Skip to main content
Log in

Probability-weighted hazard maps for comparing different flood risk management strategies: a case study

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Natural Hazards Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The study proposes an original methodology for producing probability-weighted hazard maps based on an ensemble of numerical simulations. These maps enable one to compare different strategies for flood risk management. The methodology was applied over a 270-km2 flood-prone area close to the left levee system of a 28-km reach of the river Reno (Northern Central Italy). This reach is characterised by the presence of a weir that allows controlled flooding of a large flood-prone area during major events. The proposed probability-weighted hazard maps can be used to evaluate how a structural measure such as the mentioned weir alters the spatial variability of flood hazard in the study area. This article shows an application by constructing two different flood hazard maps: a first one which neglects the presence of the weir using a regular levee system instead, and a second one that reflects the actual geometry with the weir. Flood hazard maps were generated by combining the results of several inundation scenarios, simulated by coupling 1D- and 2D-hydrodynamic models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ACER Technical Memorandum No. 11 (1988) Assistant Commissioner—Engineering and Research, Downstream Hazard Classification Guidelines, Denver, Colorado, U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation

  • Apel H, Thieken AH, Merz B, Bloschl G (2006) A probabilistic modelling system for assessing flood risks. Nat Hazards 38:79–100. doi:10.1007/s11069-005-8603-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aronica G, Bates PD, Horritt MS (2002) Assessing the uncertainty in distributed model predictions using observed binary pattern information within GLUE. Hydrol Process 16(10):2001–2016. doi:10.1002/hyp.398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aureli F, Mignosa P, Ziveri C, Maranzoni A (2006) Fully-2D and quasi-2D modelling of flooding scenarios due to embankment failure, River Flow 2006, Taylor & Francis Group, London. ISBN: 0-415-40815-6

  • Autorità di Bacino del Reno (1998) Generazione di idrogrammi di piena nel bacino del fiume Reno chiuso a Casalecchio (in Italian). Published online on http://www.regione.emilia-romagna.it/bacinoreno, Bologna

  • Autorità di Bacino del Reno (2002) Piano Stralcio per l’Assetto Idrogeologico (in Italian). Published online on http://www.regione.emilia-romagna.it/bacinoreno, Bologna

  • Barkau RL (1997) UNET One dimensional unsteady flow through a full network of open channels user’s manual. US Army Corps of Engineerings, Hydrologic Engineering Center, Davis

  • Bates PD (2004) Computationally efficient modelling of flood inundation extent. European Science Foundation Workshop, Ed. BIOS, Bologna

  • Brath A, Di Baldassarre G (2006) Modelli matematici per l’analisi della sicurezza idraulica del territorio. L’Acqua 6:39–48. ISSN: 1125–1255

    Google Scholar 

  • Brath A, Montanari A, Moretti G (2003) Assessing the effects on flood risk of land-use changes in the last five decades: an Italian case study. IAHS Publication no. 278, IAHS Press, UK

  • Camorani G, Castellarin A, Brath A (2006) Effects of land-use changes on the hydrologic response of reclamation systems. Phys Chem Earth 30:561–574

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawson RJ, Hall JW, Sayers PB, Bates PD, Rosu C (2005) Sampling-based flood risk analysis for fluvial dike systems. Stoch Environ Res Risk Anal 19(6):388–402. doi:10.1007/s00477-005-0010-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Bruijn KM, Klijn F (2001) Resilient flood risk management strategies. In: Guifen L, Wenxue L (eds) Proceedings of the IAHR congress, September 16–21, 2001, Beijing China. Tsinghua University Press, Beijing, ISBN: 7-302-04676-X/TV, pp 450–457

  • European Parliament Council (2007) Directive 2007/60/Ec of the European Parliament and of the council of 23 October 2007 on the assessment and management of flood risks. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm

  • Fohrer N, Haverkamp S, Eckhardt K, Frede H-G (2001) Hydrologic response to land use changes on the catchment scale. Phys Chem Earth 26:577–582

    Google Scholar 

  • Galland JC, Goutal N, Hervouet JM (1991) TELEMAC: a new numerical model for solving shallow water equations. Adv Water Resour 14(3):138–148. doi:10.1016/0309-1708(91)90006-A

