Skip to main content
Log in

Understanding consumers’ intention to use plastic bags: using an extended theory of planned behaviour model

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Natural Hazards Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Over 3 billion plastic bags are consumed in China every day, which brings great challenges to solid waste management. Although Chinese government has implemented the “plastic ban” in 2008, many people still use plastic bags in their daily lives. This paper examines the determinants of plastic bags usage behaviour among 392 consumers in China from the perspective of the extended theory of planned behaviour (TPB). The extension is implemented by adding three variables: convenience, environmental concern and ethical belief. The empirical results indicate that consumers’ attitude towards using plastic bags, subjective norm, perceived behaviour control and convenience are all statistically significantly and positively related to the intention to use plastic bags. Meanwhile, environmental concern and ethical belief have significant but negative effects on consumers’ attitude and intention to use plastic bags. The attitude towards using plastic bags partially mediates the effects of consumers’ environmental concern and ethical belief on their intention to use plastic bags. In addition, this study confirms the appropriateness of the TPB model and shows that the extended TPB model has good predictive power in understanding consumers’ intention to use plastic bags. Based on these results, implications for policy makers and suggestions for further future study are offered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ajzen I (1991) The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 50(2):179–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arli D, Tjiptono F (2014) The end of religion? Examining therole of religiousness, materialism, and long-term orientation on consumer ethics in Indonesia. J Bus Ethics 123(3):385–400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bamberg S, Ajzen I, Schmidt P (2003) Choice of travel mode in the theory of planned behavior: the roles of past behavior, habit, and reasoned action. Basic Appl Soc Psychol 25(3):175–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braun YA, Traore AS (2015) Plastic bags, pollution, and identity women and the gendering of globalization and environmental responsibility in Mali. Gend Soc 29(6):863–887

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen MF, Tung PJ (2014) Developing an extended theory of planned behavior model to predict consumers’ intention to visit green hotels. Int J Hosp Manag 36:221–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chib VS, Rangel A, Shimojo S (2009) Evidence for a common representation of decision values for dissimilar goods in human ventromedial prefrontal cortex. J Neurosci 29(39):12315–12320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiu CM, Wang ETG (2008) Understanding web-based learning continuance intention: the role of subjective task value. Inf Manag 45:194–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies J, Foxall GR, Pallister J (2002) Beyond the intention-behaviour mythology: an integrated model of recycling. Mark Theory 2(1):29–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dean M, Raats MM, Shepherd R (2012) The role of self-identity, past behavior and their interaction in predicting intention to purchase fresh and processed organic food. J Appl Soc Psychol 42(3):669–688

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diamantopoulos A, Schlegelmilch BB, Sinkovics RR, Bohlen GM (2003) Can socio-demographics still play a role in profiling green consumers? A review of the evidence and an empirical investigation. J Bus Res 6:465–480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrell OC, Fraedrich J (2005) Ethical decision making and cases. J Bus Ethics 560:319–336

    Google Scholar 

  • Filieri R, Alguezaui S, McLeay F (2015) Why do travelers trust Trip Advisor? Antecedents of trust towards consumer-generated media and its influence on recommendation adoption and word of mouth. Tour Manag 51:174–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fornell C, Larcker DF (1981) Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J Mark Res 18:39–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ha HY, Janda S (2012) Predicting consumer intentions to purchase energy-efficient products. J Consum Mark 29(7):461–469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair JF, Black WC, Babin BJ, Anderson RE, Tatham RL (1998) Multivariate data analysis, vol 5, no 3. Prentice hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, pp 207–219

  • Han H, Kim Y (2010) An investigation of green hotel customers’ decision formation: developing an extended model of the theory of planned behavior. J Hosp Manag 29:659–668

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Han H, Hsu LTJ, Sheu C (2010) Application of the theory of planned behavior to green hotel choice: testing the effect of environmental friendly activities. Tour Manag 31(3):325–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harman HH (1976) Modern factor analysis, 2nd edn. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartmann P, Apaolaza-Ibáñez V (2012) Consumer attitude and purchase intention toward green energy brands: the roles of psychological benefits and environmental concern. J Bus Res 65(9):1254–1263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haws KL, Winterich KP, Naylor RW (2014) Seeing the world through GREEN-tinted glasses: green consumption values and responses to environmentally friendly products. J Consum Psychol 24(3):336–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hidrue MK, Parsons GR, Kempton W, Gardner MP (2011) Willingness to pay for electric vehicles and their attributes. Resour Energy Econ 33(3):686–705

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jakovcevic A, Steg L, Mazzeo N, Caballero R, Franco P, Putrino N, Favara J (2014) Charges for plastic bags: motivational and behavioral effects. J Environ Psychol 40:372–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahn ME (2007) Do greens drive Hummers or hybrids? Environmental ideology as a determinant of consumer choice. J Environ Econ Manag 54(2):129–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser FG, Scheuthle H (2003) Two challenges to a moral extension of the theory of planned behavior: moral norms and just world beliefs in conservationism. Pers Individ Differ 35(5):1033–1048

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kasidoni M, Moustakas K, Malamis D (2015) The existing situation and challenges regarding the use of plastic carrier bags in Europe. Waste Manag Res 33(5):419–428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kilbourne W, Pickett G (2008) How materialism affects environmental beliefs concern, and environmentally responsible behavior. J Bus Res 61(9):885–893

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim YJ, Njite D, Hancer M (2013) Anticipated emotion in consumers’ intentions to select eco-friendly restaurants: augmenting the theory of planned behavior. Int J Hosp Manag 34:255–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lam T, Hsu CHC (2004) Theory of planned behavior: potential travelers from China. J Hosp Tour Res 28(4):463–482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee JS, Hsu LT, Han H, Kim Y (2010) Understanding how consumers view green hotels: how a hotel’s green image can influence behavioral intentions. J Sustain Tour 18(7):901–914

