Skip to main content
Log in

Examination of the structural characteristics arising in gypsums by the GPR and MASW methods (Sivas, Turkey)

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Natural Hazards Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study was performed at an area of 50 × 48 m2 being defined as a new settlement in the northeast of Sivas. In the study, the discontinuities that are not deep and their geophysical characteristics were examined by the GPR and MASW methods. For interpretation, GPR cross sections were prepared as 2D–3D, and MASW cross sections were prepared as 2D. As for geophysical cross sections, about 10 m depth was examined. It was understood that the reflections observed in the form of hyperbolas in GPR cross sections correspond to areas having low S wave velocity (Vs) in MASW cross sections. It was understood that the S wave velocities are lower than 653 m/s, that the seismic velocities in between 653 and 275 m/s indicate partially deteriorated areas and that the S wave velocities of unweathered gypsums are higher than 1275 m/s at these low-velocity zones. Thus, it was thought that the fill material that may arise in the fracture, crack and deterioration areas arises from intercalation and clastic gypsum units, and that it plays a role in having low value S wave velocities. In all the geophysical cross sections, it was understood that the structures with gypsum are intense at the initial 5 m. And a fracture at the south of the study area, that it was estimated might be longer than 40 m, was determined as the largest gypsum structure. It was understood that this fracture starts from a depth of about 5 m in the west and that it slopes down to 7 m depth in the east. According to these results, it was understood that the damage amount arising in time in the gypsum structures from the effect of water may increase, the study area was defined as risky, and the required importance should be attached to these structures especially in foundation engineering.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1: a
Fig. 2

Arranged from Özel (2013)

Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anchuela OP, Juan AP, Soriano AM, Sainz C (2009) Characterization of karst hazards from the perspective of the doline triangle using GPR-examples from Central Ebro Basin (Spain). Eng Geol 108:225–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atmaca E (2004) Examination and replanning of solid waste management of Sivas City Center. Cumhuriyet University, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences Department of Engineering (PhD. Thesis), Sivas, Turkey

  • Avcı N, Kılıçdağı R, Ayaz ME, Cadoğlu İF, Keskin Ö, Koçak A, Keçer M, Polat N, Nişan E (1997) Sivas kentinin çevre jeolojisi ve doğal kaynakları. General Directorate of Mineral Research and Exploration Publication 10042, 169. https://eticaret.mta.gov.tr

  • Aziz BQ, Ali MP (2013) Karst cavity detection in carbonate rocks by integration of high resolution geophysical methods. J Zankoy Sulaimani 15:159–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batayneh AT, Abdelruhman AA, Moumani AK (2002) Use of ground-penetrating-radar for assessment of potential sinkhole conditions: an example from Ghor al Haditha area, Jordan. Environ Geol 41:977–983

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bögli A (1980) Karst hydrology and physical speleology. Springer, Berlin, p 284

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cardimona S (2002) Subsurface investigation using ground penetrating radar. In: Presented at the 2nd international conference on the application of geophysics and NDT methodologies transportation facilities and infrastructure, LosAngels, California

  • Cardimona S, Roark M, Webb DJ, Lippincott T (1998) Ground penetrating radar. In: Highway applications of engineering geophysics with an emphasis on previously mined ground, pp 41–56

  • Cassidy NJ (2009) Electrical and magnetic properties of rocks, soils, and fluids. In: Jol HM (ed) Ground penetrating radar: theory and applications. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 141–172. ISBN 978-0-444-53348-7

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cerit O, Değirmenci M, Kaçaroğlu F (1996) Sivas yakın doğusu jips karst alanının tektonik özellikleri. KTÜ Mühendislik-Mimarlık Fakültesi, Jeoloji Mühendisliği Bölümü 30. Yıl Sempozyumu, Bildiriler, vol 2, pp 521–530, Trabzon, Turkey (in Turkish)

  • Collins ME, Cum M, Hanninen P (1994) Using ground-penetrating radar to investigate a subsurface Karst landscape in North-Central Florida. Geoderma 61:1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crespo TM, Ortiz DG (2007) Collapse hazard assessment in evaporitic materials from ground penetrating radar: a case study. Environ Geol 53:57–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darıcı N (2015) Investigation of in gypsum developing structural features with ground penetrating radar (GPR) and multi channel analysis of surface waves (MASW) methods. Cumhuriyet University, Institute of Science, Department of Geophysical Engineering (Master Thesis), 58, Sivas, Turkey, (unpublished)

