Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Integrating simulation tasks into an outdoor location-based game flow

  • Published:
Multimedia Tools and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Gamification and game-based learning have been established as powerful tools in education. Location-based games (geogames) have been established following mainly a ‘seek-and-find’ game-mechanic, challenging mechanics like simulations are rarely used. We describe an approach for creating an educational location-based game (geogame). The central design problem consists in integrating an ecological simulation into the location-based game flow. We show how to combine these two game mechanics by simplifying complex simulations while maintaining their validity. In an empirical study we evaluate our geogame with secondary school students (N = 329). Our quasi-experimental pre-post-test design focuses on the game-related enjoyment provided by a simplified simulation task within a geogame compared to a more complex desktop simulation and to a geogame without simulation. The results show that the players of the Geogame spend much less time on interacting with the simulation than on other tasks. Nevertheless, the simulation within the geogame contributes positively to the game playing experience. Player enjoyment is even found to be slightly higher in the simulation geogame than in the indoor simulation. A critical threshold of time for using simulations within location-based game mechanics is discussed and related design-pattern for geogames are presented to support educators and game developers in the co-design of challenging location-based games. This study contributes to locate ecological simulations in areas where they actually take place. Complex topics and competencies in education become “real” for players in an outdoor experience.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Adams E (2014) Fundamentals of game design, 3rd edn. Pearson education, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ahlqvist O, Schlieder C (eds) (2018) Geogames and geoplay: Game-based approaches to the analysis of geo-information. Advances in geographic information science. Springer, Cham

    Google Scholar 

  3. Althoff T, White RW, Horvitz E (2016) Influence of Pokémon go on physical activity: study and implications. J Med Internet Res 18(12):e315. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.6759

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Altman I, Low SM (1992) Place attachment: a conceptual inqiry. In: Altman I, Low SM (eds) Place attachment. Springer US, Boston, pp 1–12

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Anderson CL, Miller BG, Eitel KB et al (2015) Exploring techniques for integrating Mobile technology into field-based environmental education. Electron J Sci Educ 19(6):1–19

    Google Scholar 

  6. Antoniou V, Schlieder C (2018) Addressing uneven participation patterns in VGI through gamification mechanisms. In: Ahlqvist O, Schlieder C (eds) Geogames and geoplay: game-based approaches to the analysis of geo-information. Springer, Cham, pp 91–110

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Barreteau O, Le Page C, Perez P (2007) Contribution of simulation and gaming to natural resource management issues: an introduction. Simul Gaming 38(2):185–194. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046878107300660

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Brahm T, Jenert T (2014). Wissenschaft-Praxis-Kooperation in desgnbasierter Forschung: Im Spannungsfeld zwischen wissenschaftlicher Gültigkeit und praktischer Relevanz. Zeitschrift für Berufs- und Wirtschaftspädagogik 27, 45–62

  9. Braun B, Stopfer JM, Müller KW et al (2016) Personality and video gaming: comparing regular gamers, non-gamers, and gaming addicts and differentiating between game genres. Comput Hum Behav 55:406–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.09.041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chamberlin B, Trespalacios JH, Gallagher R (2014) Bridging research and game development: A Learning Games Design Model for multi-game projects. In: Khosrow-Pour M (ed) Educational technology use and design for improved learning opportunities. IGI Global, Hershey, Pennsylvania (701 E. Chocolate Avenue, Hershey, Pa., 17033, USA), pp 151–171

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Crawford MR, Holder MD, OConnor BP (2016) Using Mobile technology to engage children with nature. Environ Behav. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916516673870

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Crookall D (2011) Serious games, debriefing, and simulation/gaming as a discipline. Simul Gaming 41(6):898–920. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046878110390784

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Deci EL, Ryan RM (2003) Intrinsic Motivation Inventory 2003. http://www.selfdeterminationtheory.org/questionnaires/10-questionnaires/50 accessed 06/14/ 2015

  14. Dourish P (2006) Re-space-ing place. In: Hinds P, Martin D (eds) CSCW 2006: Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work : conference proceedings : 20th anniversary : November 4–8, 2006, the Fairmont Banff Springs Hotel, Banff, Alberta, Canada. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, N.Y., pp 299–308

