Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Leakage of nitrous oxide emissions within the Spanish agro-food system in 1961–2009

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper we examine the trends of nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions of the Spanish agricultural sector related to national production and consumption in the 1961–2009 period. The comparison between production- and consumption-based emissions at the national level provides a complete overview of the actual impact resulting from the dietary choices of a given country and allows the evaluation of potential emission leakages. On average, 1.5 % of the new reactive nitrogen that enters Spain every year is emitted as N2O. Production- and consumption-based emissions have both significantly increased in the period studied and nowadays consumption-based emissions are 45 % higher than production-based emissions. A large proportion of the net N2O emissions associated with imported agricultural goods comes from countries that are not committers for the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change Kyoto Protocol Annex I. An increase in feed consumption is the main driver of the changes observed, leading to a remarkable emission leakage in the Spanish agricultural sector. The complementary approach used here is essential to achieve an effective mitigation of Spanish greenhouse gas emissions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aguilera E, Lassaletta L, Gattinger A, Gimeno BS (2013a) Managing soil carbon for climate change mitigation and adaptation in Mediterranean cropping systems: a meta-analysis. Agric Ecosyst Environ 168:25–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aguilera E, Lassaletta L, Sanz-Cobena A, Garnier J, Vallejo A (2013b) The potential of organic fertilizers and water management to reduce N2O emissions in Mediterranean climate cropping systems. A review. Agric Ecosyst Environ 164:32–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antimiani A, Costantini V, Martini C, Salvatici L, Tommasino MC (2013) Assessing alternative solutions to carbon leakage. Energy Econ 36:299–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ariño A, Gimeno BS, Pérez de Zabala A, Ibáñez R, Ederra A, Santamaría JM (2011) Influence of nitrogen deposition on plant biodiversity at Natura 2000 sites in Spain. In: Hicks WK et al (eds) Nitrogen deposition and Natura 2000. COST, Bruxelles

    Google Scholar 

  • Arto I, Roca J, Serrano M (2012) Emisiones territoriales y fuga de emisiones. Análisis del caso español. Rev Iberoam Econ Ecol 18:73–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Audsley E, Brander M, Chatterton J, Murphy-Bokern D, Webster C, Williams A (2009) How low can we go? An assessment of greenhouse gas emissions from the UK food system and the scope to reduce them by 2050. FCRN-WWF-UK, Cranfield

    Google Scholar 

  • Avila A, Molowny-Horas R, Gimeno BS, Penuelas J (2010) Analysis of decadal time series in wet N concentrations at five rural sites in NE Spain. Water Air Soil Poll 207:123–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrett J, Peters G, Wiedmann T, Scott K, Lenzen M, Roelich K, Le Quere C (2013) Consumption-based GHG emission accounting: a UK case study. Clim Pol 13:451–470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Billen G, Beusen A, Bouwman L, Garnier J (2010) Anthropogenic nitrogen autotrophy and heterotrophy of the world’s watersheds: past, present, and future trends. Glob Biogeochem Cycles 24, GB0A11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Billen G, Garnier J, Lassaletta L (2013) The nitrogen cascade from agricultural soils to the sea: modelling nitrogen transfers at regional watershed and global scales. Phil Trans R Soc B 368:20130123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BNAE (2011) Balance del nitrógeno en la agricultura española año 2009. Ministerio De Medio Ambiente y Medio Rural y Marino, Madrid

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouwman AF, Beusen AHW, Griffioen J, Van Groenigen JW, Hefting MM, Oenema O, Van Puijenbroek PJTM, Seitzinger S, Slomp CP, Stehfest E (2013) Global trends and uncertainties in terrestrial denitrification and N2O emissions. Phil Trans R Soc B 368:20130112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cadarso M-Á, López L-A, Gómez N, Tobarra M-Á (2012) International trade and shared environmental responsibility by sector. An application to the Spanish economy. Ecol Econ 83:221–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Capper JL, Cady RA, Bauman DE (2009) The environmental impact of dairy production: 1944 compared with 2007. J Anim Sci 87:2160–2167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cederberg C, Meyer D, Flysjö A (2009) Life cycle inventory of greenhouse gas emissions and use of land and energy in Brazilian beef production. SIK report 792. The Swedish Institute for Food and Biotechnology, Gothenburg

  • da Silva V, van der Werf H, Soares S (2010) LCA of French and Brazilian broiler poultry. In: Notarnicola B (ed) Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Life Cycle Assessment in the Agri-Food Sector. Bari

  • Davis SJ, Peters GP, Caldeira K (2011) The supply chain of CO2 emissions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108:18554–18559

