Skip to main content
Log in

Social vulnerability assessment for mitigation of local earthquake risk in Los Angeles County

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Natural Hazards Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Comprehensive hazard mitigation involves (1) understanding natural systems, (2) assessment of interactions within and between social systems and the built environment, and (3) understanding geo-spatial processes. To achieve this, local emergency managers must recognize variability in vulnerable populations exposed to hazards and develop place-based emergency plans accordingly. In this study, we assess whether cities in Los Angeles County are subject to disproportionally greater earthquake losses modeled from a M7.8 earthquake on the San Andreas fault. Furthermore, we analyze whether the variation in demographic and socioeconomic characteristics across cities is associated with the earthquake losses. We were able to explain 23.2 % of variance in economic losses by looking at the percentage of minority residents, income, and renter residents in a city [F(3,84) = 8.47; p < .001]. Cities with primarily minority residents had greater economic losses when compared to cities with primarily White residents (b = 1.01; p < .001). When looking at the association between demographic predictors and potential casualty rate, the percentage of Hispanic residents was positively associated with the potential casualty rate. We argue that knowledge of the relationship between earthquake hazard and the demographic characteristics of people in the area at risk is essential to mitigate the local impact from earthquakes. In other words, we apply social vulnerability assessment as part of a comprehensive risk management framework to accelerate recovery after an event. Local policy makers and the private sector can use this approach to gain a better understanding of a city’s social vulnerability and adapt their preparedness efforts accordingly.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. HAZUS-MH is a loss-estimation software, developed by FEMA for use by agencies interested in hazards mitigation, to calculate possible losses due to disasters.

  2. MMI Engineering used HAZUS-MH MR3 methodology to calculate potential losses incurred from a M7.8 earthquake on the San Andreas fault. MMI Engineering made the data available for this study via electronic format (PDF) in September 2008. A spreadsheet was created to be merged with U.S. Census data for this analysis. MMI Engineering updated Los Angeles County inventory data to estimate potential earthquake losses (Seligson 2008). Data enhancements included significant building inventory update, which results in "Level 3" HAZUS analysis.

  3. These potential losses were calculated from ShakeOut scenario ground shaking parameters only and do not include losses due to secondary effect such as fire following the earthquake.

  4. For detailed HAZUS methodology, see HAZUS-MH MR4 Technical Manual (2003).

References

  • Bertens J, Bruschi VM, Weichselgartner J (2000) Natural risk assessment in environmental policy-making. In: Proceedings of the second Euroconference on global change and catastrophe risk management: earthquake risks in Europe. IIASA Luxemburg, Austria, 6–9 July 2000

  • Borden KA, Cutter SL (2008) Spatial patterns of natural hazards mortality in the United States. Int J Health Geogr 7:64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borden KA, Schmidtlein MC, Emrich CT, Piegorsch WW, Cutter SL (2007) Vulnerability of US cities to environmental hazards. J Homel Secur Emerg Manag 4:2

    Google Scholar 

  • Burby RJ, Steinberg LJ, Basolo V (2003) The tenure trap-the vulnerability of renters to joint natural and technological disasters. Urban Aff Rev 39(1):32–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • California Emergency Management Agency (2011) California earthquake preparedness survey: facts. http://www.oes.ca.gov/WebPage/oeswebsite.nsf/ClientOESFileLibrary/Office%20of%20Public%20Information%20-%20California%20Earthquake%20Preparedness%20Study%202010/$file/CEPS_Facts.pdf. Accessed 26 May 2011

  • Cutter SL (2010) Social science perspectives on hazards and vulnerability science. In: Beer T (ed) Geophysical hazards: minimizing risk maximizing awareness. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 17–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutter SL, Finch G (2008) Temporal and spatial changes in social vulnerability to natural hazards. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105(7):2301–2306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cutter SL, Boruff BJ, Shirley WL (2003) Social vulnerability to environmental hazards. Soc Sci Q 84(2):242–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cutter SL, Emrich CT, Mitchell JT, Boruff BJ, Gall M, Schmidtlein MC, Burton CG, Melton G (2006) The long road home: race, class, and recovery from Hurricane Katrina. Environment 48(2):8–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunno CH (2011) Measuring social vulnerability to natural hazards: an examination of the United States Virgin Islands. PhD dissertation, University of North Carolina at Greensboro

  • Fothergill A, Maestas EGM, Darlington JD (1999) Race, ethnicity and disasters in the United States: a review of the literature. Disasters 23(2):156–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones LM, Bernknopf R, Cox D, Goltz J, Hudnut K, Mileti D, Perry S, Ponti D, Porter K, Reichle M, Seligson H, Shoaf K, Treiman J, Wein A (2008) The ShakeOut scenario. US geological survey open-file report 2008-1150 and California geological survey preliminary report 25. http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2008/1150/. Accessed 22 May 2009

  • King D (2008) Reduced hazard vulnerability through local government engagement and action. Nat Hazards 47:497–508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leonard HBD, Howitt AM (2010) Acting in time against disaster: a comprehensive risk management framework. In: Kunreuther H, Useen M (eds) Learning from catastrophes: strategies for reaction and response. Prentice Hall, New Jersey

  • Los Angeles County (2011) Overview http://portal.lacounty.gov/wps/portal/lac/home. Accessed 9 June 2011

  • HAZUS-MH MR4 Technical Manual (2003) Department of Homeland Security Emergency Preparedness and Response

  • Mileti DS (1999) Disasters by design: a reassessment of natural hazards in the United States. Joseph Henry Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Mileti DS, Gailus JL (2005) Sustainable development and hazards mitigation in the United States: disasters by design revisited. Mitig Adapt Strat Glob Change 10:491–504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahsed T, Weeks J (2003) Assessing vulnerability to earthquake hazards through spatial multicriteria analysis or urban areas. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 17(6):549–576

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes EL (2003) Environmental justice in America: a new paradigm. Indiana University Press, Indiana

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlosberg D (2003) The justice of environmental justice: reconciling equity, recognition, and participation in a political movement. In: Light A, de-Shalit A (eds) Moral and political reasoning in environmental practice. MIT Press, Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlosberg D (2004) Reconceiving environmental justice: global movements and political theories. Environ Polit 13(3):517–540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlosberg D (2007) Defining environmental justice: theories, movements, and nature. University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Seligson HA (2008) HAZUS enhancements and implementation for the shakeOut scenario earthquake. MMI Engineering, Inc.

  • United States Census (2009) American fact finder. http://factfinder2.census.gov/faces/nav/jsf/pages/index.xhtml. Accessed 5 Nov 2009

  • Working Group on California Earthquake Probabilities (2008). The uniform California earthquake rupture forecast, version 2 (UCERF 2): US geological survey open-file report 2007-1437 and California geological survey special report 203. http://pibs.usgs.gov/of/2007/1091. Accessed 4 June 2009

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gabriela R. Noriega.

About this article

Cite this article

Noriega, G.R., Ludwig, L.G. Social vulnerability assessment for mitigation of local earthquake risk in Los Angeles County. Nat Hazards 64, 1341–1355 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-012-0301-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-012-0301-7

Keywords

Navigation