Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

On the design of an electromagnetic aeroelastic energy harvester from nonlinear flutter

  • Published:
Meccanica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A new energy harvester by coupling the electromagnetic induction and the pitch vibration of a rigid wing is built up in this paper. It is aimed: (1) to harvest energy from the pitch limit cycle oscillation (LCO) of the wing due to the preloaded free-play nonlinearity; (2) to introduce a theoretical analysis scheme based on the equivalent linearized method into the design of this harvester. With the equivalent linearized method, the domains of the single stable LCO and double stable LCOs are respectively obtained. Combining the analytical and numerical solutions, the single stable LCO along with the stable limit cycle amplitude greater than its corresponding unstable one is recognized as the better mode for harvesting, since the larger limit cycle domain is induced and the more energy are yielded. Based on such chosen mode, analyses of varying parameters are conducted with respect to the plunge stiffness, pitch stiffness, distance of elastic axis from center of gravity, distance of geometric center from elastic axis, load resistance and magnetic flux density. Meanwhile, three indicators are applied to reveal their effects on the harvesting performances: (1) the size of limit cycle domain, (2) the onset velocity of LCO, and (3) the energy output.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The equation of motion of the rigid wing/airfoil is not formulated at length here since a vast amount of work has been done around it in the area of aeroelasticity. Interested readers are referred to the textbook Introduction to Structural Dynamics and Aeroelasticity (2nd Edition) by Dewey H. Hodges and G. Alvin Pierce.

  2. Even though the more energy may be harvested at the larger amplitude in terms of the tendency of output voltage shown in Figs. 9 and 11, the stall of the wing may be induced if a larger angle is considered, which will reduce the airloads and is unfavorable for the energy harvesting.

  3. Some disparities are observed between these boundary lines and the initial condition \({\alpha _0}\) used to compute the LCOs, and \(\left| {{\alpha _0}} \right| > 0.3\) rad is often required for the computation of the large amplitude LCOs. These may be attributed to the other zero variables in the initial condition because a LCO can be efficiently solved through specifying the initial condition as the convergent values of the last LCO.

References

  1. Abdelkefi A (2016) Aeroelastic energy harvesting: a review. Int J Eng Sci 100:112–135

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Abdelkefi A, Nuhait AO (2013) Modeling and performance analysis of cambered wing-based piezoaeroelastic energy harvesters. Smart Mater Struct 22(9):095,029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Abdelkefi A, Hajj MR, Nayfeh AH (2012a) Sensitivity analysis of piezoaeroelastic energy harvesters. J Intell Mater Syst Struct 23(13):1523–1531

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Abdelkefi A, Nayfeh AH, Hajj MR (2012b) Design of piezoaeroelastic energy harvesters. Nonlinear Dyn 68(4):519–530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Abdelkefi A, Nayfeh AH, Hajj MR (2012c) Enhancement of power harvesting from piezoaeroelastic systems. Nonlinear Dyn 68(4):531–541

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Abdelkefi A, Nayfeh AH, Hajj MR (2012d) Modeling and analysis of piezoaeroelastic energy harvesters. Nonlinear Dyn 67(2):925–939

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Abdelkefi A, Scanlon JM, McDowell E, Hajj MR (2013) Performance enhancement of piezoelectric energy harvesters from wake galloping. Appl Phys Lett 103(3):033,903

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Abdelkefi A, Ghommem M, Nuhait AO, Hajj MR (2014) Nonlinear analysis and enhancement of wing-based piezoaeroelastic energy harvesters. J Sound Vib 333(1):166–177

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Akaydin HD, Elvin N, Andreopoulos Y (2010) Energy harvesting from highly unsteady fluid flows using piezoelectric materials. J Intell Mater Syst Struct 21(13):1263–1278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Akaydin HD, Elvin N, Andreopoulos Y (2012) The performance of a self-excited fluidic energy harvester. Smart Mater Struct 21(2):025,007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Akbar MA, Alam MS, Sattar MA (2006) KBM unified method for solving an \(n\)th order non-linear differential equation under some special conditions including the case of internal resonance. Int J Non-linear Mech 41(1):26–42