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Del Prado A, Mas K, Pardo G, Gallejones P (2013) Modelling the interactions between C and N farm balances and GHG emissions from confinement dairy farms in northern Spain. Sci Total Environ 465:156–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EC (2011) Emission Database for Global Atmospheric Research (EDGAR). European Commission. Joint Research Centre (JRC)/PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency. release version 4.2. http://edgar.jrc.ec.europe.eu. 20117 Cited 15 Apr 2013

  • Ecoinvent Centre (2007) Ecoinvent data v2.0. Ecoinvent reports No.1-25. Swiss Centre for Life Cycle Inventories, Dübendorf

    Google Scholar 

  • FAOSTAT (2013) FAOSTAT http://faostat.fao.org/site/567/default.aspx#ancor. Cited 20 Apr 2013

  • Franks JR, Hadingham B (2012) Reducing greenhouse gas emissions from agriculture: avoiding trivial solutions to a global problem. Land Use Policy 29:727–736

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galloway JN, Burke M, Bradford GE, Naylor R, Falcon W, Chapagain AK, Gaskell JC, McCullough E, Mooney HA, Oleson KLL, Steinfeld H, Wassenaar T, Smil V (2007) International trade in meat: the tip of the pork chop. Ambio 36:622–629

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerber PJ, Vellinga TV, Steinfeld H (2010) Issues and options in addressing the environmental consequences of livestock sector’s growth. Meat Sci 84:244–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grizzetti B, Pretato U, Lassaletta L, Billen G, Garnier J (2013) The contribution of food waste to global and European nitrogen pollution. Environ Sci Policy 33:186–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halsnæs K, Garg A, Christensen J, Føyn H, Karavai M, Rovere E, Bramley M, Zhu X, Mitchell C, Roy J, Tanaka K, Katayama H, Mena C, Obioh I, Bashmakov I, Mwakasonda S, Lee M-K, Vinluan M, Huang Y, Segafredo L (2012) Climate change mitigation policy paradigms—national objectives and alignments. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang 19:45–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hergoualc’h K, Skiba U, Harmand JM, Oliver R (2007) Processes responsible for the nitrous oxide emission from a Costa Rican Andosol under a coffee agroforestry plantation. Biol Fertil Soils 43:787–795

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iglesias A, Garrote L, Diz A, Schlickenrieder J, Martin-Carrasco F (2011) Re-thinking water policy priorities in the Mediterranean region in view of climate change. Environ Sci Policy 14:744–757

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iglesias A, Garrote L, Quiroga S, Moneo M (2012) A regional comparison of the effects of climate change on agricultural crops in Europe. Clim Chang 112:29–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2006) 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories. In: Eggleston HS, Buendia L, Miwa K, Ngara T, Tanabe K (eds) National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Programme. IGES, Hayama

  • Iribarren D, Hospido A, Moreira MT, Feijoo G (2011) Benchmarking environmental and operational parameters through eco-efficiency criteria for dairy farms. Sci Total Environ 409:1786–1798

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jakob M, Marschinski R (2013) Interpreting trade-related CO2 emission transfers. Nat Clim Chang 3:19–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen ES, Peoples MB, Boddey RM, Gresshoff PM, Hauggaard-Nielsen H, Alves BJR, Morrison MJ (2012) Legumes for mitigation of climate change and the provision of feedstock for biofuels and biorefineries. A review. Agron Sustain Dev 32:329--364

  • Lassaletta L, García-Gómez H, Gimeno BS, Rovira JV (2009) Agriculture-induced increase in nitrate concentrations in stream waters of a large Mediterranean catchment over 25 years (1981–2005). Sci Total Environ 407:6034–6043

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lassaletta L, García-Gómez H, Gimeno BS, Rovira JV (2010) Headwater streams: neglected ecosystems in the EU Water Framework Directive. Implications for nitrogen pollution control. Environ Sci Policy 13:423–433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lassaletta L, Romero E, Billen G, Garnier J, García-Gómez H, Rovira JV (2012) Spatialized N budgets in a large agricultural Mediterranean watershed: high loading and low transfer. Biogeosciences 9:57–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lassaletta L, Billen G, Grizzetti B, Garnier J, Leach AM, Galloway JN (2014a) Food and feed trade as a driver in the global nitrogen cycle: 50-year trends. Biogeochemistry 118:225–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lassaletta L, Billen G, Romero E, Garnier J, Aguilera E (2014b) How changes in diet and trade patterns have shaped the N cycle at the national scale: Spain (1961–2009). Reg Environ Chang 14:785–797

