Abstract
Research examining natural disaster costs on social and economic systems is substantial. However, there are few empirical studies that seek to quantify the uncertainty and establish confidence intervals surrounding natural disaster cost estimates (ex post). To better frame the data limitations associated with natural disaster loss estimates, a range of losses can be evaluated by conducting multiple analyses and varying certain input parameters to which the losses are most sensitive. This paper contributes to the literature by examining new approaches for better understanding the uncertainty surrounding three US natural disaster cost estimate case studies, via Monte Carlo simulations to quantify the 95, 90 and 75 % confidence intervals. This research also performs a sensitivity analysis for one of the case studies examining which input data variables and assumptions are the most sensitive and contribute most to the overall uncertainty of the estimate. The Monte Carlo simulations for all three of the natural disaster events examined provide additional confidence in the US billion-dollar weather and climate disaster loss estimate report (NCDC 2014), since these estimates are within the confidence limits and near the mean and median of the example simulations. The normalized sensitivity analysis of Hurricane Ike damage costs determined that commercial losses in Texas are the most sensitive to assumption variability. Therefore, improvements in quantifying the commercial insurance participation rate for Texas will result in the largest reduction of uncertainty in the total loss estimate for Hurricane Ike. Further minimization of uncertainty would continue with improved measurement of subsequent cost parameters in order of descending sensitivity.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
All-Industry Research Advisory Council (1981) The availability of homeowners insurance in six major cities consumer experience and attitudes. Bethesda, Maryland
Barthel F, Neumayer E (2012) A trend analysis of normalized insured damage from natural disasters. Clim Change 113:215–237
Cavallo EA, Noy I (2009) The economics of natural disasters: a survey. IDB working paper series IDB-WP-124, p 55
Census American Housing Survey (1980-present). http://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/ahs.html
Dixon L, Clancy N, Seabury SA, Overton A (2006) The National Flood Insurance Program’s market penetration rate: estimates and policy implications. RAND Corporation, Santa Monica
Downton M, Pielke RA Jr (2005) How accurate are disaster loss data? The case of U.S. flood damage. Nat Hazards 35:211–228
ECLAC (2003) Handbook for estimating socio-economic and environmental effects of disasters. United Nations, Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean and International Bank for Reconstruction and Development
FEMA (2014) Flood Insurance Manual. http://www.fema.gov/flood-insurance-manual
FEMA (2015) HAZUS multi-hazard loss estimation methodology. https://www.fema.gov/hazus-mh-training
Field CB, Barros V, Stocker TF et al (2012) Managing the risks of extreme events and disasters to advance climate change adaptation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Gall M, Borden KA, Emrich CT, Cutter SL (2011) The unsustainable trend of natural hazard losses in the United States. Sustainability 3:2157–2181
Hallegatte S, Dumas P (2009) Can natural disasters have positive consequences? Investigating the role of embodied technical change. Ecol Econ 68:777–786
Institute for Business & Home Safety (2007) Open for business. http://www.disastersafety.org/wp-content/uploads/open-for-business-english.pdf
Insurance Information Institute (2014) Insurance fraud. February 2015, http://www.iii.org/issue-update/insurance-fraud
Insurance Research Council (2014) Uninsured motorists annual report. http://www.insurance-research.org
IPCC (2014) Climate change 2014: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Cambridge University Press
ISO Property Claims Services (2014). http://www.iso.com/Products/Property-Claim-Services/Property-Claim-Services-PCS-info-on-losses-fromcatastrophes.html
Kerney (2010) The PCS process for identifying catastrophes and estimating the related losses. Reinsurance Association of America catastrophe modeling conference
Kron W, Steurer M, Low P, Wirtz A (2012) How to deal properly with a natural catastrophe database—analysis of flood losses. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 12:535–550
Marshall & Swift/Boeckh (2011) MSB 4Q 2011 RTC Product Bulletin
Marshall & Swift/Boeckh (2013) MSB ITV index for residential properties. Press release. http://www.msbinfo.com/Company/News/55
Munich Re (2012) Severe weather in North America, perils, risks, insurance. Munich Re Group, 274 pp
Munich Re (2014) Topics Geo—annual review: natural catastrophes 2014. Munich. http://www.munichre.com/en/reinsurance/business/non-life/natcatservice/annual-statistics/index.html
National Association of Insurance Commissioners (2007) Business and employee insurance issues among U.S. small businesses. http://www.naic.org/documents/newsroom_small_business_summary.pdf
National Insurance Crime Bureau (2014) Insurance Fraud: Understanding the basics. https://www.nicb.org/theft_and_fraud_awareness/fact_sheets
NCA (2014) U.S. National Climate Assessment Report. U.S. Global Change Research Program, Washington, DC. http://nca2014.globalchange.gov/downloads
NCDC (2014) Billion-dollar weather and climate disasters. http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/billions
NFIP (2014) Flood insurance reform - reports and studies. https://www.fema.gov/flood-insurance-reform-reports-and-studies
Pielke RA Jr, Gratz J, Landsea CW, Collins D, Saunders MA, Musulin R (2008) Normalized hurricane damage in the United States: 1900–2005. Nat Hazards Rev 9:29–42
PricewaterhouseCoopers (1999) Study of the economic effects of charging actuarially base premium rates for pre-FIRM structures
Rasmussen TN (2004) Macroeconomic implications of natural disasters in the Caribbean. IMF working paper WP/04/224
Simmons K, Sutter D, Pielke R (2013) Normalized Tornado damage in the United States, 1950–2010. Environ Hazards 12:132–147
Smith AB, Katz RW (2013) U.S. billion-dollar weather and climate disasters: data sources, trends, accuracy, and biases. Nat Hazards 67:387–410. doi:10.1007/s11069-013-0566-5
Swiss Re (2014) Sigma—natural catastrophes and man-made disasters in 2014. Zurich, Switzerland. http://www.swissre.com/sigma/
Toya H, Skidmore M (2007) Economic development and the impacts of natural disasters. Econ Lett 94:20–25
Travelers (2014) Business risk index. https://www.travelers.com/prepare-prevent/iw-images/risk-index/2014-Travelers-Business-Risk-Index-infographic.pdf
USDA/RMA (2012/2014) Summary of business and NASS principal crop acreage. http://www.rma.usda.gov/data/sob.html
World Bank (2005) Natural disaster hotspots: a global risk analysis. World Bank, Washington, DC
Acknowledgments
The work of Jessica Matthews was supported by NOAA through the Cooperative Institute for Climate and Satellites - North Carolina under Cooperative Agreement NA14NES432003. We thank ISO/Property Claims Service, FEMA’s National Flood Insurance Program, USDA’s Risk Management Agency and the Insurance Information Institute for providing key sources and insights to better understand these data and important caveats. We also thank a number of reviewers including Neal Lott, Mike Squires, Scott Chapal, John Bates, Tom Peterson, Anthony Arguez, Tom Karl and anonymous reviewers for useful comments to enhance this research article.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Smith, A.B., Matthews, J.L. Quantifying uncertainty and variable sensitivity within the US billion-dollar weather and climate disaster cost estimates. Nat Hazards 77, 1829–1851 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-015-1678-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-015-1678-x