Skip to main content
Log in

The effects of trust in government on earthquake survivors’ risk perception and preparedness in China

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Natural Hazards Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The role of trust in natural hazards risk management has not been widely examined yet. In this paper, the correlation between trust in government and individuals’ risk perception, as well as the perceived preparedness for earthquakes is examined. Survey data from 501 households in a Tibetan area in China affected by the 2010 Yushu earthquake are analyzed. The dependent variables are perceived seismic risk probability and consequences, as well as reported household preparedness for future earthquakes. The main predictor variable is trust in government, while trust in family members, trust in most of people in the society, trust in friends/relatives/colleagues, disaster impact, social support, socioeconomic and demographic variables (income, estimated house value, owned land, number of kids, gender, age, ethnicity, education, job categories, marriage status, political affiliation, religion, rural/urban residence) are used as control variables. Ordinal logistic regression models are employed in the analysis. The results indicate that people with higher degrees of trust in government perceive lower consequences of potential earthquakes and tend to prepare less. In the preparedness model, both perceived probability and consequences are additional strong and significant predictors. Potential theoretical and practical implications of these results are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Apatu E, Gregg C, Lindell M et al (2015) Survivors perceptions of stakeholders and the 2009 South Pacific tsunami. Disaster Prev Manag Int J 24:596–609. doi:10.1108/DPM-11-2014-0230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arlikatti S, Lindell MK, Prater CS et al (2007) Perceived stakeholder role relationships and adoption of seismic hazard adjustments. Int J Mass Emerg Disasters 25:218

    Google Scholar 

  • Armas I (2006) Earthquake risk perception in Bucharest, Romania. Risk Anal 26:1223–1234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armas I (2008) Social vulnerability and seismic risk perception. Case study: the historic center of the Bucharest Municipality/Romania. Nat Hazards 47:397–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basolo V, Steinberg LJ, Burby RJ et al (2009) The effects of confidence in government and information on perceived and actual preparedness for disasters. Environ Behav 41:338–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bird DK (2009) The use of questionnaires for acquiring information on public perception of natural hazards and risk mitigation: a review of current knowledge and practice. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 9:1307–1325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blanchard-Boehm RD, Cook MJ (2004) Risk communication and public education in Edmonton, Alberta, Canada on the 10th anniversary of the “Black Friday” Tornado. Int Res Geogr Environ Educ 13:38–54. doi:10.1080/10382040408668791

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bronfman NC, Vázquez EL, Gutiérrez VV, Cifuentes LA (2008) Trust, acceptance and knowledge of technological and environmental hazards in Chile. J Risk Res 11:755–773. doi:10.1080/13669870801967184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bronfman NC, Cisternas PC, López-Vázquez E, Cifuentes LA (2015) Trust and risk perception of natural hazards: implications for risk preparedness in Chile. Nat Hazards 81:307–327. doi:10.1007/s11069-015-2080-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cvetkovich G, Lofstedt RE (2013) Social trust and the management of risk. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • DeYoung SE, Peters M (2016) My community, my preparedness: the role of sense of place, community, and confidence in government in disaster readiness. Int J Mass Emerg Disasters 34:250–282

    Google Scholar 

  • Drabek TE (1986) Human system responses to disaster: an inventory of sociological findings. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Earle TC (2010) Trust in risk management: a model-based review of empirical research. Risk Anal 30:541–574. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01398.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FEMA (2011) A whole community approach to emergency management: principles, themes, and pathways for action. https://www.fema.gov/media-library-data/20130726-1813-25045-0649/whole_community_dec2011__2_.pdf. Accessed 10 April 2016

  • Ge Y, Xu W, Gu Z-H et al (2011) Risk perception and hazard mitigation in the Yangtze River Delta region, China. Nat Hazards 56:633–648

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Han Z, Nigg J (2012) The influences of business and decision makers’ characteristics on disaster preparedness: a study on the 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake. Int J Disaster Risk Sci 2:22–31. doi:10.1007/s13753-011-0017-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Han Z, Hu X, Nigg J (2011) How does disaster relief works affect the trust in local government? A study of the wenchuan earthquake. Risk Hazards Crisis Public Policy 2:1–20. doi:10.2202/1944-4079.1092

