Abstract
An external feedback control is inserted in a nonlinear continuum formulation of a noncontact AFM model. The aim of the feedback is to keep the system response to an operationally suitable one, thus allowing reliable measurement of the sample surface by avoiding possible unstable microcantilever sensor motions. The study of the weakly nonlinear system dynamics about the desired fixed point close to primary resonance is carried out via multiple-scale asymptotics, whose outcomes are validated via numerical simulations of the original system equations of motion. The latter include controllable periodic dynamics and additional periodic and distinct quasiperiodic solutions that appear beyond the asymptotic stability thresholds. The results highlight the effectiveness of the applied feedback control technique and also enable the derivation of a comprehensive system bifurcation structure highlighting the stability thresholds for robust controllable AFM dynamics.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Lee, S.I., Howell, S.A.R.: Nonlinear dynamic perspectives on dynamic force microscopy. Ultramicroscopy 97, 185–198 (2003)
Couturier, G., Boisgard, R.J.-P.: Noncontact atomic force microscopy: stability criterion and dynamical responses of the shift of frequency and damping signal. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 74(5), 2726–2734 (2003)
Yagasaki, K.: Nonlinear dynamics of vibrating microcantilevers in tapping-mode atomic force microscopy. Phys. Rev. B 70, 245419 (2004)
Misra, S., Dankowicz, H.M.R.: Degenerate discontinuity-induced bifurcations in tapping-mode atomic-force microscopy. Phys. D 239, 33–43 (2010)
Bahrami, A., Nayfeh, A.H.: On the dynamics of tapping mode atomic force microscope probes. Nonlinear Dyn. 70, 1605–1617 (2012)
Hornstein, S., Gottlieb, O.: Nonlinear dynamics, stability and control of the scan process in noncontacting atomic force microscopy. Nonlinear Dyn. 54, 93–122 (2008)
Rega, G., Settimi, V.: Bifurcation, response scenarios and dynamic integrity in a single-mode model of noncontact atomic force microscopy. Nonlinear Dyn. 73, 101–123 (2013)
Burnham, N.A., Chen, X., Hodges, C.S., Matei, G.A., Thoreson, E.J., Roberts, C.J., Davies, M.C., Tendler, S.J.B.: Comparison of calibration methods for atomic-force microscopy cantilevers. Nanotechnology 14, 1–6 (2003)
Lübbe, J., Temmen, M., Rode, S., Rahe, P., Kühnle, A., Reichling, M.: Thermal noise limit for ultra-high vacuum noncontact atomic force microscopy. Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 4, 32–44 (2013)
Slattery, A.D., Blanch, A.J., Quinton, J.S., Gibson, C.T.: Accurate measurement of atomic force microscope cantilever deflection excluding tip-surface contact with application to force calibration. Ultramicroscopy 131, 46–55 (2013)
Heima, L.-O., Rodrigues, T.S., Bonaccurso, E.: Direct thermal noise calibration of colloidal probe cantilevers. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 443, 377–383 (2014)
Humphris, A.D.L., Tamayo, J., Miles, M.J.: Active quality factor control in liquids for force spectroscopy. Langmuir 16, 7891–7894 (2000)
Zou, Q., Leang, K.K., Sadoun, E., Reed, M.J., Devasia, S.: Control issues in high-speed afm for biological applications: collagen imaging sample. Asian J. Control. 6(2), 164–178 (2004)
Yamasue, K., Hikihara, T.: Control of microcantilevers in dynamic force microscopy using time delayed feedback. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 77, 053703 (2006)
Arjmand, M.T., Sadeghian, H., Salarieh, H., Alasty, A.: Chaos control in afm systems using nonlinear delayed feedback via sliding mode control. Nonlinear Anal. Hybrid Syst. 2, 993–1001 (2008)
