Skip to main content
Log in

Low-level copy number changes of MYC genes have a prognostic impact in medulloblastoma

  • Laboratory Investigation - Human/Animal Tissue
  • Published:
Journal of Neuro-Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

High-level amplifications of MYC genes are associated with poor outcomes in childhood medulloblastoma (MB). However, the occurrence of MYCN and MYCC copy number increases below the intense amplification pattern is rarely reported, and its clinical impact has not yet been determined. Here, we describe this phenomenon and its prognostic significance in a cohort of 29 MB patients. Using interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (I-FISH), low-level copy number alterations, i.e. gain of MYCN, were shown in 5/27 (19%) samples, whereas amplification was revealed in only 1/27 (4%) samples. MYCC gain was revealed in 6/29 (21%) MB, while amplification was disclosed in only 2/29 (7%). Hyperploidy and co-incidence of gains in both MYC loci were frequently observed in samples with copy number aberrations. Survival analysis has clearly shown that MYC copy number increases are associated with lowered event-free survival and overall survival in MB. In the case of MYCN, this negative correlation was statistically significant. We conclude that limited numerical alterations in loci 2p24 (MYCN) and 8q24 (MYCC), as assessed by I-FISH, are present in MB with a higher frequency than high-level amplifications. Poor prognoses were observed in patients with copy number increases in MYC genes. Our data illustrate the importance of further investigations in multicenter trials to better refine the emerging genomic-based prognostic stratification in MB.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Crawford JR, MacDonald TJ, Packer RJ (2007) Medulloblastoma in childhood: new biological advances. Lancet Neurol 6:1073–1085. doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(07)70289-2

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Packer RJ, Vezina G (2008) Management of and prognosis with medulloblastoma: therapy at a crossroads. Arch Neurol 65:1419–1424

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Pizer BL, Clifford SC (2009) The potential impact of tumour biology on improved clinical practice for medulloblastoma: progress towards biologically driven clinical trials. Br J Neurosurg 23:364–375. doi:10.1080/02688690903121807

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Johnsen JI, Kogner P, Albihn A, Henriksson MA (2009) Embryonal neural tumours and cell death. Apoptosis 14:424–438. doi:10.1007/s10495-009-0325-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Curran EK, Le GM, Sainani KL, Propp JM, Fisher PG (2009) Do children and adults differ in survival from medulloblastoma? A study from the SEER registry. J Neurooncol 95:81–85. doi:10.1007/s11060-009-9894-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Frange P, Alapetite C, Gaboriaud G, Bours D, Zucker JM, Zerah M, Brisse H, Chevignard M, Mosseri V, Bouffet E, Doz F (2009) From childhood to adulthood: long-term outcome of medulloblastoma patients. The Institut Curie experience (1980–2000). J Neurooncol 95:271–279. doi:10.1007/s11060-009-9927-z

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Packer RJ, Gajjar A, Vezina G, Rorke-Adams L, Burger PC, Robertson PL, Bayer L, LaFond D, Donahue BR, Marymont MH, Muraszko K, Langston J, Sposto R (2006) Phase III study of craniospinal radiation therapy followed by adjuvant chemotherapy for newly diagnosed average-risk medulloblastoma. J Clin Oncol 24:4202–4208. doi:10.1200/JCO.2006.06.4980

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Gajjar A, Chintagumpala M, Ashley D, Kellie S, Kun LE, Merchant TE, Woo S, Wheeler G, Ahern V, Krasin MJ, Fouladi M, Broniscer A, Krance R, Hale GA, Stewart CF, Dauser R, Sanford RA, Fuller C, Lau C, Boyett JM, Wallace D, Gilbertson RJ (2006) Risk-adapted craniospinal radiotherapy followed by high-dose chemotherapy and stem-cell rescue in children with newly diagnosed medulloblastoma (St Jude Medulloblastoma-96): long-term results from a prospective, multicentre trial. Lancet Oncol 7:813–820. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(06)70867-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Valteau-Couanet D, Fillipini B, Benhamou E, Grill J, Kalifa C, Couanet D, Habrand JL, Hartmann O (2005) High-dose busulfan and thiotepa followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in previously irradiated medulloblastoma patients: high toxicity and lack of efficacy. Bone Marrow Transplant 36:939–945. doi:10.1038/sj.bmt.1705162

