Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

On the value of temporary carbon: a comment on Kirschbaum

  • Letter To The Editor
  • Published:
Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A recent paper by Miko Kirschbaum (Mitigat Adapt Strategies Glob Change 11(5–6):1151–1164, 2006) argues that temporary carbon (C) storage has “virtually no climate-change mitigation value.” However, temporary carbon has value in delaying global warming that needs to be recognized in carbon accounting methodologies. The conclusions reached are very sensitive to any value that is attached to time. Basing analysis exclusively on the maximum temperature reached within a 100-year time frame ignores other important impacts of global warming that also need to be included when mitigation strategies are assessed. The relative weightings for long-term versus short-term impacts represent policy choices that result in a greater or a lesser value being attributed to temporary carbon, but that value should not be zero. Global warming is too formidable an enemy to allow us the luxury of discarding part of our arsenal in fighting against it. Both reducing fossil-fuel combustion and increasing biosphere carbon stocks are needed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Blanco JT, Forner C (2000) Expiring CERs: a proposal to addressing the permanence issue for LUCF projects in the CDM. Economic and Financial Analysis Group, Ministry of the Environment, Bogotá, Colombia. FCCC/SB/2000/MISC.4/Add.2/Rev.1, 14 September 2000. (available at. http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2000/sbsta/misc08.pdf)

  • Brown S, Sathaye J, Cannell M, Kauppi P, Burschel P, Grainger A, Heuveldop J, Leemans R, Moura Costa P, Pinard M, Nilsson S, Schopfhauser W, Sedjo R, Singh N, Trexler M, van Minnen J (1996) Management of forests for mitigation of Greenhouse gas emissions. In: Watson RT, Zinyowera MC, Moss RH (eds) Climate change 1995: impacts, adaptations and mitigation of climate change: scientific-technical analyses. Contribution of working group II to the second assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 773–797

  • Cox PM, Betts RA, Collins M, Harris P, Huntingford C, Jones CD (2004) Amazonian dieback under climate-carbon cycle projections for the 21st century. Theor Appl Climatol 78:137–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fearnside PM (2001) Saving tropical forests as a global warming countermeasure: an issue that divides the environmental movement. Ecol Econ 39(2):167–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fearnside PM (2002a) Why a 100-year time horizon should be used for global warming mitigation calculations. Mitigat Adapt Strategies Glob Change 7(1):19–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fearnside PM (2002b) Time preference in global warming calculations: a proposal for a unified index. Ecol Econ 41(1):21–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fearnside PM (2006) Mitigation of climatic change in the Amazon. pp 353–375 In: Laurance WF, Peres CA (eds) Emerging threats to tropical forests. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A. 563 pp

  • Fearnside PM, Lashof DA, Moura-Costa P (2000) Accounting for time in mitigating global warming through land-use change and forestry. Mitigat Adapt Strategies Glob Change 5(3):239–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirschbaum MUF (2006) Temporary carbon sequestration cannot prevent climate change. Mitigat Adapt Strategies Glob Change 11(5–6):1151–1164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niles JO, Brown S, Pretty J, Ball AS, Fay J (2002) Potential carbon mitigation and income in developing countries from changes in use and management of agricultural and forest lands. Philos Trans–Roy Soc Lond Series A 360:1621–1640

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noble I, Apps M, Houghton R, Lashof D, Makundi W, Murdiyarso D, Murray B, Sombroek W, Valentini R, Amano M, Fearnside PM, Frangi J, Frumhoff P, Goldberg D, Higuchi N, Janetos A, Kirschbaum M, Lasco R, Nabuurs GJ, Persson R, Schlesinger W, Shvidenko A, Skole D, Smith P (2000) Implications of different definitions and generic issues. In: Watson RT, Noble IR, Bolin B, Ravindranath NH, Verardo DJ, Dokken DJ (eds) IPCC special report on land use, land-use change, and forestry. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. pp 53–126

    Google Scholar 

  • UN-FCCC (United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change). (2001) Decision 17/CP.7 in Modalities and Procedures for a Clean Development Mechanism as Defined in Article 12 of the Kyoto Protocol. Marrakech, 28 October to 9 November, UN-FCCC, Bonn, Germany

Download references

Acknowledgements

My work is financed by Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (306031/2004-3, 474548/2006-6, 557152/2005-4, 420199/2005-5), Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (PPI PRJ05.57) and Rede GEOMA (MCT). I thank an anonymous reviewer for helpful comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Philip M. Fearnside.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fearnside, P.M. On the value of temporary carbon: a comment on Kirschbaum. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Change 13, 207–210 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-007-9112-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-007-9112-7

Keywords

Navigation