Abstract
Over 3 billion plastic bags are consumed in China every day, which brings great challenges to solid waste management. Although Chinese government has implemented the “plastic ban” in 2008, many people still use plastic bags in their daily lives. This paper examines the determinants of plastic bags usage behaviour among 392 consumers in China from the perspective of the extended theory of planned behaviour (TPB). The extension is implemented by adding three variables: convenience, environmental concern and ethical belief. The empirical results indicate that consumers’ attitude towards using plastic bags, subjective norm, perceived behaviour control and convenience are all statistically significantly and positively related to the intention to use plastic bags. Meanwhile, environmental concern and ethical belief have significant but negative effects on consumers’ attitude and intention to use plastic bags. The attitude towards using plastic bags partially mediates the effects of consumers’ environmental concern and ethical belief on their intention to use plastic bags. In addition, this study confirms the appropriateness of the TPB model and shows that the extended TPB model has good predictive power in understanding consumers’ intention to use plastic bags. Based on these results, implications for policy makers and suggestions for further future study are offered.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ajzen I (1991) The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 50(2):179–211
Arli D, Tjiptono F (2014) The end of religion? Examining therole of religiousness, materialism, and long-term orientation on consumer ethics in Indonesia. J Bus Ethics 123(3):385–400
Bamberg S, Ajzen I, Schmidt P (2003) Choice of travel mode in the theory of planned behavior: the roles of past behavior, habit, and reasoned action. Basic Appl Soc Psychol 25(3):175–187
Braun YA, Traore AS (2015) Plastic bags, pollution, and identity women and the gendering of globalization and environmental responsibility in Mali. Gend Soc 29(6):863–887
Chen MF, Tung PJ (2014) Developing an extended theory of planned behavior model to predict consumers’ intention to visit green hotels. Int J Hosp Manag 36:221–230
Chib VS, Rangel A, Shimojo S (2009) Evidence for a common representation of decision values for dissimilar goods in human ventromedial prefrontal cortex. J Neurosci 29(39):12315–12320
Chiu CM, Wang ETG (2008) Understanding web-based learning continuance intention: the role of subjective task value. Inf Manag 45:194–201
Davies J, Foxall GR, Pallister J (2002) Beyond the intention-behaviour mythology: an integrated model of recycling. Mark Theory 2(1):29–113
Dean M, Raats MM, Shepherd R (2012) The role of self-identity, past behavior and their interaction in predicting intention to purchase fresh and processed organic food. J Appl Soc Psychol 42(3):669–688
Diamantopoulos A, Schlegelmilch BB, Sinkovics RR, Bohlen GM (2003) Can socio-demographics still play a role in profiling green consumers? A review of the evidence and an empirical investigation. J Bus Res 6:465–480
Ferrell OC, Fraedrich J (2005) Ethical decision making and cases. J Bus Ethics 560:319–336
Filieri R, Alguezaui S, McLeay F (2015) Why do travelers trust Trip Advisor? Antecedents of trust towards consumer-generated media and its influence on recommendation adoption and word of mouth. Tour Manag 51:174–185
Fornell C, Larcker DF (1981) Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J Mark Res 18:39–50
Ha HY, Janda S (2012) Predicting consumer intentions to purchase energy-efficient products. J Consum Mark 29(7):461–469
Hair JF, Black WC, Babin BJ, Anderson RE, Tatham RL (1998) Multivariate data analysis, vol 5, no 3. Prentice hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, pp 207–219
Han H, Kim Y (2010) An investigation of green hotel customers’ decision formation: developing an extended model of the theory of planned behavior. J Hosp Manag 29:659–668
Han H, Hsu LTJ, Sheu C (2010) Application of the theory of planned behavior to green hotel choice: testing the effect of environmental friendly activities. Tour Manag 31(3):325–334
Harman HH (1976) Modern factor analysis, 2nd edn. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL
Hartmann P, Apaolaza-Ibáñez V (2012) Consumer attitude and purchase intention toward green energy brands: the roles of psychological benefits and environmental concern. J Bus Res 65(9):1254–1263
Haws KL, Winterich KP, Naylor RW (2014) Seeing the world through GREEN-tinted glasses: green consumption values and responses to environmentally friendly products. J Consum Psychol 24(3):336–354
Hidrue MK, Parsons GR, Kempton W, Gardner MP (2011) Willingness to pay for electric vehicles and their attributes. Resour Energy Econ 33(3):686–705
Jakovcevic A, Steg L, Mazzeo N, Caballero R, Franco P, Putrino N, Favara J (2014) Charges for plastic bags: motivational and behavioral effects. J Environ Psychol 40:372–380
Kahn ME (2007) Do greens drive Hummers or hybrids? Environmental ideology as a determinant of consumer choice. J Environ Econ Manag 54(2):129–145
Kaiser FG, Scheuthle H (2003) Two challenges to a moral extension of the theory of planned behavior: moral norms and just world beliefs in conservationism. Pers Individ Differ 35(5):1033–1048
Kasidoni M, Moustakas K, Malamis D (2015) The existing situation and challenges regarding the use of plastic carrier bags in Europe. Waste Manag Res 33(5):419–428
Kilbourne W, Pickett G (2008) How materialism affects environmental beliefs concern, and environmentally responsible behavior. J Bus Res 61(9):885–893
Kim YJ, Njite D, Hancer M (2013) Anticipated emotion in consumers’ intentions to select eco-friendly restaurants: augmenting the theory of planned behavior. Int J Hosp Manag 34:255–262
Lam T, Hsu CHC (2004) Theory of planned behavior: potential travelers from China. J Hosp Tour Res 28(4):463–482
Lee JS, Hsu LT, Han H, Kim Y (2010) Understanding how consumers view green hotels: how a hotel’s green image can influence behavioral intentions. J Sustain Tour 18(7):901–914