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Massimino M, Gandola L, Spreafico F, Biassoni V, Luksch R, Collini P, Solero CN, Simonetti F, Pignoli E, Cefalo G, Poggi G, Modena P, Mariani L, Potepan P, Podda M, Casanova M, Pecori E, Acerno S, Ferrari A, Terenziani M, Meazza C, Polastri D, Ravagnani F, Fossati-Bellani F (2009) No salvage using high-dose chemotherapy plus/minus reirradiation for relapsing previously irradiated medulloblastoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 73:1358–1363. doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.06.1930

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Rosenfeld A, Kletzel M, Duerst R, Jacobsohn D, Haut P, Weinstein J, Rademaker A, Schaefer C, Evans L, Fouts M, Goldman S (2010) A phase II prospective study of sequential myeloablative chemotherapy with hematopoietic stem cell rescue for the treatment of selected high risk and recurrent central nervous system tumors. J Neurooncol 97:247–255. doi:10.1007/s11060-009-0009-z

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Rutkowski S, Bode U, Deinlein F, Ottensmeier H, Warmuth-Metz M, Soerensen N, Graf N, Emser A, Pietsch T, Wolff JE, Kortmann RD, Kuehl J (2005) Treatment of early childhood medulloblastoma by postoperative chemotherapy alone. N Engl J Med 352:978–986

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. McManamy CS, Pears J, Weston CL, Hanzely Z, Ironside JW, Taylor RE, Grundy RG, Clifford SC, Ellison DW (2007) Nodule formation and desmoplasia in medulloblastomas-defining the nodular/desmoplastic variant and its biological behavior. Brain Pathol 17:151–164. doi:10.1111/j.1750-3639.2007.00058.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Brown HG, Kepner JL, Perlman EJ, Friedman HS, Strother DR, Duffner PK, Kun LE, Goldthwaite PT, Burger PC (2000) “Large cell/anaplastic” medulloblastomas: a Pediatric Oncology Group Study. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 59:857–865

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Eberhart CG, Kepner JL, Goldthwaite PT, Kun LE, DuVner PK, Friedman HS, Strother DR, Burger PC (2002) Histopathologic grading of medulloblastomas: a pediatric oncology group study. Cancer 94:552–560. doi:10.1002/cncr.10189

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. McManamy CS, Lamont JM, Taylor RE, Cole M, Pearson AD, Clifford SC, Ellison DW (2003) Morphophenotypic variation predicts clinical behavior in childhood non-desmoplastic medulloblastomas. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 62:627–632

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lamont JM, McManamy CS, Pearson AD, Clifford SC, Ellison DW (2004) Combined histopathological and molecular cytogenetic stratification of medulloblastoma patients. Clin Cancer Res 10:5482–5493. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-03-0721

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Pfister S, Remke M, Benner A, Mendrzyk F, Toedt G, Felsberg J, Wittmann A, Devens F, Gerber NU, Joos S, Kulozik A, Reifenberger G, Rutkowski S, Wiestler OD, Radlwimmer B, Scheurlen W, Lichter P, Korshunov A (2009) Outcome prediction in pediatric medulloblastoma based on DNA copy-number aberrations of chromosomes 6q and 17q and the MYC and MYCN loci. J Clin Oncol 27:1627–1636. doi:10.1200/JCO.2008.17.9432

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Scheurlen WG, Schwabe GC, Joos S, Mollenhauer J, Sörensen N, Kühl J (1998) Molecular analysis of childhood primitive neuroectodermal tumors defines markers associated with poor outcome. J Clin Oncol 16:2478–2485

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Aldosari N, Bigner SH, Burger PC, Becker L, Kepner JL, Friedman HS, McLendon RE (2002) MYCC and MYCN oncogene amplification in medulloblastoma. A fluorescence in situ hybridization study on paraffin sections from the Children’s Oncology Group. Arch Pathol Lab Med 126:540–544

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Neben K, Korshunov A, Benner A, Wrobel G, Hahn M, Kokocinski F, Golanov A, Joos S, Lichter P (2004) Microarray-based screening for molecular markers in medulloblastoma revealed STK15 as independent predictor for survival. Cancer Res 64:3103–3111

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Takei H, Nguyen Y, Mehta V, Chintagumpala M, Dauser RC, Adesina AM (2009) Low-level copy gain versus amplification of myc oncogenes in medulloblastoma: utility in predicting prognosis and survival. Laboratory investigation. J Neurosurg Pediatr 3:61–65. doi:10.3171/2008.10.PEDS08105

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Herms J, Neidt I, Lüscher B, Sommer A, Schürmann P, Schröder T, Bergmann M, Wilken B, Probst-Cousin S, Hernaiz-Driever P, Behnke J, Hanefeld F, Pietsch T, Kretzschmar HA (2000) C-myc expression in medulloblastoma and its prognsotic value. Int J Cancer 89:395–402. doi:10.1002/1097-0215(20000920)89:5<395:AID-IJC1>3.0.CO;2-V