  15. Eisenack K (2013) A climate change board game for interdisciplinary communication and education. Simul Gaming 44(2–3):328–348. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046878112452639

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Feierabend S, Plankenhorn T, Rathgeb T (2017) JIM-Studie 2017, Jugend, Information, (Multi-)Media: Basisstudie zum Medienumgang 12- bis 19-Jähriger in Deutschland

  17. Fritsch D, Klein M (2018) 3D preservation of buildings – reconstructing the past. Multimed Tools Appl 77(7):9153–9170. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-017-4654-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hains G, Khmelevsky Y, Bartlett R et al. (2017) Game private networks performance: From geolocation to latency to user experience. In: 11th Annual IEEE International Systems Conference: Montreal, Quebec, Canada, Marriott Chateau Champlain Hotel, Monday-Thursday, April 24–27 : 2017 proceedings. IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, pp 1–6

  19. Harrison S, Dourish P (1996) Re-Place-ing Space: The Roles of Place and Space in Collaborative Systems. In: CSCW (ed) Proceedings of the 1996 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work. ACM, New York, pp 67–76

  20. Homer BD, Hayward EO, Frye J et al (2012) Gender and player characteristics in video game play of preadolescents. Comput Hum Behav 28(5):1782–1789. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.04.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ioannides M, Hadjiprocopi A, Doulamis N et al (2013) Online 4d reconstruction using multi-images available under open access. ISPRS Annals of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences (1):169–174. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprsannals-II-5-W1-169-2013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Isaacs S (2015) The Difference between Gamification and Game-Based Learning. http://inservice.ascd.org/the-difference-between-gamification-and-game-based-learning/. Accessed 07 Jan 2017

  23. Iten N, Petko D (2016) Learning with serious games: is fun playing the game a predictor of learning success? Br J Educ Technol 47(1):151–163. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kamarainen AM, Metcalf S, Grotzer T et al (2013) EcoMOBILE: integrating augmented reality and probeware with environmental education field trips. Comput Educ 68:545–556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.02.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Katsaliaki K, Mustafee N (2016) Edutainment for sustainable development: a survey of games in the field. Simul Gaming 46(6):647–672. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046878114552166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Ketelhut DJ, Nelson BC, Clarke J et al (2010) A multi-user virtual environment for building and assessing higher order inquiry skills in science. Br J Educ Technol 41(1):56–68. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.01036.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Kyriakaki G, Doulamis A, Doulamis N et al (2014) 4D reconstruction of tangible cultural heritage objects from web-retrieved images. International Journal of Heritage in the Digital Era 3(2):431–451. https://doi.org/10.1260/2047-4970.3.2.431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Lai C-H, Yang J-C, Chen F-C et al (2007) Affordances of mobile technologies for experiential learning: the interplay of technology and pedagogical practices. J Comput Assist Learn 23(4):326–337. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2007.00237.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Lee JJ, Ceyhan P, Jordan-Cooley W et al (2013) GREENIFY: a real-world action game for climate change education. Simul Gaming 44(2–3):349–365. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046878112470539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Li M-C, Tsai C-C (2013) Game-based learning in science education: a review of relevant research. J Sci Educ Technol 22(6):877–898. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-013-9436-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Lieberoth A (2015) Shallow gamification: testing psychological effects of framing an activity as a game. Games and Culture 10(3):229–248. https://doi.org/10.1177/1555412014559978

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Lukosch H, Bekebrede G, Kurapati S, Lukosch S (2018) A scientific foundation of simulation games of complex systems. Simul Gaming 49(3):279–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Marins DR, Justo MdOD, Xexeo GB et al. (2011) SmartRabbit: A Mobile Exergame Using Geolocation. In: Brazilian Symposium on Games and Digital Entertainment (SBGAMES), 2011. IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, pp 232–240

  34. Marklund BB, Backlund P, Engstrom H (2014) The practicalities of educational games: challenges of taking games into formal educational settings. In: Camilleri V, Dingli A, Montebello M (eds) VS-GAMES 2014: 2014 6th international conference on games and virtual worlds for serious applications : 9–12 September 2014, Msida, Malta. University of Malta. IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, pp 1–8

    Google Scholar 

  35. McKenney S, Reeves T (2014) Educational design research. http://dspace.ou.nl/bitstream/1820/5313/1/Ch9-DR-McKenneyReevesFinalFormatted.pdf