  • Değirmenci M, Kaçaroğlu F, Cerit O (1995) Sivas Yakın Doğusu Jips Kartsı Hidrojeolojisi. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi, Mühendislik Fakültesi Dergisi, Jeoloji Mühendisliği Seksiyonu, vol 8, pp 77–92, Isparta, Türkiye (in Turkish)

  • Değirmenci M, Kaçaroğlu F, Cerit O (1996) Jipsli Havzalarda Su Sağlamada Karşılaşılan Kalite Problemleri (Sivas Örneği). KTÜ Mühendislik-Mimarlık Fakültesi, Jeoloji Mühendisliği Bölümü 30. Yıl Sempozyumu, Bildiriler, pp 504–520, Trabzon, Türkiye (in Turkish)

  • Doğan U, Özel S (2005) Gypsum karst and its evolution east of Hafik (Sivas, Turkey). Geomorphology 71:373–388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duvarcı E (1994) Rejyonal Jeoelektrik Haritaları Projesi: Sivas Tersiyer Havzası Özdirenç Etüdü, General Directorate of Mineral Research and Exploration Publication 9701, 20. https://eticaret.mta.gov.tr

  • Google Earth (2015) Sivas (Turkey), between 39°45′01.27′′ and 37°00′54.42′′S coordinates (from 2580 m). Digital Globe 2015 (viewed 25 May 2015). http://www.google.com/earth/

  • Grandjean G, Leparoux D (2004) The potential of seismic methods for detecting cavities and buried objects: experimentation at a test site. J Appl Geophys 56:93–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grasmueck M, Weger R, Horstmeyer H (2005) Full-resolution 3-D GPR imaging. Geophysics 70(1):K12–K19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffin S, Pipet T (2002) Ground penetrating radar. Geophys Remote Sens Methods Regolith Explor 144:80–89

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamdan H, Kritikakis G, Andronikidis N, Economou N, Manoutsoglou E, Vafidis A (2010) Integrated geophysical methods for imaging saline karst aquifers: a case study of Stylos, Chania, Greece. J Balk Geophys Soc 13:1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamdan H, Economou N, Kritikakis G, Andronikidis N, Manoutsoglou E, Vafidis A, Pangratis P, Apostolidou G (2012) 2D and 3D imaging of the metamorphic carbonates at Omalos plateau/polje, Crete, Greece by employing independent and joint inversion on resistivity and seismic data. Tampa, FL (USA). Int J Speleol 41(2):199–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson KS (2008) Gypsum-karst problems in constructing dams in the USA. Environ Geol 53:945–950

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaçaroğlu F, Değirmenci M, Cerit O (1997) Karstification in Miocene gypswn: an example from Sivas, Turkey. Environ Geol 30(1/2):88–97

    Google Scholar 

  • Kadıoğlu S, Ulugergerli E (2012) Imaging karstic cavities in transparent 3D volume of the GPR data set in Akkopru dam, Mugla, Turkey. Nondestruct Test Eval 27:263–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keskin İ (2011) Investigation of the effects of discontinuity properties by means of doline occurence mechanisms in gypsum; an example from Northeast Sivas. Cumhuriyet University Graduate School of Nature and Applied Sciences Department of Geology Engineering (PhD. Thesis), Sivas, Turkey

  • Kavak KS (2005) Recognition of gypsum geohorizons in the Sivas Basin (Turkey) using ASTER and Landsat ETM+ images. Int J Remote Sens 26:4583–4596

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kofman L, Ronen A, Frydman S (2006) Detection of model voids by identifying reverberation phenomena in GPR records. J Appl Geophys 59:284–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kovin O (2010) Mapping of evaporite deformation in a potash mine using ground penetrating radar: Upper Kama deposit, Russia. J Appl Geophys 74:131–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kurtman F (1973) Sivas-Hafik-Zara ve İmranlı Bölgesinin Jeolojik ve Tektonik. Bull Miner Res Explor 80:1–33

    Google Scholar 

  • McGrath RJ, Styles P, Thomas E, Neale S (2002) Integrated high-resolution geophysical investigations as potential tools for water resource investigations in karst terrain. Environ Geol 42:552–557

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Özel S (2005) The investigation of the crustal structure of the area between Elbistan (Kahramanmaraş)-Hafik (Sivas) by magnetotelluric and gravity methods. Cumhuriyet University, Graduate School of Nature and Applied Sciences Department of Geophysical Engineering (Master Thesis), Sivas, Turkey