Merry, R., Uyanik, M., van de Molengraft, R., Koops, R., van Veghel, M., Steinbuch, M.: Identification, control and hysteresis compensation of a 3 dof metrological afm. Asian J. Control. 11(2), 130–143 (2009)
Payton, O., Champneys, A.R., Homer, M.E., Picco, L., Miles, M.J.: Feedback-induced instability in tapping mode atomic force microscopy: theory and experiment. Proc. R. Soc. A 467(2130), 1801–1822 (2011). doi:10.1098/rspa.2010.0451
Salarieh, H., Alasty, A.: Control of chaos in atomic force microscopes using delayed feedback based on entropy minimization. Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 14, 637–644 (2009)
Wang, C.C., Pai, N.S., Yau, H.T.: Chaos control in afm system using sliding mode control by backstepping design. Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 15, 741–751 (2010)
Yamasue, K., Kobayashi, K., Yamada, H., Matsushige, K., Hikihara, T.: Controlling chaos in dynamic-mode atomic force microscope. Phys. Lett. A 373(35), 3140–3144 (2009). doi:10.1016/j.physleta.2009.07.009
Yagasaki, K.: New control methodology of microcantilevers in atomic force microscopy. Phys. Lett. A 375, 23–28 (2010)
Pyragas, K.: Continuous control of chaos by self-controlling feedback. Phys. Lett. A 170, 421–428 (1992)
Yagasaki, K.: Nonlinear dynamics and bifurcations in external feedback control of microcantilevers in atomic force microscopy. Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 18(10), 2926–2943 (2013)
Crespo da Silva, M.R.M., Glynn, C.C.: Nonlinear flexural-flexural-torsional dynamics of inextensional beams. i. Equations of motion. Mech. Based Des. Struct. Mach. 6(4), 437–448 (1978)
Israelachvili, J.: Intermolecolar and Surface Forces. Academic Press, London (1992)
Sarid, D., Ruskell, T.G., Workman, R.K., Chen, D.: Driven nonlinear atomic force microscopy cantilevers: from noncontact to tapping modes of operation. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 14(2), 864–867 (1996)
Butt, H.J., Graf, K., Kappl, M.: Physics and Chemistry of Interfaces.Wiley-VCH, Weinheim (2003)
Hu, S., Howell, S., Raman, A., Reifenberger, R., Franchek, M.: Frequency domain identification of tip-sample van der Waals interactions in resonant atomic force microcantilevers. J. Vib. Acoust. 126, 343–351 (2004)
Rodriguez, R.D., Lacaze, E., Jupille, J.: Probing the probe: AFM tip-profiling via nanotemplates to determine Hamaker constants from phase-distance curves. Ultramicroscopy 121, 25–30 (2012)
Kuhn, S., Rahe, P.: Discriminating short-range from van der Waals forces using total force data in noncontact atomic force microscopy. Phys. Rev. B 89, 235417 (2014)
Nayfeh, A.H., Mook, D.T.: Nonlinear Oscillations. Wiley, New York (1979)
Rodriguez, T.R., García, R.: Compositional mapping of surfaces in atomic force microscopy by excitation of the second normal mode of the microcantilever. Appl. Phys. Lett. 84(3), 449 (2004)
Sahin, O., Quate, C.F., Solgaard, O., Atalar, A.: Resonant harmonic response in tapping-mode atomic force microscopy. Phys. Rev. B 69, 165416 (2004)
Hornstein, S., Gottlieb, O.: Nonlinear multimode dynamics and internal resonances of the scan process in noncontacting atomic force microscopy. J. Appl. Phys. 112, 074314 (2012)
Maali, A., Hurth, C., Boisgard, R., Jai, C., Cohen-Bouhacina, T., Aimé, J.P.: Hydrodynamics of oscillating atomic force microscopy cantilevers in viscous fluids. J. Appl. Phys. 97, 074907 (2005)
Hölscher, H., Milde, P., Zerweck, U., Eng, L.M., Hoffmann, R.: The effective quality factor at low temperatures in dynamic force microscopes with Fabry-Pérot interferometer detection. Appl. Phys. Lett. 94, 223514 (2009)
Settimi, V.: Bifurcation scenarios, dynamical integrity and control of noncontact atomic force microscopes. PhD thesis, Sapienza, University of Rome, 2013. http://hdl.handle.net/10805/2146