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leach AM, Galloway JN, Bleeker A, Erisman JW, Kohn R, Kitzes J (2012) A nitrogen footprint model to help consumers understand their role in nitrogen losses to the environment. Environ Dev 1:40–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee HC, McCarl B, Schneider U, Chen CC (2007) Leakage and comparative advantage implications of agricultural participation in greenhouse gas emission mitigation. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang 12:471–494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leip A, Weiss F, Wassenaar T, Fellmann T, Loudjani P, Tubiello F, Grangirard D, Monni S, Biala, K (2010) Evaluation of the livestock sector’s contribution to the EU greenhouse gas emissions (GGELS). Final report. European Commission. Joint Research Centre, Ispra

  • MAGRAMA (2012a) Guía práctica de la fertilización racional de los cultivos en España. Ministerio de Agricultura, Alimentación y Medio Ambiente, Madrid

  • MAGRAMA (2012b) Inventarios Nacionales de Emisiones a la Atmósfera 1990–2010. Vol. 2 c. Secretaría General Técnica. Ministerio de Agricultura, Alimentación y Medio Ambiente, Madrid

  • MAGRAMA (2013) More food. Less waste. Ministerio de Agricultura, Alimentación y Medio Ambiente, Madrid

  • Maté T, Guaita R, Pichiule M, Linares C, Diaz J (2010) Short-term effect of fine particulate matter (PM2.5) on daily mortality due to diseases of the circulatory system in Madrid (Spain). Sci Total Environ 408:5750–5757

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monteagudo L, Moreno JL, Picazo F (2012) River eutrophication: irrigated vs. non-irrigated agriculture through different spatial scales. Water Res 46:2759–2771

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muradian R, O’Connor M, Martinez-Alier J (2002) Embodied pollution in trade: estimating the ‘environmental load displacement’ of industrialised countries. Ecol Econ 41:51–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naylor R, Steinfeld H, Falcon W, Galloway JN, Smil V, Bradford E, Alder J, Mooney H (2005) Losing the links between livestock and land. Science 310:1621–1622

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nemecek T, Weiler K, Plassmann K, Schnetzer J (2011) Geographical extrapolation of environmental impact of crops by the MEXALCA method. Unilever-ART project no. CH-2009-0362 “Carbon and Water Data for Bio-based Ingredients”: final report of phase 2: Application of the Method and Results. Agroscope Reckenholz-Tänikon Research Station ART, Zurich

  • Nielsen PH, Nielsen AM, Weidema BP, Dalgaard R and Halberg N (2003) LCA Food Data Base. www.lcafood.dk. Cited 10 Mar 2013

  • Oltenacu PA, Broom DM (2010) The impact of genetic selection for increased milk yield on the welfare of dairy cows. Anim Welf 19:39–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Paulot F, Jacob DJ (2013) Hidden cost of U.S. Agricultural Exports: particulate matter from ammonia emissions. Environ Sci Technol 48:903–908

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters GP, Hertwich EG (2008a) Post-Kyoto greenhouse gas inventories: production versus consumption. Clim Chang 86:51–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters GP, Hertwich EG (2008b) CO2 embodied in international trade with implications for global climate policy. Environ Sci Technol 42:1401–1407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters GP, Minx JC, Weber CL, Edenhofer O (2011) Growth in emission transfers via international trade from 1990 to 2008. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108:8903–8908

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ripoll-Bosch R, de Boer IJM, Bernués A, Vellinga TV (2013) Accounting for multi-functionality of sheep farming in the carbon footprint of lamb: a comparison of three contrasting Mediterranean systems. Agric Syst 116:60–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romero E, Garnier J, Lassaletta L, Billen G, Gendre R, Riou P, Cugier P (2013) Large-scale patterns of river inputs in southwestern Europe: seasonal and interannual variations and potential eutrophication effects at the coastal zone. Biogeochemistry 113:481–505

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sánchez-Chóliz J, Duarte R (2004) CO2 emissions embodied in international trade: evidence for Spain. Energ Policy 32:1999–2005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanz-Cobeña A, Misselbrook TH, Arce A, Mingot JI, Diez JA, Vallejo A (2008) An inhibitor of urease activity effectively reduces ammonia emissions from soil treated with urea under Mediterranean conditions. Agric Ecosyst Environ 126:243–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanz-Cobeña A, Sánchez-Martín L, García-Torres, Vallejo A (2012) Gaseous emissions of N2O and NO and NO3- leaching from urea applied with urease and nitrification inhibitors to a maize (Zea mays) crop. Agric Ecosyst Environ 149:64–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schenck R (2006) Life Cycle Assessment of USA Pork Production in 2004. Final report. Institute for Environmental Research and Education, Tacoma