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Ali M, Arafa M, Elaraby M (2013) Energy harvesting from wind-induced vibrations. Int J Sci Eng Res 4(10):422–432

    Google Scholar 

  13. Barrero-Gil A, Alonso G, Sanz-Andres A (2010) Energy harvesting from transverse galloping. J Sound Vib 329(14):2873–2883

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. Bryant M, Garcia E (2009) Development of an aeroelastic vibration power harvester. In: Proceedings of SPIE, California, United States

  15. Bryant M, Garcia E (2011) Modeling and testing of a novel aeroelastic flutter energy harvester. J Vib Acoust 133(1):011,010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Dai HL, Abdelkefi A, Wang L (2014) Theoretical modeling and nonlinear analysis of piezoelectric energy harvesting from vortex-induced vibrations. J Intell Mater Syst Struct 25(14):1861–1874

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Dai HL, Abdelkefi A, Javed U, Wang L (2015) Modeling and performance of electromagnetic energy harvesting from galloping oscillations. Smart Mater Struct 24(4):045,012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. De Marqui CJ, Erturk A (2013) Electroaeroelastic analysis of airfoil-based wind energy harvesting using piezoelectric transduction and electromagnetic induction. J Intell Mater Syst Struct 24(7):846–854

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. De Marqui CJ, Erturk A, Inman DJ (2009) An electromechanical finite element model for piezoelectric energy harvester plates. J Sound Vib 327(1–2):9–25

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. De Marqui CJ, Erturk A, Inman DJ (2010) Piezoaeroelastic modeling and analysis of a generator wing with continuous and segmented electrodes. J Intell Mater Syst Struct 21(10):983–993

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Dias JAC, De Marqui CJ, Erturk A (2013) Hybrid piezoelectric-inductive flow energy harvesting and dimensionless electroaeroelastic analysis for scaling. Appl Phys Lett 102(4):044,101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Dias JAC, De Marqui CJ, Erturk A (2015) Three-degree-of-freedom hybrid piezoelectric-inductive aeroelastic energy harvester exploiting a control surface. AIAA J 53(2):394–404

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. Dunn P, Dugundji J (1992) Nonlinear stall flutter and divergence analysis of cantilevered graphite/epoxy wings. AIAA J 30(1):153–162

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Dunnmon JA, Stanton SC, Mann BP, Dowell EH (2011) Power extraction from aeroelastic limit cycle oscillations. J Fluids Struct 27(8):1182–1198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Erturk A, Inman DJ (2009) An experimentally validated bimorph cantilever model for piezoelectric energy harvesting from base excitations. Smart Mater Struct 18(2):025009

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. Erturk A, Inman DJ (2011) Broadband piezoelectric power generation on high-energy orbits of the bistable duffing oscillator with electromechanical coupling. J Sound Vib 330(10):2339–2353

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. Erturk A, Bilgen O, Fontenille M, Inman DJ (2008) Piezoelectric energy harvesting from macro-fiber composites with an application to morphing-wing aircrafts. In: Proceedings of the 19th international conference on adaptive structures and technologies, Ascona, Switzerland

  28. Erturk A, Hoffmann J, Inman DJ (2009) A piezomagnetoelastic structure for broadband vibration energy harvesting. Appl Phys Lett 94(25):254,102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Erturk A, Vieira WGR, De Marqui CJ, Inman DJ (2010) On the energy harvesting potential of piezoaeroelastic systems. Appl Phys Lett 96(18):184,103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Javed U, Dai HL, Abdelkefi A (2015) Nonlinear dynamics and comparative analysis of hybrid piezoelectric-inductive energy harvesters subjected to galloping vibrations. Eur Phys J Spec Top 224(14):2929–2948

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Jung HJ, Lee SW, Jang DD (2009) Feasibility study on a new energy harvesting electromagnetic device using aerodynamic instability. IEEE Trans Magn 45(10):4376–4379

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  32. Lee BHK, Price SJ, Wong YS (1999) Nonlinear aeroelastic analysis of airfoils: bifurcation and chaos. Prog Aerosp Sci 35(3):205–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Li P, Yang YR (2016) On double stable limit cycle flutter of a plate with motion constraints in subsonic flow. Meccanica 51(5):1257–1273

