Abstract
Physicalists are committed to the determination without remainder of the psychological by the physical, but are they committed to this determination being a priori? This paper distinguishes this question understood de dicto from this question understood de re, argues that understood de re the answer is yes in a way that leaves open the answer to the question understood de dicto.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
D.M. Armstrong (1968) A Materialist Theory of the Mind Routledge and Kegan Paul London
N. Block R. Stalnaker (1999) ArticleTitle‘Conceptual Analysis, Dualism, and the Explanatory Gap’ Philosophical Review 108 1–46 Occurrence Handle10.2307/2998259
Block, Ned forthcoming ‘Max Black’s Objection to Mind-Body Identity’, in Oxford Studies in Metaphysics, III edn. Dean Zimmerman, Oxford: Oxford University Press
K. Campbell (1970) Body and Mind Macmillan London
K. Campbell (1976) Metaphysics Dickenson: California California
D.J. Chalmers F. Jackson (2001) ArticleTitle‘Conceptual Analysis and Reductive Explanation’ Philosophical Review 110 315–360
R. Courant H Robbins (1947) What is Mathematics? EditionNumber4 Oxford University Press New York
T. Crane D.H. Mellor (1990) ArticleTitle‘There is No Question of Physicalism’ Mind 99 185–206 Occurrence Handle10.1093/mind/XCIX.394.185
C.S. Hill (1984) ArticleTitle‘In Defence of Type Materialism’ Synthese 59 295–320 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00869337
F. Jackson (1998) From Metaphysics to Ethics Clarendon Press Oxford
F. Jackson (2003) ‘From H2O to Water: The Relevance to A Priori Passage’ L. Hallvard G. Roderiguez-Pereyra (Eds) Real Metaphysics Routledge London 84–97
F. Jackson (2005) ‘The Case for A Priori Physicalism’ N. Christian A. Beckermann (Eds) Philosophy–Science–Scientific Philosophy. Main Lectures and Colloquia of GAP.5, Fifth International Congress of the Society for Analytical Philosophy, 2003 Mentis Paderborn 251–265
S. Kripke (1980) Naming and Necessity Harvard University Press Cambridge, Mass
Lewis, D.K. (1971): ‘An Argument for the Identity Theory’, reprinted in Materialism and the Mind-Body Problem, David M. Rosenthal (ed.), (pp. 162–171) New Jersey: Prentice-Hall
D.K. Lewis (1972) ArticleTitle‘Psychophysical and Theoretical Identifications’ Australasian Journal of Philosophy 50 249–258 Occurrence Handle10.1080/00048407212341301
B. Medlin (1967) ‘Ryle and the Mechanical Hypothesis’ C.F. Presley (Eds) The Identity Theory of Mind University of Queensland Press St Lucia 94–150
H. Putnam (1973) ArticleTitle‘Reductionism and the Nature of Psychology’ Cognition 2 131–146 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0010-0277(72)90033-9
J.J.C. Smart (1959) ArticleTitle‘Sensations and Brain Processes’ Philosophical Review 68 141–156 Occurrence Handle10.2307/2182164
K Frisch Particlevon (1947) ArticleTitle‘The Dances of the Honey Bee’ Bulletin of Animal Behaviour 5 1–32
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jackson, F. On Ensuring that Physicalism is Not a Dual Attribute Theory In Sheep’s Clothing. Philos Stud 131, 227–249 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-006-5989-3
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-006-5989-3