Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

An Objective Analysis of Support Vector Machine Based Classification for Remote Sensing

  • Case Study
  • Published:
Mathematical Geosciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Accurate thematic classification is one of the most commonly desired outputs from remote sensing images. Recent research efforts to improve the reliability and accuracy of image classification have led to the introduction of the Support Vector Classification (SVC) scheme. SVC is a new generation of supervised learning method based on the principle of statistical learning theory, which is designed to decrease uncertainty in the model structure and the fitness of data. We have presented a comparative analysis of SVC with the Maximum Likelihood Classification (MLC) method, which is the most popular conventional supervised classification technique. SVC is an optimization technique in which the classification accuracy heavily relies on identifying the optimal parameters. Using a case study, we verify a method to obtain these optimal parameters such that SVC can be applied efficiently. We use multispectral and hyperspectral images to develop thematic classes of known lithologic units in order to compare the classification accuracy of both the methods. We have varied the training to testing data proportions to assess the relative robustness and the optimal training sample requirement of both the methods to achieve comparable levels of accuracy. The results of our study illustrated that SVC improved the classification accuracy, was robust and did not suffer from dimensionality issues such as the Hughes Effect.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barry P, Shippert P, Gorodetzky D, Beck R (2003) Draft Hyperion hyperspectral mapping exercise using atmospheric correction and end members from spectral libraries and regions of interest with data from Cuprite, Nevada. EO-1 User Guide, v 2.3, 74 p

  • Benediktsson JA, Sveinsson JR, Arnason K (1995) Classification and feature extraction of AVIRIS data. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 33(5):1194–1205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chi M, Bruzzone L (2007) Classification of hyperspectral remote sensing data with primal semi-supervised SVMs: 4rth International Workshop on Pattern Recognition in Remote Sensing (PRRS’06), Hong Kong. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 45(6):1870–1880

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang CI (2003) Hyperspectral imaging: techniques for spectral detection and classification. Kluwer/Plenum, New York, 370 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Foody G, McCullagh MB, Yates WB (1995) The effect of training set size and composition on artificial neural net classification. Int J Remote Sens 16:1707–1723

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foody GM, Mathur A (2004) A relative evaluation of multiclass image classification by support vector machines. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 42:1335–1343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunn SR (1998) Support vector machines for classification and regression. Technical Report, University of Southampton, 54 p

  • Hord MR (1982) Digital image processing of remotely sensed data. Academic Press, New York, 256 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang C, Davis LS, Townshed JRG (2002) An assessment of support vector machines for land cover classification. Int J Remote Sens 23:725–749

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes GF (1968) On the mean accuracy of statistical pattern recognizers. IEEE Trans Inf Theory 14:55–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsu CW, Chang CC, Lin CJ (2003) A practical guide to support vector classification. National Taiwan University, 12 p

  • Ikeda M, Dobson FW (1995) Oceanographic applications of remote sensing. CRC Press, Boca Raton, 492 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Jia X (1999) Adaptable class data representation for hyperspectral image classification. http://www.gisdevelopment.net/aars/acrs/1999/ts10/ts10109pf.htm

  • Keerthi SS, Lin CJ (2003) Asymptotic behaviors of support vector machines with Gaussian kernel. Neural Comput 15:1667–1689

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohavi R, Provost F (1998) Glossary of terms. Mach Learn 30(23):271–274

    Google Scholar 

  • Lillesand TM, Kiefer RW, Chipman JW (2004) Remote sensing and image interpretation, 5th edn. Wiley, New York, p 724

    Google Scholar 

  • Melgani F, Bruzzone L (2004) Classification of hyperspectral remote sensing images with support vector machines. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens, pp 1778–1790

  • Mertie JB Jr (1940) The Goodnews platinum deposits, Alaska. US Geol Surv Bull 918:97

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer D (2001) Support vector machines. R News, Volume 1/3. http://cran.r-project.org/doc/Rnews/Rnews_2001-3.pdf

  • Murai S (1996) GIS workbook (fundamental course). Japan Association of Surveyors, Tokyo, 169 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Pal M, Mather PM (2005) Support vector machines for classification in remote sensing. Int J Remote Sens 26:1007–1011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richards JA, Jia X (1998) Remote sensing digital image analysis, 3rd edn. Springer, Berlin, 63 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Schrader S, Pouncey R (1997) Erdas field guide, 4th edn. Erdas Inc., Atlanta Georgia, 686 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Schowengerdt RA (1983) Techniques for image processing and classification in remote sensing. Academic Press, New York, p 245

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherrod PH (2003) Classification and regression trees and support vector machines for predictive modeling and forecasting. DTREG program manual. www.dtreg.com

  • Stewart JH, Carlson JE (1978) Geologic map of Nevada. Nevada Bureau of Mines and Geology, Map

  • Vapnik VN (1995) The nature of statistical learning theory. Springer, New York, 188 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu G, Blumberg DG (2002) Classification using ASTER data and SVM algorithms – The case study of Beer Sheva, Israel. Remote Sens Environ 80:233–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Debasmita Misra.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Oommen, T., Misra, D., Twarakavi, N.K.C. et al. An Objective Analysis of Support Vector Machine Based Classification for Remote Sensing. Math Geosci 40, 409–424 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-008-9156-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-008-9156-6

Keywords

Navigation