Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Assessment of treatment response to dendritic cell vaccine in patients with glioblastoma using a multiparametric MRI-based prediction model

  • Research
  • Published:
Journal of Neuro-Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Autologous tumor lysate-loaded dendritic cell vaccine (DCVax-L) is a promising treatment modality for glioblastomas. The purpose of this study was to investigate the potential utility of multiparametric MRI-based prediction model in evaluating treatment response in glioblastoma patients treated with DCVax-L.

Methods

Seventeen glioblastoma patients treated with standard-of-care therapy + DCVax-L were included. When tumor progression (TP) was suspected and repeat surgery was being contemplated, we sought to ascertain the number of cases correctly classified as TP + mixed response or pseudoprogression (PsP) from multiparametric MRI-based prediction model using histopathology/mRANO criteria as ground truth. Multiparametric MRI model consisted of predictive probabilities (PP) of tumor progression computed from diffusion and perfusion MRI-derived parameters. A comparison of overall survival (OS) was performed between patients treated with standard-of-care therapy + DCVax-L and standard-of-care therapy alone (external controls). Additionally, Kaplan–Meier analyses were performed to compare OS between two groups of patients using PsP, Ki-67, and MGMT promoter methylation status as stratification variables.

Results

Multiparametric MRI model correctly predicted TP + mixed response in 72.7% of cases (8/11) and PsP in 83.3% (5/6) with an overall concordance rate of 76.5% with final diagnosis as determined by histopathology/mRANO criteria. There was a significant concordant correlation coefficient between PP values and histopathology/mRANO criteria (r = 0.54; p = 0.026). DCVax-L-treated patients had significantly prolonged OS than those treated with standard-of-care therapy (22.38 ± 12.8 vs. 13.8 ± 9.5 months, p = 0.040). Additionally, glioblastomas with PsP, MGMT promoter methylation status, and Ki-67 values below median had longer OS than their counterparts.

Conclusion

Multiparametric MRI-based prediction model can assess treatment response to DCVax-L in patients with glioblastoma.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

CL:

Coefficient of linear anisotropy

CP:

Coefficient of planar anisotropy

CS:

Coefficient of spherical anisotropy

CAR-T:

Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell

CCRT:

Concurrent chemoradiation therapy

DCVax-L:

Autologous tumor lysate-pulsed dendritic cell vaccine

DTI:

Diffusion tensor imaging

DSC:

Dynamic susceptibility contrast

FA:

Fractional anisotropy

GBM:

Glioblastoma

IDH :

Isocitrate dehydrogenase

MD:

Mean diffusivity

MGMT:

O6-methylguanine-DNA-methyltransferase

MRI:

Magnetic resonance imaging

OS:

Overall survival

PP:

Predictive probability of tumor progression

PsP:

Pseudoprogression

rCBV:

Relative cerebral blood volume

SOC:

Standard-of-care

TMZ:

Temozolomide

TP:

True progression

References

  1. Stupp R, Mason WP, van den Bent MJ et al (2005) Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma. N Engl J Med 352:987–996

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Poon MTC, Sudlow CLM, Figueroa JD, Brennan PM (2020) Longer-term (≥ 2 years) survival in patients with glioblastoma in population-based studies pre- and post-2005: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep 10(1):11622

  3. Montoya ML, Kasahara N, Okada H (2020) Introduction to immunotherapy for brain tumor patients: challenges and future perspectives. Neurooncol Pract 7:465–476

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Desland FA, Hormigo A (2020) The CNS and the brain tumor microenvironment: implications for glioblastoma immunotherapy. Int J Mol Sci. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21197358

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Boussiotis VA, Charest A (2018) Immunotherapies for malignant glioma. Oncogene 37:1121–1141

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Prins RM, Craft N, Bruhn KW et al (2006) The TLR-7 agonist, imiquimod, enhances dendritic cell survival and promotes tumor antigen-specific T cell priming: relation to central nervous system antitumor immunity. J Immunol 176:157–164

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Prins RM, Soto H, Konkankit V et al (2011) Gene expression profile correlates with T-cell infiltration and relative survival in glioblastoma patients vaccinated with dendritic cell immunotherapy. Clin Cancer Res 17:1603–1615

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lepski G, Bergami-Santos PC, Pinho MP et al (2023) Adjuvant vaccination with allogenic dendritic cells significantly prolongs overall survival in high-grade gliomas: results of a phase II trial. Cancers. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15041239

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Liau LM, Ashkan K, Tran DD et al (2018) First results on survival from a large Phase 3 clinical trial of an autologous dendritic cell vaccine in newly diagnosed glioblastoma. J Transl Med 16:142

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Liau LM, Ashkan K, Brem S et al (2022) Association of autologous tumor lysate-loaded dendritic cell vaccination with extension of survival among patients with newly diagnosed and recurrent glioblastoma. JAMA Oncol 9:112–121

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Chawla S, Shehu V, Gupta PK et al (2021) Physiological imaging methods for evaluating response to immunotherapies in glioblastomas. Int J Mol Sci 22:3867

