Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A 3D ellipsoidal volumetric foot–ground contact model for forward dynamics

  • Published:
Multibody System Dynamics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Foot–ground contact models are an important part of forward dynamic biomechanic models, particularly those used to model gait, and have many challenges associated with them. Contact models can dramatically increase the complexity of the multibody system equations, especially if the contact surface is relatively large or conforming. Since foot–ground contact has a large potential contact area, creating a computationally efficient model is challenging. This is particularly problematic in predictive simulations, which may determine optimal performance by running a model simulation thousands of times. An ideal contact model must find a balance between accuracy for large, conforming surfaces, and computational efficiency.

Volumetric contact modelling is explored as a computationally efficient model for foot–ground contact. Previous foot models have used volumetric contact before, but were limited to 2D motion and approximated the surfaces as spheres or 2D shapes. The model presented here improves on current work by using ellipsoid contact geometry and considering 3D motion and geometry. A gait experiment was used to parametrise and validate the model. The model ran over 100 times faster than real-time (in an inverse simulation at 128 fps) and matched experimental normal force and centre of pressure location with less than 7% root-mean-square error.

In most gait studies, only the net reaction forces, centre of pressure, and body motions are recorded and used to identify parameters. In this study, contact pressure was also recorded and used as a part of the identification, which was found to increase parameter optimisation time from 10 to 164 s (due to the additional time needed to calculate the pressure distribution) but helped the results converge to a more realistic model. The model matched experimental pressures with 33–45% root-mean-square error, though some of this was due to measurement errors.

The same parametrisation was done with friction included in the foot model. It was determined that the velocity-based friction model that was used was inappropriate for use in an inverse-dynamics simulation. Attempting to optimise the model to match experimental friction resulted in a poor match to the experimental friction forces, inaccurate values for the coefficient of friction, and a poorer match to the experimental normal force.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Anderson, F.C., Pandy, M.G.: Dynamic optimization of human walking. J. Biomech. Eng. 123(5), 381–390 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Peasgood, M., Kubica, E., McPhee, J.: Stabilization of a dynamic walking gait simulation. J. Comput. Nonlinear Dyn. 2(3), 65–72 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Smith, C.R., Vignos, M.F., Lenhart, R.L., Kaiser, J., Thelen, D.G.: The influence of component alignment and ligament properties on tibiofemoral contact forces in total knee replacement. J. Biomech. Eng. 138(5), 021017 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Fregly, B.J., Reinbolt, J.A., Rooney, K.L., Mitchell, K.H., Chmielewski, T.L.: Design of patient-specific gait modifications for knee osteoarthritis rehabilitation. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 54(9), 1687–1695 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Allen, S.J., King, M.A., Yeadon, M.R.: Optimisation of phase ratio in the triple jump using computer simulation. Hum. Mov. Sci. 46, 167–176 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Halloran, J.P., Ackermann, M., Erdemir, A., van den Bogert, A.J.: Concurrent musculoskeletal dynamics and finite element analysis predicts altered gait patterns to reduce foot tissue loading. J. Biomech. 43(14), 2810–2815 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Saraswat, P., Andersen, M.S., MacWilliams, B.A.: A musculoskeletal foot model for clinical gait analysis. J. Biomech. 43, 1645–1652 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Fluit, R., Andersen, M.S., Kolk, S., Verdonschot, N., Koopman, H.F.J.M.: Prediction of ground reaction forces and moments during various activities of daily living. J. Biomech. 47(10), 2321–2329 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Skals, S., Jung, M.K., Damsgaard, M., Andersen, M.S.: Prediction of ground reaction forces and moments during sports-related movements. Multibody Syst. Dyn. 39(3), 175–195 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Font-Llagunes, J.M., Barjau, A., Pàmies-Vilà, R., Kovecses, J.: Dynamic analysis of impact in swing-through crutch gait using impulsive and continuous contact models. Multibody Syst. Dyn. 28(3), 257–282 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Ros, J., Font-Llagunes, J.M., Plaza, A., Kovecses, J.: Dynamic considerations of heel-strike impact in human gait. Multibody Syst. Dyn. 35(3), 215–232 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Pérez-Gonzâlez, A., Fenollosa-Esteve, C., Sancho-Bru, J.L., Sanchez-Marfn, F.T., Vergara, M., Rodrfguez-Cervantes, P.J.: A modified elastic foundation contact model for application in 3D models of the prosthetic knee. Med. Eng. Phys. 30(3), 387–398 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Flores, P., Machado, M., Silva, M.T., Martins, J.M.: On the continuous contact force models for soft materials in multibody dynamics. Multibody Syst. Dyn. 25(3), 357–375 (2011)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Mahboobin, A., Cham, R., Piazza, S.J.: The impact of a systematic reduction in shoe-floor friction on heel contact walking kinematics—a gait simulation approach. J. Biomech. 43, 1532–1539 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lopes, D.S., Neptune, R.R., Ambrósio, J.A., Silva, M.T.: A superellipsoid-plane model for simulating foot–ground contact during human gait. Comput. Methods Biomech. Biomed. Eng. 19(9), 954–963 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Jackson, J.N., Hass, C.J., Fregly, B.J.: Development of a subject-specific foot- ground contact model for walking. J. Biomech. Eng. 138(9), 091002 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Moreira, P., Silva, M., Flores, P.: Ground foot interaction in human gait: modelling and simulation. In: Proceedings of 7th EUROMECH Solid Mechanics Conference, 7–11 September Lisbon, Portugal (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Millard, M., Kecskeméthy, A.: A 3D foot–ground model using disk contacts. In: The 3rd Joint International Conference on Multibody System Dynamics & The 7th Asian Conference on Multibody Dynamics, Busan, Korea (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Gonçalves, A.A., Bernardino, A., Jorge, J., Lopes, D.S.: A benchmark study on accuracy-controlled distance calculation between superellipsoid and superovoid contact geometries. Mech. Mach. Theory 115, 77–96 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Gonthier, Y., McPhee, J., Lange, C., Piedbœuf, J.-C.: A contact modeling method based on volumetric properties. In: ASME IDETC, Long Beach, California, USA pp. 477–486 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Boos, M., McPhee, J.: Volumetric modeling and experimental validation of normal contact dynamic forces. J. Comput. Nonlinear Dyn. 8(2), 021006 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Gonthier, Y.: Contact dynamics modelling for robotic task simulation. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Waterloo (2007)

