Abstract
Urbanization, land subsidence and sea level rise will increase vulnerability of the urbanized low-lying areas in the western part of the Netherlands. In this article possibilities are explored to reduce vulnerability of these areas by implementing alternative water management options. Two main water management fields are distinguished, water supply and flood control. A four-component vulnerability framework is presented that includes threshold capacity, coping capacity, recovery capacity, and adaptive capacity. By using the vulnerability framework it is shown that current water supply and flood control strategies in the Netherlands focus on increasing threshold capacity by constructing higher and stronger dikes, improved water storage and delivery infrastructure. A complete vulnerability decreasing strategy requires measures that include all four capacities. Flood damage reduction, backup water supply systems and emergency plans are measures that can contribute to increasing coping capacity. Recovery capacity can be increased by multi-source water supply, insurance, or establishing disaster funds. Adaptive capacity can be developed by starting experiments with new modes of water supply and urbanization. Including all four components of the vulnerability framework enables better understanding of water and climate related vulnerability of urban areas and enables developing more complete water management strategies to reduce vulnerability.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ale B (2006) Hoogleraren over rampenbestrijding. http://www.vpro.nl/programma/tegenlicht. Cited 9 Nov 2006
Bogard WC (1989) Bringing social theory to hazards research: conditions and consequences of the mitigation of environmental hazards. Sociol Perspect 31:147–168
Blaikie P, Cannon T, Davis I, Wisner B (1994) At risk: natural hazards, people’s vulnerability, and disasters. Routledge, London
de Bruin D, Schultz B (2003) A simple start with far-reaching consequences. Irrig Drain 52:51–63
Cannon T, Twigg J, Rowell J (2002) Social vulnerability, sustainable livelihoods and disasters. Available via http://www.benfieldhrc.org/disaster_studies/projects/soc_vuln_sust_live.pdf. Cited on 6 Dec 2006
Dow K (1992) Exploring differences in our common future(s): the meaning of vulnerability to global environmental change. Geoforum 23:417–436
Drunen M van (ed) (2006) Naar een klimaatbestendig Nederland, samenvatting routeplanner. Klimaat voor Ruimte, Leven met Water, Habiforum and CURNET, Gouda
Fraser E, Mabee W, Slaymaker O (2003) Mutual vulnerability, mutual dependence, The reflexive relation between human society and the environment. Glob Environ Change 13:137–144
Fraser E, Mabee W, Figge F (2005) A framework for assessing the vulnerability of food systems to future shocks. Futures 37:465–479
Gunderson L, Holling CS (2001) Panarchy: understanding transformations in human and natural systems. Island Press, Washington, DC
de Graaf RE, van de Ven FHM (2005) Transitions to more sustainable concepts of urban water management and water supply. In: Conference proceedings 10th international conference on urban drainage, 21–26 August 2005, Copenhagen
IPCC (2001) Impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability for climate change, third assessment report of the IPCC. Cambridge University Press
Jonkman SN (2007) Loss of life estimation in flood risk assessment, theory and applications. Dissertation Delft University of Technology, Delft
KNMI (2006) KNMI climate change scenarios 2006 for the Netherlands, KNMI scientific report wr 2006–01. De Bilt
Leurs AL (2005) The surface of vulnerability: An analytical framework. Glob Environ Change 15:214–223
Ministerie van Verkeer en Waterstaat (2005) Flood risks and safety in the Netherlands, Floris study full report. Available via http://www.safecoast.org/public_download/. Cited 18 Dec 2006
Mitchell JK (ed) (1999) Crucibles of hazard: mega-cities and disasters in transition. United Nations University Press, Tokyo
NMP (2004) Effecten van klimaatverandering in Nederland, Bilthoven
Oude Essink GHP (2001) Salt water intrusion in a three-dimensional groundwater system in the Netherlands: a numerical study. Trans Por Media 43:137–158
RIZA (2005) Aard, ernst en omvang van watertekorten in Nederland, RIZA report 2005.016. Lelystad
Rotmans J (2003) Transitiemanagement, sleutel voor een duurzame ontwikkeling. Koninklijke Van Gorcum, Assen
Scheffer M, Carpenter S, Foley JA, Folke C, Walker B (2001) Catastrophic shifts in ecosystems. Nature 413:591–596
Schiller A, De Sherbinin A, Hsieh W, Pulsipher A (2001) The vulnerability of global cities to climate hazards. In: Proceedings of the 2001 open meeting of the human dimensions of global environmental change, Rio de Janeiro
Sheffi Y (2005) The resilient enterprise, overcoming vulnerability for competitive advantage. MIT Press, Cambridge
Suarez P (2002) Urbanization, climate change and flood risk: addressing the fractal nature of differential vulnerability. In: Proceedings second annual IIASA-DPRI meeting integrated disaster risk management megacity vulnerability and resilience, 29–31 July 2002, Laxenburg
Timmerman P (1981) Vulnerability, resilience and the collapse of society: a review of models and possible climatic applications, environmental monograph 1. University of Toronto
Thywissen K (2006) Components of risk: a comparative glossary. UNU-EHS, Bonn
Turner BL, Kasperson RE, Matsone PA, McCarthy JJ, Corell RW, Christensene L, Eckley N, Kasperson JX, Luers A, Martellog ML, Polsky C, Pulsipher A, Schiller A (2003) A framework for vulnerability analysis in sustainability science. PNAS 100:8074–8079
van de Ven GP (1996) Man Made lowlands. history of water management and land reclamation in the Netherlands. Matrijs, Utrecht
VROM, LNV, VenW, EZ, Ministeries van (2005) Nota Ruimte. Den Haag
White GF (ed) (1974) Natural Hazards. Oxford University Press, New York
Acknowledgements
The participants of the Leven met Water Research project P1002, Transitions to more Sustainable Urban Water Management are thankfully acknowledged for funding this research. Two anonymous reviewers helped to improve the quality of the article by providing detailed comments.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
de Graaf, R., van de Giesen, N. & van de Ven, F. Alternative water management options to reduce vulnerability for climate change in the Netherlands. Nat Hazards 51, 407–422 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-007-9184-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-007-9184-4