Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Initial Contraceptive Choices of Women Enrolled in a Cluster-Randomized Trial in Southwest Trifinio, Guatemala

  • Published:
Maternal and Child Health Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

The aim of this analysis is to present initial contraceptive choices of women offered postpartum contraception in rural Guatemala.

Methods

We trained community nurses participating in the delivery of a home-based antepartum and postpartum care program in rural Guatemala in contraceptive implant placement and had them offer condoms, pills, an injection, or an implant at women’s home-based 40-day postpartum visit in intervention clusters of a non-blinded, cluster-randomized trial. Women who had already started postpartum contraception or were over the age of 35 were excluded from participation. The primary outcome of the trial was contraceptive use at 3 months postpartum, so this initial analysis describes immediate preferences in the population.

Results

Of 208 women enrolled in the study, 108 were in intervention clusters and 100 lived in control clusters. In the intervention group, 32 women declined contraception, 36 women received the injectable, 30 women had an implant placed, 5 women started pills, 2 women chose condoms, and data on 3 women were missing. In the control clusters, 43 women were planning on the injectable, 11 planned on the implant, 10 did not want to start a method, 5 planned on sterilization, 2 aimed for natural family planning, 2 wanted a copper IUD, 1 woman wanted condoms, 18 did not know, and data on 8 women were missing.

Discussion

The contraceptive implant, which was not previously available in this community, had high uptake at 27.8% in the intervention group.

Trial Registration

Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT04005391; Retrospectively Registered 7/2/2019, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04005391

Protocol: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3735-3

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Data available on request due to privacy/ethical restrictions.

Abbreviations

IUD:

Intrauterine device

References

  • Asturias, E. J., Heinrichs, G., Domek, G., Brett, J., Shick, E., Cunningham, M., et al. (2016). The Center for Human Development in Guatemala. Advances in Pediatrics, 63(1), 357–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curtis, K. M., Tepper, N. K., Jatlaoui, T. C., Berry-Bibee, E., Horton, L. G., Zapata, L. B., et al. (2016). U.S. medical eligibility criteria for contraceptive use, 2016. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report: Recommendations and Reports, 65(3), 1–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison MS. Postpartum contraceptive use in a convenience sample of rural Guatemalan women: Findings from a quality improvement database (unpublished data).

  • Harrison, M. S., Bunge-Montes, S., Rivera, C., Jimenez-Zambrano, A., Heinrichs, G., Scarbro, S., et al. (2019). Delivery of home-based postpartum contraception in rural Guatemalan women: A cluster-randomized trial protocol. Trials, 20(1), 639.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, M. S., Fought, A., Montes, S. B., Rivera, C., Nacht, A., Zambrano, A. J., et al. (2021a). Blood pressure in a pregnant, rural Guatemalan population: Results from a quality improvement database. European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology, 258, 475–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, M. S., Jimenez-Zambrano, A., Rivera, C., Bunge-Montes, S., & Huebschmann, A. G. (2021b). Delivery of home-based postpartum contraception in Southwest Trifinio, Guatemala: Reach, adoption, and implementation in a cluster-randomized trial. Contraception, 104, 406–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, M. S., Montes, S. B., Rivera, C., Nacht, A., Zambrano, A. J., Lamb, M., et al. (2020). Interpregnancy interval in a rural Guatemalan population: Results from a quality improvement database. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 24(8), 1038–1046.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nacht, A. S., Maurer, L., Norheim, L., Himes, E., Barrington, E., Rivera, C., et al. (2021). COVID reinforces trends in distance global health education: A program re-design to strengthen clinical capacity in underserved low-resource settings. European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 256, 507–508.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, C., Larrea, N., Celada, M., & Heinrichs, G. (2018). A qualitative assessment of community attitudes and barriers to family planning use in the Trifinio Region of Southwest Guatemala. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 22(4), 461–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Secura, G. M., Allsworth, J. E., Madden, T., Mullersman, J. L., & Peipert, J. F. (2010). The Contraceptive CHOICE Project: Reducing barriers to long-acting reversible contraception. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 203(2), 115.e1–115.e7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We want to thank all the women and men involved in collection of the data analyzed in this work and all the women who participated in the study—their health, well-being, and successful pregnancy outcomes are the motivation for performing this work.

Funding

Funding for this project comes from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institutes of Child Health and Human Development Women’s Reproductive Health Research K12 award (5K12HD001271) and the Doris Duke Charitable Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

MSH and JS conceived of the project with feedback from SBM, CR, EA, GH, and SB. SBM and CR coordinate the study with oversight from MSH and AB, and data management assistance from AJZ. GH aided with the site initiation visit and interpretation of results. MSH performed the analysis and wrote the manuscript with input from all authors.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Margo S. Harrison.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no relationships to disclose that may be deemed to influence the objectivity of this paper and its review. The authors report no commercial associations, either directly or through immediate family, in areas such as expert testimony, consulting, honoraria, stock holdings, equity interest, ownership, patent-licensing situations or employment that might pose a conflict of interest to this analysis. Additionally, the authors have no conflicts such as personal relationships or academic competition to disclose. The findings presented in this paper represent the views of the named authors only, and not the views of their institutions or organizations.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Harrison, M.S., Bunge-Montes, S., Rivera, C. et al. Initial Contraceptive Choices of Women Enrolled in a Cluster-Randomized Trial in Southwest Trifinio, Guatemala. Matern Child Health J 26, 168–176 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-021-03275-4

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-021-03275-4

Keywords

Navigation