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Grotzer MA, Hogarty MD, Janss AJ, Liu X, Zhao H, Eggert A, Sutton LN, Rorke LB, Brodeur GM, Phillips PC (2001) MYC messenger RNA expression predicts survival outcome in childhood primitive neuroectodermal tumor/medulloblastoma. Clin Cancer Res 7:2425–2433

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Eberhart CG, Kratz J, Wang Y, Summers K, Stearns D, Cohen K, Dang CV, Burger PC (2004) Histopathological and molecular prognostic markers in medulloblastoma: c-myc, N-myc, TrkC, and anaplasia. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 63:441–449

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Grotzer MA, Janss AJ, Fung K, Biegel JA, Sutton LN, Rorke LB, Zhao H, Cnaan A, Phillips PC, Lee VM, Trojanowski JQ (2000) TrkC expression predicts good clinical outcome in primitive neuroectodermal brain tumors. J Clin Oncol 18:1027–1035

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Rutkowski S, von Bueren A, von Hoff K, Hartmann W, Shalaby T, Deinlein F, Warmuth-Metz M, Soerensen N, Emser A, Bode U, Mittler U, Urban C, Benesch M, Kortmann RD, Schlegel PG, Kuehl J, Pietsch T, Grotzer M (2007) Prognostic relevance of clinical and biological risk factors in childhood medulloblastoma: results of patients treated in the prospective multicenter trial HIT’91. Clin Cancer Res 13:2651–2657. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-1779

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Pizem J, Cört A, Zadravec-Zaletel L, Popovic M (2005) Survivin is a negative prognostic marker in medulloblastoma. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol 31:422–428. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2990.2005.00664.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Haberler C, Slavc I, Czech T, Gelpi E, Heinzl H, Budka H, Urban C, Scarpatetti M, Ebetsberger-Dachs G, Schindler C, Jones N, Klein-Franke A, Maier H, Jauk B, Kiefer A, Hainfellner JA (2006) Histopathological prognostic factors in medulloblastoma: high expression of survivin is related to unfavourable outcome. Eur J Cancer 42:2996–3003. doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2006.05.038

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Ellison DW, Onilude OE, Lindsey JC, Lusher ME, Weston CL, Taylor RE, Pearson AD, Clifford SC (2005) beta-Catenin status predicts a favorable outcome in childhood medulloblastoma: the United Kingdom Children’s Cancer Study Group Brain Tumour Committee. J Clin Oncol 23:7951–7957. doi:10.1200/JCO.2005.01.5479

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Clifford SC, Lusher ME, Lindsey JC, Langdon JA, Gilbertson RJ, Straughton D, Ellison DW (2006) Wnt/Wingless pathway activation and chromosome 6 loss characterize a distinct molecular sub-group of medulloblastomas associated with a favorable prognosis. Cell Cycle 5:2666–2670

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Fattet S, Haberler C, Legoix P, Varlet P, Lellouch-Tubiana A, Lair S, Manie E, Raquin MA, Bours D, Carpentier S, Barillot E, Grill J, Doz F, Puget S, Janoueix-Lerosey I, Delattre O (2009) Beta-catenin status in paediatric medulloblastomas: correlation of immunohistochemical expression with mutational status, genetic profiles, and clinical characteristics. J Pathol 218:86–94. doi:10.1002/path.2514

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Ruggero D (2009) The role of Myc-induced protein synthesis in cancer. Cancer Res 69:8839–8843. doi:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-1970

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Necesalova E, Vranova V, Kuglik P, Cejpek P, Jarosova M, Pesakova M, Relichova J, Veselska R (2007) Incidence of the main genetic markers in glioblastoma multiforme is independent of tumor topology. Neoplasma 54:212–218

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Friedman HS, Burger PC, Bigner SH, Trojanowski JQ, Brodeur GM, He XM, Wikstrand CJ, Kurtzberg J, Berens ME, Halperin EC, Bigner DD (1988) Phenotypic and genotypic analysis of a human medulloblastoma cell line and transplantable xenograft (D341 Med) demonstrating amplification of c-myc. Am J Pathol 130:472–484

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Badiali M, Pession A, Basso G, Andreini L, Rigobello L, Galassi E, Giangaspero F (1991) N-myc and c-myc oncogenes amplification in medulloblastomas. Evidence of particularly aggressive behavior of a tumor with c-myc amplification. Tumori 77:118–121

