Skip to main content
Log in

Tablet splitting of narrow therapeutic index drugs: a nationwide survey in Taiwan

  • Research Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background Tablet splitting or pill splitting frequently occurs in daily medical practice. For drugs with special pharmacokinetic characters, such as drugs with narrow therapeutic index (NTI), unequal split tablets might lead to erroneous dose titration and it even cause toxicity. Objective The aim of this study was to investigate the frequency of prescribing split NTI drugs at ambulatory setting in Taiwan. Setting A population-based retrospective study was conducted using the National Health Insurance Research Database in Taiwan. All ambulatory visits were analyzed from the longitudinal cohort datasets of the National Health Insurance Research Database. Methods The details of ambulatory prescriptions containing NTI drugs were extracted by using the claims datasets of one million beneficiaries from National Healthcare Insurance Research Database in 2010 in Taiwan. The analyses were stratified by dosage form, patient age and the number of prescribed tablets in a single dose for each NTI drugs. Main outcome measures Number and distinct dosage forms of available NTI drug items in Taiwan, number of prescriptions involved split NTI drugs, and number of patients received split NTI drugs. Results A total of 148,548 patients had received 512,398 prescriptions of NTI drugs and 41.8 % (n = 62,121) of patients had received 36.3 % (n = 185,936) of NTI drug prescriptions in form of split tablets. The percentage of splitting was highest in digoxin prescriptions (81.0 %), followed by warfarin (72.0 %). In the elderly patients, split tablets were very prevalent with digoxin (82.4 %) and warfarin (84.5 %). Conclusion NTI drugs were frequently prescribed to be taken in split forms in Taiwan. Interventions may be needed to provide effective and convenient NTI drug use. Further studies are needed to evaluate the clinical outcome of inappropriate split NTI drugs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chou CY, Hsu CC, Chiang SC, Ho CC, Chou CL, Wu MS, et al. Association between physician specialty and risk of prescribing inappropriate pill splitting. PLoS One. 2013;8(7):e70113. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0070113 (eCollection 2013).

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Quinzler R, Gasse C, Schneider A, Kaufmann-Kolle P, Szecsenyi J, Haefeli WE. The frequency of inappropriate tablet splitting in primary care. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2006;62(12):1065–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Quinzler R, Schmitt SP, Pritsch M, Kaltschmidt J, Haefeli WE. Substantial reduction of inappropriate tablet splitting with computerised decision support: a prospective intervention study assessing potential benefit and harm. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2009;9:30. doi:10.1186/1472-6947-9-30 (eCollection 2009).

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Olliaro PL, Vaillant M, Hayes DJ, Montresor A, Chitsulo L. Practical dosing of praziquantel for schistosomiasis in preschool-aged children. Trop Med Int Health. 2013;18(9):1085–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. van Santen E, Barends DM, Frijlink HW. Breaking of scored tablets: a review. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2002;53(2):139–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Choe HM, Stevenson JG, Streetman DS, Heisler M, Sandiford CJ, Piette JD. Impact of patient financial incentives on participation and outcomes in a statin pill-splitting program. Am J Manag Care. 2007;13(6):298–304.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Miller DP, Furberg CD, Small RH, Millman FM, Ambrosius WT, Harshbarger JS, et al. Controlling prescription drug expenditures: a report of success. Am J Manag Care. 2007;13(8):473–80.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Peek BT, Al-Achi A, Coombs SJ. Accuracy of tablet splitting by elderly patients. JAMA. 2002;288(4):451–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. McDevitt JT, Gurst AH, Chen Y. Accuracy of tablet splitting. Pharmacotherapy. 1998;18(1):193–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Jiang W, Yu LX. Bioequivalence for narrow therapeutic index drugs. In: Yu L, Li B, editors. FDA bioequivalence standards. New York: Springer; 2014. p. 191–216.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Neidecker M, Patel AA, Nelson WW, Reardon G. Use of warfarin in long-term care: a systematic review. BMC Geriatr. 2012;12:14. doi:10.1186/1471-2318-12-14 (eCollection 2012).

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Clark NP, Witt DM, Delate T, Trapp M, Garcia D, Ageno W, et al. Warfarin-associated research projects and other endeavors consortium. Thromboembolic consequences of subtherapeutic anticoagulation in patients stabilized on warfarin therapy: the low INR study. Pharmacotherapy. 2008;28(8):960–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Blix HS, Viktil KK, Moger TA, Reikvam A. Drugs with narrow therapeutic index as indicators in the risk management of hospitalised patients. Pharm Pract (Internet). 2009;8(1):50–55. PMCID: PMC4140577.

