Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The role of endoscopic endonasal surgery in the management of prolactinomas based on their invasiveness into the cavernous sinus

  • Published:
Pituitary Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To review our institutional experience with the surgical management of prolactinomas through the endoscopic endonasal approach with specific focus on cavernous sinus invasion.

Methods

Clinical and radiographic data were collected retrospectively from the electronic medical record of 78 consecutive patients with prolactinomas undergoing endoscopic endonasal resection from 2002 to 2019. Immediate and late post-operative remission were defined as prolactin < 20 ng/mL within 14 days and 1-year of surgery without adjuvant therapy, respectively. Cavernous sinus invasion was quantified by Knosp score.

Results

A total of 78 patients with prolactinoma, 59% being male, underwent surgical resection with a mean age of 37 ± 13 years. Indications for surgery were medication resistance in 38 patients (48.7%), medication intolerance in 11 (14.1%), and patient preference in 29 (37.2%). Patients with Knosp 0–2 achieved higher immediate remission rates (83.8%) compared to patients with Knosp 3 (58.8%) and Knosp 4 (41.7%) patients (p = 0.003). Long-term remission rates were 48.7% and increased to 71.8% when combined with adjuvant treatments. Knosp 4 prolactinomas had significantly higher tumor volumes, higher preoperative prolactin levels, higher recurrence rates, higher rates of adjuvant therapy utilization, and were more likely to have failed dopamine agonist therapy compared to other tumor grades (p < 0.05). We encountered 18 complications in our series, and no cerebrospinal fluid leaks.

Conclusion

The endoscopic endonasal approach is a safe and effective modality that can be employed in properly selected patients with invasive prolactinomas. It is associated with improved control and remission rates despite cavernous sinus invasion, though at a lower rate than without invasion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All authors confirm the appropriateness of all dataset and software used for supporting the conclusion. All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

Code availability

Not applicable.

References

  1. Wong A, Eloy JA, Couldwell WT, Liu JK (2015) Update on prolactinomas. Part 1: clinical manifestations and diagnostic challenges. J Clin Neurosci 22:1562–1567

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Wong A, Eloy JA, Couldwell WT, Liu JK (2015) Update on prolactinomas. Part 2: treatment and management strategies. J Clin Neurosci 22:1568–1574

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Colao A, Di Sarno A, Landi ML, Cirillo S, Sarnacchiaro F, Facciolli G, Pivonello R, Cataldi M, Merola B, Annunziato L, Lombardi G (1997) Long-term and low-dose treatment with cabergoline induces macroprolactinoma shrinkage. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 82(11):3574–3579

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Schade R, Andersohn F, Suissa S, Haverkamp W, Garbe E (2007) Dopamine agonists and the risk of cardiac-valve regurgitation. N Engl J Med 356(1):29–38

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Zanettini R, Antonini A, Gatto G, Gentile R, Tesei S, Pezzoli G (2007) Valvular heart disease and the use of dopamine agonists for Parkinson’s disease. N Engl J Med 356(1):39–46

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Gillam MP, Molitch ME, Lombardi G, Colao A (2006) Advances in the treatment of prolactinomas. Endocr Rev 27:485–534

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Noronha S, Stokes V, Karavitaki N, Grossman A (2016) Treating prolactinomas with dopamine agonists: always worth the gamble? Endocrine 51:205–210

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Drake WM, Stiles CE, Howlett TA, Toogood AA, Bevan JS, Steeds RP, UK Dopamine Agonist Valvulopathy Group (2014) A cross-sectional study of the prevalence of cardiac valvular abnormalities in hyperprolactinemic patients treated with ergot-derived dopamine agonists. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 99:90–96

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Webster J, Piscitelli G, Polli A, Ferrari CI, Ismail I, Scanlon MF (1994) A comparison of cabergoline and bromocriptine in the treatment of hyperprolactinemic amenorrhea. Cabergoline Comparative Study Group. N Engl J Med 331:904–909

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Verhelst J, Abs R, Maiter D, van den Bruel A, Vandeweghe M, Velkeniers B, Mockel J, Lamberigts G, Petrossians P, Coremans P, Mahler C, Stevenaert A, Verlooy J, Raftopoulos C, Beckers A (1999) Cabergoline in the treatment of hyperprolactinemia: a study in 455 patients. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 84:2518–2522