Liang (2010) The factors research of companies and products perceived convenience that based on the perspective of service consumers. Manag Innov 3:102–104
Lu LC, Chang HH, Chang A (2015) Consumer personality and green buying intention: the mediate role of consumer ethical beliefs. J Bus Ethics 127(1):205–219
Mitchell VW, Balabanis G, Schlegelmich BB, Cornwell TB (2009) Measuring unethical consumer behaviors across four countries. J Bus Ethics 88(2):395–412
Moser AK (2015) Thinking green, buying green? Drivers of pro-environmental purchasing behavior. J Consum Mark 32(3):167–175
Mostafa MM (2009) Shades of green: a psychographic segmentation of the green consumer in Kuwait using self-organizing maps. Expert Syst Appl 26(8):11030–11038
Perugini M, Bagozzi RP (2001) The role of desires and anticipated emotions in goal-directed behaviors: broadening and deepening the theory of planned behavior. Br J Soc Psychol 40:79–98
Peters A, Gutscher H, Scholz RW (2011) Psychological determinants of fuel consumption of purchased new cars. Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav 14(3):229–239
Ramayah T, Lee JWC, Lim S (2012) Sustaining the environment through recycling: an empirical study. J Environ Manag 102:141–147
Read DL, Brown RF, Thorsteinsson EB, Morgan M, Price I (2013) The theory of planned behavior as a model for predicting public opposition to wind farm developments. J Environ Psychol 36:70–76
Ritch E, Brennan C, MacLeod C (2009) Plastic bag politics: modifying consumer behavior for sustainable development. Int J Consum Stud 33(2):168–174
Schwartz SH (1977) Normative influences on Altruism. Adv Exp Soc Psychol 10:221–279
Sidique SF, Joshi SV, Lupi F (2010a) Factors influencing the rate of recycling: an analysis of Minnesota counties. Resour Conserv Recycl 54(4):242–249
Sidique SF, Lupi F, Joshi SV (2010b) The effects of behavior and attitudes on drop-off recycling activities. Resour Conserv Recycl 54(3):163–170
Singhapakdi A, Salyachivin S, Virakul B, Veerayangkur V (2000) Some important factors underlying ethical decision making of managers in Thailand. J Bus Ethics 27(3):271–284
Suki NM (2016) Consumer environmental concern and green product purchase in Malaysia: structural effects of consumption values. J Clean Prod 132:204–214
Tarrant M, Cordell H (1997) The effect of respondent characteristics on general environmental attitude-behavior correspondence. Environ Behav 29(5):618–637
Teng YM, Wu KS, Liu HH (2014) Integrating altruism and the theory of planned behavior to predict patronage intention of a green hotel. J Hosp Tour Res 39(3):299–315
Tonglet M, Phillips PS, Read AD (2004) Using the theory of planned behavior to investigate the determinants of recycling behavior: a case study from Brixworth, UK. Resour Conserv Recycl 41(3):191–214
Tsarenko Y, Ferraro C, Sands S, Mclead C (2013) Environmentally conscious consumption: the role of retailers and peers as external influences. J Retail Consum Serv 20:302–310
Vitell SJ, Muncy J (2005) The Muncy–Vitell consumer ethics scale: a modification and application. J Bus Ethics 62:267–275
Wahid NA, Rahbar E, Shyan TS (2011) Factors influencing the green purchase behavior of Penang environmental volunteers. Int Bus Manag 5(1):38–49
Wang S, Fan J, Zhao D et al (2016) Predicting consumers’ intention to adopt hybrid electric vehicles: using an extended version of the theory of planned behavior model. Transportation 43(1):123–143
Yadav R, Pathak GS (2016) Young consumers’ intention towards buying green products in a developing nation: extending the theory of planned behavior. J Clean Prod 135:732–739
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 71601174 and 71571172), China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (Grant No. 2016M590583), Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities and Sichuan Education Department Foundation (Grant No. 16SB0087).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix: Constructs and measurement items
Appendix: Constructs and measurement items
Constructs and measurement items |
---|
Attitude |
A1: Using plastic bags is a good idea |
A2: Using plastic bags is a wise choice |
A3: I like the idea of using plastic bags |
Subjective norm |
SN1: Most people who are important to me think I should use plastic bags |
SN2: My friend’s positive opinion influences me to use plastic bags |
SN3: People whose opinion I value would prefer that I should not use plastic bags |
Perceived behaviour control |
PBC1: Whether to use plastic bags is entirely up to me |
PBC2: I am confident that if I want to, I will use plastic bags |
PBC3: Plastic bags are generally available in the shops where I usually do my shopping |
Convenience |
C1: It is convenient to use plastic bags |
C2: Plastic bags are waterproof and oil-proof |
C3: I think plastic bags are thin and easy to carry |
Environmental concern |
EC1: When humans interfere with nature, it often produces disastrous consequences |
EC2: Humans must live in harmony with nature to survive |
EC3: Humans are severely abusing the environment |
EC4: I am very concerned about the environment |
EC5: I am willing to reduce my consumption to help protect the environment |
Ethical belief |
EB1: I will buy only from companies that have a strong willingness to protect the environment |
EB2: I will buy the products that are labelled as “environmentally friendly” |
EB3: I will buy products that are made of recycled materials |
Usage intention |
UI1: I will use plastic bags for personal use |
UI2: I am willing to use plastic bags while shopping |
UI3: I intend to use plastic bags in the near future |
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sun, Y., Wang, S., Li, J. et al. Understanding consumers’ intention to use plastic bags: using an extended theory of planned behaviour model. Nat Hazards 89, 1327–1342 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-017-3022-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-017-3022-0