Skip to main content
Log in

Time-dependent Inversion of Surface Subsidence due to Dynamic Reservoir Compaction

  • Published:
Mathematical Geosciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We introduce a novel, time-dependent inversion scheme for resolving temporal reservoir pressure drop from surface subsidence observations (from leveling or GPS data, InSAR, tiltmeter monitoring) in a single procedure. The theory is able to accommodate both the absence of surface subsidence estimates at sites at one or more epochs as well as the introduction of new sites at any arbitrary epoch. Thus, all observation sites with measurements from at least two epochs are utilized. The method uses both the prior model covariance matrix and the data covariance matrix, which incorporates the spatial and temporal correlations between model parameters and data, respectively. The incorporation of the model covariance implicitly guarantees smoothness of the model estimate, while maintaining specific geological features like sharp boundaries. Taking these relations into account through the model covariance matrix enhances the influence of the data on the inverted model estimate. This leads to a better defined and interpretable model estimate. The time-dependent aspect of the method yields a better constrained model estimate and makes it possible to identify non-linear acceleration or delay in reservoir compaction.

The method is validated by a synthetic case study based on an existing gas reservoir with a highly variable transmissibility at the free water level. The prior model covariance matrix is based on a Monte Carlo simulation of the geological uncertainty in the transmissibility.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bos AG, Spakman W, Nyst MCJ (2003) Surface deformation and tectonic setting of Taiwan inferred from a GPS velocity field. J Geophys Res 108(B10):2458. doi:10.1028/2002JB002336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bos AG, Usai S, Spakman W (2005) Kinematics of the South-Western US Deformation Zone inferred from GPS motion data. J Geophys Res 110(B8):B08405. doi:10.1029/2003JB002742

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bremmer CN, Lange Gd, Linden Wvd, Veling E, Veldkamp JG (2003) Bodemdaling en integraal Waterbeheer: Eindrapport Delft Cluster Project 06.03.02. TNO-NITG report, 03-200-A

  • Brink JL, Patzek TW, Silin DB, Fielding EJ (2002) Lost Hills field trial—Incorporating new technology for reservoir management. SPE, 77646. Presented at the SPE ann tech conf & exhib, San Antonio

  • Bürgmann R, Ergintav S, Segall P, Hearn EH, McClusky S, Reilinger RE, Woith H, Zschau J (2002) Time-dependent distributed afterslip on and deep below the Izmit earthquake rupture. Bull Seismol Soc Am 92(1):126–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carnec C, Fabriol H (1999) Monitoring and land subsidence at the Cerro Prieto geothermal field, Baja California, using SAR interferometry. Geophys Res Lett 26:1211–1214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chin LY, Thomas LK (1999) Fully coupled analysis of improved oil recovery by reservoir compaction. SPE, 56753. Presented at the 1999 SPE ann tech conf & exh, Houston

  • Dake LP (1978) Fundamentals of reservoir engineering. Developments in petroleum science, vol 8. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, 443 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Disperati L, Virdis S, Feigl KL, Rindinella A (2005) Land subsidence monitoring in the Lucca plain (central Italy) with ERS 1/2. In: Proc. Fringe ATSR workshop, ESA-ESRIN, Frascati, Italy

  • Doornhof D (1992) Surface subsidence in the Netherlands: The Groningen gas field. Geol Mijnb 71:119–130

    Google Scholar 

  • Du J, Brissenden S, McGillivray P, Bourne S, Hofstra P, Davis E-J, Roadarmel WH, Wolhart SL, Wright CA (2005a) Mapping fluid flow in a reservoir using tiltmeter-based surface deformation measurements. SPE, 96897. Presented at the SPE ann tech conf & exhib, Dallas

  • Du J, Brissenden S, McGillivray P, Bourne S, Hofstra P, Davis E-J, Roadarmel WH, Wolhart SL, Marsic S, Gusek R, Wright CA (2005b) Mapping reservoir volume changes during cyclic steam stimulation using tiltmeter-based surface-deformation measurements. SPE, 97848. Presented at the SPE international thermal operations and heavy oil symposium, Calgary

  • Du J, Olson JE (2001) A poroelastic reservoir model for predicting subsidence and mapping subsurface pressure fronts. J Pet Sci Eng 30:181–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dusseault MB, Rothenburg L (2002) Analysis of deformation measurements for reservoir management. Oil Gas Sci Technol Rev IFP 57:539–554

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fares N, Li VC (1988) General image method in a plane-layered elastostatic medium. J Appl Mech 110:781–785, Trans ASME 55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fokker PA (2002) Subsidence prediction and inversion of subsidence data. SPE, 78227. Presented at the SPE rock mechanics conference, Irving