  • Özel S (2010) Investigating with geophysical methods of spreading inside the underground of the leachates of the Sivas city solid waste disposal area. Cumhuriyet University, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences Department of Engineering (PhD. Thesis), Sivas, Turkey

  • Özel S (2013) 2D analysis of karst structures by ERT, GPR and MASW methods. In: 20th international geophysical congress and exhibition of Turkey, pp 25–27 November, Antalya, Turkey, (unpublished)

  • Parker EH, Hawman RB (2012) Multi-channel analysis of surface waves (masw) in karst terrain, southwest Georgia: implications for detecting anomalous features and fracture zones. J Environ Geol. https://doi.org/10.2113/JEEG17.3.129

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavlic M, Praznik B (2011) Detecting Karstic zones during highway construction using ground-penetrating radar. Acta Geotech 8:17–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Poisson A, Guezou JC, Öztürk A, İnan S, Temiz H, Gürsoy H, Kavak KŞ, Özden S (1996) Tectonic setting and evolution of the Sivas basin central Anatolia, Turkey. Int Geol Rev 38:838–853

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rittgers J, Butler D, Sirles P (2008) Subsurface void detection in Oklahoma evaporite deposits using geophysical methods. In: Proceedings of the 59th annual highway geology symposium: Santa Fe, NM, May 6–9, pp 445–468.7

  • Robert A, Bosset CD (1994) Application of ground penetrating radar to the detection of cavities, gravel pockets and kastic zones. J Appl Geophys 31(1–4):197–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandmeier KJ (2005) Reflexw manuel, version 7.0.3. Sandmeier Scientific Software, Karlsruhe

    Google Scholar 

  • SeisImager/SW (2006) Windows software for analysis of surface waves. Including explanation of surface wave data acquisition using Geometrics Seismodule Controller Software (v.9.14). Manual, Geometrics, Inc.

  • Stevens KM, Lodha GS, Holoway AL, Soonawala NM (1995) The application of ground penetrating radar for mapping fractures in plutonic rocks within the Whiteshell research area, Pinawa, Manitoba, Canada. J Appl Geophys 33:125–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strobbia C (2005) Surface wave methods acquisition processing and inversion, Phd. Thesis, Politecnico Di Torino

  • Tanıdır R, Karlı R (1996) Türkiye rejyonal elektrik haritalar projesi. General Directorate of Mineral Research and Exploration Publication, 9868. https://eticaret.mta.gov.tr

  • Temiz H (1994) Deformation shape and tectonostratigraphy of Sivas Tertiary basin in the region between Kemah (Erzincan) and Hafik (Sivas). Cumhuriyet University Graduate School of Nature and Applied Sciences Department of Geology Engineering (PhD. Thesis), Sivas, Turkey

  • Toshioka T, Tsuchida T, Sasahara K (1995) Application of GPR to detecting and mapping cracks in rock slopes. J Appl Geophys 33:119–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ulugergerli E, Akca I (2006) Detection of cavities in gypsum. J Balk Geophys Soc 9:8–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Waltham T (2002) Gypsum karst near Sivas, Turkey. Trans Br Cave Res As Cave Karst Sci 29:1

    Google Scholar 

  • Xavier D, Odile A (2000) GPR and Seismic imaging in a gypsum quarry. J Appl Geophys 45:157–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu C, Butt SD (2006) Evaluation of MASW techniques to image steeply dipping cavities in laterally inhomogeneous terrain. J Appl Geophys 59:106–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yılmaz A (1984) Tokat (Dumanlıdağı) ile Sivas (Çeltekdağı) Dolaylarının Temel Jeoloji Özellikleri ve Ofiyolitli Karışığın Konumu. Bull Miner Res Explor 99(100):1–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Yılmaz A, Atmaca E (2006) Environmental geological assessment of a solid waste disposal site: a case study in Sivas, Turkey. Environ Geol 50:677–689

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yılmaz A, Yılmaz H (2006) Characteristic features and structural evolution of a post collisional basin: The Sivas Basin, Central Anatolia, Turkey. J Asian Earth Sci 27:164–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yılmaz H, Özel S (2008) Crustal structure of the Eastern part of Central Anatolia (Turkey). Turk J Earth Sci 18:169–185

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sevda Özel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Darıcı, N., Özel, S. Examination of the structural characteristics arising in gypsums by the GPR and MASW methods (Sivas, Turkey). Nat Hazards 93, 661–676 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-018-3320-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-018-3320-1

Keywords

Navigation