Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Crop response to magnesium fertilization as affected by nitrogen supply

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
Plant and Soil Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Crop yield depends in large part on the availability and accessibility of nitrogen in the soil. For optimal yield, the soil nitrogen must be available at critical periods of crop development, and in a form that is accessible for plant uptake and use. Ancillary crop nutrients can alter the plant’s ability to access and utilize nitrogen. Therefore, crop fertilization with magnesium should focus on its effect on nitrogen management. This conceptual review aims to assess the present state of knowledge regarding the importance of magnesium in fulfilling both objectives.

Scope

The response to fertilizer magnesium of high-yielding wheat, maize, sugar beet and potato crops was evaluated using published and unpublished data on yield, yield components and nitrogen uptake. A simple, stepwise regression and path analysis was applied to explain the effect of fertilizer magnesium on yield and yield components.

Conclusions

The effect of soil or foliar applied magnesium on yield of crops was inconsistent due to (i) weather experienced during the growth season, (ii) rates of applied fertilizer nitrogen, and (iii) the (natural background levels of?) magnesium available in the soil. The yield increase due to magnesium application was related to the extra supply of nitrogen. In cereals, magnesium application resulted in a higher number of ears and/or thousand grain weight (TGW), stressing the magnesium-sensitive stages of yield formation. The increase of sugar beet yield was most pronounced in dry years. The main conclusion gleaned from the review underlines a positive effect of magnesium on nitrogen uptake efficiency. The optimal yield forming effect of fertilizer magnesium can generally occur under conditions of relatively low nitrogen supply (soil + fertilizer nitrogen), but high supply of magnesium. This phenomenon can best be described as “magnesium-induced nitrogen uptake”.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allison MF, Fowler JH, Allen EJ (2001) Factors affecting the magnesium nutrition of potatoes (Solanum tuberosum). J Agric Sci Camb 137:397–409

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Andrieu B, Allirand JM, Jaggard KW (1997) Ground cover and leaf area index of maize and sugar beet crops. Agronomia 17:315–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barbottin A, Lecomte C, Bouchard C, Jeuffroy M-H (2005) Nitrogen remobilization during grain filling on wheat: genotypic and environmental aspects. Crop Sci 45:1141–1150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barłóg P, Frąckowiak K (2008) Effect of mineral fertilization on yield of maize cultivars differing on maturity scale. Acta Sci Pol Agric 7(4):5–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Barłóg P, Grzebisz W (2001) Effect of magnesium foliar application on the yield and quality of sugar beet roots. Rostl Vyroba 47(9):418–422

    Google Scholar 

  • Barłóg P, Grzebisz W (2004a) Yield forming and diagnostic evaluation of sugar beet fertilization with potassium, sodium and magnesium. Part 1. Yield of storage roots and tops. Biul IHAR 234:73–82 (in Polish with English summary)

    Google Scholar 

  • Barłóg P, Grzebisz W (2004b) Sugar beet fertilization with potassium, sodium and magnesium—yielding and diagnostic evaluation. Part III. Prognosis on root yield and its quality. Biul IHAR 234:93–105 (in Polish with English summary)

    Google Scholar 

  • Barłóg P, Lehrke R, Górski D, Paradowski A (2001) Effect of potassium fertilizers on potassium, magnesium and sodium accumulation in sugar beet varieties. Zesz Probl Post Nauk Rol 480:167–176 (in Polish with English summary)

    Google Scholar 

  • Barłóg P, Grzebisz W, Paradowski A (2002a) Effect of potassium, sodium and magnesium fertilization of three sugar beet varieties. Part I. Yield of roots and sugar. Biul IHAR 222:119–126 (in Polish with English summary)

    Google Scholar 

  • Barłóg P, Grzebisz W, Górski D, Gaj R (2002b) Response of high-yielding sugar beet varieties to fertilization with potassium, sodium and magnesium. Biul IHAR 222:135–142 (in Polish with English summary)

    Google Scholar 

  • Cakmak I, Kirkby E (2008) Role of magnesium in carbon partitioning and alleviating photo-oxidative damage. Physiol Plant V 133(4):692–704

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cakmak I, Hengeler C, Marschner H (1994) Partitioning of shoot and root dry matter and carbohydrates in bean plant plants suffering from phosphorus, potassium and magnesium deficiency. J Exp Bot 45:1245–1250

    Google Scholar 

  • Casson S, Lindsey K (2003) Genes and signaling in root development. New Phytol 158:11–38

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cazetta J, Seebauer J, Below F (1999) Sucrose and nitrogen supplies regulate growth of maize kernels. Ann Bot 84:747–754