  14. Liang BA, Mackey TK, Lovett KM. Illegal “no prescription” internet access to narrow therapeutic index drugs. Clin Ther. 2013;35(5):694–700.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Paveliu MS, Bengea S, Paveliu FS. Generic substitution issues: brand-generic substitution, generic-generic substitution, and generic substitution of narrow therapeutic index (nti)/critical dose drugs. Maedica. 2011;6(1):52–8.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Helmy SA. Tablet splitting: is it worthwhile? Analysis of drug content and weight uniformity for half tablets of 16 commonly used medications in the outpatient setting. J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2015;21(1):76–86.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Shah RB, Collier JS, Sayeed VA, Bryant A, Habib MJ, Khan MA. Tablet splitting of a narrow therapeutic index drug: a case with levothyroxine sodium. AAPS Pharm Sci Tech. 2010;11(3):1359–67.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Bureau of National Health Insurance, Department of Health, Executive Yuan, “The National Health Insurance Statistics,” 2010. http://www.nhi.gov.tw/English/webdata/webdata.aspx?menu=11&menu_id=296&WD_ID=296&webdata_id=4010. Accessed Aug 3 2015.

  19. Chen YC, Yeh HY, Wu JC, Haschler I, Chen TJ, Wetter T. Taiwan’s national health insurance research database: administrative health care database as study object in bibliometrics. Scientometrics. 2010;86(2):365–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Narrow therapeutic index drugs designated by the north carolina secretary of human resources. North Carolina Register. 2013;27(13):1263.

  21. Fischbach MS, Gold JL, Lee M, Dergal JM, Litner GM, Rochon PA. Pill-splitting in a long-term care facility. CMAJ. 2001;164(6):785–6.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Berg C, Ekedahl A. Dosages involving splitting tablets: common but unnecessary? J Pharm Health Serv Res. 2010;1(3):137–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Vivo RP, Krim SR, Perez J, Inklab M, Tenner T Jr, Hodgson J. Digoxin: current use and approach to toxicity. Am J Med Sci. 2008;336:423–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Ehle M, Patel C, Giugliano RP. Digoxin: clinical highlights: a review of digoxin and its use in contemporary medicine. Crit Pathw Cardiol. 2011;10(2):93–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Information Product. Lanoxin, digoxin 2006. Greenville: GlaxoSmith-Kline; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Bressler R, Bahl JJ. Principles of drug therapy for the elderly patient. Mayo Clin Proc. 2003;78(12):1564–77.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Currie GM, Wheat JM, Kiat H. Pharmacokinetic considerations for digoxin in older people. Open Cardiovasc Med J. 2011;5:130–5.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Leendertse AJ, Van den Bemt PMLA, Poolman JB, Stoker LJ, Egberts ACG, Postma MJ. Preventable hospital admissions related to medication (HARM): cost analysis of the HARM study. Value Health. 2011;14(1):34–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Bachynsky J, Wiens C, Melnychuk K. The practice of splitting tablets: cost and therapeutic aspects. Pharmacoeconomics. 2002;20(5):339–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Powell EC, Reynolds SL, Rubenstein JS. Theophylline toxicity in children: a retrospective review. Pediatr Emerg Care. 1993;9(3):129–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Hocaoğlu N, Yıldıztepe E, Bayram B, Aydın B, Tunçok Y, Kalkan Ş. Demographic and clinical characteristics of theophylline exposures between 1993 and 2011. Balkan Med J. 2014;31(4):322–7.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Shannon M. Life-threatening events after theophylline overdose: a 10-year prospective analysis. Arch Intern Med. 1999;159:989–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Hsu CC, Chou CY, Chou CL, Ho CC, Chen TJ, Chiang SC, et al. Impact of a warning CPOE system on the inappropriate pill splitting of prescribed medications in outpatients. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(12):e114359. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0114359 (eCollection 2014).

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Wang BR, Chou CL, Hsu CC, Chou YC, Chen TJ, Chou LF. Drugs cheaper than threepenny: the market of extremely low-priced drugs within the National Health Insurance in Taiwan. ScientificWorldJournal. 2014;2014:234941. doi:10.1155/2014/234941 (eCollection 2014).

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Elliott I, Mayxay M, Yeuichaixong S, Lee SJ, Newton PN. The practice and clinical implications of tablet splitting in international health. Trop Med Int Health. 2014;19(7):754–60.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study is based in part on data from the National Health Insurance Research Database provided by the Bureau of National Health Insurance, Department of Health and managed by National Health Research Institutes, Taiwan. The interpretation and conclusions contained herein do not represent those of Bureau of National Health Insurance, Department of Health or National Health Research Institutes.

Funding

This study was supported by Grants from Taipei Veterans General Hospital (V102C-160) and National Science Council in Taiwan (NSC 99-2410-H-004-029-MY3).

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yueh-Ching Chou.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chou, CL., Hsu, CC., Chou, CY. et al. Tablet splitting of narrow therapeutic index drugs: a nationwide survey in Taiwan. Int J Clin Pharm 37, 1235–1241 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-015-0194-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-015-0194-0

Keywords

Navigation