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. da Cruz LCH, da Cruz LCH, Rodriguez I et al (2011) Pseudoprogression and pseudoresponse: imaging challenges in the assessment of posttreatment glioma. Am J Neuroradiol 32:1978–1985

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Okada H, Weller M, Huang R et al (2015) Immunotherapy response assessment in neuro-oncology: a report of the RANO working group. Lancet Oncol 16:e534–e542

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Ellingson BM, Wen PY, Cloughesy TF (2017) Modified criteria for radiographic response assessment in glioblastoma clinical trials. Neurotherapeutics 14:307–320

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Qin L, Li X, Stroiney A et al (2017) Advanced MRI assessment to predict benefit of anti-programmed cell death 1 protein immunotherapy response in patients with recurrent glioblastoma. Neuroradiology 59:135–145

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Song J, Kadaba P, Kravitz A et al (2020) Multiparametric MRI for early identification of therapeutic response in recurrent glioblastoma treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Neuro Oncol 22:1658–1666

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Wang S, O’Rourke DM, Chawla S et al (2019) Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in the assessment of anti-EGFRvIII chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy in patients with recurrent glioblastoma. Br J Cancer 120:54–56

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Vrabec M, Van Cauter S, Himmelreich U et al (2011) MR perfusion and diffusion imaging in the follow-up of recurrent glioblastoma treated with dendritic cell immunotherapy: a pilot study. Neuroradiology 53:721–731

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Stenberg L, Englund E, Wirestam R et al (2006) Dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced perfusion magnetic resonance (MR) imaging combined with contrast-enhanced MR imaging in the follow-up of immunogene-treated glioblastoma multiforme. Acta radiol 47:852–861

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Wang S, Martinez-Lage M, Sakai Y et al (2016) Differentiating tumor progression from pseudoprogression in patients with glioblastomas using diffusion tensor imaging and dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 37:28–36

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Louis DN, Perry A, Wesseling P et al (2021) The 2021 WHO classification of tumors of the central nervous system: a summary. Neuro Oncol 23:1231–1251

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Verma G, Chawla S, Mohan S et al (2019) Three-dimensional echo planar spectroscopic imaging for differentiation of true progression from pseudoprogression in patients with glioblastoma. NMR Biomed 32:e4042

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Bagley SJ, Schwab RD, Nelson E et al (2019) Histopathologic quantification of viable tumor versus treatment effect in surgically resected recurrent glioblastoma. J Neurooncol 141:421–429

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Akbari H, Rathore S, Bakas S et al (2020) Histopathology-validated machine learning radiographic biomarker for noninvasive discrimination between true progression and pseudo-progression in glioblastoma. Cancer 126:2625–2636

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Mohan S, Wang S, Coban G et al (2019) Detection of occult neoplastic infiltration in the corpus callosum and prediction of overall survival in patients with glioblastoma using diffusion tensor imaging. Eur J Radiol 112:106–111

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Rahman R, Ventz S, McDunn J et al (2021) Leveraging external data in the design and analysis of clinical trials in neuro-oncology. Lancet Oncol 22:e456–e465

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Wang S, Kim S, Chawla S et al (2009) Differentiation between glioblastomas and solitary brain metastases using diffusion tensor imaging. Neuroimage 44:653–660

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Chawla S, Wang S, Mohan S et al (2019) Differentiation of brain infection from necrotic glioblastoma using combined analysis of diffusion and perfusion MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 49:184–194

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Nasrallah MP, Binder ZA, Oldridge DA et al (2019) Molecular neuropathology in practice: clinical profiling and integrative analysis of molecular alterations in glioblastoma. Acad Pathol 6:2374289519848353

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Kasten BB, Udayakumar N, Leavenworth JW et al (2019) Current and future imaging methods for evaluating response to immunotherapy in neuro-oncology. Theranostics 9:5085–5104

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Liau LM, Prins RM, Kiertscher SM et al (2005) Dendritic cell vaccination in glioblastoma patients induces systemic and intracranial T-cell responses modulated by the local central nervous system tumor microenvironment. Clin Cancer Res 11:5515–5525

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Ellingson BM, Sampson J, Achrol AS et al (2021) Modified RANO, immunotherapy RANO, and standard RANO response to convection-enhanced delivery of IL4R-targeted immunotoxin MDNA55 in recurrent glioblastoma. Clin Cancer Res 27:3916–3925

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Heugenhauser J, Galijasevic M, Mangesius S et al (2022) MRI response assessment in glioblastoma patients treated with dendritic-cell-based immunotherapy. Cancers. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14061579

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Aquino D, Gioppo A, Finocchiaro G et al (2017) MRI in glioma immunotherapy: evidence, pitfalls, and perspectives. J Immunol Res 2017:5813951

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Rowe LS, Butman JA, Mackey M et al (2018) Differentiating pseudoprogression from true progression: analysis of radiographic, biologic, and clinical clues in GBM. J Neurooncol 139:145–152