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardin R (2002) Trust and trustworthiness. Russell Sage Foundation, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Heitz C, Spaeter S, Auzet A-V, Glatron S (2009) Local stakeholders’ perception of muddy flood risk and implications for management approaches: a case study in Alsace (France). Land Use Policy 26:443–451. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2008.05.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hörhager E (2015) Political implications of natural disasters: regime consolidation and political contestation. WIT Trans Built Environ 150:271–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang L, Bao W, Chen K, Bi J (2014) The comparison analysis of Chinese public perception of earthquakes on different time scales. Nat Hazards 73:613–625

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs A (2010) An official mourning in China for quake victims. N. Y. Times, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Joffe H, Perez-Fuentes G, Potts HWW, Rossetto T (2016) How to increase earthquake and home fire preparedness: the fix-it intervention. Nat Hazards. doi:10.1007/s11069-016-2528-1

    Google Scholar 

  • Knuth D, Kehl D, Hulse L et al (2015) Risk perception and emergency experience: comparing a representative German sample with German emergency survivors. J Risk Res 18:581–601

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kung Y-W, Chen S-H (2012) Perception of earthquake risk in Taiwan: effects of gender and past earthquake experience. Risk Anal 32:1535–1546

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laska SB (1990) Homeowner adaptation to flooding an application of the general hazards coping theory. Environ Behav 22:320–357. doi:10.1177/0013916590223002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin S, Shaw D, Ho M-C (2007) Why are flood and landslide victims less willing to take mitigation measures than the public? Nat Hazards 44:305–314. doi:10.1007/s11069-007-9136-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindell M (2013) North American cities at risk: household responses to environmental hazards. In: Joffe H, Rossetto T, Adams J (eds) Cities at risk. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 109–130

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lindell MK, Perry RW (2000) Household adjustment to earthquake hazard a review of research. Environ Behav 32:461–501. doi:10.1177/00139160021972621

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindell MK, Arlikatti S, Prater CS (2009) Why people do what they do to protect against earthquake risk: perceptions of hazard adjustment attributes. Risk Anal 29:1072–1088. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2009.01243.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lo AY, Cheung LTO (2015) Seismic risk perception in the aftermath of Wenchuan earthquakes in southwestern China. Nat Hazards 78:1979–1996

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lobb AE, Mazzocchi M, Traill WB (2007) Modelling risk perception and trust in food safety information within the theory of planned behaviour. Food Qual Prefer 18:384–395. doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2006.04.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mulilis J-P, Duval TS (1997) The PrE model of coping and tornado preparedness: moderating effects of responsibility. J Appl Soc Psychol 27:1750–1766. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1997.tb01623.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mulilis J-P, Duval TS, Rogers R (2003) The effect of a swarm of local Tornados on Tornado preparedness: a quasi-comparable cohort investigation1. J Appl Soc Psychol 33:1716–1725. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2003.tb01971.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norris P (2011) Comparing political support around the world. In: Norris P (ed) Democratic deficit: critical citizens revisited. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 83–102

  • Oral M, Yenel A, Oral E et al (2015) Earthquake experience and preparedness in Turkey. Disaster Prev Manag 24:21–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paton D (2007) Preparing for natural hazards: the role of community trust. Disaster Prev Manag Int J 16:370–379. doi:10.1108/09653560710758323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paton D (2008) Risk communication and natural hazard mitigation: how trust influences its effectiveness. Int J Glob Environ Issues 8:2–16. doi:10.1504/IJGENVI.2008.017256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paton D, Bajek R, Okada N, McIvor D (2010) Predicting community earthquake preparedness: a cross-cultural comparison of Japan and New Zealand. Nat Hazards 54:765–781. doi:10.1007/s11069-010-9500-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perry RW, Lindell MK (2008) Volcanic risk perception and adjustment in a multi-hazard environment. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 172:170–178. doi:10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2007.12.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poortinga W, Pidgeon NF (2005) Trust in risk regulation: cause or consequence of the acceptability of GM food? Risk Anal 25:199–209. doi:10.1111/j.0272-4332.2005.00579.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadiq A-A, Graham JD (2016) Exploring the predictors of organizational preparedness for natural disasters. Risk Anal 36:1040–1053. doi:10.1111/risa.12478