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Govi M, Turitto O (2000) Casistica storica sui processi d’iterazione delle correnti di piena del Po con arginature e con elementi morfotopografici del territorio adiacente (in Italian), Istituto Lombardo Accademia di Scienza e Lettere

  • Hall JW, Sayers PB, Dawson RJ (2005) National-scale assessment of current and future flood risk in England and Wales. Nat Hazards 36:147–164. doi:10.1007/s11069-004-4546-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hervouet JM, Van Haren L (1996) Recent advances in numerical methods for fluid flows. In: Anderson MG, Walling DE, Bates PD (eds) Floodplain processes. Wiley, Chichester, UK, pp 183–214

  • Holling CS (1973) Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 4:1–24. doi:10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horritt MS, Di Baldassarre G, Bates PD, Brath A (2007) Comparing the performance of 2-D finite element and finite volume models of floodplain inundation using airborne SAR imagery. Hydrol Process 21:2745–2759. doi:10.1002/hyp.6486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hydrologic Engineering Center (2001) Hydraulic reference manual. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Davis, USA

  • Jonkman SN, Vrijling JK (2008) Loss of life due to floods. J Flood Risk Manag 1(1):43–56. doi:10.1111/j.1753-318X.2008.00006.x

    Google Scholar 

  • Merz B, Thieken AH, Gocht M (2007) Flood risk mapping at the local scale: concepts and challenges. In: Begum S, Stive MJF, Hall JW (eds) Flood risk management in Europe: innovation in policy and practice. Series: Advances in natural and technological hazards research, vol 25. Springer, Dordrecht, Chapter 13, p 231–251

  • Montanari A (2005) Large sample behaviors of the generalized likelihood uncertainty estimation (GLUE) in assessing the uncertainty of rainfall-runoff simulations. Water Resour Res 41:W08406. doi:10.1029/2004WR003826

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ohl C, Tapsell S (2000) Flooding and human health: the dangers posed are not always obvious. BMJ 321:1167–1168. doi:10.1136/bmj.321.7270.1167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Penning-Rowsell E, Fordham M (1994) Floods across Europe. Hazard assessment, modelling and management. Middlesex University Press, Middlesex. ISBN: 1 898253 01 3

  • Staatscourant (1998) Regeling oogstschade (1998) Staatscourant 1998, no. 244. Ministerie van Algemene Zaken, Den Haag, pp 16–17

  • Stuart-Menteth A (2007) RMS releases report on the summer 2007, U.K. Floods. http://www.rms.com

  • van Manen SE, Brinkhuis M (2005) Quantitative flood risk assessment for Polders. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 90:229–237. doi:10.1016/j.ress.2004.10.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vis M, Klijn F, De Bruijn KM, Van Buuren M (2003) Resilience strategies for flood risk management in the Netherlands. Int J River Basin Manag 1(1):33–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Vrisou van Eck N, Kok M (2001) Standaardmethode Schade en Slachtoffers als gevolg van overstromingen. Dienst Weg-en Waterbouwkunde. Ministerie van Rijkswaterstaat, The Netherlands. Publicatie-no. W-DWW-2001-028

  • Wooldridge S, Kalma J, Kuczera G (2001) Parameterisation of a simple semi-distributed model for assessing the impact of landuse on hydrologic response. J Hydrol (Amst) 254:16–32. doi:10.1016/S0022-1694(01)00489-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are extremely grateful to the Autorità di Bacino del Reno, Settore Tecnico e Protezione Civile and Consorzio Generale di Bonifica nella Provincia di Ferrara allowing access to their data of river Reno. The authors wish to thank Jeff Neal and Guy Schumann for their valuable suggestions and comments. Three unknown Reviewers and the Associate Editor are acknowledged for their useful and constructive reviews.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giuliano Di Baldassarre.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Di Baldassarre, G., Castellarin, A., Montanari, A. et al. Probability-weighted hazard maps for comparing different flood risk management strategies: a case study. Nat Hazards 50, 479–496 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-009-9355-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-009-9355-6

Keywords

Navigation