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Claupein W (1993) Nitrogen Fertilization and chemical plant protection in a long-term field experiment and the yield response laws of Liebig, Liebscher, Wollny and Mitscherlich. J Agron Crop Sci 171:102–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craighead MD, Martin RJ (2001) Responses to magnesium fertilizers in wheat in mid Canterbury. Agron N Z 31:63–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Czyzewicz JR, Below FE (1994) Genotypic variation for nitrogen by maize kernels grown in vitro. Crop Sci 34:1003–1008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demotes-Mainard S, Jeuffroy M-H (2001) Incorporating radiation and nitrogen nutrition into a model of kernel number in wheat. Crop Sci 41:415–423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ding Y, Luo W, Xu G (2006) Characterization of magnesium nutrition and interaction of magnesium and potassium in rice. Ann Appl Biol 149:111–123

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dobermann A, Cassman K (2002) Plant nutrient management for enhanced productivity in intensive grain production systems of the United States and Asia. Plant Soil 247:153–175

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Evans L, Fisher R (1999) Yield potential: its definition, measurement and significance. Crop Sci 39:1544–1551

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernandes MS, Rossiello RO (1995) Mineral nutrition in plant physiology and plant nutrition. Crit Rev Plant Sci 14(2):111–148

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Forde B, Lorenzo H (2001) The nutritional control of root development. Plant Soil 232:51–68

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Foulkes J, Shearman V, Spink J, Ingram J (2002) Management strategies for high yields of cereals and oilseed rape. HGCA Conference: Agronomic Intelligence: the basis for profitable production, 18 p

  • Foulkes M, Hawkesford M, Barraclough P, Holdsworth M, Kerr S, Kightley S, Sherwy P (2009) Identifying traits to improve the nitrogen economy of wheat: recent advances and future prospects. Field Crops Res 114:329–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gastal F, Lemaire G (2002) N uptake and distribution in crops: an agronomical and ecophysiological perspective. J Exp Bot 53(370):789–799

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gebbing T, Schnyder H (1999) Pre-anthesis reserve utilization for protein and carbohydrate in grains of wheat. Plant Physiol 121:871–878

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Grzebisz W, Barłóg P, Lehrke R (2001) Effect of the interaction between the method of magnesium application and amount nitrogen fertilizer on sugar recovery and technical quality of sugar beet. Zuckerindustrie 956–960

  • Grzebisz W, Górski D, Barłóg P (2002) Mineral composition of storage roots and tops as criterion of technological ripeness of sugar beets. Part I. Yield of storage roots. J Elementol 7(4):247–258 (in Polish with English summary)

    Google Scholar 

  • Grzebisz W, Wrońska M, Diatta JB, Szczepaniak W (2008) Effect of zinc foliar application at early stage of maize growth on the patterns of nutrients and dry matter accumulation by the canopy. Part II. Nitrogen uptake and dry matter accumulation patterns. J Elementol 13(1):29–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Hermans C, Bourgis F, Faucher M, Strasses RJ, Delrot S, Verbruggen N (2005) Magnesium deficiency in sugar beets alters sugar partitioning and phloem lading in young mature leaves. Planta 220:541–549

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hirel B, Le Gouis J, Ney B, Gallais A (2007) The challenge of improving nitrogen use efficiency in crop plants: towards a more central role for genetic variability and quantitative genetic within integrated approaches. J Exp Bot 58(9):2369–2387

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • IFA (2009) The global “4R” nutrient stewardship framework. IFA Task Force on Fertilizer Best Management Practices. AgCom/09/44, 10 pp

  • Janssen B (1998) Efficient use of nutrients: an art of balancing. Field Crops Res 56:197–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King J, Gay A, Sylvester-Bradley R, Bingham I, Foulkes J, Gregory P, Robinson D (2003) Modelling cereal systems for water and nitrogen capture: towards an economic optimum. Ann Bot 91:383–390

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Konys L, Wiśniewski P (1984) Path analysis on cause-effect systems. Rocz Akad Rol Pozn 102:37–57 (in Polish with English summary)

    Google Scholar 

  • Maddoni GA, Oteguie ME, Bonhomme R (1998) Grain yield components in maize. II. Postsilking growth and kernel weight. Field Crops Res 56:257–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malnou CS, Jaggard KW, Sparkes DL (2006) A canopy approach to nitrogen fertilizer recommendation for the sugar beet crop. Eur J Agron 25:254–263

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Matłosz C (1992) Effect of cereals fertilization with magnesium conducted in different stages of growth on yields of grain and straw and some grain quality parameters. PhD thesis. Poznań Univeristy of Life sciences, Poznań, 47 pp. (in Polish)

  • Moll RH, Kamprath EJ, Jackson WA (1982) Analysis and interpretation of factors which contribute to efficiency of nitrogen utilization. Agron J 74:562–564

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orlovius K (1997) Kali und Salz Field experiments. Annual Report 1997

  • Plaut Z, Butow BJ, Blumenthal CS, Wrigley CS (2004) Transport of dry matter into developing wheat kernels and its contribution to grain yield under post-anthesis water deficit and elevation. Field Crops Res 86:185–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pommel B, Gallai A, Coque M, Quillere I, Hirel B, Prioul J, Andrieu B, Floriot M (2006) Carbon and nitrogen allocation and grain filling in three maize hybrids differing in senescence. Eur J Agron 24:200–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Potarzycki J (2008a) Influence of nitrogen and magnesium fertilization at the flag leaf stage of winter wheat development on the yield and grain quality. Fertil Fertil 32:100–110