Nayfeh, A.H.: Perturbation methods in nonlinear dynamics. In: Jowett, J.M., Month, M., Turner, S. (eds.) Nonlinear Dynamics Aspects of Particle Accelerators, Springer-Verlag, New York (1985)
Luongo, A., Zulli, D.: A paradigmatic system to study the transition from zero/Hopf to double-zero/Hopf bifurcation. Nonlinear Dyn. 70, 111–124 (2012)
Acknowledgments
Oded Gottlieb acknowledges the partial support of the Israel Science (1475/09) and Giuseppe Rega acknowledges the partial support of the Sapienza University of Rome (C26A12R2L2). Valeria Settimi is grateful to the Sapienza University of Rome for the financial support via a post doc scholarship and to the Russell Berrie Nanotechnology Institute for support of her stay at the Technion.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendices
Appendix 1
The integral expressions in (15) are
Appendix 2
1.1 MSM: second-order solution
Substitution of \(p_1\) (36) in the second equation of (33), and elimination of secular terms yield
so that
Using (36) and (47), and remembering that \(\tilde{x}_{ \textit{ref1} }= A_{un}(T_1,T_2,T_3)e^{i\omega _1T_0}+c.c.\) is the solution of amplitude \(A_{un}(T_1,T_2,T_3)\) of the first-order uncontrolled system, the first equation of (33), without \(\tilde{x}_{ \textit{ref2} }\) and \(N_{22}(\tilde{x}_{ \textit{ref1} })\) terms, becomes
and the solvability condition implies that
For the uncontrolled system, it is \(D_1A_{un}=0\) and thus \(A_{un}=A_{un}(T_2,T_3)\). The particular solution at this order is
while the solution of the uncontrolled system is \(\tilde{x}_{ \textit{ref2} }=\frac{C_{211}}{3\omega _1^2}A_{un}^2 e^{2i\omega _1T_0}-\frac{2C_{214}}{\omega _1^2} A_{un}\bar{A}_{un}+c.c.\) For the expression of the \(C_{ijk}\) coefficients, see “Appendix 3” of [37].
1.2 MSM: third-order solution
At the third order, by means of the obtained results, the second of (34) becomes
and the secular terms elimination, providing
permits to obtain
Here, \(\tilde{x}_{ \textit{ref3} }\) and \(N_{32}(\tilde{x}_{ \textit{ref1} },\tilde{x}_{ \textit{ref2} })\) terms, together with terms related to the horizontal and vertical excitations, are present also in the uncontrolled system, so that they can be neglected; using (36), (46), (47), (49), (50), (52), (53), and being \(D_1A_{un} = 0\) (“Appendix 2” of [37]), the first equation of (34) hence becomes
with \(\gamma _{ij}\) defined in “Appendix 3” of [37]. Note that \(\gamma _{31}\) depends on \(D_2A\), so that the solvability condition of (54) provides
The particular solution at the third order for the controlled system results
For what concerns the uncontrolled system, the solvability condition at the third order yields
whose expression is later on needed, and the particular solution results \(\tilde{x}_{ \textit{ref3} }=C_{303} A_{un}^3 e^{3i \omega _1 T_0}+c.c.\)
1.3 MSM: fourth-order solution
By means of the previous results, the second equation of (35) at the fourth order becomes
with the vanishing of secular term providing
and the particular solution resulting
The first equation of (35) can thus be rewritten as
The secular terms elimination requires that \(\gamma _{41}\), which depends on \(D_3A\), identically vanishes. Using Eqs. (46),(49),(52),(55), and assuming that \(2 D_1D_2A=\frac{ d D_1A}{ d T_2}+\frac{ d D_2A}{ d T_1}\) [39], it results
Appendix 3
Terms \(c_{hk}\), \(h,k=1,...,5\) of the Jacobian matrix (42) are
Appendix 4
Coefficients \(f_{hkl}\) of the steady-state responses (41) are
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Settimi, V., Gottlieb, O. & Rega, G. Asymptotic analysis of a noncontact AFM microcantilever sensor with external feedback control. Nonlinear Dyn 79, 2675–2698 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-014-1840-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-014-1840-0