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Dekkers OM, Lagro J, Burman P, Jorgensen JO, Romijn JA, Pereira AM (2010) Recurrence of hyperprolactinemia after withdrawal of dopamine agonists: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 95:43–51

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Thomson JA, Gray CE, Teasdale GM (2002) Relapse of hyperprolactinemia after transsphenoidal surgery for microprolactinoma: lessons from long-term follow-up. Neurosurgery 50:36–39 (discussion 9-40)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Jethwa PR, Patel TD, Hajart AF, Eloy JA, Couldwell WT, Liu JK (2016) Cost-effectiveness analysis of microscopic and endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery versus medical therapy in the management of microprolactinoma in the United States. World Neurosurg 87:65–76

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Zygourakis CC, Imber BS, Chen R, Han SJ, Blevins L, Molinaro A, Kahn JG, Aghi MK (2017) Cost-effectiveness analysis of surgical versus medical treatment of prolactinomas. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 78:125–131

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Molitch ME (2015) Endocrinology in pregnancy: management of the pregnant patient with a prolactinoma. Eur J Endocrinol 172(5):R205–R213

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Koutourousiou M, Vaz Guimaraes Filho F, Fernandez-Miranda JC, Wang EW, Stefko ST, Snyderman CH, Gardner PA (2017) Endoscopic endonasal surgery for tumors of the cavernous sinus: a series of 234 patients. World Neurosurg 103:713–732

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Fernandez-Miranda JC, Zwagerman NT, Abhinav K, Lieber S, Wang EW, Snyderman CH, Gardner PA (2018) Cavernous sinus compartments from the endoscopic endonasal approach: anatomical considerations and surgical relevance to adenoma surgery. J Neurosurg 129:430–441

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Cohen-Cohen S, Gardner PA, Alves-Belo JT, Truong HQ, Snyderman CH, Wang EW, Fernandez-Miranda JC (2018) The medial wall of the cavernous sinus. Part 2: selective medial wall resection in 50 pituitary adenoma patients. J Neurosurg 131(1):131–140

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Schlechte JA, Sherman BM, Chapler FK, VanGilder J (1986) Long term follow-up of women with surgically treated prolactin-secreting pituitary tumors. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 62:1296–1301

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Tyrrell JB, Lamborn KR, Hannegan LT, Applebury CB, Wilson CB (1999) Transsphenoidal microsurgical therapy of prolactinomas: initial outcomes and long-term results. Neurosurgery 44:254–261 (discussion 61-3)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Maira G, Anile C, De Marinis L, Barbarino A (1989) Prolactin-secreting adenomas: surgical results and long-term follow-up. Neurosurgery 24:736–743

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Losa M, Mortini P, Barzaghi R, Gioia L, Giovanelli M (2002) Surgical treatment of prolactin-secreting pituitary adenomas: early results and long-term outcome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 87:3180–3186

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Rodman EF, Molitch ME, Post KD, Biller BJ, Reichlin S (1984) Long-term follow-up of transsphenoidal selective adenomectomy for prolactinoma. JAMA 252:921–924

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Massoud F, Serri O, Hardy J, Somma M, Beauregard H (1996) Transsphenoidal adenomectomy for microprolactinomas: 10 to 20 years of follow-up. Surg Neurol 45:341–346

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Serri O, Rasio E, Beauregard H, Hardy J, Somma M (1983) Recurrence of hyperprolactinemia after selective transsphenoidal adenomectomy in women with prolactinoma. N Engl J Med 309:280–283

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Abe T, Ludecke DK (2002) Transnasal surgery for prolactin-secreting pituitary adenomas in childhood and adolescence. Surg Neurol 57:369–378 (discussion 78-9)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Qu X, Wang M, Wang G, Han T, Mou C, Han L, Jiang M, Qu Y, Zhang M, Pang Q, Xu G (2011) Surgical outcomes and prognostic factors of transsphenoidal surgery for prolactinoma in men: a single-center experience with 87 consecutive cases. Eur J Endocrinol 164:499–504

