Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Detection of Mycobacterium leprae DNA in clinical and environmental samples using serological analysis and PCR

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Molecular Biology Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Leprosy is a chronic infectious disease caused by Mycobacterium leprae and persists as a serious public health problem in Brazil. This microorganism is inculturable, making it difficult to diagnose and elucidate details of its transmission chain. Thus, this study aimed to analyze the dynamics of environmental transmission of M. leprae in a case–control study in the city of Mossoró, Brazil.

Methods and results

Data of clinical, epidemiological, bacilloscopic, and serological evaluation of 22 newly diagnosed patients were compared, with molecular results of detection of specific genome regions RLEP and 16S rRNA of M. leprae in samples of the nasal swab, saliva, and house dust of these individuals and their controls (44 household contacts and 44 peridomiciliar contacts). The rapid serological tests evaluated, ML flow (IgM ND-O-BSA) and OrangeLife® (IgM and IgG anti NDO-LID 1) showed similar results, with greater positivity among paucibacillaries by OrangeLife® (54.5%). Positivity for nasal swab and saliva in multibacillary patients with RLEP primer was 16.7% and 33.3%, respectively. There was no detection of bacterial DNA in house dust or among paucibacillaries. The OrangeLife® test indicated that the lower the amount of windows, the more transmission in the house (3.79 more chances). Having a history of leprosy cases in the family increased the risk by 2.89 times, and being over 60 years of age gave 3.6 times more chances of acquiring the disease. PCR positivity was higher among all clinical samples using the M. leprae RLEP region than 16S rRNA.

Conclusions

In this study, the serological and PCR analysis were capable of detecting M. leprae DNA in clinical samples but not in the environmental samples. Close monitoring of patients and household contacts appears an effective measure to reduce the transmission of leprosy in endemic areas.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pathak VK, Singh I, Turankar RP, Lavania M, Ahuja M, Singh V, Sengupta U (2019) Utility of multiplex PCR for early diagnosis and household contact surveillance for leprosy. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 95:114855

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Van Hooij A, Fat EMTK, van den Eeden SJ, Wilson L, da Silva MB, Salgado CG, Geluk A (2017) Field-friendly serological tests for determination of M. leprae-specific antibodies. Sci Rep 7: 1–8

  3. Polycarpou A, Walker SL, Lockwood DN (2013) New findings in the pathogenesis of leprosy and implications for the management of leprosy. Curr Opin Infect Dis 26:413–419

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Rodrigues LC, Lockwood DN (2011) Leprosy now: epidemiology, progress, challenges, and research gaps. Lancet Infect Dis 11:464–470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Wheat WH, Casali AL, Thomas V, Spencer JS, Lahiri R, Williams DL, Jackson M (2014) Long-term survival and virulence of Mycobacterium leprae in amoebal cysts. PLOS Negl Trop Dis 8:e3405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Turankar RP, Pandey S, Lavania M, Singh I, Nigam A, Darlong J, Sengupta U (2015) Comparative evaluation of PCR amplification of RLEP, 16S rRNA, rpoT and Sod A gene targets for detection of M. leprae DNA from clinical and environmental samples. Int J Mycobacteriol 4: 54–59

  7. Van Hooij A, Tió-Coma M, Verhard EM, Khatun M, Alam K, Tjon Kon Fat E, Jong D, Chowdhury AS, Corstjens P, Richardus JH, Geluk A (2020) Household contacts of leprosy patients in endemic areas display a specific innate immunity profile. Front Immunol 11: 1811

  8. Tió-Coma M, Avanzi C, Verhard EM, Pierneef L, van Hooij A, Benjak A, Roy JC, Khatun M, Alam K, Corstjens P, Cole ST, Richardus JH, Geluk A (2020) Genomic characterization of Mycobacterium leprae to explore transmission patterns identifies new subtype in Bangladesh. Front Microbiol 11:1220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Amorim FM, Nobre ML, Ferreira LC, Nascimento LS, Miranda AM, Monteiro GR, Jeronimo SM (2016) Identifying leprosy and those at risk of developing leprosy by detection of antibodies against LID-1 and LID-NDO. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 10:e0004934

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Abdalla LF, Santos JHA, Collado CSC, Cunha MDGS, Naveca FG (2010) Mycobacterium leprae in the periodontium, saliva and skin smears of leprosy patients. Revista Odonto Ciência 25:148–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. De Campos AG, Liporaci TDPC, de Azevedo TS (2010) Identificação de ácaros da poeira domiciliar de ITUVERAVA-SP. Nucleus 7:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Bührer-Sékula S, Smits HL, Gussenhoven GC, Van Leeuwen J, Amador S, Fujiwara T, Oskam L (2003) Simple and fast lateral flow test for classification of leprosy patients and identification of contacts with high risk of developing leprosy. J Clin Microbiol 41:1991–1995