  • Smith P, Martino D, Cai Z, Gwary D, Janzen H, Kumar P, McCarl B, Ogle S, O’Mara F, Rice C (2007) Policy and technological constraints to implementation of greenhouse gas mitigation options in agriculture. Agric Ecosyst Environ 118:6–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soussana JF, Lemaire G (2014) Coupling carbon and nitrogen cycles for environmentally sustainable intensification of grasslands and crop-livestock systems. Agric Ecosyst Environ. doi:10.1016/j.agee.2013.10.012

    Google Scholar 

  • Steen-Olsen K, Weinzettel J, Cranston G, Ercin AE, Hertwich EG (2012) Carbon, land, and water footprint accounts for the European Union: consumption. production, and displacements through international trade. Environ Sci Technol 46:10883–10891

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steinfeld H, Wassenaar T (2007) The role of livestock production in carbon and nitrogen cycles. Annu Rev Environ Resour 32:271–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sutton MA, Bleeker A, Howard CM, Bekunda M, Grizzetti B, de Vries W, van Grinsven HJM, Abrol YP, Adhya TK, Billen G, Davidson EA, Datta A, Diaz R, Erisman JW, Liu XJ, Oenema O, Palm C, Raghuram N, Reis S, Scholz RW, Sims T, Westhoek H, Zhang FS (2013) Our nutrient world. The challenge to produce more food and energy with less pollution. UNEP, Edinburgh

    Google Scholar 

  • The Barsac Declaration (2010) http://www.nine-esf.org/barsac-declaration. Cited 23 May 2013

  • Trnka M, Olesen JE, Kersebaum KC, SkjelvÅg AO, Eitzinger J, Seguin B, Peltonen-Sainio P, RÖtter R, Iglesias ANA, Orlandini S, DubrovskÝ M, Hlavinka P, Balek J, Eckersten H, Cloppet E, Calanca P, Gobin A, VuČEtiĆ V, Nejedlik P, Kumar S, Lalic B, Mestre A, Rossi F, Kozyra J, Alexandrov V, SemerÁDovÁ D, ŽAlud Z (2011) Agroclimatic conditions in Europe under climate change. Glob Chang Biol 17:2298–2318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • USDA (1998) Agricultural Statistics Database. National Agricultural Statistics Service. http://www.nass.usda.gov/. Cited 10 May 2013

  • Velthof GL, Lesschen JP, Webb J, Pietrzak S, Miatkowski Z, Pinto M, Kros J, Oenema O (2014) The impact of the Nitrates Directive on nitrogen emissions from agriculture in the EU-27 during 2000–2008. Sci Total Environ 468–469:1225–1233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vergé X, Dyer J, Desjardins R, Worth D (2009) Long-term trends in greenhouse gas emissions from the Canadian poultry industry. J Appl Poult Res 18:210–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wei T, Yang S, Moore JC, Shi P, Cui X, Duan Q, Xu B, Dai Y, Yuan W, Wei X, Yang Z, Wen T, Teng F, Gao Y, Chou J, Yan X, Wei Z, Guo Y, Jiang Y, Gao X, Wang K, Zheng X, Ren F, Lv S, Yu Y, Liu B, Luo Y, Li W, Ji D, Feng J, Wu Q, Cheng H, He J, Fu C, Ye D, Xu G, Dong W (2012) Developed and developing world responsibilities for historical climate change and CO2 mitigation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109:12911–12915

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiedmann T (2009) A review of recent multi-region input—output models used for consumption-based emission and resource accounting. Ecol Econ 69:211–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WWF (2013) Informe de emisiones de Gases de Efecto invernadero en España 1990–2012. WWF, Madrid

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This paper is the result of an international collaboration among several research institutions presented in the 2nd Workshop of the REMEDIA network, held in Zaragoza in April 2013. We wish to thank the FIRE (Fédération Ile de France de Recherche en Environnement, CNRS and UPMC) and the Research in Paris Programme (Paris City), which have supported the research of Luis Lassaletta in France. Guillermo Pardo would like to thank the Spanish National R+D+i Plan (CGL2009-10176, AGL2012-37815-C05-04) for financial support. The views expressed in this document are purely those of the authors and may not in any circumstances be regarded as stating an official position of the European Commission. We thank Javier Castrillo who developed several computer routines for the data management. We sincerely acknowledge the anonymous referees and the editor for their thorough and constructive revision on the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luis Lassaletta.