  • Fokker PA, Orlic B (2006) Semi-analytic modeling of subsidence. Math Geol 38:565–589

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fredrich JT, Deitrick GL, Arguello JG, DeRouffignac EP (1998) Reservoir compaction, surface subsidence and casing damage: A geomechanics approach to mitigation and reservoir management. In: Eurock’98, Part 1, SPE 46284, pp 403–412

  • Geertsma J (1973) Land subsidence above compacting oil and gas reservoirs. J Pet Technol 73:734–744

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanssen R, Amelung F, Zebker H (1998) Geodetic interpretation of land subsidence measurements at the Cerro Prieto geothermal field monitored by radar interferometry: EOS Trans AGU, 79, F37

  • Hejmanowski R (1995) Prediction of surface subsidence due to oil- or gasfield development. In: Proceedings of the fifth international symposium on land subsidence FISOLS’95, The Hague, The Netherlands, 16–20 October 1995

  • Hettema ME, Papamichos E, Schutjens P (2002) Subsidence delay: Field observations and analysis. Oil Gas Sci Technol 57:443–458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann J (2003) The application of satellite radar interferometry to the study of land subsidence over developed aquifer systems. Ph.D. thesis, Stanford University

  • Houtenbos APEM, Hounjet MWA, Barends FBJ (2005) Subsidence from geodetic measurements in the Ravenna area. In: Land subsidence—special vol. Proceedings of the seventh international symposium on land subsidence, Shanghai, P.R. China, 23–28 October, pp 79–99

  • Johnson JP, Rhett D, Siemers WT (1989) Rock mechanics of the Ekofisk reservoir in the evaluation of subsidence. J Pet Technol 41(7):717–722

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenselaar F (2001) A testing procedure for subsidence analysis. In: Proceedings of the 10th FIG international symposium on deformation measurements, Orange, California, 19–22 March

  • Kroon IC, Nguyen B-L, Fokker PA (2008) Disentangling shallow and deep processes causing surface movement. Math Geosci (submitted)

  • Marchina PJM (1996) The use of subsidence data to monitor reservoir behaviour. SPE 36918:413–421

    Google Scholar 

  • Menke W (1989) Geophysical Data Analysis: Discrete inverse theory, revised edn. Int Geophysics Series, vol 45, Academic Press, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  • Morita N, Whitfill DL, Nygaard O, Bale A (1989) A quick method to determine subsidence, reservoir compaction, and in-situ stress induced by reservoir depletion. J Pet Technol 89:71–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Opstal, GHCv (1974) The effect of base-rock rigidity on subsidence due to reservoir compaction. In: Proc. 3rd congr int soc rock mech, vol 2, pp 1102–1111

  • Pavelko MT (2004) Estimates of hydraulic properties from a one-dimensional numerical model of vertical aquifer-system deformation. U.S.G.S. water-resources investigation report, v 03-4083, Lorenzi site, Las Vegas, Nevada, 35 p

  • Schmidt DA, Bürgmann R (2003) Time dependent land uplift and subsidence in the Santa Clara valley, California, from a large interferometric synthetic aperture radar data set. J Geophys Res 108(B9):2416–2429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schroot BM, Fokker PA, Lutgert JE, Van Der Meer BGH, Orlic B, Scheffers BC, Barends FBJ (2005) Subsidence induced by gas production: an integrated approach. In: Land subsidence—special vol. Proceedings of the seventh international symposium on land subsidence, Shanghai, P.R. China, 23–28 October, pp 121–136

  • Settari A, Walters DA (2001) Advances in coupled geomechanical and reservoir modeling with applications to reservoir compaction. SPE J 6(3):334–342

    Google Scholar 

  • Spakman W, Nyst MCJ (2002) Inversion of relative motion data for fault slip and continuous deformation in crustal blocks. Earth Planet Sci Lett 203:577–591

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tarantola A (2005) Inverse problem theory and methods for model parameter estimation. SIAM, Philadelphia, 342 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Vasco DW, Karasaki K, Doughty C (2000) Using surface deformation to image reservoir characteristics. Geophysics 65:132–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vasco DW (2004) Estimation of flow properties using surface deformation and head data: A trajectory-based approach. Water Resour Res 40:W10104. doi:10.1029/2004WR003272

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. G. Muntendam-Bos.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Muntendam-Bos, A.G., Kroon, I.C. & Fokker, P.A. Time-dependent Inversion of Surface Subsidence due to Dynamic Reservoir Compaction. Math Geosci 40, 159–177 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-007-9135-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-007-9135-3

Keywords

Navigation