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Rasheed BK, Bigner SH (1991) Genetic alterations in glioma and medulloblastoma. Cancer Metastasis Rev 10:289–299. doi:10.1007/BF00554791

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Tomlinson FH, Jenkins RB, Scheithauer BW, Keelan PA, Ritland S, Parisi JE, Cunningham J, Olsen KD (1994) Aggressive medulloblastoma with high-level N-myc amplification. Mayo Clin Proc 69:359–365

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Bruggers CS, Tai KF, Murdock T, Sivak L, Le K, Perkins SL, Coffin CM, Carroll WL (1998) Expression of the c-Myc protein in childhood medulloblastoma. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 20:18–25

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Jay V, Squire J, Bayani J, Alkhani AM, Rutka JT, Zielenska M (1999) Oncogene amplification in medulloblastoma: analysis of a case by comparative genomic hybridization and fluorescence in situ hybridization. Pathology 31:337–344

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Kucerova H, Stejskalova E, Vicha A, Tichy M, Chanova M, Sumerauer D, Koutecky J, Eckschlager T (2000) Gene aberrations in childhood brain tumors. Folia Biol (Praha) 46:187–190

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Gilhuis HJ, Anderl KL, Boerman RH, Jeuken JM, James CD, Raffel C, Scheithauer BW, Jenkins RB (2000) Comparative genomic hybridization of medulloblastomas and clinical relevance: eleven new cases and a review of the literature. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 102:203–209. doi:10.1016/S0303-8467(00)00112-8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Eberhart CG, Kratz JE, Schuster A, Goldthwaite P, Cohen KJ, Perlman EJ, Burger PC (2002) Comparative genomic hybridization detects an increased number of chromosomal alterations in large cell/anaplastic medulloblastomas. Brain Pathol 12:36–44. doi:10.1111/j.1750-3639.2002.tb00420.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Stearns D, Chaudhry A, Abel TW, Burger PC, Dang CV, Eberhart CG (2006) c-myc overexpression causes anaplasia in medulloblastoma. Cancer Res 66:673–681. doi:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-1580

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Garson JA, Pemberton LF, Sheppard PW, Varndell IM, Coakham HB, Kemshead JT (1989) N-myc gene expression and oncoprotein characterisation in medulloblastoma. Br J Cancer 59:889–894

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Malakho SG, Korshunov A, Stroganova AM, Poltaraus AB (2008) Fast detection of MYCN copy number alterations in brain neuronal tumors by real-time PCR. J Clin Lab Anal 22:123–130. doi:10.1002/jcla.20232

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Ambros PF, Ambros IM, Brodeur GM, Haber M, Khan J, Nakagawara A, Schleiermacher G, Speleman F, Spitz R, London WB, Cohn SL, Pearson AD, Maris JM (2009) International consensus for neuroblastoma molecular diagnostics: report from the International Neuroblastoma Risk Group (INRG) Biology Committee. Br J Cancer 100:1471–1482. doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6605014

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Souzaki R, Tajiri T, Higashi M, Kinoshita Y, Tanaka S, Kohashi K, Tsuneyoshi M, Taguchi T (2008) Clinical implications of a slight increase in the gene dosage of MYCN in neuroblastoma determined using quantitative PCR. Pediatr Surg Int 24:1095–1100. doi:10.1007/s00383-008-2228-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Ryott M, Wangsa D, Heselmeyer-Haddad K, Lindholm J, Elmberger G, Auer G, Avall Lundqvist E, Ried T, Munck-Wikland E (2009) EGFR protein overexpression and gene copy number increases in oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma. Eur J Cancer 45:1700–1708. doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2009.02.027

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Zerbini C, Gelber RD, Weinberg D, Sallan SE, Barnes P, Kupsky W, Scott RM, Tarbell NJ (1993) Prognostic factors in medulloblastoma, including DNA ploidy. J Clin Oncol 11:616–622

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Latimer FR, AlSaadi AA, Robbins TO (1987) Cytogenetic studies of human brain tumors and their clinical significance. 1. Medulloblastoma. J Neurooncol 4:287–291. doi:10.1007/BF00150618

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by grant IGA MZCR NR9125-4/2006. We thank Dr Michal Kyr for his technical help with statistical analysis.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karel Zitterbart.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zitterbart, K., Filkova, H., Tomasikova, L. et al. Low-level copy number changes of MYC genes have a prognostic impact in medulloblastoma. J Neurooncol 102, 25–33 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-010-0289-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-010-0289-3

Keywords

Navigation