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Yano S, Kawano T, Kudo M, Makino K, Nakamura H, Kai Y, Morioka M, Kuratsu J (2009) Endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal approach through the bilateral nostrils for pituitary adenomas. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 49:1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Rudnik A, Kos-Kudla B, Larysz D, Zawadzki T, Bazowski P (2007) Endoscopic transsphenoidal treatment of hormonally active pituitary adenomas. Neuro Endocrinol Lett 28:438–444

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Frank G, Pasquini E, Farneti G, Mazzatenta D, Sciarretta V, Grasso V, Faustini Fustini M (2006) The endoscopic versus the traditional approach in pituitary surgery. Neuroendocrinology 83:240–248

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Smith TR, Hulou MM, Huang KT, Gokoglu A, Cote DJ, Woodmansee WW, Laws ER Jr (2015) Current indications for the surgical treatment of prolactinomas. J Clin Neurosci 22:1785–1791

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Akin S, Isikay I, Soylemezoglu F, Yucel T, Gurlek A, Berker M (2016) Reasons and results of endoscopic surgery for prolactinomas: 142 surgical cases. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 158:933–942

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Donegan D, Atkinson JL, Jentoft M, Natt N, Nippoldt TB, Erickson B, Meyer F, Erickson D (2017) Surgical outcomes of prolactinomas in recent era: results of a heterogenous group. Endocr Pract 23:37–45

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Song YJ, Chen MT, Lian W, Xing B, Yao Y, Feng M, Wang RZ (2017) Surgical treatment for male prolactinoma: a retrospective study of 184 cases. Medicine (Baltimore) 96:e5833

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Han YL, Chen DM, Zhang C, Pan M, Yang XP, Wu YG (2018) Retrospective analysis of 52 patients with prolactinomas following endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgery. Medicine (Baltimore) 97:e13198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Knosp E, Steiner E, Kitz K, Matula C (1993) Pituitary adenomas with invasion of the cavernous sinus space: a magnetic resonance imaging classification compared with surgical findings. Neurosurgery 33:610–617 (discussion 7-8)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Zanation AM, Carrau RL, Snyderman CH, Germanwala AV, Gardner PA, Prevedello DM, Kassam AB (2009) Nasoseptal flap reconstruction of high flow intraoperative cerebral spinal fluid leaks during endoscopic skull base surgery. Am J Rhinol Allergy 23:518–521

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Hadad G, Rivera-Serrano CM, Bassagaisteguy LH, Carrau RL, Fernandez-Miranda J, Prevedello DM, Kassam AB (2011) Anterior pedicle lateral nasal wall flap: a novel technique for the reconstruction of anterior skull base defects. Laryngoscope 121:1606–1610

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Ma Q, Su J, Li Y, Wang J, Long W, Luo M, Liu Q (2018) The chance of permanent cure for micro- and macroprolactinomas, medication or surgery? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 9:636

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Menucci M, Quinones-Hinojosa A, Burger P, Salvatori R (2011) Effect of dopaminergic drug treatment on surgical findings in prolactinomas. Pituitary 14:68–74

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Lamba N, Noormohamed N, Simjian T, Alsheikh MY, Jamal A, Doucette J, Zaidi H, Smith TR, Mekary RA (2018) Fertility after transsphenoidal surgery in patients with prolactinomas: a meta-analysis. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 176:53–60

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Glezer A, Bronstein MD (2020) Prolactinomas in pregnancy: considerations before conception and during pregnancy. Pituitary 23(1):65–69

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

None.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Georgios A. Zenonos.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors report no conflict of interest concerning the materials or methods used in this study or the findings specified in this paper.

Ethical approval

The study was approved by the IRB at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center.

Consent to participate

Informed consent was obtained from all participants included in study.

Research involving human participants and/or animals

The study was performed in accordance with the ethical standards as laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Abou-Al-Shaar, H., Mallela, A.N., Patel, A. et al. The role of endoscopic endonasal surgery in the management of prolactinomas based on their invasiveness into the cavernous sinus. Pituitary 25, 508–519 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11102-022-01221-3

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11102-022-01221-3

Keywords

Navigation