  23. Millard, M., McPhee, J., Kubica, E.: Multi-step forward dynamic gait simulation. In: Bottasso, C.L. (ed.) Multibody Dynamics: Computational Methods and Applications, pp. 25–43. Springer, Dordrecht (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Sharif Shourijeh, M., McPhee, J.: Forward dynamic optimization of human gait simulations: a global parameterization approach. J. Comput. Nonlinear Dyn. 9(3), 031018 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Shourijeh, M.S., McPhee, J.: Foot-ground contact modeling within human gait simulations: from Kelvin–Voigt to hyper-volumetric models. Multibody Syst. Dyn. 35(4), 393–407 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Mouzo, F., Lugrfs, U., Pàmies-Vilà, R., Font-Llagunes, J.M., Cuadrado, J.: Underactuated approach for the control-based forward dynamic analysis of acquired gait motions. In: ECCOMAS Thematic Conference on Multibody Dynamics, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Brown, P.: Contact modelling for forward dynamics of human motion. Master’s thesis, University of Waterloo (2017)

  28. Brown, P., McPhee, J.: Volumetric contact model of ellipsoid-plane geometries. In: ECCOMAS Thematic Conference on Multibody Dynamics (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Pàmies-Vilà, R., Font-Llagunes, J.M., Lugrfs, U., Cuadrado, J.: Parameter identification method for a three-dimensional foot–ground contact model. Mech. Mach. Theory 75, 107–116 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Gerus, P., Sartori, M., Besier, T.F., Fregly, B.J., Delp, S.L., Banks, S.A., Pandy, M.G., D’Lima, D.D., Lloyd, D.G.: Subject-specific knee joint geometry improves predictions of medial tibiofemoral contact forces. J. Biomech. 46(16), 2778–2786 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Wesseling, M., De Groote, F., Bosmans, L., Bartels, W., Meyer, C., Desloovere, K., Jonkers, I.: Subject-specific geometrical detail rather than cost function formulation affects hip loading calculation. Comput. Methods Biomech. Biomed. Eng. 19(14), 1475–1488 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Hannah, I., Sawacha, Z., Guiotto, A., Mazzà, C.: Relationship between sagittal plane kinematics, foot morphology and vertical forces applied to three regions of the foot. Int. Biomech. 3(1), 50–56 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Zhu, J., Wang, Q., Wang, L.: On the design of a powered transtibial prosthesis with stiffness adaptable ankle and toe joints. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform. 61(9), 4797–4807 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Brown, P., McPhee, J.: A continuous velocity-based friction model for dynamics and control with physically meaningful parameters. J. Comput. Nonlinear Dyn. 11(5), 054502 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Li, K.W., Wen, H.C.: Friction between foot and floor under barefoot conditions: a pilot study. In: IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, pp. 1651–1655 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Gronqvist, R., Abeysekera, J., Gard, G., Hsiang, S.M., Leamon, T.B., Newman, D.J., Gielo-Perczak, K., Lockhart, T.E., Pai, C.Y.: Human-centred approaches in slipperiness measurement. Ergonomics 44(13), 1167–1199 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was funded by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada and the Canada Research Chairs program.

Special thanks to Dr. Stacey Acker and David Kingston for the use of their lab space and assistance running the gait experiments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Systems Design Engineering, University of Waterloo, 200 University Ave W, Waterloo, ON, N2L 3G1, Canada

    Peter Brown & John McPhee

Authors
  1. Peter Brown
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. John McPhee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter Brown.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Brown, P., McPhee, J. A 3D ellipsoidal volumetric foot–ground contact model for forward dynamics. Multibody Syst Dyn 42, 447–467 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11044-017-9605-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11044-017-9605-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation