Skip to main content
Log in

Nonlinear vibration absorbers applied on footbridges

  • Published:
Meccanica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper deals with the performance of linear and nonlinear dynamic vibration absorbers (DVAs) to suppress footbridges vertical vibrations. The walking pedestrian vertical force is modeled as a moving time-dependent force and mass. The partial differential equations govern the dynamics of the system; such equations are reduced to a set of ordinary differential equations by means of the Bubnov–Galerkin method with an accurate multimode expansion of the displacement field. The optimal vibration absorber parameters are determined using two objective functions: maximum footbridge deflection and the transferred energy from the footbridge to the DVA. The most suitable nonlinear DVA is proposed for the investigated footbridge. The results show that the DVAs with quadratic nonlinearity are the most performant DVAs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Caprani CC, Ahmadi E (2016) Formulation of human-structure interaction system models for vertical vibration. J Sound Vib 377:346–367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Pedersen L, Frier C (2010) Sensitivity of footbridge vibrations to stochastic walking parameters. J Sound Vib 329(13):2683–2701

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Pedersen L, Frier C (2015) Stochastic load models and footbridge response. Dyn Civil Struct 2:75–81

    Google Scholar 

  4. Racic V, Pavic A, Brownjohn J (2009) Experimental identification and analytical modelling of human walking forces: literature review. J Sound Vib 326(1):1–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Young P (2001) Improved floor vibration prediction methodologies. Proc ARUP Vib Semin

  6. Wheeler JE (1982) Prediction and control of pedestrian-induced vibration in footbridges. J Struct Div 108(ST-9)

  7. Piccardo G, Tubino F (2012) Equivalent spectral model and maximum dynamic response for the serviceability analysis of footbridges. Eng Struct 40:445–456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Pfeil M, Amador N, Pimentel R, Vasconcelos R Analytic-numerical model for walking person: footbridge structure interaction. In: Proceedings of the 9th international conference on structural dynamics eurodyn, Porto, pp. 1079–1085.

  9. Samani FS, Pellicano F, Masoumi A (2013) Performances of dynamic vibration absorbers for beams subjected to moving loads. Nonlinear Dyn 73(1–2):1065–1079

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Wu JJ (2006) Study on the inertia effect of helical spring of the absorber on suppressing the dynamic responses of a beam subjected to a moving load. J Sound Vib 297(3–5):981–999

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Esmailzadeh E, Ghorashi M (1995) Vibration analysis of beams traversed by uniform partially distributed moving masses. J Sound Vib 184(1):9–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Den Hartog JP (1985) Mechanical vibrations. Courier Corporation, Chelmsford

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Pun D, Liu Y (2000) On the design of the piecewise linear vibration absorber. Nonlinear Dyn 22(4):393–413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ding H, Chen LQ (2020) Designs, analysis, and applications of nonlinear energy sinks. Nonlinear Dyn 100(4):3061–3107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lievens K, Lombaert G, De Roeck G, Van den Broeck P (2016) Robust design of a TMD for the vibration serviceability of a footbridge. Eng Struct 123:408–418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Jiang X, McFarland DM, Bergman LA, Vakakis AF (2003) Steady state passive nonlinear energy pumping in coupled oscillators: theoretical and experimental results. Nonlinear Dyn 33(1):87–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Gourdon E, Alexander NA, Taylor CA, Lamarque CH, Pernot S (2007) Nonlinear energy pumping under transient forcing with strongly nonlinear coupling: theoretical and experimental results. J Sound Vib 300(3–5):522–551

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Gourdon E, Lamarque CH, Pernot S (2007) Contribution to efficiency of irreversible passive energy pumping with a strong nonlinear attachment. Nonlinear Dyn 50(4):793–808

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Gatti G (2018) Fundamental insight on the performance of a nonlinear tuned mass damper. Meccanica 53(1–2):111–123