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  34. Li P, Yang YR, Lu L (2014) Nonlinear flutter behavior of a plate with motion constraints in subsonic flow. Meccanica 49(12):2797–2815

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  35. Païdoussis MP, Price SJ, de Langre E (2010) Fluid-structure interactions: cross-flow-induced instabilities. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  36. Patil MJ, Hodges DH, Cesnik CES (2001a) Limit-cycle oscillations in high-aspect-ratio wings. J Fluids Struct 15(1):107–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Patil MJ, Hodges DH, Cesnik CES (2001b) Nonlinear aeroelasticity and flight dynamics of high-altitude long-endurance aircraft. J Aircr 38(1):88–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Peters DA, Karunamoorthy S, Cao WM (1995) Finite state induced flow models part I: two-dimensional thin airfoil. J Aircr 32(2):313–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Rothwell EJ, Cloud MJ (2001) Electromagnetics. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Book  Google Scholar 

  40. Stanton SC, McGehee CC, Mann BP (2009) Reversible hysteresis for broadband magnetopiezoelastic energy harvesting. Appl Phys Lett 95(17):174,103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Tang D, Dowell EH (2001) Experimental and theoretical study on aeroelastic response of high-aspect-ratio wings. AIAA J 39(8):1430–1441

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  42. Tang D, Yamamoto H, Dowell EH (2003) Flutter and limit cycle oscillations of two-dimensional panels in three-dimensional axial flow. J Fluids Struct 17(2):225–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Tang L, Païdoussis MP (2007) On the instability and the post-critical behaviour of two-dimensional cantilevered flexible plates in axial flow. J Sound Vib 305(1–2):97–115

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  44. Tang L, Païdoussis MP, Jiang J (2009) Cantilevered flexible plates in axial flow: energy transfer and the concept of flutter-mill. J Sound Vib 326(1–2):263–276

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  45. Vasconcellos R, Abdelkefi A (2015a) Nonlinear dynamical analysis of an aeroelastic system with multi-segmented moment in the pitch degree-of-freedom. Commun Nonlinear Sci Numer Simul 20(1):324–334

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  46. Vasconcellos R, Abdelkefi A (2015b) Phenomena and characterization of grazingsliding bifurcations in aeroelastic systems with discontinuous impact effects. J Sound Vib 358(8):315–323

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  47. Vasconcellos R, Abdelkefi A, Hajj MR, Marques FD (2014) Grazing bifurcation in aeroelastic systems with freeplay nonlinearity. Commun Nonlinear Sci Numer Simul 19(5):1611–1625

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  48. Wu Y, Li D, Xiang J, Ronch AD (2017) Piezoaeroelastic energy harvesting based on an airfoil with double plunge degrees of freedom: modeling and numerical analysis. J Fluids Struct 74:111–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Xiao Q, Zhu Q (2014) A review on flow energy harvesters based on flapping foils. J Fluids Struct 46:174–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Yang Y, Zhao L, Tang L (2013) Comparative study of tip cross-sections for efficient galloping energy harvesting. Appl Phys Lett 102(6):064,105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Yang YR (1995) Limit cycle hunting of a bogie with flanged wheels. Veh Syst Dyn 24(3):185–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Yang YR (1995) KBM method of analyzing limit cycle flutter of a wing with an external store and comparison with a wind-tunnel test. J Sound Vib 187(2):271–280

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  53. Yang ZC, Zhao LC (1988) Analysis of limit cycle flutter of an airfoil in incompressible flow. J Sound Vib 123(1):1–13

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  54. Zhu Q, Haase M, Wu CH (2009) Modeling the capacity of a novel flow-energy harvester. Appl Math Model 33(5):2207–2217

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No: 11772273) and the Applied and Basic Research Plans of Sichuan Province, China (Grant No: 2015JY0083). The authors are grateful to the anonymous reviewers whose work greatly improved this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peng Li.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, S., Li, P. & Yang, Y. On the design of an electromagnetic aeroelastic energy harvester from nonlinear flutter. Meccanica 53, 2807–2831 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11012-018-0875-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11012-018-0875-6

Keywords

Navigation