  36. Oppermann L, Schaal S, Eisenhardt M et al. (2017) Move, Interact, Learn, Eat – a Toolbox for Educational Location-Based Games. In: ACE 2017 - Advances in Computer Entertainment Technology

  37. Otto SP, Day T (2007) A Biologist's guide to mathematical modeling in ecology and evolution. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Book  Google Scholar 

  38. Padilla-Zea N, Medina NM, Gutiérrez Vela FL et al (2017) PLAGER-VG: platform for managing educational multiplayer video games. Multimed Tools Appl. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-017-4376-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Paliokas I, Sylaiou S (2016) The Use of Serious Games in Museum Visits and Exhibitions: A Systematic Mapping Study. In: 2016 8th International Conference on Games and Virtual Worlds for Serious Applications (VS-Games): VS-Games 2016 : 7–9 September, Barcelona, Spain. IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, pp 1–8

  40. Pivec M, Kronberger A (2016) Virtual Museum: Playful Visitor Experience in the Real and Virtual World. In: 2016 8th International Conference on Games and Virtual Worlds for Serious Applications (VS-Games): VS-Games 2016 : 7–9 September, Barcelona, Spain. IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, pp 1–4

  41. Prandi C, Roccetti M, Salomoni P et al (2017) Fighting exclusion: a multimedia mobile app with zombies and maps as a medium for civic engagement and design. Multimed Tools Appl 76(4):4951–4979. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-016-3780-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Puentedura RR (2006) Transformation, Technology, and Education. http://hippasus.com/resources/tte/. Accessed 29 Apr 2016

  43. Rasche P, Schlomann A, Mertens A (2017) Who is still playing Pokémon go? A web-based survey. JMIR Serious Games 5(2):e7. https://doi.org/10.2196/games.7197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Riess W, Mischo C (2009) Promoting systems thinking through biology lessons. Int J Sci Educ 32(6):705–725. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690902769946

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Rodríguez-Pupo L, Casteleyn S, Granell C (2017) On metrics for location-aware games. IJGI 6(10):299. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi6100299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Ruchter M, Klar B, Geiger W (2010) Comparing the effects of mobile computers and traditional approaches in environmental education. Comput Educ 54(4):1054–1067. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.10.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Rutten N, van Joolingen WR, van der Veen JT (2012) The learning effects of computer simulations in science education. Comput Educ 58(1):136–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.07.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Salen K, Zimmerman E (2004) Rules of play: game design fundamentals. MIT Press, Reading

    Google Scholar 

  49. Schaal S, Lude A (2015) Using Mobile devices in environmental education and education for sustainable development—comparing theory and practice in a nation wide survey. Sustainability 7(8):10153–10170. https://doi.org/10.3390/su70810153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Scheider S, Kiefer P (2018) (re-)localization of location-based games. In: Ahlqvist O, Schlieder C (eds) Geogames and geoplay: game-based approaches to the analysis of geo-information. Springer, Cham, pp 131–159

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  51. Schlieder C, Wullinger P (2016) Reducing Locomotion Overhead in Educational Geogames. In: Gartner G, Huang H (eds) LBS-16, Proc. Int. Conf. on Location Based Services, pp 228–232

  52. Schlieder C, Kremer D, Heinz T (2018) Teaching Geogame design: game relocation as a spatial analysis task. In: Ahlqvist O, Schlieder C (eds) Geogames and geoplay: game-based approaches to the analysis of geo-information. Springer, Cham, pp 111–130

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  53. Schneider J, Schaal S (2017) Location-based smartphone games in the context of environmental education and education for sustainable development: fostering connectedness to nature with Geogames. Environ Educ Res:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2017.1383360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Schulze J, Martin R, Finger A et al (2015) Design, implementation and test of a serious online game for exploring complex relationships of sustainable land management and human well-being. Environ Model Softw 65:58–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2014.11.029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Shultis J (2001) Consuming nature: the uneasy relationship between technology, outdoor recreation and protected areas. The George Wright Forum 18(1):56–66