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Zikou A, Sioka C, Alexiou GA et al (2018) Radiation necrosis, pseudoprogression, pseudoresponse, and tumor recurrence: imaging challenges for the evaluation of treated gliomas. Contrast Med Mol Imaging 2018:6828396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Mohan S, Wang S, Chawla S et al (2021) Multiparametric MRI assessment of response to convection-enhanced intratumoral delivery of MDNA55, an interleukin-4 receptor targeted immunotherapy, for recurrent glioblastoma. Surg Neurol Int 12:337

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Gerstner ER, McNamara MB, Norden AD et al (2009) Effect of adding temozolomide to radiation therapy on the incidence of pseudo-progression. J Neurooncol 94:97–101

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Gunjur A, Lau E, Taouk Y, Ryan G (2011) Early post-treatment pseudo-progression amongst glioblastoma multiforme patients treated with radiotherapy and temozolomide: a retrospective analysis. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 55:603–610

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Kang H-C, Kim C-Y, Han JH et al (2011) Pseudoprogression in patients with malignant gliomas treated with concurrent temozolomide and radiotherapy: potential role of p53. J Neurooncol 102:157–162

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Sanghera P, Perry J, Sahgal A et al (2010) Pseudoprogression following chemoradiotherapy for glioblastoma multiforme. Can J Neurol Sci 37:36–42

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Van Mieghem E, Wozniak A, Geussens Y et al (2013) Defining pseudoprogression in glioblastoma multiforme. Eur J Neurol 20:1335–1341

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Li H, Li J, Cheng G et al (2016) IDH mutation and MGMT promoter methylation are associated with the pseudoprogression and improved prognosis of glioblastoma multiforme patients who have undergone concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide-based chemoradiotherapy. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 151:31–36

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Weller M, Stupp R, Reifenberger G et al (2010) MGMT promoter methylation in malignant gliomas: ready for personalized medicine? Nat Rev Neurol 6:39–51

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Mishra-Kalyani PS, Amiri Kordestani L, Rivera DR et al (2022) External control arms in oncology: current use and future directions. Ann Oncol 33:376–383

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The support of Penn Neuroradiology Clinical Research Core (Ms. Lauren Karpf, Ms. Lisa Desiderio, and Dr. Shadi Asadollah) and Penn Neurosurgery Clinical Research Division (Ms. Eileen Maloney) and clinical research coordinators is gratefully acknowledged. The dendritic cell vaccine trial at the University of Pennsylvania was sponsored by Northwest Biotherapeutics, the protocol, “A Phase-3 Clinical Trial Evaluating DC Vax®L, Autologous Dendritic Cells Pulsed with Tumor Lysate Antigen for the Treatment of Glioblastoma Multiforme”, approved by the Abramson Cancer Center – CTSRMC (Clinical Trials Scientific Review Committee (UPCC # 34313) and the Institutional Review Board (#81817). The data analyses and the drafting of the manuscript were performed by the authors, independent of the sponsor.

Funding

The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Laiz Laura de Godoy: Conceptualization; Data curation; Investigation; Project administration; Writing—original draft; Writing—review & editing. Sanjeev Chawla: Conceptualization; Data curation; Investigation; Methodology; Supervision; Writing—original draft; Writing—review & editing. Steven Brem: Conceptualization; Investigation; Supervision; Writing—review & editing. Sumei Wang: Formal analysis; Methodology; Software; Writing—review & editing. Donald M. O’Rourke: Investigation; Writing—review & editing. MacLean P. Nasrallah: Data curation; Investigation; Writing—review & editing. Arati Desai: Investigation; Writing—review & editing. Laurie A. Loevner: Investigation; Writing—review & editing. Linda M. Liau: Conceptualization; Investigation; Writing—review & editing. Suyash Mohan: Conceptualization; Investigation; Methodology; Supervision; Writing—review & editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sanjeev Chawla.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Dr. S. Brem received partial support of travel expenses in 2022 from Northwest Biotherapeutics. The remaining authors do not have any potential conflicts of interest.

Ethical approval

This study was performed in line with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. The DCVax-L trial at the University of Pennsylvania, “A Phase-3 Clinical Trial Evaluating DC Vax®L, Autologous Dendritic Cells Pulsed with Tumor Lysate Antigen for the Treatment of Glioblastoma Multiforme” was sponsored by Northwest Biotherapeutics, using the protocol, NCT00045968. It was approved by the Abramson Cancer Center—CTSRMC (Clinical Trials Scientific Review Committee (UPCC # 34313) and the Institutional Review Board (#81817).

Consent to participate

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 14 KB)

Supplementary file2 (TIFF 3715 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

de Godoy, L.L., Chawla, S., Brem, S. et al. Assessment of treatment response to dendritic cell vaccine in patients with glioblastoma using a multiparametric MRI-based prediction model. J Neurooncol 163, 173–183 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-023-04324-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-023-04324-4

Keywords

Navigation