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liang (2010) The factors research of companies and products perceived convenience that based on the perspective of service consumers. Manag Innov 3:102–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu LC, Chang HH, Chang A (2015) Consumer personality and green buying intention: the mediate role of consumer ethical beliefs. J Bus Ethics 127(1):205–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell VW, Balabanis G, Schlegelmich BB, Cornwell TB (2009) Measuring unethical consumer behaviors across four countries. J Bus Ethics 88(2):395–412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moser AK (2015) Thinking green, buying green? Drivers of pro-environmental purchasing behavior. J Consum Mark 32(3):167–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mostafa MM (2009) Shades of green: a psychographic segmentation of the green consumer in Kuwait using self-organizing maps. Expert Syst Appl 26(8):11030–11038

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perugini M, Bagozzi RP (2001) The role of desires and anticipated emotions in goal-directed behaviors: broadening and deepening the theory of planned behavior. Br J Soc Psychol 40:79–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters A, Gutscher H, Scholz RW (2011) Psychological determinants of fuel consumption of purchased new cars. Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav 14(3):229–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramayah T, Lee JWC, Lim S (2012) Sustaining the environment through recycling: an empirical study. J Environ Manag 102:141–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Read DL, Brown RF, Thorsteinsson EB, Morgan M, Price I (2013) The theory of planned behavior as a model for predicting public opposition to wind farm developments. J Environ Psychol 36:70–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ritch E, Brennan C, MacLeod C (2009) Plastic bag politics: modifying consumer behavior for sustainable development. Int J Consum Stud 33(2):168–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz SH (1977) Normative influences on Altruism. Adv Exp Soc Psychol 10:221–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sidique SF, Joshi SV, Lupi F (2010a) Factors influencing the rate of recycling: an analysis of Minnesota counties. Resour Conserv Recycl 54(4):242–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sidique SF, Lupi F, Joshi SV (2010b) The effects of behavior and attitudes on drop-off recycling activities. Resour Conserv Recycl 54(3):163–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singhapakdi A, Salyachivin S, Virakul B, Veerayangkur V (2000) Some important factors underlying ethical decision making of managers in Thailand. J Bus Ethics 27(3):271–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suki NM (2016) Consumer environmental concern and green product purchase in Malaysia: structural effects of consumption values. J Clean Prod 132:204–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tarrant M, Cordell H (1997) The effect of respondent characteristics on general environmental attitude-behavior correspondence. Environ Behav 29(5):618–637

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teng YM, Wu KS, Liu HH (2014) Integrating altruism and the theory of planned behavior to predict patronage intention of a green hotel. J Hosp Tour Res 39(3):299–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tonglet M, Phillips PS, Read AD (2004) Using the theory of planned behavior to investigate the determinants of recycling behavior: a case study from Brixworth, UK. Resour Conserv Recycl 41(3):191–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsarenko Y, Ferraro C, Sands S, Mclead C (2013) Environmentally conscious consumption: the role of retailers and peers as external influences. J Retail Consum Serv 20:302–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vitell SJ, Muncy J (2005) The Muncy–Vitell consumer ethics scale: a modification and application. J Bus Ethics 62:267–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wahid NA, Rahbar E, Shyan TS (2011) Factors influencing the green purchase behavior of Penang environmental volunteers. Int Bus Manag 5(1):38–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang S, Fan J, Zhao D et al (2016) Predicting consumers’ intention to adopt hybrid electric vehicles: using an extended version of the theory of planned behavior model. Transportation 43(1):123–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yadav R, Pathak GS (2016) Young consumers’ intention towards buying green products in a developing nation: extending the theory of planned behavior. J Clean Prod 135:732–739

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 71601174 and 71571172), China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (Grant No. 2016M590583), Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities and Sichuan Education Department Foundation (Grant No. 16SB0087).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shanyong Wang.

Appendix: Constructs and measurement items

Appendix: Constructs and measurement items

Constructs and measurement items

Attitude

 A1: Using plastic bags is a good idea

 A2: Using plastic bags is a wise choice

 A3: I like the idea of using plastic bags

Subjective norm

 SN1: Most people who are important to me think I should use plastic bags

 SN2: My friend’s positive opinion influences me to use plastic bags

 SN3: People whose opinion I value would prefer that I should not use plastic bags

Perceived behaviour control

 PBC1: Whether to use plastic bags is entirely up to me

 PBC2: I am confident that if I want to, I will use plastic bags

 PBC3: Plastic bags are generally available in the shops where I usually do my shopping

Convenience

 C1: It is convenient to use plastic bags

 C2: Plastic bags are waterproof and oil-proof

 C3: I think plastic bags are thin and easy to carry

Environmental concern

 EC1: When humans interfere with nature, it often produces disastrous consequences

 EC2: Humans must live in harmony with nature to survive

 EC3: Humans are severely abusing the environment

 EC4: I am very concerned about the environment

 EC5: I am willing to reduce my consumption to help protect the environment

Ethical belief

 EB1: I will buy only from companies that have a strong willingness to protect the environment

 EB2: I will buy the products that are labelled as “environmentally friendly”

 EB3: I will buy products that are made of recycled materials

Usage intention

 UI1: I will use plastic bags for personal use

 UI2: I am willing to use plastic bags while shopping

 UI3: I intend to use plastic bags in the near future

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sun, Y., Wang, S., Li, J. et al. Understanding consumers’ intention to use plastic bags: using an extended theory of planned behaviour model. Nat Hazards 89, 1327–1342 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-017-3022-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-017-3022-0

Keywords

Navigation