    Google Scholar 

  56. Silpasuwanchai C, Ma X, Shigemasu H et al. (2016) Developing a Comprehensive Engagement Framework of Gamification for Reflective Learning. In: Foth M, Ju W, Schroeter R et al. (eds) DIS 2016 companion: Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems : June 4–8, 2016, Brisbane, Australia. The Association for Computing Machinery, New York, New York, pp 459–472

  57. Schaal S, Schaal S, Lude A (2015) Digital Geogames to foster local biodiversity. International Journal for Transformative Research 3(1):16–29. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijtr-2015-0009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Schaal S, Otto S, Schaal S et al (2018) Game-related enjoyment or personal pre-requisites – which is the crucial factor when using geogames to encourage adolescents to value local biodiversity. International Journal of Science Education, Part B 8(3):213–226. https://doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2018.1441571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Squire KD, Mingfong J (2007) Mad City mystery: developing scientific argumentation skills with a place-based augmented reality game on handheld computers. J Sci Educ Technol 16(1):5–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-006-9037-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Schaal S, Grübmeyer S, Matt M (2012) Outdoors and online – inquiry with mobile devices in pre-service science teacher education. World Journal on Educational Technology 4(2):113–125

    Google Scholar 

  61. Su C-H (2016) The effects of students' motivation, cognitive load and learning anxiety in gamification software engineering education: a structural equation modeling study. Multimed Tools Appl 75(16):10013–10036. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-015-2799-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Tutwiler M, Grotzer T (2013) Why Immersive, Interactive Simulation Belongs in the Pedagogical Toolkit of “Next Generation” Science: Facilitating student understanding of complex causal dynamics. In: Khine MS, Saleh IM (eds) Approaches and strategies in next generation science learning. IGI Global, pp 127–146

  63. Uzunboylu H, Cavus N, Ercag E (2009) Using mobile learning to increase environmental awareness. Comput Educ 52(2):381–389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.09.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. van Broeckhoven F, Vlieghe J, Troyer O de (2015) Mapping between Pedagogical Design Strategies and Serious Game Narratives. In: VS-GAMES 2015: 7th International Conference on Games and Virtual Worlds for Serious Applications : 16–18 September 2015, Skövde, Sweden. IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, pp 1–8

  65. Vester F (2011) Ecopolicy – Das kybernetische Strategiespiel“, malik management

  66. Wardaszko M (2018) Interdisciplinary approach to complexity in simulation game design and implementation. Simul Gaming 49(3):263–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Wilde M, Bätz K, Kovaleva A et al (2009) Überprüfung einer Kurzskala intrinsischer Motivation (KIM). Zeitschrift für Didaktik der Naturwissenschaften 15:31–45

    Google Scholar 

  68. Yiakoumettis C, Doulamis N, Miaoulis G et al (2014) Active learning of user’s preferences estimation towards a personalized 3D navigation of geo-referenced scenes. GeoInformatica 18(1):27–62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10707-013-0176-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Zarraonandia T, Diaz P, Aedo I et al (2015) Designing educational games through a conceptual model based on rules and scenarios. Multimed Tools Appl 74(13):4535–4559. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-013-1821-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This manuscript is an expanded and revised version of a paper presented at the VS-Games Conference 2017: “Geogames in education for sustainable development: Transferring a simulation game in outdoor settings”, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/VS-GAMES.2017.8056574

This study was conducted in association with the BioDiv2Go project: The project „BioDiv2Go - Biodiversität erleben mit ortsbezogenen Spielen (experiencing biodiversity by location-based games) “is cooperatively funded by BMUB – Bundesministerium für Umwelt, Naturschutz, Bau und Reaktorsicherheit (Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation, Building and Nuclear Saftey) / BfN – Bundesamt für Naturschutz (Federal Agency for Nature Conservation) and BMBF – Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (Federal Ministry of Education and Research); FKZ:01LC1311A; www.finde-vielfalt.de / www.biodiv2go.de

The authors gratitude goes to the interdisciplinary team of the project BioDiv2Go for designing, revising and evaluating the Geogames. The authors also thank Klaus Stein and Clemens Klug, University Bamberg, for extracting and processing server data on the relative playing time.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joachim Schneider.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Schneider, J., Schaal, S. & Schlieder, C. Integrating simulation tasks into an outdoor location-based game flow. Multimed Tools Appl 79, 3359–3385 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-019-07931-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-019-07931-4

Keywords

Navigation