Appendix: Technical notes about the emission factors

Appendix: Technical notes about the emission factors

The N2O EFs for most of the studied crop products were calculated as averages of the values provided in the LCA databases USDA, LCA Food DK and Ecoinvent (USDA 1998; Nielsen et al. 2003; Ecoinvent Centre 2007,), implemented in SimaPro 7. These products are wheat, rice (Oryza sativa), barley, maize, rye (Secale cereale), oats (Avena sativa), sorghum (Sorghum sp.), other cereals, potatoes, sugar cane (Saccharum officinarum), sugar beets (Beta vulgaris), pulses, sunflower (Helianthus annuus) seed, rape (Brassica napus) and mustard (Sinapis sp.) seed, cotton (Gossypium sp.) seed, other oil crops, tomatoes (Solanum lycopersicum), other vegetables and other fruits. World median EF values from Nemecek et al. (2011) were used for treenuts, groundnuts (Arachis hypogaea), palm kernels (Elaeis guineensis), onions (Allium cepa), oranges (Citrus x sinensis) and mandarins (Citrus reticulate), bananas and platains (Musa x paradisiaca) and apples (Malus domestica). Data from Audsley et al. (2009) was used for estimating the EFs of tea (Camelia sinensis), pepper (Piper nigrum), pimento (Capsicum annuum), cloves (Syzigium aromaticum) and other spices. Coffee (Coffea sp.) EF was taken from Hergoualc’h et al. (2007). When we did not find specific EFs, we used the EF of a similar crop. Particularly, sorghum EF was used for millet (Panicum miliaceum); potato EF for cassava (Manihot sculenta), sweet potatoes (Ipomoea batatas) and other roots; pulses average EF for beans and other pulses; oilcrops average EF for coconuts (Cocos nucifera) (incl. copra); sunflower and rapeseed average EF for sesame (Sesamum indicum) seed; oranges EF for lemons (Citrus x limon), limes (Citrus x aurantifolia), grapefruit (Citrus x paradise) and other citrus; coffee EF for cocoa (Theobroma cacao) beans; and banana EF for pineapples (Ananas comosus) and dates (Phoenix dactylifera).

Given the uncertainty in LCA-based EFs of soybeans, and the importance of this crop in Spanish international trade, an empirically-based EF of 1.253 g N-N2O/kg product was calculated using world average emission data from Jensen et al. (2012) and yield data from FAOStat. The EFs of grapes, olives and forages were 0.058, 0.189 and 0.201 g N-N2O/kg product, respectively, and they were estimated using Spanish data, as described in the methods section.

The EFs of the processed products were calculated from EFs of primary products using processing ratios obtained from Ecoinvent (Ecoinvent Centre 2007), FAOSTAT, and from own estimations (Table 3). Economic allocation was used to divide the N2O emissions between the co-products. All meat values refer to carcass weight. Poultry meat EF was assumed for other meat. Butter and cream were assumed to have 80 % and 18 % fat contents, respectively. Allocation of emissions from the incoming milk to dairy products was done using dry mass as a suitable proxy for economic value. Milk category refers to raw milk assuming 4 % fat content (Table 4).

Herein we present an example of the calculation of N2O emissions associated with animal products. As we indicate in the methodology section, the calculation of N2O emissions associated with animal products requires particular attention. We considered different EFs for production, imports and exports, in order to reflect differences between Spanish and foreign production systems, and to avoid double counting of emissions involved in other sections of the study. All these calculations require a last correction for meat because production data include not only national production (indigenous meat), but also those animals imported alive that are slaughtered in Spain. Herein we present the example of the calculations for bovine meat N2O emissions (Tables 5, 6, 7 and 8).

For products produced in Spain we only took into account N2O emissions associated with manure management and direct excretion of grazing animals because other emissions have been already accounted in the crops and processed products calculations. For imported products we used a complete EF that includes also feed production. This EF is general and not specific to any country. For exported cattle meat we used a complete EF (i.e., including feed production) specific for Spain. For imported as live animals we used same EF as for imported cattle meat. For exported as live animals only feed production is considered (9.13 g N-N2O/kg product; Leip et al. 2010). Finally, we correct the emission taking into account the live animals: To the final account we remove imported as live animals to the production and we add this to the import value. We also add exported as live animals emissions to the export emissions.

Table 3 Weight of primary matter per kg of processed product and proportion of the N2O emissions allocated to the co-products
Table 4 Emission factors used for the animal production
Table 5 Production and trade of bovine meat in 2009 in Spain
Table 6 Emission factors for cattle
Table 7 Results of the production multiplied by the EF
Table 8 Emission of N-N2O associated to production, import and export of cattle meat in 2009

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lassaletta, L., Aguilera, E., Sanz-Cobena, A. et al. Leakage of nitrous oxide emissions within the Spanish agro-food system in 1961–2009. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Change 21, 975–994 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-014-9569-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-014-9569-0

Keywords

Navigation