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. da Silva Ferreira J, Souza DA, Santos JP, Ribeiro CCDU, Baêta BA, Teixeira RC, Bechara GH (2018) Ticks as potential vectors of Mycobacterium leprae: use of tick cell lines to culture the bacilli and generate transgenic strains. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 12:e0007001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Flach DM, Andrade M, Valle CLP, Pimentel MIF, Mello KT (2010) Analysis of the historical series from 2001 to 2009 of the leprosy cases in people under 15 years-old, in Rio de Janeiro state, Brazil. Hansenol Int 35:13–19

    Google Scholar 

  15. Oliveira MBBD, Diniz LM (2016) Leprosy among children under 15 years of age: literature review. An Bras Dermatol 91:196–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Chan MMF, Smoller BR (2016) Overview of the histopathology and other laboratory investigations in leprosy. Curr Trop Med Rep 3:131–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Yap FBB, Kiung ST (2016) Knowledge and confidence in the diagnosis and management of leprosy among family medicine specialists in Malaysia. J Dermatol Dermatol Surg 20:46–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Bahmanyar ER, Smith WC, Brennan P, Cummings R, Duthie M, Richardus JH, Geluk A (2016) Leprosy diagnostic test development as a prerequisite towards elimination: requirements from the user’s perspective. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 10:e0004331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Queiroz JW, Dias GH, Nobre ML, Dias MCDS, Araújo SF, Barbosa JD, Jeronimo SM (2010) Geographic information systems and applied spatial statistics are efficient tools to study Hansen’s disease (leprosy) and to determine areas of greater risk of disease. Am J Trop Med Hyg 82:306–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Arunagiri K, Sangeetha G, Sugashini PK, Balaraman S, Ali MS (2017) Nasal PCR assay for the detection of Mycobacterium leprae pra gene to study subclinical infection in a community. Microb Pathog 104:336–339

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Barreto JG, Bisanzio D, Guimaraes LDS, Spencer JS, Vazquez-Prokopec GM, Kitron U, Salgado CG (2014) Spatial analysis spotlighting early childhood leprosy transmission in a hyperendemic municipality of the Brazilian Amazon region. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 8(2): e2665

  22. de Macedo AC, Cunha Jr JE, Yaochite JNU, Tavares CM, Nagao-Dias AT (2017) Salivary anti-PGL-1 IgM may indicate active transmission of Mycobacterium leprae among young people under 16 years of age. Braz J Infect Dis 21(5): 557–561

  23. Düppre NC, Camacho LAB, Sales AM, Illarramendi X, Nery JAC, Sampaio EP, Bührer-Sékula S (2012) Impact of PGL-I seropositivity on the protective effect of BCG vaccination among leprosy contacts: a cohort study. PLoS Neg Trop Dis 6:e1711

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kettleson E, Kumar S, Reponen T, Vesper S, Méheust D, Grinshpun SA, Adhikari A (2013) Stenotrophomonas, Mycobacterium, and Streptomyces in home dust and air: associations with moldiness and other home/family characteristics. Indoor Air 23:387–396

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Tió-Coma M, Wijnands T, Pierneef L, Schilling AK, Alam K, Roy JC, Faber WR, Menke H, Pieters T, Stevenson K, Richardus JH, Geluk A (2019) Detection of Mycobacterium leprae DNA in soil: multiple needles in the haystack. Sci Rep 9(1):1–7

    Google Scholar 

  26. Layton DW, Beamer PI (2009) Migration of contaminated soil and airborne particulates to indoor dust. Environ Sci Technol 43:8199–8205

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceptualization: ISdAH, Methodology: IGdOBdS, Formal analysis and investigation: JAdSN and JdSF, Writing—original draft preparation: IGdOBdS, Writing—review and editing: TSS, Supervision: ISdAH. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tatiane Severo Silva.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the Institutional Review Board of the Universidade Estadual do Rio Grande do Norte (CAAE 47180115.1.0000.5294) and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Consent for publication

All the authors agree and approved the manuscript for publication.

Consent to participate

Consent to participate was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Barreto da Silveira, I.G.O., da Silva Neto, J.A., da Silva Ferreira, J. et al. Detection of Mycobacterium leprae DNA in clinical and environmental samples using serological analysis and PCR. Mol Biol Rep 48, 6887–6895 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-021-06691-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-021-06691-5

Keywords

Navigation