Smith M, Han X (2013) Sampling date, leaf age and root size: implications for the study of plant C: N: P stoichiometry. PLoS One 8:e60360
Zhang Y, Li C, Wang M (2018a) Linkages of C:N:P stoichiometry between soil and leaf and their response to climatic factors along altitudinal gradients. J Soils Sediments 19:1820–1829. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-018-2173-2
Zhang D, Wang C, Li X, Yang X, Zhao L, Liu L, Zhu C, Li R (2018b) Linking plant ecological stoichiometry with soil nutrient and bacterial communities in apple orchards. Appl Soil Ecol 126:1–10
Zhang J, Zhao N, Liu C, Yang H, Li M, Yu G, Wilcox K, Yu Q, He N (2018c) C:N:P stoichiometry in China’s forests: from organs to ecosystems. Funct Ecol 32:50–60
Zhou L, Addo-Danso SD, Wu P, Li S, Zou X, Zhang Y, Ma X (2016) Leaf resorption efficiency in relation to foliar and soil nutrient concentrations and stoichiometry of Cunninghamia lanceolata with stand development in southern China. J Soils Sediments 16:1448–1459
Zhu YG, Smith SE, Smith FA (2001) Zinc-phosphorus interactions in two cultivars of spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) differing in P uptake efficiency. Ann Bot 88:941–945
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by National Natural Science Fund Projects of China (51608499, 41701561), China Postdoctoral Science Foundation funded Project (2016 M601095), National Key Research and Development Project of China (2016YFD0800104-4) and Sino-Danish Joint Doctoral Promotion Programme (Chinese Academy of Sciences).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Richard J. Simpson.
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
ESM 1
(DOCX 67 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Li, M., Huang, C., Yang, T. et al. Role of plant species and soil phosphorus concentrations in determining phosphorus: nutrient stoichiometry in leaves and fine roots. Plant Soil 445, 231–242 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-019-04288-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-019-04288-3