    Google Scholar 

  • Potarzycki J (2008b) Nitrogen management of winter wheat fertilized with magnesium and different forms of nitrogen at the flag leaf stage. Fertil Fertil 32:111–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Potarzycki J (2010a) Yield forming effect of zinc and magnesium applied as supplements of the NPK fertilizer to maize cultivated in monoculture. Fertil Fertil 39:25–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Potarzycki J (2010b) Yield forming effect of combined application of magnesium, sulphur and zinc in maize fertilization. Fertil Fertil 39:44–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Potarzycki J (2011) Effect of magnesium or zinc supplementation at the background of nitrogen rate on nitrogen management by maize canopy cultivated in monoculture. Plant Soil Environ 57(1):19–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajcan I, Tollenaar M (1999) Source:sink ratio and leaf senescence in maize: I. Dry matter accumulation and partitioning during grain filling. Field Crops Res 60:245–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rasheed M, Mahmiid T, Nazir MS, Bhutta WA, Ghaffar A (2004) Nutrient efficiency and economics of hybrid maize under different planting methods and nutrient levels. Int J Agric Biol 6(5):922–925

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritche J, Alagarswamy G (2003) Model concept to express genetic differences in maize yield components. Agron J 95:4–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts T (2008) Improving nutrient use efficiency. Turk J Agric For 32:177–182

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubio G, Zhu J, Lynch J (2003) A critical test of the prevailing theories of plant response to nutrient availability. Am J Bot 90(1):143–152

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schuurman J (1983) Effect of soil conditions on morphology and physiology of roots and shoots of annual plants. Proceedings: Root Ecology and Its Practical Application, Bundesanstalt Gumpenstein, A-8952 Irdning, pp 343–354

  • Semenov M, Jamieson P, Martre P (2007) Deconvoluting nitrogen use efficiency in wheat: a simulation study. Eur J Agron 26:283–294

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shaul O (2002) Magnesium transport and function in plants: the tip of the iceberg. BioMetals 15:309–323

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shearman V, Sylvester-Bradley R, Scott R, Foulkes M (2005) Physiological processes associated with wheat progress in the UK. Crop Sci 45(1):175–185

    Google Scholar 

  • Skubiszewska A, Diatta J (2008) Overcoming aluminum negative effects by the application of magnesium sulfate. Ochr Środ Zas Nat 35(36):289–296

    Google Scholar 

  • Spiertz J, Vos J (1985) Grain growth of wheat and its limitation by carbohydrate and nitrogen supply. In: Day W, Atkin R (eds) Wheat growth and modelling. Plenum Press, New York, pp 129–141

    Google Scholar 

  • Subedi K, Ma B (2005) Nitrogen uptake and partitioning in stay-green and leafy maize hybrids. Crops Sci 45:740–747

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Szulc P (2010a) Response of maize hybrid (Zea mays L.), stay-green type to fertilization with nitrogen, sulphur, and magnesium. Part I. Yields and chemical composition. Acta Sci Pol Agric 9(1):29–40

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Szulc P (2010b) Effects of differentiated levels of nitrogen fertilization and the method of magnesium application on the utilization of nitrogen by two different maize cultivars for grain. Pol J Environ Stud 19(2):407–412

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Szulc P, Waligóra H (2010) Response of maize hybrid (Zea mays L.), stay-green type to fertilization with nitrogen, sulphur, and magnesium. Part I. Plant development and the uptake of mineral components. Acta Sci Pol Agric 9(1):41–53

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Szulc P, Waligóra H, Skrzypczak W (2008) Better effectiveness of maize fertilization with nitrogen throughout additional application of magnesium and sulfur. Nauka Przyr Technol 2(3):1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Szulc P, Bocianowski J, Rybus-Zając M (2011) The reaction of stay green maize hybrid (Zea mays L.) to various methods of magnesium application. Fresenius Environ Bull 20(8a):216–234

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang J, Zhang J (2006) Grain filling of cereals under soil drying. New Phytol 169:230–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin X, Goudriaan J, Lantinga EA, Vos J, Spiertz H (2003) A flexible sigmoid function of determinate growth. Ann Bot 91:361–371

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zengin M, Gokmen F, Yazici MA, Gezgin S (2009) Effect of potassium, magnesium, and sulphur containing fertilizers on yield and quality of sugar beets (Beta vulgaris L.). Turk J Agric For 33:495–502

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zerche S, Hecht R (1999) Nitrogen uptake of winter wheat during shoot elongation phase in relation to canopy high and shoot density. Agribiol Res 52(3/4):231–250

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Witold Grzebisz.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Ismail Cakmak.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Grzebisz, W. Crop response to magnesium fertilization as affected by nitrogen supply. Plant Soil 368, 23–39 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-012-1574-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-012-1574-z

Keywords

Navigation