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Alhassan MA, Al-Rousan RZ, Al-Khasawneh SI (2020) Control of vibrations of common pedestrian bridges in Jordan using tuned mass dampers. Proced Manuf 44:36–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ferreira F, Moutinho C, Cunha Á, Caetano E (2019) Use of semi-active tuned mass dampers to control footbridges subjected to synchronous lateral excitation. J Sound Vib 446:176–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Moutinho C, Cunha Á, Caetano E, de Carvalho J (2018) Vibration control of a slender footbridge using passive and semiactive tuned mass dampers. Struct Control Health Monit 25(9):e2208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Maślanka M (2019) Optimised semi-active tuned mass damper with acceleration and relative motion feedbacks. Mech Syst Signal Process 130:707–731

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Parseh M, Dardel M, Ghasemi MH (2015) Performance comparison of nonlinear energy sink and linear tuned mass damper in steady-state dynamics of a linear beam. Nonlinear Dyn 81(4):1981–2002

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. Samani FS, Pellicano F (2012) Vibration reduction of beams under successive traveling loads by means of linear and nonlinear dynamic absorbers. J Sound Vib 331(10):2272–2290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Yang Y, Wan X (2019) Investigation into the linear velocity response of cantilever beam embedded with impact damper. J Vib Control 25(7):1365–1378

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. Gourc E, Seguy S, Michon G, Berlioz A, Mann B (2015) Quenching chatter instability in turning process with a vibro-impact nonlinear energy sink. J Sound Vib 355:392–406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Wang J, Wang B, Liu Z, Zhang C, Li H (2020) Experimental and numerical studies of a novel asymmetric nonlinear mass damper for seismic response mitigation. Struct Control Health Monit 27(4):e2513

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Kala J, Salajka V, Hradil P (2009) Footbridge response on single pedestrian induced vibration analysis. Int J Eng Appl Sci 5(4):269–280

    Google Scholar 

  30. Blanchard J, Davies B, Smith J (1977) Design criteria and analysis for dynamic loading of footbridges. In: Proceeding of a symposium on dynamic behaviour of bridges at the transport and road research laboratory, Crowthorne, Berkshire, England

  31. Živanović S, Pavic A, Reynolds P (2005) Vibration serviceability of footbridges under human-induced excitation: a literature review. J Sound Vib 279(1):1–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Fanning P, Archbold P, Pavic A, Reynolds P (2005) Transient response simulation of a composite material footbridge to crossing pedestrians. Recent Dev Bridge Eng 43.

  33. 10137 I (1992) Serviceability of buildings and walkways against vibration.

  34. Samani FS, Pellicano F (2009) Vibration reduction on beams subjected to moving loads using linear and nonlinear dynamic absorbers. J Sound Vib 325(4–5):742–754

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Balachandran B, Nayfeh A (1991) Observations of modal interactions in resonantly forced beam-mass structures. Nonlinear Dyn 2(2):77–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Roberson RE (1952) Synthesis of a nonlinear dynamic vibration absorber. J Frankl Inst 254(3):205–220

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  37. Andersen D, Starosvetsky Y, Vakakis A, Bergman L (2012) Dynamic instabilities in coupled oscillators induced by geometrically nonlinear damping. Nonlinear Dyn 67(1):807–827

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  38. McFarland DM, Bergman LA, Vakakis AF (2005) Experimental study of non-linear energy pumping occurring at a single fast frequency. Int J Nonlinear Mech 40(6):891–899

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Bonsel J, Fey R, Nijmeijer H (2004) Application of a dynamic vibration absorber to a piecewise linear beam system. Nonlinear Dyn 37(3):227–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Georgiades F, Vakakis A (2007) Dynamics of a linear beam with an attached local nonlinear energy sink. Commun Nonlinear Sci Numer Simul 12(5):643–651

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Starosvetsky Y, Gendelman O (2009) Vibration absorption in systems with a nonlinear energy sink: nonlinear damping. J Sound Vib 324(3–5):916–939

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Minaei A, Ghorbani-Tanha A (2019) Optimal step-by-step tuning method for variable stiffness semiactive tuned mass dampers. J Eng Mech 145(6):04019037

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Farhad S. Samani.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Saber, H., Samani, F.S. & Pellicano, F. Nonlinear vibration absorbers applied on footbridges. Meccanica 56, 23–40 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11012-020-01262-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11012-020-01262-7

Keywords

Navigation