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salazar M, Wang X, Hu X et al (2011) The impact of natural disasters on the social protection system: empirical evidence from the Wenchuan earthquake.IDS publication. https://www.ids.ac.uk/publication/the-impact-of-natural-disasters-on-the-social-protection-system-empirical-evidence-from-the-wenchuan-earthquake. Accessed 15 March 2016

  • Siegrist M (2010) Trust and Confidence: the Difficulties in Distinguishing the Two Concepts in Research. Risk Anal 30:1022–1024. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01454.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siegrist M, Cvetkovich G (2000) Perception of Hazards: The Role of Social Trust and Knowledge. Risk Anal 20:713–720. doi:10.1111/0272-4332.205064

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slovic P (1987) Perception of risk. Science 236:280–285. doi:10.1126/science.3563507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slovic P (1993) Perceived Risk, Trust, and Democracy. Risk Anal 13:675–682. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.1993.tb01329.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solberg C, Rossetto T, Joffe H (2010) The social psychology of seismic hazard adjustment: re-evaluating the international literature. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 10:1663–1677. doi:10.5194/nhess-10-1663-2010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Su Y, Sun X-P, Zhao F (2015) Trust and its effects on the public’s perception of flood risk: a social science investigation of the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River. J Flood Risk Manag n/a-n/a. doi:10.1111/jfr3.12138

    Google Scholar 

  • Teets JC (2009) Post-Earthquake Relief and Reconstruction Efforts: the Emergence of Civil Society in China? China Q 198:330–347. doi:10.1017/S0305741009000332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tekeli-Yesil S, Dedeoglu N, Braun-Fahrlaender C, Tanner M (2011) Earthquake awareness and perception of risk among the residents of Istanbul. Nat Hazards 59:427–446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terpstra T (2011) Emotions, Trust, and Perceived Risk: affective and Cognitive Routes to Flood Preparedness Behavior. Risk Anal 31:1658–1675. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01616.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thiers P (2003) Risk society comes to China: SARS, transparency and public accountability. Asian Perspect 27:241–251

    Google Scholar 

  • Tian L, Yao P (2015) Preferences for earthquake insurance in rural China: factors influencing individuals’ willingness to pay. Nat Hazards 79:93–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trappel R (2016) “In accordance with local conditions”: policy design and implementation of agrarian change policies in rural China. J Curr Chin Aff 45:141–168

    Google Scholar 

  • Viklund MJ (2003) Trust and risk perception in western Europe: a cross-national study. Risk Anal 23:727–738. doi:10.1111/1539-6924.00351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Visschers VH, Siegrist M (2008) Exploring the triangular relationship between trust, affect, and risk perception: a review of the literature. Risk Manag 10:156–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wachinger G, Renn O, Begg C, Kuhlicke C (2013) The risk perception paradox: implications for governance and communication of natural hazards. Risk Anal 33:1049–1065. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01942.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y, Chen H, Li J (2012a) Factors affecting earthquake recovery: the Yao’an earthquake of China. Nat Hazards 64:37–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang M, Liao C, Yang S et al (2012b) Are people willing to buy natural disaster insurance in China? Risk awareness, insurance acceptance, and willingness to pay. Risk Anal 32:1717–1740

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wei J, Zhu W, Marinova D, Wang F (2016) Household adoption of smog protective behavior: a comparison between two Chinese cities. J Risk Res. doi:10.1080/13669877.2015.1121904

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinstein ND, Lyon JE, Rothman AJ, Cuite CL (2000) Preoccupation and affect as predictors of protective action following natural disaster. Br J Health Psychol 5:351–363. doi:10.1348/135910700168973

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu W, Wei J, Zhao D (2016) Anti-nuclear behavioral intentions: the role of perceived knowledge, information processing, and risk perception. Energy Policy 88:168–177. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2015.10.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the Sichuan University under Grant skyb201502, by the Volkswagen Foundation under Grant AZ 87 382, by the National Science Foundation of China (91224009) and Beijing Social Science Fund (15JDJGB047).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ziqiang Han.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Han, Z., Lu, X., Hörhager, E.I. et al. The effects of trust in government on earthquake survivors’ risk perception and preparedness in China. Nat Hazards 86, 437–452 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-016-2699-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-016-2699-9

Keywords

Navigation