Skip to main content
Log in

Image tamper detection based on noise estimation and lacunarity texture

  • Published:
Multimedia Tools and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aiming at the problem of image tampering, a novel detection method is proposed based on the image noise and lacunarity. As there exist differences in image sensor pattern noise and image lacunarity between real image and tampered image, standard deviation of noise, relative frequency lacunarity (RFL), relative frequency mean (RFM) and relative frequency variance (RFV) are extracted from the suspected image to construct feature space. By using LIBSVM classifier, the image is detected if it is tampered or not. Experimental results and analysis show that it can effectively be used for the detection of real image and tampered image, natural image and computer generated graphics. Furthermore, it can be implemented for the detection of artificial blurring in the image with high precision.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ardizzone E, Bruno A (2010) Copy-move forgery detection via texture description, vol 10. ACM, Firenze, Italy, pp 59–64

  2. Bayram S, Avcıbas I, Sankur B, Memon N (2005) Image manipulation detection with binary similarity measures. In: Proc. of 13th European Signal Processing Conference, vol. 1. pp 752–755

  3. Chang C-C, Lin C-J (2001) LIBSVM: a library for support vector machines

  4. Chen M, Fridrich J, Goljan M, Lukáš J (2008) Determining image origin and integrity using sensor noise. IEEE Trans Inf Forensics Secur 3:74–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Dirik AE, Memon N (2009) Image tamper detection based on demosaicing artifacts. IEEE International Conference Image Processing (ICIP), pp 1497–1500

  6. Gilmore S, Wellenhof RH, Muir J, Soyer HP (2009) Lacunarity analysis: a promising method for the automated assessment of melanocytic naevi and melanoma. PLoS ONE 4:e7449,1–e7449,10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gou H, Swaminathan A, Wu M (2007) Noise features for image tampering detection and steganalysis. In IEEE International Conference on Image Processing

  8. Guo K, Wang R (2010) An effective method for identifying natural images and computer graphics. J Comput Inf Syst pp 3303–3308

  9. Hsu Y-F, Chang S-F (2007) Image splicing detection using camera response function consistency and automatic segmentation. In: International Conference on Multimedia and Expo

  10. Kaye BH (1989) A random walk through fractal dimensions. VCH Publishers, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Kemal IK, Rahib HA (2011) Exploiting the synergy between fractal dimension and lacunarity for improved texture recognition. Signal Process 91:2332–2344

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Lin WS, Tjoa SK, Zhao HV, Ray Liu KJ (2009) Digital image source coder forensics via intrinsic fingerprints. IEEE Trans Inf Forensics Secur 4:460–475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Mahdian B, Saic S (2009) Using noise inconsistencies for blind image forensice. Image Vis Comput 27:1497–1503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Muhammad G, Hussain M, Khawaji K, Bebis G (2011) Blind copy move image forgery detection using dyadic undecimated wavelet transform. Browse Conference Publications Digital Signal Processing, 17th International Conference on

  15. Plotnick RE, Gardner RH, Hargrove WW, Prestegaard K, Perlmutter M (1996) Lacunarity analysis: a general technique for the analysis of spatial patterns. Phys Rev E 53:5461–5468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Plotnick RE, Gardner RH, O’Neill RV (1993) Lacunarity indices as measures of landscape texture. Landsc Ecol 8:201–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Pospescu AC, Farid H (2004) Exposing digital forgeries by detecting dublicated image regions

  18. Roy A, Perfect E, Dunne WM, Odling N, Kim JW (2010) Lacunarity analysis of fracture networks: evidence for scale-dependent clustering. J Struct Geol 32:1444–1449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Valous NA, Mendoza F, Sun DW, Allen P (2009) Texture appearance characterization of pre-sliced pork ham images using fractal metrics: fourier analysis dimension and lacunarity. Food Res Int 42:353–362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ye S, Sun Q, Chang E (2007) Detecting digital image forgeries by measuring inconsistencies of blocking artifact. In: IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo, pp 12–15

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fei Peng.

Additional information

This work was partly supported by the National Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 61572182, 61370225, 61300036), the Projects in the National Science & Technology Pillar Program (Grant No.2013BAH38F01), and Hunan Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No.15JJ2007), and the Scientific Research Plan of Hunan Provincial Science and Technology Department of China (2014FJ4161), the Foundation for University Key Teacher by the Ministry of Education.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yang, Q., Peng, F., Li, JT. et al. Image tamper detection based on noise estimation and lacunarity texture. Multimed Tools Appl 75, 10201–10211 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-015-3079-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-015-3079-2

Keywords

Navigation