Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of magnetic field on cell dedifferentiation and callus induction derived from embryo culture in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum. L) genotypes

  • Published:
Molecular Biology Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Current study was conducted to investigation of effect of magnetic field on cell dedifferentiation and follow it callus induction derived from mature embryo culture in bread wheat genotypes. For this purpose, a factorial experiment based on completely randomized design was carried out with two wheat genotypes and three level of magnetic field strength (0.0, 8.8 and 17.6 Tesla) in three replications. Callus growth rate (CGR), relative growth rate (RGR), callus relative growth rate (CRGR), percentage of callus water content and percentage of callus induction traits were measured. To sum up, the results showed that differences between wheat genotypes and level of magnetic field strength were significant for some studied treats related to callus induction. The effect of magnetic field levels on CGR (from 0.181 to 0.175), RGR (from 1.442 to 0.655) and CRGR (from 0.052 to 0.022) were decreased with increment of magnetic field intensity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

CGR:

Callus growth rate

RGR:

Relative growth rate

CRGR:

Callus relative growth rate

PCWC:

Percentage of callus water content

POCI:

Percentage of callus induction

S.O.V:

Source of variations

d.f.:

Degree of freedom

CV:

Coefficient of variation

References

  1. Kahrizi D, Arminian A, Masumi AA (2007) In vitro plant breeding. Razi University Press, Kermanshah

    Google Scholar 

  2. Causevic A, Delaunay A, Ounnar S, Righezza M, Delmotte F, Brignolas F, Hagège D, Maury S (2005) DNA methylating and demethylating treatments modify phenotype and cell wall differentiation state in sugarbeet cell lines. Plant Physiol Biochem 43:681–691

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Midura RJ, Ibiwoye MO, Powell KA, Sakai Y, Doehring T, Grabiner MD, Patterson TE, Zborowski M, Wolfman A (2005) Pulsed electromagnetic field treatments enhance the healing of fibular osteotomies. J Orthop Res 23:1035–1046

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Shenzhi X, Naohide T, Ken I, Yoshito I (2006) Recovery of small-sized blood vessels in ischemic bone under static magnetic field. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med 4:59–63

    Google Scholar 

  5. De Souza A, Garcia D, Sueiro L, Gilart F, Porras E, Licea L (2006) Pre-sowing magnetic treatments of tomato seeds increase the growth and yield of plants. Bioelectromagnetics 27:247–257

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Triampo W, Doungchawee G, Triampo D, Wong-Ekkabut J, Tang I (2004) Effects of static magnetic field on growth of leptospire, leptospira interrogans serovar canicola: immunoreactivity and cell division. J Biosci Bioeng 98:182–186

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Belyavskaya NA (2004) Biological effects due to weak magnetic field on plants. Adv Space Res 34:1566–1574

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Jerry LP, Wendy H, William JT, Tamako IJ, Adey WR (1992) Magnetic field-induced changes in specific gene transcription. Biochim Biophys Acta 1132:140–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Albertini MC, Accorsi A, Citterio B, Burattini S, Piacentini MP, Uguccioni F, Piatti E (2003) Morphological and biochemical modifications induced by a static magnetic field on Fusarium culmorum. Biochimie 85:963–970

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Germana MA, Chiancone B, Melati MR, Firetto A (2003) Preliminary results on the effect of magnetic fields on anther culture and pollen germination of Citrus clementine. Acta Hortic 625:411–418

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ghasempour HR, Kahrizi D, Mahdiah N (2007) New discussions in biotechnology. Razi University Press, Kermanshah

  12. Al-Khayri JM, Al-Bahrany AM (2004) Growth, water content, and proline accumulation in drought-stressed callus of date palm. Biol Plant 48:105–108

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Arzani A, Mirodjagh SS (1999) Response of durum wheat cultivars to immature embryo culture, callus induction and in vitro salt stress. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 58:67–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Birsin MA, Ozgen MA (2004) A comparison of callus induction and plant regeneration from different embryo explants of triticale (× Triticosecale wittmack). Cell Mol Biol Lett 9(2):353–361

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Soorni J, Kahrizi D, Molsaghi M (2012) The effects of photoperiod and 2, 4-D concentrations on callus induction of Cuminum cyminum’s leaf explant: an important medicinal plant. Asian J Biol Sci (in press)

  16. Kim SS, Choi SY, Park JH, Lee DJ (2004) Regulation of the activity of Korean radish cationic peroxidase promoter during dedifferentiation and differentiation. Plant Physiol Biochem 42:763–772

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Murashige T, Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco cultures. Physiol Plant 15:473–497

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Chen JJ, Yue RQ, Xu HX, Chen XJ (2006) Study on plant regeneration of wheat mature embryos under endosperm-supported culture. Agric Sci China 5:572–578

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Raymond RC, Anaira C, Wahl RL (1996) Exposure to strong static magnetic field slows the growth of human cancer cells in vitro. Bioelectromagnetics 17:358–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Grigoryeva LP, Shletser IA (2006) Screening wheat cultivars for morphogenesis ability in immature embryo culture in vitro. Biologia 3:64–66

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hanzel JJ, Miller JP, Brinkman MA, Fendos E (1985) Genotype and media effects on callus formation and regeneration in barley. Crop Sci 25:27–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kahrizi D, Mohammad R (2009) Study of androgenesis and spontaneous chromosome doubling in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) genotypes using isolated microspore culture. Acta Agron Hung 57(2):155–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kahrizi D, Mirzaei M (2012) Induced androgenic embryogenesis in cereals. In: Ken-ichi S (ed) Embryogenesis. InTech. doi:10.5772/36646

  24. Alatzas A, Foundouli A (2006) Distribution of ubiquitinated histone H2A during plant cell differentiation in maize root and dedifferentiation in callus culture. Plant Sci 171:481–487

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like for gratefully acknowledge Mr Gholamreza Amjadian for his helpful comments and preparing the magnetic coil. Razi University has financially supported this research project No. 868. Thanks to The Cooperative No. 4407 the Knowledge Base New Ideas Co. and The Cooperative the Knowledge Base Shafa Hooraman for all supports.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Danial Kahrizi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kahrizi, D., Cheghamirza, K., Akbari, L. et al. Effects of magnetic field on cell dedifferentiation and callus induction derived from embryo culture in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum. L) genotypes. Mol Biol Rep 40, 1651–1654 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-012-2214-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-012-2214-7

Keywords

Navigation